Guest guest Posted August 23, 2006 Report Share Posted August 23, 2006 Hi All, See the below for the most important, I believe, data from the report that is pdf-availed. choenhofen EA, Wyszynski DF, Andersen S, Pennington J, Young R, Terry DF, Perls TT. Characteristics of 32 supercentenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Aug;54(8):1237-40. PMID: 16913991 http://tinyurl.com/njek7 Table 2. Sociodemographic, Medical, and Functional Characteristics of 32 Supercentenarians ====================================== Characteristic Value ====================================== Age, mean ¡À SD (range) 111 ¡À 2 (110¨C119) Sex, n (%) Female 27 (84) Male 5 (16) Education, years, n (%) ¡Ü8 17 (53) 9¨C12 8 (25) 13¨C17 7 (19) ¡Ý18 0 (0) Education, years, mean ¡À SD 10 ¡À 4 (0) Race, n (%) Caucasian 28 (88) Other 4 (12) Place of birth, n (%) Australia 2 (7) Canada (Prince Island) 1 (3) Germany 1 (3) Ireland 1 (3) Morocco 1 (3) United States 26 (81) Grandparents' ethnicity, n (%) Danish 1 (3) English 10 (31) English/Dutch 1 (3) English/German 1 (3) English/Irish/ish 1 (3) English/French 1 (3) French 1 (3) German 4 (12) German/Spanish 1 (3) Irish 1 (3) Irish/German 1 (3) Irish/Canadian/French 1 (3) Norwegian/German 1 (3) ish 1 (3) ish/English 1 (3) Spanish 1 (3) Unknown 4 (12) Living situation, n (%) With family 5 (17) Assisted living 5 (17) Nursing home 19 (65) Missing data 3 (1) Medical history, n (%) Myocardial infarction 2 (6) Cardiac arrhythmia 1 (3) Pacemaker inserted 0 (0) Angina pectoris 0 (0) Stroke 4 (13) Treated hypertension 7 (22) Adult-onset diabetes mellitus 1 (3) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 0 (0) Hypothyroidism 5 (16) Other thyroid condition 2 (6) Osteoporosis 14 (44) Cataract 28 (88) Parkinson's disease 1 (3) Cancer 8 (25) Bladder 1 (3) Breast 2 (6) Colon 2 (6) Skin 2 (6) Unknown 1 (3) Functional status (Barthel Index score), n (%) Totally dependent (<20) 3 (9) Very dependent (20¨C39) 10 (31) Partially dependent (40¨C59) 6 (19) Requires minimal assistance (60¨C79) 8 (25) Independent (80¨C100) 5 (16) --- bill4cr <bill4cr@...> wrote: > Living to be 100 isn't as rare as it used to be. It is now > supercentenarians¡ªindividuals aged 110 and older--who are making > headlines. In the August, 2006 issue of The Journal of the American > Geriatrics Society, T Perls, MD, MPH of Boston University > Medical Center and colleagues report the health characteristics of > these long lived individuals, and reveal that a surprisingly > substantial portion were still functioning independently at the time > of the study. > > Dr Perls' team analyzed 32 individuals between the ages of 110 and 119 > who make up half of the supercentenarians living in the United States. > Twenty-seven of the participants were women. The 119 year old > participant was the oldest documented living person in the world at > the time of enrollment. > > Five subjects were able to function independently, 8 with minimal > assistance, and 6 with partial assistance. Thirteen were classified > as very or totally dependent. One-fourth of the subjects had a > history of cancer, all of whom were cured. Only one participant was > diabetic and one had Parkinson's disease. Osteoporosis was more > common, with 44 percent suffering from the disease, and the majority > of the group had experienced cataracts. A predominant feature was the > near-absence of vascular disease. Only two participants had a history > of heart attack, and four had had strokes. Seven were taking > antihypertensive drugs. > > The authors observed that the onset of functional decline and > age-related disease is delayed among centenarians, and hypothesized > that the same delay must be extended at least to the age of 100 to > enable a person to reach supercentenarian status. " By virtue of their > likely ability to markedly delay or escape age-related illnesses and > frailty and their probable sharing of traits that enable such > exceptional survival, supercentenarians are likely to be an important > resource for discovering environmental, behavioral, and genetic > factors that predispose to longevity and decreased susceptibility to > vascular and other lethal diseases associated with aging, " they conclude. -- Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.