Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Chocolate (dark) - A food to include?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

hmmm... ??? :PThe 119 year old woman ate "2 POUNDS" of chocolate per week!!?? - see below..." ... a study of 8000 male Harvard graduates showed that chocaholics lived longer than abstainers. Their longevity may be explained by the high polyphenol levels in chocolate. Polyphenols reduce the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and thereby protect against heart disease. Such theories are still speculative. Coincidentally or otherwise, many of the worlds oldest supercentenarians, e.g. Jeanne Calment (1875-1997) and Knauss (1880-1999), were passionately fond of chocolate. Jeanne Calment habitually ate two pounds of chocolate per week until her physician

induced her to give up sweets at the age of 119 - three years before her death aged 122. Life-extensionists are best advised to eat dark chocolate rather than the kinds of calorie-rich confectionery popular in America. http://www.chocolate.org/http://www.chocolate.org/refs/index.html Felice Chocolate: the key to eternal youth? ...A German confectioner claims to have come up with the first anti-ageing chocolates. Made with dark chocolate, mango and soya milk, the creators believe the Felice chocolates not only make you happy, but keep you young. http://www.chocolate.org/health/antiaging.htmldangerous?, or a wise supplement to add?D.H.

Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly dangerous if you listen to the outrageous claims of that last link you posted. I notice that it was dated 2003, and yet it hasn't " caught on " with the scientific community ;-).

We have long recommended plain dark unsweetened cocoa, sweetened with the sweetner of your choice. This is the same unsweetened cocoa powder you can buy in the grocery. I mix with a bit of water to make a fudgy concoction and then I sweeten to taste. A good substitute for the fattening, sugary processed chocolates sold, for an arm and a leg if you're buying Godiva or some other expensive brand.

on 12/15/2005 6:59 AM, D. H. at d7882001@... wrote:

hmmm... ??? :P

The 119 year old woman ate " 2 POUNDS " of chocolate per week!!?? - see below...

" ... a study of 8000 male Harvard graduates showed that chocaholics lived longer than abstainers. Their longevity may be explained by the high polyphenol <http://www.chocolate.org/polyphenols.html> levels in chocolate. Polyphenols reduce the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and thereby protect against heart disease. Such theories are still speculative.

Coincidentally or otherwise, many of the worlds oldest supercentenarians <http://www.supercentenarian.com/records.html> , e.g. Jeanne Calment (1875-1997) and Knauss (1880-1999), were passionately fond of chocolate. Jeanne Calment habitually ate two pounds of chocolate per week until her physic! ian induced her to give up sweets at the age of 119 - three years before her death aged 122. Life-extensionists are best advised to eat dark chocolate <http://www.chocolate.org/health/dark-chocolate.html> rather than the kinds of calorie-rich confectionery popular in America.

http://www.chocolate.org/

http://www.chocolate.org/refs/index.html

Felice Chocolate: the key to eternal youth?

...A German confectioner claims to have come up with the first anti-ageing chocolates.

Made with dark chocolate, mango and soya milk, the creators believe the Felice chocolates not only make you happy, but keep you young.

http://www.chocolate.org/health/antiaging.html

dangerous?, or a wise supplement to add?

D.H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi D.H.:

It does seem there are beneficial properties to some component(s) of

the cacao plant. It is not clear to me that it is known for certain

which confer the benefit, although there are plenty of guesses.

***BUT*** check the ingredient list of a variety of chocolate

products available in stores. Many contain large amounts of

hydrogenated fats, for example. The vast majority of chocolate

products contain sizeable amounts of various fats, and sugar as well

or course, even if not the hydrogenated ones.

I was once given a gift that was labelled as " chocolate " which,

according to the ingredient list, contained nothing at all from the

cacao plant, and was very nearly 100% hydrogenated fats -

hydrogenated to the extent that it was **solid** at room temperature.

So one needs to be very cautious about which chocolate product one

selects.

Rodney.

