Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Mediterranean diet beats low fat diet for heart health

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

check out the details of the "low fat" diet... as we will see.. it will be not be a low fat diet and it will be very low in fiber, and high in refined carbs... and not very high in fruits and veggies.. some things never change. :) Diane Walter <dianepwalter@...> wrote: Compared with a low-fat diet, Mediterranean diets supplemented witholive oil or nuts have beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors.http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/145/1/1-Diane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi All,

The effects of two Mediterranean diets have been compared with a low fat diet.

A

CR-like effect was observed for the particants who consumed increased levels of

olive oil. The pdf is available.

Table 3. Changes in Energy and Nutrient Intake*

================================================================================\

===

Food---Mean Changes from baseline at 3 mo (95% CI)------Mediterranean with olive

oil

vs. low-fat diet---Mediterranean with nuts vs. low-fat diet

---Mediterranean with olive oil (n=257)---Mediterranean with nuts

(n=257)---Low-fat diet (n=256)------

Mean (95% CI) Between-group difference, g/d^¶ Pe---Mean (95% CI) Between-group

difference, g/d^¶ P

================================================================================\

===

Energy, kcal -180 (-271 to -89) -34 (-140 to 67) -197 (-300 to -95) 4.5

(-139.0

to 148.0) 0.95 161 (12 to 310) 0.034

Energy from total protein, % 0.36 (-0.06 to 0.78) -0.28 (-0.69 to 0.11) 0.83

(0.38 to 1.27) -0.47 (-1.07 to 0.13) 0.122 -1.00 (-1.60 to -0.38) 0.002

Energy from total carbohydrate, % 0.33 (-0.59 to 1.26) -2.9 (-4.0 to -1.9)

-0.36

(-1.50 to 0.80) 0.22 (-1.30 to 1.70) 0.84 -3.6 (-5.2 to -2.1)

<0.001

Fiber, g/d 0.98 (-0.74 to 2.70) 3.8 (1.8 to 5.7) 0.60 (-0.94 to 2.20) 0.49

(-1.90

to 2.90) 0.69 2.00 (-0.54 to 4.50) 0.124

Energy from total fat, % -0.75 (-1.60 to 0.08) 3.4 (2.4 to 4.5) -1.40 (-2.50

to

-0.21) 0.45 (-1.00 to 1.90) 0.55 5.0 (3.5 to 6.5) <0.001

SFA, % -0.77 (-1.00 to -0.49) -1.00 (-1.40 to -0.72) -0.74 (-1.20 to -0.31)

-0.09

(-0.55 to 0.36) 0.69 0.07 (-0.40 to 0.54) 0.78

MUFA, % 0.15 (-0.39 to 0.70) 1.38 (0.81 to 2.00) -0.52 (-1.20 to 0.22) 0.58

(-0.30 to 1.45) 0.198 1.9 (1.0 to 2.8) <0.001

PUFA, % -0.11 (-0.38 to 0.17) 3.0 (2.5 to 3.6) 0.14 (-0.46 to 0.17) 0.03

(-0.53

to 0.58) 0.93 3.0 (2.4 to 3.5) <0.001

Linoleic acid, g/d -2.1 (-2.8 to -1.1) 7.6 (5.8 to 9.3) -0.68 (-1.80 to 0.44)

-0.27 (-0.85 to 0.31) 0.76 1.4 (1.1 to 1.7) <0.001

Alpha-linolenic acid, g/d 0.06 (-0.17 to 0.04) 1.20 (0.92 to 1.40) -0.10

(-0.27

to 0.08) 0.03 (-0.32 to 0.25) 0.82 1.20 (0.86 to 1.50) <0.001

Marine n-3 fatty acids, g/d 0.02 (-0.05 to 0.08) 0.11 (0.01 to 0.21) 0.13

(-0.02

to 0.28) 0.11 (-0.26 to 0.04) 0.143 -0.04 (-0.20 to 0.12) 0.60

Energy from olive oil, % 2.05 (1.20 to 2.90) 0.46 (-0.41 to 1.30) 0.06 (-1.00

to

1.20) 1.9 (0.55 to 3.20) 0.006 0.17 (-1.20 to 1.50) 0.81

Energy from nuts, % 0.40 (0.01 to 0.79) 10.2 (8.7 to 12.0) -0.07 (-0.57 to

0.42)

0.03 (-1.30 to 1.40) 0.97 9.1 (7.7 to 10.0) <0.001

Cholesterol, mg/d -53 (-75 to -31) -54 (-74 to -34) -13 (-47 to 21) -38 (-152

to

76) 0.27 -42 (-165 to 80) 0.152

================================================================

* Forty-nine participants were excluded from calculations of energy and

nutrient

intake because reported energy was unrealistic (see Table 2).

