Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 hmmm... ??? :PThe 119 year old woman ate "2 POUNDS" of chocolate per week!!?? - see below..." ... a study of 8000 male Harvard graduates showed that chocaholics lived longer than abstainers. Their longevity may be explained by the high polyphenol levels in chocolate. Polyphenols reduce the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and thereby protect against heart disease. Such theories are still speculative. Coincidentally or otherwise, many of the worlds oldest supercentenarians, e.g. Jeanne Calment (1875-1997) and Knauss (1880-1999), were passionately fond of chocolate. Jeanne Calment habitually ate two pounds of chocolate per week until her physician induced her to give up sweets at the age of 119 - three years before her death aged 122. Life-extensionists are best advised to eat dark chocolate rather than the kinds of calorie-rich confectionery popular in America. http://www.chocolate.org/http://www.chocolate.org/refs/index.html Felice Chocolate: the key to eternal youth? ...A German confectioner claims to have come up with the first anti-ageing chocolates. Made with dark chocolate, mango and soya milk, the creators believe the Felice chocolates not only make you happy, but keep you young. http://www.chocolate.org/health/antiaging.htmldangerous?, or a wise supplement to add?D.H. Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 Certainly dangerous if you listen to the outrageous claims of that last link you posted. I notice that it was dated 2003, and yet it hasn't " caught on " with the scientific community ;-). We have long recommended plain dark unsweetened cocoa, sweetened with the sweetner of your choice. This is the same unsweetened cocoa powder you can buy in the grocery. I mix with a bit of water to make a fudgy concoction and then I sweeten to taste. A good substitute for the fattening, sugary processed chocolates sold, for an arm and a leg if you're buying Godiva or some other expensive brand. on 12/15/2005 6:59 AM, D. H. at d7882001@... wrote: hmmm... ??? The 119 year old woman ate " 2 POUNDS " of chocolate per week!!?? - see below... " ... a study of 8000 male Harvard graduates showed that chocaholics lived longer than abstainers. Their longevity may be explained by the high polyphenol <http://www.chocolate.org/polyphenols.html> levels in chocolate. Polyphenols reduce the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and thereby protect against heart disease. Such theories are still speculative. Coincidentally or otherwise, many of the worlds oldest supercentenarians <http://www.supercentenarian.com/records.html> , e.g. Jeanne Calment (1875-1997) and Knauss (1880-1999), were passionately fond of chocolate. Jeanne Calment habitually ate two pounds of chocolate per week until her physic! ian induced her to give up sweets at the age of 119 - three years before her death aged 122. Life-extensionists are best advised to eat dark chocolate <http://www.chocolate.org/health/dark-chocolate.html> rather than the kinds of calorie-rich confectionery popular in America. http://www.chocolate.org/ http://www.chocolate.org/refs/index.html Felice Chocolate: the key to eternal youth? ...A German confectioner claims to have come up with the first anti-ageing chocolates. Made with dark chocolate, mango and soya milk, the creators believe the Felice chocolates not only make you happy, but keep you young. http://www.chocolate.org/health/antiaging.html dangerous?, or a wise supplement to add? D.H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 Hi D.H.: It does seem there are beneficial properties to some component(s) of the cacao plant. It is not clear to me that it is known for certain which confer the benefit, although there are plenty of guesses. ***BUT*** check the ingredient list of a variety of chocolate products available in stores. Many contain large amounts of hydrogenated fats, for example. The vast majority of chocolate products contain sizeable amounts of various fats, and sugar as well or course, even if not the hydrogenated ones. I was once given a gift that was labelled as " chocolate " which, according to the ingredient list, contained nothing at all from the cacao plant, and was very nearly 100% hydrogenated fats - hydrogenated to the extent that it was **solid** at room temperature. So one needs to be very cautious about which chocolate product one selects. Rodney. > > hmmm... ??? > > The 119 year old woman ate " 2 POUNDS " of chocolate per week!!?? - see below... > > " ... a study of 8000 male Harvard graduates showed that chocaholics lived longer than abstainers. Their longevity may be explained by the high polyphenol levels in chocolate. Polyphenols reduce the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and thereby protect against heart disease. Such theories are still speculative. Coincidentally or otherwise, many of the worlds oldest supercentenarians, e.g. Jeanne Calment (1875-1997) and Knauss (1880-1999), were passionately fond of chocolate. Jeanne Calment habitually ate two pounds of chocolate per week until her physician induced her to give up sweets at the age of 119 - three years before her death aged 122. Life-extensionists are best advised to eat dark chocolate rather than the kinds of calorie-rich confectionery popular in America. > > http://www.chocolate.org/ > http://www.chocolate.org/refs/index.html > > > Felice Chocolate: the key to eternal youth? > ...A German confectioner claims to have come up with the first anti-ageing chocolates. > Made with dark chocolate, mango and soya milk, the creators believe the Felice chocolates not