>

> hmmm... ??? :P

>

> The 119 year old woman ate " 2 POUNDS " of chocolate per week!!?? -

see below...

>

> " ... a study of 8000 male Harvard graduates showed that

chocaholics lived longer than abstainers. Their longevity may be

explained by the high polyphenol levels in chocolate. Polyphenols

reduce the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and thereby protect

against heart disease. Such theories are still speculative.

Coincidentally or otherwise, many of the worlds oldest

supercentenarians, e.g. Jeanne Calment (1875-1997) and Knauss

(1880-1999), were passionately fond of chocolate. Jeanne Calment

habitually ate two pounds of chocolate per week until her physician

induced her to give up sweets at the age of 119 - three years before

her death aged 122. Life-extensionists are best advised to eat dark

chocolate rather than the kinds of calorie-rich confectionery popular

in America.

>

> http://www.chocolate.org/

> http://www.chocolate.org/refs/index.html

>

>

> Felice Chocolate: the key to eternal youth?

> ...A German confectioner claims to have come up with the first

anti-ageing chocolates.

> Made with dark chocolate, mango and soya milk, the creators

believe the Felice chocolates not only make you happy, but keep you

young.

> http://www.chocolate.org/health/antiaging.html

>

>

> dangerous?, or a wise supplement to add?

>

> D.H.

>

>

> ---------------------------------

>

> Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3032114

Journal Report

07/18/2005

Dark chocolate may reduce blood pressure, improve insulin

resistance

American Heart Association rapid access journal report:

DALLAS, July 19 – If you have high blood pressure, a daily bar-sized

serving of flavonol-rich dark chocolate might lower your blood pressure

and improve insulin resistance, researchers report in Hypertension:

Journal of the American Heart Association.

“Previous studies suggest flavonoid-rich foods, including fruits,

vegetables, tea, red wine and chocolate, might offer cardiovascular

benefits, but this is one of the first clinical trials to look

specifically at dark chocolate’s effect on lowering blood pressure among

people with hypertension,” said study author B. Blumberg,

Ph.D.

Blumberg is a senior scientist at the Mayer USDA Human Nutrition

Research Center on Aging at Tufts University in Boston.

Flavonoids are natural antioxidants found in many foods from

plants.

“This study is not about eating more chocolate,” Blumberg

cautioned. “It suggests that cocoa flavonoids appear to have

benefits on vascular function and glucose sensitivity.”

Blumberg and colleagues at the University of L’Aquila in Italy, including

senior author Dr. Claudio Ferri, studied 10 men and 10 women. They

all had hypertension and a systolic blood pressure (the top number in a

blood pressure reading) between 140 and 159 millimeters of mercury (mm

Hg) and a diastolic blood pressure (bottom number) between 90 and

99. None of the participants was taking antihypertensive

medicines, and none had diabetes or other disease, nor did they

smoke.

For one week before starting the study, participants avoided all

chocolate and other flavonoid-rich foods. During the next 15

days, half ate a daily 3.5-ounce bar of flavonoid-rich dark chocolate,

while the other half ate the same amount of white chocolate.

After another week of avoiding flavonoid-rich foods, each subject

“crossed over” and ate the other chocolate.

“White chocolate, which has no flavonoids, was the perfect control food

because it contains all the other ingredients and calories found in dark

chocolate,” Blumberg said. “It’s important to note that the

dark chocolate we used had a high level of flavonoids, giving it a

slightly bittersweet taste. Most Americans eat milk chocolate,

which has a low amount of these compounds.”

The researchers found a 12 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure and

a 9 mm Hg decrease in diastolic blood pressure in the dark chocolate

group after 15 days. Blood pressure did not decrease in the

white chocolate group.

etc.

Maco

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi folks:

Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are

manufactured using what is called the " Dutch " process which

eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components from

the original.

I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made by

this method. They replied and said their policy was to not disclose

this information!!!!!