MUFA=monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA=polyunsaturated fatty acid;

SFA=saturated

fatty acid.

^¶ Adjusted for center, age, sex, and baseline body weight.

Table 4. Changes in Adiposity, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors*

================================================================================\

===

Food---Mean Changes from baseline at 3 mo (95% CI)------Mediterranean with olive

oil

vs. low-fat diet---Mediterranean with nuts vs. low-fat diet

---Mediterranean with olive oil (n=257)---Mediterranean with nuts

(n=257)---Low-fat diet (n=256)------

Mean (95% CI) Between-group difference, g/d^¶ Pe---Mean (95% CI) Between-group

difference, g/d^¶ P

================================================================================\

===

Weight, kg -0.19 (-0.46 to 0.07) -0.26 (-0.59 to 0.08) -0.24 (-0.48 to 0.01)

0.01

(-0.39 to 0.42) 0.96 0.01 (-0.40 to 0.43) 0.95

BMI, kg/m2 -0.12 (-0.24 to 0.06) -0.09 (-0.24 to 0.05) -0.21 (-0.38 to -0.05)

0.09 (-0.12 to 0.29) 0.40 0.15 (-0.06 to 0.35) 0.165

Waist, cm -0.82 (-1.80 to 0.14) -0.29 (-0.95 to 0.37) -0.37 (-1.20 to 0.44)

-0.52

(-1.60 to 0.61) 0.37 0.12 (-1.00 to 1.30) 0.84

Systolic BP, mm Hg -4.8 (-6.7 to -2.7) -6.5 (-8.7 to -4.3) 0.64 (-1.30 to

2.30)

-5.9 (-8.7 to -3.1) <0.001 -7.1 (-10.0 to -4.1) <0.001

Diastolic BP, mm Hg -2.5 (-3.5 to -1.5) -3.6 (-4.7 to -2.5) -0.85 (-1.79 to

0.09)

-1.60 (-3.00 to -0.01) 0.048 -2.6 (-4.2 to 1.0) 0.001

Fasting glucose level 0.017 0.039

mmol/L -0.21 (-0.41 to -0.01) -0.14 (-0.31 to 0.03) 0.19 (-0.06 to 0.04)

-0.39

(-0.72 to -0.07) -0.30 (-0.58 to -0.01)

mg/dL -3.8 (-7.4 to -0.2) -2.5 (-5.5 to 0.5) 3.5 (-1.0 to 8.0) -7.0 (-13.0

to

-1.3) -5.4 (-10.5 to -0.2)

Fasting insulin level, pmol/L^¶¶ -9.7 (-15.3 to -3.8) -9.7 (-15.9 to -3.5)

6.5

(-3.8 to 16.7) -16.7 (-27.1 to -0.4) 0.001 -20.4 (-31.9 to -9.7) <0.001

HOMA index^¶¶ -0.53 (-0.83 to -0.23) -0.54 (-0.82 to -0.26) 0.32 (-0.15 to

0.79)

-0.91 (-1.40 to -0.46) <0.001 -1.1 (-1.6 to -0.55) <0.001

Total cholesterol level 0.26 0.040

mmol/L -0.10 (-0.21 to 0.01) -0.13 (-0.22 to -0.04) 0.02 (-0.10 to 0.14)

-0.09

(-0.25 to 0.07) -0.16 (-0.31 to -0.01)

mg/dL -3.90 (-8.10 to 0.35) -5.0 (-8.6 to -1.4) 0.74 (-3.80 to 5.30) -3.5

(-9.5 to 2.6) -6.20 (-12.00 to -0.28)

LDL cholesterol level 0.177 0.119

mmol/L -0.15 (-0.25 to -0.05) -0.10 (-0.19 to -0.01) -0.15 (-0.12 to 0.09)

-0.10 (-0.25 to 0.04) -0.09 (-0.23 to 0.05)

mg/dL -5.8 (-9.8 to -1.8) -3.80 (-7.30 to -0.39) -0.56 (-4.60 to 3.50)

