Guest guest Posted October 13, 2005 Report Share Posted October 13, 2005 Hi All, When comparing the values for P in the tables 3 and 4: > †Adjusted for age and examination year (P value for trend, <.001). with: > ‡Adjusted for age, examination year, fasting glucose level, systolic blood pressure, > parental history of premature cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol level, > cigarette smoking, abnormal resting, and exercise electrocardiograms the little difference that is seen may suggest that what you say, Rodney, may not apply. --- Rodney <perspect1111@...> wrote: > Hi folks: > > Two comments on this study: > > 1) It is BLAIR. AGAIN!!! > > 2) Have they really demonstrated that exercise reduces the risk of > death from CVD in diabetics in proportion to how much they exercise? > (Which is what they would like us to believe they have > demonstrated). Or have they, rather, demonstrated that the more > occluded the subjects' arteries are (and therefore the closer they > are to infarction and death) the less capable they are of exercise > and so, in consequence, they perform less well on the tests done by > the investigators to determine their fitness level? > > IMO the latter is obviously true. Whether the former is true or not > I really have no idea, and from what I have seen of it I do not think > this study helps elucidate the issue. But Dr. Henry has an > opinion, lol. --- In , Al Pater <old542000@y...> wrote: > ... Table 3. Rates and Hazard Ratios of Cardiovascular Disease Death by Body Mass > Index and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level > =============== > Cardiorespiratory fitness No. Man-years deaths Rate* HR† (95% CI) Ptrend HR‡ (95% > CI) Ptrend > =============== > BMI, 18.5-24.9 – – – <.001 – – – <.001 > Low 116 2111.7 17 79.0 4.2 (2.0-8.6) 2.7 (1.3-5.7) > Moderate 279 5319.4 27 51.3 2.7 (1.4-5.3) 2.3 (1.2-4.6) > High 354 6143.4 13 18.9 1.0 (Reference) 1.0 (Reference) > BMI, 25.0-29.9 – – – <.001 – – – .07 > Low 339 5730.5 44 80.7 4.3 (2.3-7.9) 2.7 (1.4-5.1) > Moderate 519 8068.3 31 34.9 1.9 (0.9-3.6) 1.6 (0.9-3.2) > High 247 3408.8 12 32.5 1.7 (0.8-3.8) 1.5 (0.7-3.4) > BMI, 30.0-34.9 – – – <.001 – – – .02 > Low 256 3622.4 27 84.2 4.5 (2.3-8.7) <.001 2.8 (1.4-5.6) > Moderate/high 206 2305.7 8 32.2 1.7 (0.7-4.1) 1.5 (0.6-3.6) > =============== > Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by > the square of height in meters); CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio from > proportional hazard models. > *Per 10,000 man-years with adjustment for age and examination year. > †Adjusted for age and examination year. > ‡Adjusted for age, examination year, fasting glucose level, systolic blood pressure, > parental history of premature CVD, total cholesterol level, cigarette smoking, > abnormal resting, and exercise electrocardiograms. > > ... Table 4. Rates and Hazard Ratios of Cardiovascular Disease Death by > Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level Quantified in 1-MET Increments Obtained During a > Maximal Treadmill Test > ============= > METs No. Man-Yyars No. of deaths Rate* HR (95% CI)† HR (95% CI)‡ > ============= > <7.0 126 1602 31 142.8 2.8 (1.6-4.7) 1.6 (0.9-2.8) > 7.0-7.9 205 3117 35 110.8 2.1 (1.3-3.5) 1.7 (1.0-2.8) > 8.0-8.9 293 4159 35 91.7 1.8 (1.1-2.9) 1.6 (0.9-2.6) > 9.0-9.9 415 6450 27 51.8 1.0 (Reference) 1.0 (Reference) > 10.0-10.9 486 8078 26 41.8 0.8 (0.5-1.4) 0.9 (0.5-1.5) > 11.0-11.9 299 5014 14 40.6 0.8 (0.4-1.5) 0.9 (0.5-1.8) > 12.0-12.9 242 4168 5 17.1 0.3 (0.1-0.9) 0.3 (0.1-0.9) > =/>13.0 250 4118 6 23.1 0.4 (0.2-1.1) 0.6 (0.3-1.4) > ============== > Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio from proportional > hazard models; METs, metabolic equivalents (1 MET = 3.5 mL of oxygen uptake/kg -1 > per minute -1 ). > *Per 10,000 man-years with adjustment for age and examination year. > †Adjusted for age and examination year (P value for trend, <.001). > ‡Adjusted for age, examination year, fasting glucose level, systolic blood pressure, > parental history of premature cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol level, > cigarette smoking, abnormal resting, and exercise electrocardiograms (P value for > trend, <.001). Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________ Start your day with - Make it your home page! http://www./r/hs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2005 Report Share Posted October 13, 2005 Hi All, When comparing the values for P in the tables 3 and 4: > †Adjusted for age and examination year (P value for trend, <.001). with: > ‡Adjusted for age, examination year, fasting glucose level, systolic blood pressure, > parental history of premature cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol level, > cigarette smoking, abnormal resting, and exercise electrocardiograms the little difference that is seen may suggest that what you say, Rodney, may not apply. --- Rodney <perspect1111@...> wrote: > Hi folks: > > Two comments on this study: > > 1) It is BLAIR. AGAIN!!! > > 2) Have they really demonstrated that exercise reduces the risk of > death from CVD in diabetics in proportion to how much they exercise? > (Which is what they would like us to believe they have > demonstrated). Or have they, rather, demonstrated that the more > occluded the subjects' arteries are (and therefore the closer they > are to infarction and death) the less capable they are of exercise > and so, in consequence, they perform less well on the tests done by > the investigators to determine their fitness level? > > IMO the latter is obviously true. Whether the former is true or not > I really have no idea, and from what I have seen of it I do not think > this study helps elucidate the issue. But Dr. Henry has an > opinion, lol. --- In , Al Pater <old542000@y...> wrote: > ... Table 3. Rates and Hazard Ratios of Cardiovascular Disease Death by Body Mass > Index and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level > =============== > Cardiorespiratory fitness No. Man-years deaths Rate* HR† (95% CI) Ptrend HR‡ (95% > CI) Ptrend > =============== > BMI, 18.5-24.9 – – – <.001 – – – <.001 > Low 116 2111.7 17 79.0 4.2 (2.0-8.6) 2.7 (1.3-5.7) > Moderate 279 5319.4 27 51.3 2.7 (1.4-5.3) 2.3 (1.2-4.6) > High 354 6143.4 13 18.9 1.0 (Reference) 1.0 (Reference) > BMI, 25.0-29.9 – – – <.001 – – – .07 > Low 339 5730.5 44 80.7 4.3 (2.3-7.9) 2.7 (1.4-5.1) > Moderate 519 8068.3 31 34.9 1.9 (0.9-3.6) 1.6 (0.9-3.2) > High 247 3408.8 12 32.5 1.7 (0.8-3.8) 1.5 (0.7-3.4) > BMI, 30.0-34.9 – – – <.001 – – – .02 > Low 256 3622.4 27 84.2 4.5 (2.3-8.7) <.001 2.8 (1.4-5.6) > Moderate/high 206 2305.7 8 32.2 1.7 (0.7-4.1) 1.5 (0.6-3.6) > =============== > Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by > the square of height in meters); CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio from > proportional hazard models. > *Per 10,000 man-years with adjustment for age and examination year. > †Adjusted for age and examination year. > ‡Adjusted for age, examination year, fasting glucose level, systolic blood pressure, > parental history of premature CVD, total cholesterol level, cigarette smoking, > abnormal resting, and exercise electrocardiograms. > > ... Table 4. Rates and Hazard Ratios of Cardiovascular Disease Death by > Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level Quantified in 1-MET Increments Obtained During a > Maximal Treadmill Test > ============= > METs No. Man-Yyars No. of deaths Rate* HR (95% CI)† HR (95% CI)‡ > ============= > <7.0 126 1602 31 142.8 2.8 (1.6-4.7) 1.6 (0.9-2.8) > 7.0-7.9 205 3117 35 110.8 2.1 (1.3-3.5) 1.7 (1.0-2.8) > 8.0-8.9 293 4159 35 91.7 1.8 (1.1-2.9) 1.6 (0.9-2.6) > 9.0-9.9 415 6450 27 51.8 1.0 (Reference) 1.0 (Reference) > 10.0-10.9 486 8078 26 41.8 0.8 (0.5-1.4) 0.9 (0.5-1.5) > 11.0-11.9 299 5014 14 40.6 0.8 (0.4-1.5) 0.9 (0.5-1.8) > 12.0-12.9 242 4168 5 17.1 0.3 (0.1-0.9) 0.3 (0.1-0.9) > =/>13.0 250 4118 6 23.1 0.4 (0.2-1.1) 0.6 (0.3-1.4) > ============== > Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio from proportional > hazard models; METs, metabolic equivalents (1 MET = 3.5 mL of oxygen uptake/kg -1 > per minute -1 ). > *Per 10,000 man-years with adjustment for age and examination year. > †Adjusted for age and examination year (P value for trend, <.001). > ‡Adjusted for age, examination year, fasting glucose level, systolic blood pressure, > parental history of premature cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol level, > cigarette smoking, abnormal resting, and exercise electrocardiograms (P value for > trend, <.001). Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________ Start your day with - Make it your home page! http://www./r/hs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.