This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew

that if they answered I would avoid the product.

fwiw

Rodney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi folks:

So in short, if anyone knows of a de-fatted, sugar free, non-

'Dutched' REAL chocolate product please post : ^ )))

Rodney.

--- In , " Rodney " <perspect1111@y...>

wrote:

>

> Hi folks:

>

> Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are

> manufactured using what is called the " Dutch " process which

> eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components

from

> the original.

>

> I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made by

> this method. They replied and said their policy was to not

disclose

> this information!!!!!

>

> This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew

> that if they answered I would avoid the product.

>

> fwiw

>

> Rodney.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate, hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her alive, after 95yo.

When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.

She died from pneum.

The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can run a test to get whatever results you want.

If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now, purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill.

Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.

Regards.

[ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include?

Hi folks:So in short, if anyone knows of a de-fatted, sugar free, non-'Dutched' REAL chocolate product please post : ^ )))Rodney.>> Hi folks:> > Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are > manufactured using what is called the "Dutch" process which > eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components from > the original.> > I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made by > this method. They replied and said their policy was to not disclose > this information!!!!!> > This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew > that if they answered I would avoid the product.> > fwiw > > Rodney.>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ,

I think "they" can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite the idea?

Do they have a patent on fish oil caps?

Regards.

Re: [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include?

Not exactly... If they can't patent it they don't want to know about it.There's lots of bennies from natural foods. LE is still probably more about "how much" rather than what, while the wrong "what" could prematurely shorten our brief strut upon this stage.Happy happy, merry merry...JRjwwright wrote:> The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate, > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her > alive, after 95yo.> When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.> She died from pneum.> The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can run a > test to get whatever results you want.> If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now, > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill.> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.> > Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi JW:

Well when a drug company finds a component in some exotic amazonian

plant (we keep hearing about how cutting down the jungle will deprive

us of these miraculous chemicals, yet to be discovered, so it seems

like a reasonable example to quote), isolates it and finds what

medical use can be found for it, they do get patent rights on it for

a limited period.

So is there something different about chocolate?

You could say: " why wouldn't people just eat the chocolate instead? "

But usually these chemicals are present in such tiny amounts in the

natural product that you have to enormously concentrate it, or

produce it in the laboratory, to get a therapeutic dose.

So it seems to me there is no reason why chocolate would not be

investigated if peopole thought it could yield profitable products.

But I am no expert in patent law, of course.

Rodney.

> > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate,

> > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to

keep her

> > alive, after 95yo.

> > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.

> > She died from pneum.

> > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in

life

> > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you

can run a

> > test to get whatever results you want.

> > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before

now,

> > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per

pill.

> >

> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.

> >

> > Regards.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they can sell a " pill " without a patent. The issue is they

won't invest the time, money, and effort, to jump through all the

regulatory hurdles, and do the expensive studies to get approval for a

" product " that they can't sell exclusively. Without some exclusive

franchise, lower cost competitors will just capitalize on the work and

money they spent, and under cut them in the market.

This is a bit of a catch 22. It's just not worth it for anybody to

pursue natural vitamins/food if they can't somehow control the final

product. What's left is small, fly by night companies, sometime using

dubious science to develop and promote potentially useful

pharmaceuticals. This is perhaps appropriate work for the government to

support but I don't think we have a good structure for that in place.

JR

jwwright wrote:

> Hi ,

> I think " they " can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than

> 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard

> labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite

> the idea?

> Do they have a patent on fish oil caps?

>

> Regards.

>

>

> * Re: [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to

> include?

>

> Not exactly... If they can't patent it they don't want to know about it.

>

> There's lots of bennies from natural foods. LE is still probably more

> about " how much " rather than what, while the wrong " what " could

> prematurely shorten our brief strut upon this stage.

>

> Happy happy, merry merry...

>

> JR

>

> jwwright wrote:

> > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate,

> > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her

> > alive, after 95yo.

> > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.

> > She died from pneum.

> > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life

> > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can

> run a

> > test to get whatever results you want.

> > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now,

> > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill.