-3.9

(-9.5 to 1.7) -3.4 (-8.9 to 2.1)

HDL cholesterol level <0.001 0.006

mmol/L 0.62 (0.08 to 0.04) 0.020 (0.002 to 0.050) -0.01 (-0.03 to 0.01)

0.08

(0.04 to 0.10) 0.04 (0.01 to 0.07)

mg/dL 2.4 (3.1 to 1.6) 0.94 (0.10 to 1.80) -0.37 (-1.20 to 0.40) 2.9 (1.7

to

4.0) 1.60 (0.45 to 2.70)

Triglyceride level 0.21 0.022

mmol/L -0.03 (-0.13 to 0.07) -0.09 (-0.16 to -0.01) 0.03 (-0.05 to 0.10)

-0.08

(-0.20 to 0.04) -0.15 (-0.26 to -0.02)

mg/dL -3.0 (-11.8 to 5.9) -7.6 (-14.0 to -1.1) 2.4 (-4.4 to 9.2) -7.1

(-18.0

to 3.9) -13.0 (-23.0 to -1.9)

Cholesterol-HDL cholesterol ratio -0.32 (-0.45 to -0.18) -0.17 (-0.27 to

-0.02)

0.06 (-0.05 to 0.16) -0.38 (-0.55 to -0.22) <0.001 -0.26 (-0.42 to -0.10) 0.002

================================================================

* BMI=body mass index; BP=blood pressure; HDL=high-density lipoprotein;

HOMA=homeostasis model assessment (a measure of insulin resistance);

LDL=low-density

lipoprotein.

^¶ Adjusted for center, age, sex, and baseline body weight.

^¶¶ Determined only for 305 participants without diabetes (95 in the

Mediterranean diet with olive oil group, 110 in the Mediterranean diet with nuts

group, and 100 in the low-fat diet group).

...limitation is that nutritional education about low-fat diet was less

intense

than education about Mediterranean diets. In fact, fat intake was only

marginally

reduced in the group assigned to the low-fat diet. This was partly because of

the

study design but also because participants belonged to a Mediterranean culture,

where people prefer using olive oil. Because the low-fat diet was not the usual

diet, participants in this group also changed food habits in a healthy way.

Therefore, the differences in outcomes observed between the Mediterranean diet

groups and the low-fat diet group might be attributed to the supplemental foods

provided. The duration of follow-up of only 3 months cannot be considered a

major

limitation because effects of dietary interventions on risk factors do not need

a

long induction period (44, 45, 53) and seem to persist as long as adherence is

maintained (12, 48, 49). ...

--- Diane Walter <dianepwalter@...> wrote:

> Compared with a low-fat diet, Mediterranean diets supplemented with

> olive oil or nuts have beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors.

>

> http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/145/1/1

-- Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@...

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

let me know if this comes thru JSNDiane Walter <dianepwalter@...> wrote: Jeff,I'm not a subscriber so I couldn't view the whole article (and thusthe details of the diets). Can you post it?Thanks,Diane> Compared with a low-fat diet, Mediterranean dietssupplemented with> olive oil or nuts have beneficial effects on cardiovascular riskfactors.> > http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/145/1/1> > -Diane>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Al:

It would really help if you could explain the column labels that go

along with the tables.

For example, excluding the 95% CI data - which are in parentheses -

there are seven columns in the first table. Could you possibly

identify for us what each of those columns are please? I have tried

to relate those seven columns to the labels listed above, but I

cannot figure out which labels apply.

--------------------

On entirely different point, are not the study's conclusions totally

discredited by the quote: " ... In fact, fat intake was only

marginally reduced in the group assigned to the low-fat diet " ?

Are they not saying, in other words, that the people they **label**

as on a low fat diet WERE NOT ON A LOW FAT DIET?

Unless I misunderstand that quotation it makes the entire conclusion

of the study laughable. If I am mistaken I would appreciate someone

pointing out what it is I have misunderstood.

I have a number of other misgivings based on what I see here, but

will refrain from raising them until I see the study in more detail.

Rodney.

>

> > Compared with a low-fat diet, Mediterranean diets supplemented

with

> > olive oil or nuts have beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk

factors.

> >

> > http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/145/1/1

>

> -- Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@...

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...