Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 I believe the changes in metabolic rate, either increased due to overeating or decrease due to undereating are short term adaptive/compensatory changes. Are there studies showing this is along term change? Also, the thermal effect of food, averaging about 10% for a mixed diet, will change based on increases or decreases in calorie intake. so, eating more or less would have an equivalent effect on TEF and hence metabolic rate. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 I believe the changes in metabolic rate, either increased due to overeating or decrease due to undereating are short term adaptive/compensatory changes. Are there studies showing this is along term change? Also, the thermal effect of food, averaging about 10% for a mixed diet, will change based on increases or decreases in calorie intake. so, eating more or less would have an equivalent effect on TEF and hence metabolic rate. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Jeff, I have looked more into the decrease in BMR associated with CR. The changes seem to be permanent as long as the caloric level remains low. Some CRONies, e.g., Liza May, who has been on CR for over 20 years have substantially lower BMR than calculated with the Mifflin-St Jeor equations. I imagine that the opposite is also true. As long as you overeat, your BMR will be higher. The body adjusts BMR based on the availability of food. This fact provides support for the concept of " set point " , but unfortunately not enough to be able to quantify it. " Set point " would correspond to the caloric intake where the BMR is neither increased nor decreased by a corresponding deficit or surplus of food, i.e., Perfect Balance. Tony > > I believe the changes in metabolic rate, either increased due to > overeating or decrease due to undereating are short term > adaptive/compensatory changes. Are there studies showing this is along > term change? > > Also, the thermal effect of food, averaging about 10% for a mixed diet, > will change based on increases or decreases in calorie intake. so, > eating more or less would have an equivalent effect on TEF and hence > metabolic rate. > > Jeff > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Jeff, I have looked more into the decrease in BMR associated with CR. The changes seem to be permanent as long as the caloric level remains low. Some CRONies, e.g., Liza May, who has been on CR for over 20 years have substantially lower BMR than calculated with the Mifflin-St Jeor equations. I imagine that the opposite is also true. As long as you overeat, your BMR will be higher. The body adjusts BMR based on the availability of food. This fact provides support for the concept of " set point " , but unfortunately not enough to be able to quantify it. " Set point " would correspond to the caloric intake where the BMR is neither increased nor decreased by a corresponding deficit or surplus of food, i.e., Perfect Balance. Tony > > I believe the changes in metabolic rate, either increased due to > overeating or decrease due to undereating are short term > adaptive/compensatory changes. Are there studies showing this is along > term change? > > Also, the thermal effect of food, averaging about 10% for a mixed diet, > will change based on increases or decreases in calorie intake. so, > eating more or less would have an equivalent effect on TEF and hence > metabolic rate. > > Jeff > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Hi folks: It looks like it is permanent. Energy expenditure in rhesus monkeys on CR for eleven years: " Energy expenditure of rhesus monkeys subjected to 11 years of dietary restriction. Blanc S, Schoeller D, Kemnitz J, Weindruch R, Colman R, Newton W, Wink K, Baum S, Ramsey J. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1571, USA. Dietary restriction (DR) is currently the only paradigm that has consistently extended maximal life span and reduced the onset of age- related chronic diseases in all of the nonprimate species tested. Although it is controversial, some investigators have suggested that the underlying mechanisms may be mediated by adaptations in energy expenditure. We evaluated the extent to which DR alters energy metabolism in a unique cohort of rhesus monkeys submitted to DR for 11 yr. Total energy expenditure (doubly labeled water), resting energy expenditure (REE; indirect calorimetry), and nonbasal energy expenditure (calculated by difference) were measured in DR (n = 12) and control (n = 11) animals. Body composition was determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Both fat mass and fat-free mass were lower in the restricted animals (56 and 12%, respectively). DR induced a 17% lower total energy expenditure that was attributable to a 20% decrease in REE without changes in the nonbasal energy expenditure. Adjusted for fat-free mass, REE was 13% lower with DR (- 250 kJ/d). Taken together with a reanalysis of previous DR experiments published in humans, rodents, and monkeys, these results