> >

> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.

> >

> > Regards.

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi JR:

What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a

substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical

plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in,

and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?

Is it me that is confused .............. ?

Rodney.

> > > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate

chocolate,

> > > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks

to keep her

> > > alive, after 95yo.

> > > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.

> > > She died from pneum.

> > > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value

in life

> > > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me

you can

> > run a

> > > test to get whatever results you want.

> > > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out

before now,

> > > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$

per pill.

> > >

> > > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.

> > >

> > > Regards.

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had previously discussed the product:

http://www.rawfood.com/cgi-bin/order/index.cgi?

id=122468680932 & d=single & item_id=1004 & m=home

which claims to be exactly that.

-

> >

> > Hi folks:

> >

> > Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are

> > manufactured using what is called the " Dutch " process which

> > eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components

> from

> > the original.

> >

> > I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made

by

> > this method. They replied and said their policy was to not

> disclose

> > this information!!!!!

> >

> > This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew

> > that if they answered I would avoid the product.

> >

> > fwiw

> >

> > Rodney.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I have 9 patents, they are mostly in electronics (with one

thermodynamics). Drug patents are about two clicks beyond my level of

expertise.

My general sense is that drug companies patent a specific " process " for

synthesizing useful compounds. So rather than patenting the actual

element, they control the method of making. Generic drug makers figure

out an alternate approach to make the same, or close enough to be

effective, compound without infringing on the protected method.

Hoodia, is apparently scarce and impractical to cultivate. The drug

company apparently failed to come up with an effective way to synthesize

an equivalent to the natural product.

There are probably lurkers here with far better grasp of this than I,

who will hopefully educate us all.

JR

Rodney wrote:

> Hi JR:

>

> What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a

> substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical

> plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in,

> and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?

>

> Is it me that is confused .............. ?

>

> Rodney.

>

>

>>> > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate

> chocolate,

>>> > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks

> to keep her

>>> > alive, after 95yo.

>>> > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.

>>> > She died from pneum.

>>> > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value

> in life

>>> > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me

> you can

>>> run a

>>> > test to get whatever results you want.

>>> > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out

> before now,

>>> > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$

> per pill.

>>> >

>>> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.

>>> >

>>> > Regards.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I have 9 patents, they are mostly in electronics (with one

thermodynamics). Drug patents are about two clicks beyond my level of

expertise.

My general sense is that drug companies patent a specific " process " for

synthesizing useful compounds. So rather than patenting the actual

element, they control the method of making. Generic drug makers figure

out an alternate approach to make the same, or close enough to be

effective, compound without infringing on the protected method.

Hoodia, is apparently scarce and impractical to cultivate. The drug

company apparently failed to come up with an effective way to synthesize

an equivalent to the natural product.

There are probably lurkers here with far better grasp of this than I,

who will hopefully educate us all.

JR

Rodney wrote:

> Hi JR:

>

> What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a

> substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical

> plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in,

> and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?

>

> Is it me that is confused .............. ?

>

> Rodney.

>

>

>>> > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate

> chocolate,

>>> > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks

> to keep her

>>> > alive, after 95yo.

>>> > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.

>>> > She died from pneum.

>>> > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value

> in life

>>> > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me

> you can

>>> run a

>>> > test to get whatever results you want.

>>> > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out

> before now,

>>> > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$

> per pill.

>>> >

>>> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.

>>> >

>>> > Regards.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One piece of infomation from my inaccurate memory. I read an article several

years ago in

Science News about the number of chemical components that made up the flavor in

chocolate. Over a 1,000, as I remember. Strawberries maybe 300, and Coke soda

about 500.

It may be a challenge just to find which components are healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One piece of infomation from my inaccurate memory. I read an article several

years ago in

Science News about the number of chemical components that made up the flavor in

chocolate. Over a 1,000, as I remember. Strawberries maybe 300, and Coke soda

about 500.

