Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 > > First, as we have discussed before, if it is a GENE that is > > responsible for obesity where in hell did these obese people get this > > gene from? > > Sorry. But this looks to me like just another in a long line of > > excuses used to relieve obese people from taking responsibility for > > the actions that it is necessary for them to take in order to lose > > weight. I recall watching a TV documentary (Nova?) many years ago about experiments designed to show whether or not some people genetically inherited a " higher metabolism " than others, so that they would burn more food and be thinner. The experimenters put people in airtight chambers and measured how much oxygen they consumed. The result was that there was no significant difference in metabolism from one person to another. But it was pointed out that that differences in appetite did seem to be inherited. Apparently, each person has about the same food-burning engine but people have inherited genetically a greater or lesser desire to eat. For me, this adds to the wisdom of the strategy of putting most of your concentration on food choice with a secondary emphasis on food amount. A person who has inherited a large appetite may always have a terrible struggle with it but at least, once he or she has eliminated the habits of bad food choices, the struggle with be over how many blueberries or sweet potatoes to eat rather than Big Macs and french fries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 > > First, as we have discussed before, if it is a GENE that is > > responsible for obesity where in hell did these obese people get this > > gene from? > > Sorry. But this looks to me like just another in a long line of > > excuses used to relieve obese people from taking responsibility for > > the actions that it is necessary for them to take in order to lose > > weight. I recall watching a TV documentary (Nova?) many years ago about experiments designed to show whether or not some people genetically inherited a " higher metabolism " than others, so that they would burn more food and be thinner. The experimenters put people in airtight chambers and measured how much oxygen they consumed. The result was that there was no significant difference in metabolism from one person to another. But it was pointed out that that differences in appetite did seem to be inherited. Apparently, each person has about the same food-burning engine but people have inherited genetically a greater or lesser desire to eat. For me, this adds to the wisdom of the strategy of putting most of your concentration on food choice with a secondary emphasis on food amount. A person who has inherited a large appetite may always have a terrible struggle with it but at least, once he or she has eliminated the habits of bad food choices, the struggle with be over how many blueberries or sweet potatoes to eat rather than Big Macs and french fries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 Hi : Yes! In addition, some foods have greater 'satiation per hundred calories' than others. And, fortunately, many of those are among the foods we all recognize as being among the healthier selections. Rodney. --- In , " gdmedia1 " <garybiz2@...> wrote: > > > > > First, as we have discussed before, if it is a GENE that is > > > responsible for obesity where in hell did these obese people get > this > > > gene from? > > > > Sorry. But this looks to me like just another in a long line of > > > excuses used to relieve obese people from taking responsibility for > > > the actions that it is necessary for them to take in order to lose > > > weight. > > I recall watching a TV documentary (Nova?) many years ago about > experiments designed to show whether or not some people genetically > inherited a " higher metabolism " than others, so that they would burn > more food and be thinner. The experimenters put people in airtight > chambers and measured how much oxygen they consumed. > > The result was that there was no significant difference in metabolism > from one person to another. But it was pointed out that that > differences in appetite did seem to be inherited. Apparently, each > person has about the same food-burning engine but people have inherited > genetically a greater or lesser desire to eat. > > For me, this adds to the wisdom of the strategy of putting most of your > concentration on food choice with a secondary emphasis on food amount. > A person who has inherited a large appetite may always have a terrible > struggle with it but at least, once he or she has eliminated the habits > of bad food choices, the struggle with be over how many blueberries or > sweet potatoes to eat rather than Big Macs and french fries. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 Hi : Yes! In addition, some foods have greater 'satiation per hundred calories' than others. And, fortunately, many of those are among the foods we all recognize as being among the healthier selections. Rodney. --- In , " gdmedia1 " <garybiz2@...> wrote: > > > > > First, as we have discussed before, if it is a GENE that is > > > responsible for obesity where in hell did these obese people get > this > > > gene from? > > > > Sorry. But this looks to me like just another in a long line of > > > excuses used to relieve obese people from taking responsibility for > > > the actions that it is necessary for them to take in order to lose > > > weight. > > I recall watching a TV documentary (Nova?) many years ago about > experiments designed to show whether or not some people genetically > inherited a " higher metabolism " than others, so that they would burn > more food and be thinner. The experimenters put people in airtight > chambers and measured how much oxygen they consumed. > > The result was that there was no significant difference in metabolism > from one person to another. But it was pointed out that that > differences in appetite did seem to be inherited. Apparently, each > person has about the same food-burning engine but people have inherited > genetically a greater or lesser desire to eat. > > For me, this adds to the wisdom of the strategy of putting most of your > concentration on food choice with a secondary emphasis on food amount. > A person who has inherited a large appetite may always have a terrible > struggle with it but at least, once he or she has eliminated the habits > of bad food choices, the struggle with be over how many blueberries or > sweet potatoes to eat rather than Big Macs and french fries. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Found the website to the NOVA program you mentioned (I'm guessing this is the correct one) - " Dying to be Thin: > http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/thin/ > > I recall watching a TV documentary (Nova?) many years ago about > > experiments designed to show whether or not some people genetically > > inherited a " higher metabolism " than others, so that they would burn > > more food and be thinner. The experimenters put people in airtight > > chambers and measured how much oxygen they consumed. > > > > The result was that there was no significant difference in > metabolism > > from one person to another. But it was pointed out that that > > differences in appetite did seem to be inherited. Apparently, each > > person has about the same food-burning engine but people have > inherited > > genetically a greater or lesser desire to eat. > > > > For me, this adds to the wisdom of the strategy of putting most of > your > > concentration on food choice with a secondary emphasis on food > amount. > > A person who has inherited a large appetite may always have a > terrible > > struggle with it but at least, once he or she has eliminated the > habits > > of bad food choices, the struggle with be over how many blueberries > or > > sweet potatoes to eat rather than Big Macs and french fries. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Found the website to the NOVA program you mentioned (I'm guessing this is the correct one) - " Dying to be Thin: > http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/thin/ > > I recall watching a TV documentary (Nova?) many years ago about > > experiments designed to show whether or not some people genetically > > inherited a " higher metabolism " than others, so that they would burn > > more food and be thinner. The experimenters put people in airtight > > chambers and measured how much oxygen they consumed. > > > > The result was that there was no significant difference in > metabolism > > from one person to another. But it was pointed out that that > > differences in appetite did seem to be inherited. Apparently, each > > person has about the same food-burning engine but people have > inherited > > genetically a greater or lesser desire to eat. > > > > For me, this adds to the wisdom of the strategy of putting most of > your > > concentration on food choice with a secondary emphasis on food > amount. > > A person who has inherited a large appetite may always have a > terrible > > struggle with it but at least, once he or she has eliminated the > habits > > of bad food choices, the struggle with be over how many blueberries > or > > sweet potatoes to eat rather than Big Macs and french fries. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.