only make you happy, but keep you young. > http://www.chocolate.org/health/antiaging.html > > > dangerous?, or a wise supplement to add? > > D.H. > > > --------------------------------- > > Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3032114 Journal Report 07/18/2005 Dark chocolate may reduce blood pressure, improve insulin resistance American Heart Association rapid access journal report: DALLAS, July 19 – If you have high blood pressure, a daily bar-sized serving of flavonol-rich dark chocolate might lower your blood pressure and improve insulin resistance, researchers report in Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association. “Previous studies suggest flavonoid-rich foods, including fruits, vegetables, tea, red wine and chocolate, might offer cardiovascular benefits, but this is one of the first clinical trials to look specifically at dark chocolate’s effect on lowering blood pressure among people with hypertension,” said study author B. Blumberg, Ph.D. Blumberg is a senior scientist at the Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University in Boston. Flavonoids are natural antioxidants found in many foods from plants. “This study is not about eating more chocolate,” Blumberg cautioned. “It suggests that cocoa flavonoids appear to have benefits on vascular function and glucose sensitivity.” Blumberg and colleagues at the University of L’Aquila in Italy, including senior author Dr. Claudio Ferri, studied 10 men and 10 women. They all had hypertension and a systolic blood pressure (the top number in a blood pressure reading) between 140 and 159 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) and a diastolic blood pressure (bottom number) between 90 and 99. None of the participants was taking antihypertensive medicines, and none had diabetes or other disease, nor did they smoke. For one week before starting the study, participants avoided all chocolate and other flavonoid-rich foods. During the next 15 days, half ate a daily 3.5-ounce bar of flavonoid-rich dark chocolate, while the other half ate the same amount of white chocolate. After another week of avoiding flavonoid-rich foods, each subject “crossed over” and ate the other chocolate. “White chocolate, which has no flavonoids, was the perfect control food because it contains all the other ingredients and calories found in dark chocolate,” Blumberg said. “It’s important to note that the dark chocolate we used had a high level of flavonoids, giving it a slightly bittersweet taste. Most Americans eat milk chocolate, which has a low amount of these compounds.” The researchers found a 12 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure and a 9 mm Hg decrease in diastolic blood pressure in the dark chocolate group after 15 days. Blood pressure did not decrease in the white chocolate group. etc. Maco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 Hi folks: Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are manufactured using what is called the " Dutch " process which eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components from the original. I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made by this method. They replied and said their policy was to not disclose this information!!!!! This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew that if they answered I would avoid the product. fwiw Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 Hi folks: So in short, if anyone knows of a de-fatted, sugar free, non- 'Dutched' REAL chocolate product please post : ^ ))) Rodney. --- In , " Rodney " <perspect1111@y...> wrote: > > Hi folks: > > Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are > manufactured using what is called the " Dutch " process which > eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components from > the original. > > I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made by > this method. They replied and said their policy was to not disclose > this information!!!!! > > This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew > that if they answered I would avoid the product. > > fwiw > > Rodney. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate, hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her alive, after 95yo. When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories. She died from pneum. The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can run a test to get whatever results you want. If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now, purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill. Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data. Regards. [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include? Hi folks:So in short, if anyone knows of a de-fatted, sugar free, non-'Dutched' REAL chocolate product please post : ^ )))Rodney.>> Hi folks:> > Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are > manufactured using what is called the "Dutch" process which > eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components from > the original.> > I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made by > this method. They replied and said their policy was to not disclose > this information!!!!!> > This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew > that if they answered I would avoid the product.> > fwiw > > Rodney.