It may be a challenge just to find which components are healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right.

I did this:

I looked through duke's and pubmed and came up with a list of herbs, etc that claimed to be good for prostate cancer including saw palmetto. I ordered the herbs and then tried to dose to match the info I could find on each one.

Someone else got the same idea and marketed it on TV for a relatively high price. Well of course it doesn't work at least it doesn't change PSA. But I could say it works because I have no PCa - HA. The fact that it works or doesn't work, does not stop me from marketing the same formulation based on those articles I used to select the components. How could it be patented without test to prove it? Probably can't.

So it's marketed by one of those snake oil sellers. Someone with PCa will probably buy it, thinking they're doing an alternative cure.

Now don't tell me there aren't a lot of people selling the same crap in the same manner.

Including some claiming to be doctors.

Like the one in Europe that claims to cure cancer with cottage cheese and flax oil.

The only reason I couldn't do it with chocolate is because the mfgrs of chocolate have the process pretty well perfected and it would be difficult to compete with chocolate sales, unless one could identify precisely and synthesize the important components.

I should be able to copywrite the idea, or patent the process.

But in fact, if the components in chocolate were effective, the mfgrs of chocolate would be scurrying to find it and synthesize it,ie, someone would and probably that someone would first write a book about it, someone like Sears, and make more money on the book then the cure.

I think if anyone found a cure for any cancer, he could write his own check, and not worry the details.

BTW, it ain't vit C.

FYI, talking to a MMM rep in 1965 about one of their products, he said they never patent a process because that reveals the process to the public and by the time the lawsuits pan out on the copier, the copier's company is bankrupt and he's working on copying something else.

So they keep it secretized.

Another BTW, I don't believe glucosamine/condroitin works and it's held it's price.

Regards.

[ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include?

Hi JR:What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?Is it me that is confused .............. ?Rodney. > > Hi ,> > I think "they" can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than > > 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard > > labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite > > the idea? > > Do they have a patent on fish oil caps?> > > > Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right.

I did this:

I looked through duke's and pubmed and came up with a list of herbs, etc that claimed to be good for prostate cancer including saw palmetto. I ordered the herbs and then tried to dose to match the info I could find on each one.

Someone else got the same idea and marketed it on TV for a relatively high price. Well of course it doesn't work at least it doesn't change PSA. But I could say it works because I have no PCa - HA. The fact that it works or doesn't work, does not stop me from marketing the same formulation based on those articles I used to select the components. How could it be patented without test to prove it? Probably can't.

So it's marketed by one of those snake oil sellers. Someone with PCa will probably buy it, thinking they're doing an alternative cure.

Now don't tell me there aren't a lot of people selling the same crap in the same manner.

Including some claiming to be doctors.

Like the one in Europe that claims to cure cancer with cottage cheese and flax oil.

The only reason I couldn't do it with chocolate is because the mfgrs of chocolate have the process pretty well perfected and it would be difficult to compete with chocolate sales, unless one could identify precisely and synthesize the important components.

I should be able to copywrite the idea, or patent the process.

But in fact, if the components in chocolate were effective, the mfgrs of chocolate would be scurrying to find it and synthesize it,ie, someone would and probably that someone would first write a book about it, someone like Sears, and make more money on the book then the cure.

I think if anyone found a cure for any cancer, he could write his own check, and not worry the details.

BTW, it ain't vit C.

FYI, talking to a MMM rep in 1965 about one of their products, he said they never patent a process because that reveals the process to the public and by the time the lawsuits pan out on the copier, the copier's company is bankrupt and he's working on copying something else.

So they keep it secretized.

Another BTW, I don't believe glucosamine/condroitin works and it's held it's price.

Regards.

[ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include?

Hi JR:What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?Is it me that is confused .............. ?Rodney. > > Hi ,> > I think "they" can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than > > 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard > > labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite > > the idea? > > Do they have a patent on fish oil caps?> > > > Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of focusing on one food like it was a panacea, why not search Duke's database and make a list of protective chemicals and see what they're in? These aren't secrets, but they're probably small concentrations, except like carrots for betacarotene.