suggest that DR may lower REE independent of the DR-induced changes in body composition. Whether this reduction in REE contributes to the life-extending properties of DR warrants further analysis, but it suggests that the long-standing debate regarding DR effects on metabolic rates may derive from the lack of consensus on how to adjust for body size and composition. " PMID: 12519821 Rodney. > > Jeff, > > I have looked more into the decrease in BMR associated with CR. The > changes seem to be permanent as long as the caloric level remains low. > Some CRONies, e.g., Liza May, who has been on CR for over 20 years > have substantially lower BMR than calculated with the Mifflin-St Jeor > equations. > > I imagine that the opposite is also true. As long as you overeat, > your BMR will be higher. > > The body adjusts BMR based on the availability of food. This fact > provides support for the concept of " set point " , but unfortunately not > enough to be able to quantify it. " Set point " would correspond to the > caloric intake where the BMR is neither increased nor decreased by a > corresponding deficit or surplus of food, i.e., Perfect Balance. > > Tony > > > --- In , " Jeff Novick " <jnovick@p...> wrote: > > > > I believe the changes in metabolic rate, either increased due to > > overeating or decrease due to undereating are short term > > adaptive/compensatory changes. Are there studies showing this is along > > term change? > > > > Also, the thermal effect of food, averaging about 10% for a mixed diet, > > will change based on increases or decreases in calorie intake. so, > > eating more or less would have an equivalent effect on TEF and hence > > metabolic rate. > > > > Jeff > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Hi folks: It looks like it is permanent. Energy expenditure in rhesus monkeys on CR for eleven years: " Energy expenditure of rhesus monkeys subjected to 11 years of dietary restriction. Blanc S, Schoeller D, Kemnitz J, Weindruch R, Colman R, Newton W, Wink K, Baum S, Ramsey J. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1571, USA. Dietary restriction (DR) is currently the only paradigm that has consistently extended maximal life span and reduced the onset of age- related chronic diseases in all of the nonprimate species tested. Although it is controversial, some investigators have suggested that the underlying mechanisms may be mediated by adaptations in energy expenditure. We evaluated the extent to which DR alters energy metabolism in a unique cohort of rhesus monkeys submitted to DR for 11 yr. Total energy expenditure (doubly labeled water), resting energy expenditure (REE; indirect calorimetry), and nonbasal energy expenditure (calculated by difference) were measured in DR (n = 12) and control (n = 11) animals. Body composition was determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Both fat mass and fat-free mass were lower in the restricted animals (56 and 12%, respectively). DR induced a 17% lower total energy expenditure that was attributable to a 20% decrease in REE without changes in the nonbasal energy expenditure. Adjusted for fat-free mass, REE was 13% lower with DR (- 250 kJ/d). Taken together with a reanalysis of previous DR experiments published in humans, rodents, and monkeys, these results suggest that DR may lower REE independent of the DR-induced changes in body composition. Whether this reduction in REE contributes to the life-extending properties of DR warrants further analysis, but it suggests that the long-standing debate regarding DR effects on metabolic rates may derive from the lack of consensus on how to adjust for body size and composition. " PMID: 12519821 Rodney. > > Jeff, > > I have looked more into the decrease in BMR associated with CR. The > changes seem to be permanent as long as the caloric level remains low. > Some CRONies, e.g., Liza May, who has been on CR for over 20 years > have substantially lower BMR than calculated with the Mifflin-St Jeor > equations. > > I imagine that the opposite is also true. As long as you overeat, > your BMR will be higher. > > The body adjusts BMR based on the availability of food. This fact > provides support for the concept of " set point " , but unfortunately not > enough to be able to quantify it. " Set point " would correspond to the > caloric intake where the BMR is neither increased nor decreased by a > corresponding deficit or surplus of food, i.e., Perfect Balance. > > Tony > > > --- In , " Jeff Novick " <jnovick@p...> wrote: > > > > I believe the changes in metabolic rate, either increased due to > > overeating or decrease due to undereating are short term > > adaptive/compensatory changes. Are there studies showing this is along > > term change? > > > > Also, the thermal effect of food, averaging about 10% for a mixed diet, > > will change based on increases or decreases in calorie intake. so, > > eating more or less would have an equivalent effect on TEF and hence > > metabolic rate. > > > > Jeff > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.