Guest guest Posted April 29, 2006 Report Share Posted April 29, 2006 I don't dismiss running or one's desire to do it, but I think one should get a dr's approval before starting and I think walking is enough aerobic, per the AHA. Subjectively, we can probably get more people to walk than run. I've increased my sodium intake to just under 3 grams. There ARE other side effects one can't find in an article, peer reviewed or not. I'm not convinced either will extend lifespan, especially for humans that started late in life. Do you have at hand an article that shows risk versus running like the BMI/IHD. I have not found such yet. Regards. Re: [ ] Re: BMI and IHD jwwright wrote:> > I can understand not giving an expensive test to everyone, but I also > think I can err on the side of moderation and not take up running, eg.> >> > Regards.> Hi JW... I'm posting here for convenience but I have some thoughts on the general subject of running wrt health risk/benefit.Allow me to preface my comments by acknowledging a probable bias in favor as a long time runner. AFAIK, there isn't a box on death certificates to check that states "cause of death" was running. True it is a stress to the system and many circulatory failures can be precipitated by physical stress but that doesn't even remotely mean the individual might not have died within days anyhow while having sex or while arguing with somebody that cut in line ahead of him at the market checkout line.I suspect running, or more broadly aerobic exercise, is another of those double edged swords... too much or not enough could be bad for you. I doubt that exercise alone could ever be wholly protective against other imbalances.In line with the hormetic dose dependent benefits from toxins or other stressors I suspect exercise in modest amounts, for an individual that isn't already under excessive stress working similar pathways, could be beneficial. There may be similarities to the beneficial stresses of exercise and CR that would suggest optimal amounts of exercise for energy restricted individuals would be lower.Regarding the health advocate who had a heart attack immediately after running, the running may have impacted what time of day he had his heart attack while not being causal. If his body was already heavily stressed by some other imbalance, perhaps the stress of exercise was additive and exceeded a healthy threshold, becoming contributory.We all need to consider our personal risk/benefit but I would not dismiss aerobic exercise in moderation.JRPS: JW a little side note about on of your favorite topics (Salt). With the recent run of hot weather I had to start dosing with salt when I started to get cramping again (I don't need to supplement during winter months). I rarely pay much attention to the %BF on my tanita but I did notice between Wednesday and today my #BF dropped from 14%+ to 12%+ while my weight varied less than 1/2 #. Over the last few days I probably consumed an extra 3+ G of salt (mixed in water). Since the tanita works on electrical conduction this seems like one of several potential error sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2006 Report Share Posted April 29, 2006 I don't dismiss running or one's desire to do it, but I think one should get a dr's approval before starting and I think walking is enough aerobic, per the AHA. Subjectively, we can probably get more people to walk than run. I've increased my sodium intake to just under 3 grams. There ARE other side effects one can't find in an article, peer reviewed or not. I'm not convinced either will extend lifespan, especially for humans that started late in life. Do you have at hand an article that shows risk versus running like the BMI/IHD. I have not found such yet. Regards. Re: [ ] Re: BMI and IHD jwwright wrote:> > I can understand not giving an expensive test to everyone, but I also > think I can err on the side of moderation and not take up running, eg.> >> > Regards.> Hi JW... I'm posting here for convenience but I have some thoughts on the general subject of running wrt health risk/benefit.Allow me to preface my comments by acknowledging a probable bias in favor as a long time runner. AFAIK, there isn't a box on death certificates to check that states "cause of death" was running. True it is a stress to the system and many circulatory failures can be precipitated by physical stress but that doesn't even remotely mean the individual might not have died within days anyhow while having sex or while arguing with somebody that cut in line ahead of him at the market checkout line.I suspect running, or more broadly aerobic exercise, is another of those double edged swords... too much or not enough could be bad for you. I doubt that exercise alone could ever be wholly protective against other imbalances.In line with the hormetic dose dependent benefits from toxins or other stressors I suspect exercise in modest amounts, for an individual that isn't already under excessive stress working similar pathways, could be beneficial. There may be similarities to the beneficial stresses of exercise and CR that would suggest optimal amounts of exercise for energy restricted individuals would be lower.Regarding the health advocate who had a heart attack immediately after running, the running may have impacted what time of day he had his heart attack while not being causal. If his body was already heavily stressed by some other imbalance, perhaps the stress of exercise was additive and exceeded a healthy threshold, becoming contributory.We all need to consider our personal risk/benefit but I would not dismiss aerobic exercise in moderation.JRPS: JW a little side note about on of your favorite topics (Salt). With the recent run of hot weather I had to start dosing with salt when I started to get cramping again (I don't need to supplement during winter months). I rarely pay much attention to the %BF on my tanita but I did notice between Wednesday and today my #BF dropped from 14%+ to 12%+ while my weight varied less than 1/2 #. Over the last few days I probably consumed an extra 3+ G of salt (mixed in water). Since the tanita works on electrical conduction this seems like one of several potential error sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2006 Report Share Posted April 29, 2006 jwwright wrote: > I don't dismiss running or one's desire to do it, but I think one should > get a dr's approval before starting and I think walking is enough > aerobic, per the AHA. > Subjectively, we can probably get more people to walk than run. > > I've increased my sodium intake to just under 3 grams. There ARE > other side effects one can't find in an article, peer reviewed or not. > > I'm not convinced either will extend lifespan, especially for humans > that started late in life. > > Do you have at hand an article that shows risk versus running like the > BMI/IHD. I have not found such yet. > > Regards. > > Agreed walking is OK, just takes longer to get where I want to go.. :-) I am not aware of studies of (human) running wrt longevity but do recall reports of CR'd rats running on their wheels. I try not to read too much into animal behavior under such unnatural conditions, so wouldn't even try to infer something from such reports for humans. I have seen a recent discussion of aerobic exercise being protective wrt decline of mental function. If one plans to live a long time it would be nice to keep more of our marbles..... Admittedly this is just a QOL issue but IMO rather important. JR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2006 Report Share Posted April 29, 2006 jwwright wrote: > I don't dismiss running or one's desire to do it, but I think one should > get a dr's approval before starting and I think walking is enough > aerobic, per the AHA. > Subjectively, we can probably get more people to walk than run. > > I've increased my sodium intake to just under 3 grams. There ARE > other side effects one can't find in an article, peer reviewed or not. > > I'm not convinced either will extend lifespan, especially for humans > that started late in life. > > Do you have at hand an article that shows risk versus running like the > BMI/IHD. I have not found such yet. > > Regards. > > Agreed walking is OK, just takes longer to get where I want to go.. :-) I am not aware of studies of (human) running wrt longevity but do recall reports of CR'd rats running on their wheels. I try not to read too much into animal behavior under such unnatural conditions, so wouldn't even try to infer something from such reports for humans. I have seen a recent discussion of aerobic exercise being protective wrt decline of mental function. If one plans to live a long time it would be nice to keep more of our marbles..... Admittedly this is just a QOL issue but IMO rather important. JR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.