Then look up the chemical in pubmed and see if they think it has anticancer properties.

Anyone can do this. Let me warn you there are thousands of chemicals.

I lost attention span about the C's.

I'll give you a head start on food selection- many of these you already eat:

Actinidia chinensis (Kiwi) Fruit

Allium ampeloprasum (Elephant Garlic) Plant

Allium cepa (Onion) Bulb

Allium sativum var. sativum (Garlic) Bulb

Allium schoenoprasum (Chives) Leaf

Alocasia macrorrhiza (Giant Taro) Leaf

Amaranthus sp. (Pigweed) Leaf

Anacardium occidentale (Cashew) Seed

Ananas comosus (Pineapple) Plant

Anethum graveolens (Dill) Fruit

Apium graveolens (Celery) Leaf

Arachis hypogaea (Groundnut) Seed

Armoracia rusticana (Horseradish) Plant

Asparagus officinalis (Asparagus) Shoot

Avena sativa (Oats) Plant

Basella alba (Vinespinach) Leaf

Bertholletia excelsa (Brazilnut) Seed

Beta vulgaris subsp. subsp. vulgaris (Beet) Leaf

Beta vulgaris subsp. subsp. vulgaris (Beet) Root

Brassica napus var. napobrassica var. napobrassica (Rutabaga) Root

Brassica nigra (Black Mustard) Seed

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis l. var. botrytis (Cauliflower) Flower

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis l. var. botrytis (Cauliflower) Leaf

