Guest guest Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Hi All, The available pdf for the below study that prospectively associates low-grade prostate cancer with vasectomies provides some more details, as shown below. Hormone factors come to mind, since CRers tend to have lower levels of sex hormones, but seemed to be not considered or associated directly with the cancers. Highly sexually active males may be at risk. Definitions are: stage = The extent to which cancer has spread from its original site to other parts of the body. Usually denoted by a number from Stage 1 (least severe) to Stage 4 (more advanced). Different lymphoma types have different criteria for staging. grade ... tumour... Solid or cystic ... of high differentiation or low grade. Gleason's tumour grade = A classification of adenocarcinoma of the prostate by evaluation of the pattern of glandular differentiation; the tumour grade, know as Gleason's score, is the sum of the dominant and secondary patterns, each numbered on a scale of 1 to 5. Rohrmann S, Paltoo DN, Platz EA, Hoffman SC, Comstock GW, Helzlsouer KJ. Association of Vasectomy and Prostate Cancer Among Men in a land Cohort. Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Dec;16(10):1189-1194. PMID: 16215869 .... followed since 1989. On a questionnaire mailed in 1996... hazard ratios (HR) .... HR for prostate cancer for men who had had a vasectomy was 2.03 (95% CI: 1.24-3.32). Risk of low-grade disease (HR=2.87; 95% CI 1.49-5.54), but not high-grade disease (HR=0.99; 95% CI 0.36-2.76), was higher in men who had had a vasectomy. No statistically significant associations were observed for low- or high-stage disease. The association for vasectomy was more pronounced in men who were 40 years at the time of vasectomy (HR=2.63; 95% CI 1.40-4.94) than in men who were younger at vasectomy. ... The results from this prospective study suggest a positive association between vasectomy and prostate cancer, especially low-grade disease. .... About 12% of married men have had a vasectomy and are generally under the age of 40 years when the procedure is performed ... .... Table 2.Hazard ratios a (HR)and 95%con & #64257;dence intervals (CI) for prostate cancer by vasectomy status among 3373 men in the CLUE II study,1996-2004 ================= No vasectomy Vasectomy ================== All cases/person-years 51/20,211 27/7785 HR (95%CI)1.0 2.03 (1.24-3.32) Low-stage cases b /person-years 17/20,211 6/7785 HR (95%CI)1.0 1.47 (0.55-3.90) High-stage cases b/person-years 11/20,211 4/7785 HR (95%CI)1.0 1.52 (0.46-5.06) Low-grade cases c/person-years 22/20,211 18/7785 HR (95%CI)1.0 2.87 (1.49-5.54) High-grade cases c/person-years 19/20,211 5/7785 HR (95%CI)1.0 0.99 (0.36-2.76) ================================ a Estimated from a proportional hazards regression model after adjusting for age as a continuous variable. b Low-stage cases =SEER stage 1 or 2;high-stage cases =SEER stage 3 or 4. c Low-grade cases =Gleason sum <7;high-grade cases =Gleason sum =/>7. .... Table 3.Hazard ratios a (HR)and 95%con & #64257;dence intervals (CI)for prostate cancer according to age at vasectomy and time since vasectomy among 3330 b men in the CLUE II Study,1996-2004 ================ No vasectomy---- ================ ----Age at vasectomy ----<40 years of age =/>40 years of age =============== Cases/person years 51/20,211 14/5556 12/1854 HR (95%CI)1.00 1.77 (0.93-3.37)2.63 (1.40-4.94) Time since vasectomy <20 years ago =/>20 years ago Cases/person years 51/20,211 7/3107 19/4294 HR (95%CI)1.00 2.21 (0.92-5.34)2.03 (1.19-3.47) =============== a Estimated from proportional hazards regression models after adjusting for age as a continuous variable. b Information on age at vasectomy is missing for 43 men who had had a vasectomy. .... Given the hypothesis that some of the cases with missing stage are men with early stage disease,in a sensitivity analysis,we included the men with missing stage along with the early stage cases and observed a statistically signi & #64257;cant association between vasectomy and low-stage prostate cancer .This result is similar to the association of vasectomy with low-grade prostate cancer. ... .... Potential confounders that we could not address in this study include androgen levels ... Men who have higher testosterone levels might be more likely to be sexually active and undergo vasectomy to control fertility. Although circulating testosterone concentra- tions have not been consistently linked to prostate cancer risk [23 ], androgens are permissive for prostate cancer development. ... Men who are sexually more active may be more likely to acquire sex- ually transmitted diseases than men who are less sexually active. Unaccounted for associations of vasectomy with androgen levels and STDs might lead to a very modest overestimation in the RR of prostate cancer. .... Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________ - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.