Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 This suggests LA increases risk, ALA decreases. At least it agrees with the biochem - effects on eicosanoids. Disagrees with the one article blaming ALA. Suggests EPA/DHA. "Our results provide evidence that .............the omega-3 fatty acid SDA [precursor of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)] promotes apoptosis" suggests the ALA is also important. Regards. Neoplasia. 2006 Feb;8(2):112-24. Prostate Tumor Growth and Recurrence Can Be Modulated by the omega-6:omega-3 Ratio in Diet: Athymic Mouse Xenograft Model Simulating Radical Prostatectomy.Kelavkar UP, Hutzley J, Dhir R, Kim P, KG, McHugh K.Department of Urology and Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Email: kelavkarup@....Evidence indicates that a diet rich in omega (omega)-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) [e.g., linoleic acid (LA)] increases prostate cancer (PCa) risk, whereas a diet rich in omega-3 decreases risk. Precisely how these PUFAs affect disease development remains unclear. So we examined the roles that PUFAs play in PCa, and we determined if increased omega-3 consumption can impede tumor growth. .......... Our results provide evidence that prostate tumors can be modulated by the manipulation of omega-6:omega-3 ratios through diet and that the omega-3 fatty acid SDA [precursor of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)] promotes apoptosis and decreases proliferation in cancer cells, causing decreased PSA doubling time, compared to omega-6 LA fatty acid, likely by competing with the enzymes of LA and AA pathways, namely, 15-LO-1 and cyclooxygenases (COXs). Thus, EPA and DHA (major components of fish oil) could potentially be promising dietary intervention agents in PCa prevention aimed at 15-LO-1 and COX-2 as molecular targets. These observations also provide clues as to its mechanisms of action.PMID: 16611404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Hi JW: Is a " decreased doubling time " supposed to be good or bad? If my PSA was to double in less time (one year instead of two years, say) I would have thought that was bad. But they seem to see it as good? Is it me that is confused? Or them? Rodney. --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@...> wrote: > > This suggests LA increases risk, ALA decreases. At least it agrees with the biochem - effects on eicosanoids. Disagrees with the one article blaming ALA. > Suggests EPA/DHA. > " Our results provide evidence that .............the omega-3 fatty acid SDA [precursor of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)] promotes apoptosis " suggests the ALA is also important. > Regards. > > Neoplasia. 2006 Feb;8(2):112-24. > > > Prostate Tumor Growth and Recurrence Can Be Modulated by the omega- 6:omega-3 Ratio in Diet: Athymic Mouse Xenograft Model Simulating Radical Prostatectomy. > > Kelavkar UP, Hutzley J, Dhir R, Kim P, KG, McHugh K. > > Department of Urology and Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Email: kelavkarup@... > > Evidence indicates that a diet rich in omega (omega)-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) [e.g., linoleic acid (LA)] increases prostate cancer (PCa) risk, whereas a diet rich in omega-3 decreases risk. Precisely how these PUFAs affect disease development remains unclear. So we examined the roles that PUFAs play in PCa, and we determined if increased omega-3 consumption can impede tumor growth. .......... > > Our results provide evidence that prostate tumors can be modulated by the manipulation of omega-6:omega-3 ratios through diet and that the omega-3 fatty acid SDA [precursor of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)] promotes apoptosis and decreases proliferation in cancer cells, causing decreased PSA doubling time, compared to omega-6 LA fatty acid, likely by competing with the enzymes of LA and AA pathways, namely, 15-LO-1 and cyclooxygenases (COXs). Thus, EPA and DHA (major components of fish oil) could potentially be promising dietary intervention agents in PCa prevention aimed at 15-LO-1 and COX-2 as molecular targets. These observations also provide clues as to its mechanisms of action. > > PMID: 16611404 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Hi JW: Is a " decreased doubling time " supposed to be good or bad? If my PSA was to double in less time (one year instead of two years, say) I would have thought that was bad. But they seem to see it as good? Is it me that is confused? Or them? Rodney. --- In , " jwwright " <jwwright@...> wrote: > > This suggests LA increases risk, ALA decreases. At least it agrees with the biochem - effects on eicosanoids. Disagrees with the one article blaming ALA. > Suggests EPA/DHA. > " Our results provide evidence that .............the omega-3 fatty acid SDA [precursor of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)] promotes apoptosis " suggests the ALA is also important. > Regards. > > Neoplasia. 2006 Feb;8(2):112-24. > > > Prostate Tumor Growth and Recurrence Can Be Modulated by the omega- 6:omega-3 Ratio in Diet: Athymic Mouse Xenograft Model Simulating Radical Prostatectomy. > > Kelavkar UP, Hutzley J, Dhir R, Kim P, KG, McHugh K. > > Department of Urology and Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Email: kelavkarup@... > > Evidence indicates that a diet rich in omega (omega)-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) [e.g., linoleic acid (LA)] increases prostate cancer (PCa) risk, whereas a diet rich in omega-3 decreases risk. Precisely how these PUFAs affect disease development remains unclear. So we examined the roles that PUFAs play in PCa, and we determined if increased omega-3 consumption can impede tumor growth. .......... > > Our results provide evidence that prostate tumors can be modulated by the manipulation of omega-6:omega-3 ratios through diet and that the omega-3 fatty acid SDA [precursor of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)] promotes apoptosis and decreases proliferation in cancer cells, causing decreased PSA doubling time, compared to omega-6 LA fatty acid, likely by competing with the enzymes of LA and AA pathways, namely, 15-LO-1 and cyclooxygenases (COXs). Thus, EPA and DHA (major components of fish oil) could potentially be promising dietary intervention agents in PCa prevention aimed at 15-LO-1 and COX-2 as molecular targets. These observations also provide clues as to its mechanisms of action. > > PMID: 16611404 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.