Brassica oleracea var. capitata l. var. capitata (Cabbage) Leaf

Brassica rapa var. rapa (Rapini) Root

Camellia sinensis (Tea) Leaf

Canavalia ensiformis (Jack Bean) Fruit

Capsicum annuum (Bell Pepper) Fruit

Capsicum frutescens (Cayenne) Fruit

Carica papaya (Papaya) Fruit

Carica papaya (Papaya) Leaf

Carya illinoensis (Pecan) Seed

Carya ovata (Shagbark Hickory) Stem Bark

Castanea sativa (European Chestnut) Leaf

Cichorium endivia (Endive) Leaf

Cichorium intybus (Chicory) Leaf

Citrullus lanatus (Watermelon) Seed

Citrus limon (Lemon) Leaf Essent. Oil

Citrus limon (Lemon) Pericarp Essent. Oil

Citrus paradisi (Grapefruit) Fruit

Citrus reticulata (Mandarin) Fruit

Citrus sinensis (Orange) Fruit

Cnidoscolus chayamansa () Leaf

Cocos nucifera (Coconut) Hull Husk

Coffea arabica (Coffee) Seed

Cola acuminata (Abata Cola) Seed

Coriandrum sativum (Chinese Parsley) Fruit

Coriandrum sativum (Chinese Parsley) Plant

Corylus avellana (Cobnut) Seed

Cucumis melo subsp. ssp melo var.cantalupensis (Cantaloupe) Cotyledon

Cucumis melo subsp. ssp melo var.cantalupensis (Cantaloupe) Seed

Cucumis sativus (Cucumber) Cotyledon

Cucumis sativus (Cucumber) Fruit

Cucurbita pepo (Pumpkin) Seed

Cuminum cyminum (Cumin) Fruit

Daucus carota (Carrot) Root

Elaeagnus umbellatus (Russian Olive) Fruit

Foeniculum vulgare (Fennel) Fruit

Fragaria spp (Strawberry) Fruit

Genipa americana (Genipap) Seed

Glycine max (Soybean) Seed

Helianthus annuus (Girasol) Pericarp

Helianthus annuus (Girasol) Seed

Hibiscus sabdariffa (Acedera de Guinea (Sp.)) Leaf

Hordeum vulgare (Barley) Plant

Hordeum vulgare (Barley) Seed

Ilex paraguariensis (Mate) Leaf

Ipomoea batatas (Sweet Potato) Root

Juglans cinerea (Butternut) Seed

Juglans regia (English Walnut) Fruit

Juglans regia (English Walnut) Seed

Lactuca sativa (Lettuce) Plant

Lagenaria siceraria (Calabash Gourd) Seed

Lens culinaris (Lentil) Seed

Linum usitatissimum (Flax) Seed

Luffa aegyptiaca (Luffa) Leaf

Luffa aegyptiaca (Luffa) Seed

Lycopersicon esculentum (Tomato) Fruit

Macadamia spp (Macadamia) Seed

Malus domestica (Apple) Fruit

Mammea americana (Mamey) Leaf

Mangifera indica (Mango) Flower

Momordica charantia (Bitter Melon) Fruit

Morinda citrifolia (Indian Mulberry) Leaf

Morus alba (Sang-Pai-Pi) Bark

Musa x paradisiaca (Banana) Fruit

Myrciaria dubia (Camu-camu) Fruit

Nasturtium officinale (Berro) Herb

Ocimum basilicum (Basil) Leaf

Oenothera biennis (Evening-Primrose) Leaf

Opuntia ficus-indica (Indian Fig) Seed

Oryza sativa (Rice) Plant

Panax quinquefolius (American Ginseng) Plant

Papaver somniferum (Opium Poppy) Seed

Pastinaca sativa (Parsnip) Root Essent. Oil

linia cupana (Guarana) Seed

Perilla frutescens (Perilla) Leaf

Persea americana (Avocado) Fruit

Phyllanthus emblica (Emblic) Fruit

Piper nigrum (Black Pepper) Fruit

Pistacia vera (Pistachio) Seed

Pisum sativum (Pea) Seed

Portulaca oleracea (Purslane) Herb

Prunus armeniaca (Apricot) Seed

Prunus cerasus (Sour Cherry) Fruit

Prunus dulcis (Almond) Seed

Psidium guajava (Guava) Fruit

Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (Asparagus Pea) Root

Pueraria montana subsp. var. lobata (Kudsu) Stem

Punica granatum (Granado (Sp.)) Pericarp

Pyrus communis (Pear) Fruit

Ribes nigrum (Black Currant) Fruit

Ribes uva-crispa (Gooseberry) Fruit

Rubus idaeus (Raspberry) Fruit

Rubus idaeus (Raspberry) Leaf

Rumex acetosa (Garden Sorrel) Leaf

Salvia officinalis (Sage) Leaf

Sesamum indicum (Ajonjoli (Sp.)) Leaf

Sesamum indicum (Ajonjoli (Sp.)) Seed

Solanum melongena (Aubergine) Fruit

Solanum tuberosum (Potato) Tuber

Sorbus aucubaria (Rowan Berry) Wood

Spinacia oleracea (Spinach) Plant

Terminalia catappa (Indian Almond) Fruit

Theobroma cacao (Cacao) Seed

Thymus vulgaris (Common Thyme) Leaf

Trigonella foenum-graecum (Alholva (Sp.)) Plant

Trigonella foenum-graecum (Alholva (Sp.)) Seed

Triticum aestivum (Wheat) Plant

Triticum aestivum (Wheat) Seed

Tropaeolum majus (Nasturtium) Shoot

Vaccinium corymbosum (Blueberry) Fruit

Vaccinium myrtillus (Bilberry) Leaf

Vaccinium vitis-idaea var. minus (Cowberry) Leaf

Vitis vinifera (European Grape) Fruit

Zea mays (Corn) Stem

Zizyphus jujuba (Da-Zao) Fruit

Regards

[ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include?

Hi JR:What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?Is it me that is confused .............. ?Rodney. > > > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate,> > > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her> > > alive, after 95yo.> > > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.> > > She died from pneum.> > > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life> > > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can> > run a> > > test to get whatever results you want.> > > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now,> > > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill.> > > > > > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.> > > > > > Regards.> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...