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 Hi , I think "they" can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite the idea? Do they have a patent on fish oil caps? Regards. Re: [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include? Not exactly... If they can't patent it they don't want to know about it.There's lots of bennies from natural foods. LE is still probably more about "how much" rather than what, while the wrong "what" could prematurely shorten our brief strut upon this stage.Happy happy, merry merry...JRjwwright wrote:> The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate, > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her > alive, after 95yo.> When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.> She died from pneum.> The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can run a > test to get whatever results you want.> If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now, > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill.> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.> > Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 Hi JW: Well when a drug company finds a component in some exotic amazonian plant (we keep hearing about how cutting down the jungle will deprive us of these miraculous chemicals, yet to be discovered, so it seems like a reasonable example to quote), isolates it and finds what medical use can be found for it, they do get patent rights on it for a limited period. So is there something different about chocolate? You could say: " why wouldn't people just eat the chocolate instead? " But usually these chemicals are present in such tiny amounts in the natural product that you have to enormously concentrate it, or produce it in the laboratory, to get a therapeutic dose. So it seems to me there is no reason why chocolate would not be investigated if peopole thought it could yield profitable products. But I am no expert in patent law, of course. Rodney. > > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate, > > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her > > alive, after 95yo. > > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories. > > She died from pneum. > > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life > > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can run a > > test to get whatever results you want. > > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now, > > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill. > > > > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data. > > > > Regards. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 Of course they can sell a " pill " without a patent. The issue is they won't invest the time, money, and effort, to jump through all the regulatory hurdles, and do the expensive studies to get approval for a " product " that they can't sell exclusively. Without some exclusive franchise, lower cost competitors will just capitalize on the work and money they spent, and under cut them in the market. This is a bit of a catch 22. It's just not worth it for anybody to pursue natural vitamins/food if they can't somehow control the final product. What's left is small, fly by night companies, sometime using dubious science to develop and promote potentially useful pharmaceuticals. This is perhaps appropriate work for the government to support but I don't think we have a good structure for that in place. JR jwwright wrote: > Hi , > I think " they " can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than > 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard > labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite > the idea? > Do they have a patent on fish oil caps? > > Regards. > > > * Re: [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to > include? > > Not exactly... If they can't patent it they don't want to know about it. > > There's lots of bennies from natural foods. LE is still probably more > about " how much " rather than what, while the wrong " what " could > prematurely shorten our brief strut upon this stage. > > Happy happy, merry merry... > > JR > > jwwright wrote: > > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate, > > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her > > alive, after 95yo. > > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories. > > She died from pneum. > > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life > > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can > run a > > test to get whatever results you want. > > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now, > > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill. > > > > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data. > > > > Regards. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 Hi JR: What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest? Is it me that is confused .............. ? Rodney. > > > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate, > > > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her > > > alive, after 95yo. > > > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories. > > > She died from pneum. > > > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life > > > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can > > run a > > > test to get whatever results you want. > > > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now, > > > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill. > > > > > > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 We had previously discussed the product: http://www.rawfood.com/cgi-bin/order/index.cgi? id=122468680932 & d=single & item_id=1004 & m=home which claims to be exactly that. - > > > > Hi folks: > > > > Also, I believe most of the powdered forms of chocolate are > > manufactured using what is called the " Dutch " process which > > eliminates some of the (possibly the beneficial ones) components > from > > the original. > > > > I emailed Nestlé and asked if their powdered chocolate was made by > > this method. They replied and said their policy was to not > disclose > > this information!!!!! > > > > This suggests they likely understood the reason I asked, and knew > > that if they answered I would avoid the product. > > > > fwiw > > > > Rodney. