Guest guest Posted January 28, 2006 Report Share Posted January 28, 2006 Hi folks: Am I boring you yet? (I certainly hope not.) I have just completed another two weeks taking zero vitamin D supplements. This time I even omitted the calcium with a small amount of D. Yet again, my SBP has returned to 110! I am now getting pretty close to persuading myself that, at least for me, vitamin D supplements appreciably raise my SBP. I will check again tomorrow morning to verify the 110. Then do another two weeks taking 1125 IU of supplements daily and recheck one more time whether it, yet again, raises my SBP. The amount by which my SBP is raised while taking the supplement varies appreciably. The lowest I have seen it after two weeks on the supplements is 116, the highest 137. Off supplements it is pretty consistently 110. Anyway the possible relevance for people here is that if you have a SBP above what you think it ought to be (want it to be) and are taking supplemental D you might want to try the following. Measure your BP a few times to get a benchmark number. Then stop taking the D supplements, and after a few weeks without them recheck your SBP a few times. You just may find that your BP is higher than it needs to be. It certainly seems to be the case with me. And in my case two weeks off the supplements is long enough to wash out the effect. fwiw. Obviously this is a one-mouse experiment and we all know, from reading Dr. Walford if not before, the extent to which we should pay attention to one-mouse experiments. Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.