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 While I have 9 patents, they are mostly in electronics (with one thermodynamics). Drug patents are about two clicks beyond my level of expertise. My general sense is that drug companies patent a specific " process " for synthesizing useful compounds. So rather than patenting the actual element, they control the method of making. Generic drug makers figure out an alternate approach to make the same, or close enough to be effective, compound without infringing on the protected method. Hoodia, is apparently scarce and impractical to cultivate. The drug company apparently failed to come up with an effective way to synthesize an equivalent to the natural product. There are probably lurkers here with far better grasp of this than I, who will hopefully educate us all. JR Rodney wrote: > Hi JR: > > What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a > substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical > plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, > and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest? > > Is it me that is confused .............. ? > > Rodney. > > >>> > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate > chocolate, >>> > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks > to keep her >>> > alive, after 95yo. >>> > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories. >>> > She died from pneum. >>> > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value > in life >>> > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me > you can >>> run a >>> > test to get whatever results you want. >>> > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out > before now, >>> > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ > per pill. >>> > >>> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data. >>> > >>> > Regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 While I have 9 patents, they are mostly in electronics (with one thermodynamics). Drug patents are about two clicks beyond my level of expertise. My general sense is that drug companies patent a specific " process " for synthesizing useful compounds. So rather than patenting the actual element, they control the method of making. Generic drug makers figure out an alternate approach to make the same, or close enough to be effective, compound without infringing on the protected method. Hoodia, is apparently scarce and impractical to cultivate. The drug company apparently failed to come up with an effective way to synthesize an equivalent to the natural product. There are probably lurkers here with far better grasp of this than I, who will hopefully educate us all. JR Rodney wrote: > Hi JR: > > What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a > substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical > plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, > and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest? > > Is it me that is confused .............. ? > > Rodney. > > >>> > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate > chocolate, >>> > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks > to keep her >>> > alive, after 95yo. >>> > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories. >>> > She died from pneum. >>> > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value > in life >>> > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me > you can >>> run a >>> > test to get whatever results you want. >>> > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out > before now, >>> > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ > per pill. >>> > >>> > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data. >>> > >>> > Regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 One piece of infomation from my inaccurate memory. I read an article several years ago in Science News about the number of chemical components that made up the flavor in chocolate. Over a 1,000, as I remember. Strawberries maybe 300, and Coke soda about 500. It may be a challenge just to find which components are healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 One piece of infomation from my inaccurate memory. I read an article several years ago in Science News about the number of chemical components that made up the flavor in chocolate. Over a 1,000, as I remember. Strawberries maybe 300, and Coke soda about 500. It may be a challenge just to find which components are healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2005 Report Share Posted December 18, 2005 Right. I did this: I looked through duke's and pubmed and came up with a list of herbs, etc that claimed to be good for prostate cancer including saw palmetto. I ordered the herbs and then tried to dose to match the info I could find on each one. Someone else got the same idea and marketed it on TV for a relatively high price. Well of course it doesn't work at least it doesn't change PSA. But I could say it works because I have no PCa - HA. The fact that it works or doesn't work, does not stop me from marketing the same formulation based on those articles I used to select the components. How could it be patented without test to prove it? Probably can't. So it's marketed by one of those snake oil sellers. Someone with PCa will probably buy it, thinking they're doing an alternative cure. Now don't tell me there aren't a lot of people selling the same crap in the same manner. Including some claiming to be doctors. Like the one in Europe that claims to cure cancer with cottage cheese and flax oil. The only reason I couldn't do it with chocolate is because the mfgrs of chocolate have the process pretty well perfected and it would be difficult to compete with chocolate sales, unless one could identify precisely and synthesize the important components. I should be able to copywrite the idea, or patent the process. But in fact, if the components in chocolate were effective, the mfgrs of chocolate would be scurrying to find it and synthesize it,ie, someone would and probably that someone would first write a book about it, someone like Sears, and make more money on the book then the cure. I think if anyone found a cure for any cancer, he could write his own check, and not worry the details. BTW, it ain't vit C. FYI, talking to a MMM rep in 1965 about one of their products, he said they never patent a process because that reveals the process to the public and by the time the lawsuits pan out on the copier, the copier's company is bankrupt and he's working on copying something else. So they keep it secretized. Another BTW, I don't believe glucosamine/condroitin works and it's held it's price. Regards. [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include? Hi JR:What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?Is it me that is confused .............. ?Rodney. > > Hi ,> > I think "they" can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than > > 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard > > labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite > > the idea? > > Do they have a patent on fish oil caps?> > > > Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2005 Report Share Posted December 18, 2005 Right. I did this: I looked through duke's and pubmed and came up with a list of herbs, etc that claimed to be good for prostate cancer including saw palmetto. I ordered the herbs and then tried to dose to match the info I could find on each one. Someone else got the same idea and marketed it on TV for a relatively high price. Well of course it doesn't work at least it doesn't change PSA. But I could say it works because I have no PCa - HA. The fact that it works or doesn't work, does not stop me from marketing the same formulation based on those articles I used to select the components. How could it be patented without test to prove it? Probably can't. So it's marketed by one of those snake oil sellers. Someone with PCa will probably buy it, thinking they're doing an alternative cure. Now don't tell me there aren't a lot of people selling the same crap in the same manner. Including some claiming to be doctors. Like the one in Europe that claims to cure cancer with cottage cheese and flax oil. The only reason I couldn't do it with chocolate is because the mfgrs of chocolate have the process pretty well perfected and it would be difficult to compete with chocolate sales, unless one could identify precisely and synthesize the important components. I should be able to copywrite the idea, or patent the process. But in fact, if the components in chocolate were effective, the mfgrs of chocolate would be scurrying to find it and synthesize it,ie, someone would and probably that someone would first write a book about it, someone like Sears, and make more money on the book then the cure. I think if anyone found a cure for any cancer, he could write his own check, and not worry the details. BTW, it ain't vit C. FYI, talking to a MMM rep in 1965 about one of their products, he said they never patent a process because that reveals the process to the public and by the time the lawsuits pan out on the copier, the copier's company is bankrupt and he's working on copying something else. So they keep it secretized. Another BTW, I don't believe glucosamine/condroitin works and it's held it's price. Regards. [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include? Hi JR:What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?Is it me that is confused .............. ?Rodney. > > Hi ,> > I think "they" can sell a pill without a patent, and some go higher than > > 1$, especially diet/health pills. When you determine through your hard > > labor that a chemical in chocolate will lengthen life, can you copywrite > > the idea? > > Do they have a patent on fish oil caps?> > > > Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2005 Report Share Posted December 18, 2005 Instead of focusing on one food like it was a panacea, why not search Duke's database and make a list of protective chemicals and see what they're in? These aren't secrets, but they're probably small concentrations, except like carrots for betacarotene. Then look up the chemical in pubmed and see if they think it has anticancer properties. Anyone can do this. Let me warn you there are thousands of chemicals. I lost attention span about the C's. I'll give you a head start on food selection- many of these you already eat: Actinidia chinensis (Kiwi) Fruit Allium ampeloprasum (Elephant Garlic) Plant Allium cepa (Onion) Bulb Allium sativum var. sativum (Garlic) Bulb Allium schoenoprasum (Chives) Leaf Alocasia macrorrhiza (Giant Taro) Leaf Amaranthus sp. (Pigweed) Leaf Anacardium occidentale (Cashew) Seed Ananas comosus (Pineapple) Plant Anethum graveolens (Dill) Fruit Apium graveolens (Celery) Leaf Arachis hypogaea (Groundnut) Seed Armoracia rusticana (Horseradish) Plant Asparagus officinalis (Asparagus) Shoot Avena sativa (Oats) Plant Basella alba (Vinespinach) Leaf Bertholletia excelsa (Brazilnut) Seed Beta vulgaris subsp. subsp. vulgaris (Beet) Leaf Beta vulgaris subsp. subsp. vulgaris (Beet) Root Brassica napus var. napobrassica var. napobrassica (Rutabaga) Root Brassica nigra (Black Mustard) Seed Brassica oleracea var. botrytis l. var. botrytis (Cauliflower) Flower Brassica oleracea var. botrytis l. var. botrytis (Cauliflower) Leaf Brassica oleracea var. capitata l. var. capitata (Cabbage) Leaf Brassica rapa var. rapa (Rapini) Root Camellia sinensis (Tea) Leaf Canavalia ensiformis (Jack Bean) Fruit Capsicum annuum (Bell Pepper) Fruit Capsicum frutescens (Cayenne) Fruit Carica papaya (Papaya) Fruit Carica papaya (Papaya) Leaf Carya illinoensis (Pecan) Seed Carya ovata (Shagbark Hickory) Stem Bark Castanea sativa (European Chestnut) Leaf Cichorium endivia (Endive) Leaf Cichorium intybus (Chicory) Leaf Citrullus lanatus (Watermelon) Seed Citrus limon (Lemon) Leaf Essent. Oil Citrus limon (Lemon) Pericarp Essent. Oil Citrus paradisi (Grapefruit) Fruit Citrus reticulata (Mandarin) Fruit Citrus sinensis (Orange) Fruit Cnidoscolus chayamansa () Leaf Cocos nucifera (Coconut) Hull Husk Coffea arabica (Coffee) Seed Cola acuminata (Abata Cola) Seed Coriandrum sativum (Chinese Parsley) Fruit Coriandrum sativum (Chinese Parsley) Plant Corylus avellana (Cobnut) Seed Cucumis melo subsp. ssp melo var.cantalupensis (Cantaloupe) Cotyledon Cucumis melo subsp. ssp melo var.cantalupensis (Cantaloupe) Seed Cucumis sativus (Cucumber) Cotyledon Cucumis sativus (Cucumber) Fruit Cucurbita pepo (Pumpkin) Seed Cuminum cyminum (Cumin) Fruit Daucus carota (Carrot) Root Elaeagnus umbellatus (Russian Olive) Fruit Foeniculum vulgare (Fennel) Fruit Fragaria spp (Strawberry) Fruit Genipa americana (Genipap) Seed Glycine max (Soybean) Seed Helianthus annuus (Girasol) Pericarp Helianthus annuus (Girasol) Seed Hibiscus sabdariffa (Acedera de Guinea (Sp.)) Leaf Hordeum vulgare (Barley) Plant Hordeum vulgare (Barley) Seed Ilex paraguariensis (Mate) Leaf Ipomoea batatas (Sweet Potato) Root Juglans cinerea (Butternut) Seed Juglans regia (English Walnut) Fruit Juglans regia (English Walnut) Seed Lactuca sativa (Lettuce) Plant Lagenaria siceraria (Calabash Gourd) Seed Lens culinaris (Lentil) Seed Linum usitatissimum (Flax) Seed Luffa aegyptiaca (Luffa) Leaf Luffa aegyptiaca (Luffa) Seed Lycopersicon esculentum (Tomato) Fruit Macadamia spp (Macadamia) Seed Malus domestica (Apple) Fruit Mammea americana (Mamey) Leaf Mangifera indica (Mango) Flower Momordica charantia (Bitter Melon) Fruit Morinda citrifolia (Indian Mulberry) Leaf Morus alba (Sang-Pai-Pi) Bark Musa x paradisiaca (Banana) Fruit Myrciaria dubia (Camu-camu) Fruit Nasturtium officinale (Berro) Herb Ocimum basilicum (Basil) Leaf Oenothera biennis (Evening-Primrose) Leaf Opuntia ficus-indica (Indian Fig) Seed Oryza sativa (Rice) Plant Panax quinquefolius (American Ginseng) Plant Papaver somniferum (Opium Poppy) Seed Pastinaca sativa (Parsnip) Root Essent. Oil linia cupana (Guarana) Seed Perilla frutescens (Perilla) Leaf Persea americana (Avocado) Fruit Phyllanthus emblica (Emblic) Fruit Piper nigrum (Black Pepper) Fruit Pistacia vera (Pistachio) Seed Pisum sativum (Pea) Seed Portulaca oleracea (Purslane) Herb Prunus armeniaca (Apricot) Seed Prunus cerasus (Sour Cherry) Fruit Prunus dulcis (Almond) Seed Psidium guajava (Guava) Fruit Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (Asparagus Pea) Root Pueraria montana subsp. var. lobata (Kudsu) Stem Punica granatum (Granado (Sp.)) Pericarp Pyrus communis (Pear) Fruit Ribes nigrum (Black Currant) Fruit Ribes uva-crispa (Gooseberry) Fruit Rubus idaeus (Raspberry) Fruit Rubus idaeus (Raspberry) Leaf Rumex acetosa (Garden Sorrel) Leaf Salvia officinalis (Sage) Leaf Sesamum indicum (Ajonjoli (Sp.)) Leaf Sesamum indicum (Ajonjoli (Sp.)) Seed Solanum melongena (Aubergine) Fruit Solanum tuberosum (Potato) Tuber Sorbus aucubaria (Rowan Berry) Wood Spinacia oleracea (Spinach) Plant Terminalia catappa (Indian Almond) Fruit Theobroma cacao (Cacao) Seed Thymus vulgaris (Common Thyme) Leaf Trigonella foenum-graecum (Alholva (Sp.)) Plant Trigonella foenum-graecum (Alholva (Sp.)) Seed Triticum aestivum (Wheat) Plant Triticum aestivum (Wheat) Seed Tropaeolum majus (Nasturtium) Shoot Vaccinium corymbosum (Blueberry) Fruit Vaccinium myrtillus (Bilberry) Leaf Vaccinium vitis-idaea var. minus (Cowberry) Leaf Vitis vinifera (European Grape) Fruit Zea mays (Corn) Stem Zizyphus jujuba (Da-Zao) Fruit Regards [ ] Re: Chocolate (dark) - A food to include? Hi JR:What I wish someone would explain to me is: if they can't patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, chocolate (a tropical plant), then how come they CAN patent a substance they discover in, and isolate from, a plant they obtained from the Amazon rain forest?Is it me that is confused .............. ?Rodney. > > > The one data point I have is my 102 yo neighbor ate chocolate,> > > hershey's, when she could remember. We fed her egg milks to keep her> > > alive, after 95yo.> > > When you eat only chocolate, it's not a lot of calories.> > > She died from pneum.> > > The way things are processed, I wouldn't expect any value in life> > > extension, and I laugh at any value to BP. Just tells me you can> > run a> > > test to get whatever results you want.> > > If chocolate lowered BP, they would have found it out before now,> > > purified the ingredient that lowers BP and sell it for 1$ per pill.> > > > > > Talk to ex-cpas about rigging data.> > > > > > Regards.> > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.