Guest guest Posted February 12, 2003 Report Share Posted February 12, 2003 Pretty good advice from an old man. I'd be tempted to leave in the " schmuck " tho. Or something stronger. LOL Jessie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2003 Report Share Posted February 12, 2003 After talking with several people in this area, we've decided the best way to handle the comments made about Karrie in the newspaper would be best handled by flooding the reporter and/or newspaper with letters and/or calls. Anyone have any input as to if they think this is the best way to handle the situation? Sue mom to Kate 13 and Karrie 6 w/ds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2003 Report Share Posted February 12, 2003 Tracey, Good question...it was the Alton Telegraph. The story was on the front page of the Sunday paper, which covers many outlying towns and a couple of counties. Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2003 Report Share Posted February 12, 2003 Very good point. That is what worries me the most. He is the kind to do just that. Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2003 Report Share Posted February 12, 2003 on 2/12/03 11:42 PM, Sue Brown at karriemom@... wrote: Very good point. That is what worries me the most. He is the kind to do just that. Sue Sue, in my sometimes flawed human opinion, I wouldn't offer anything unless asked. Should the need arise (for your vindication or that of your children...) that you do need to be asked then have someone anonymously leak to the reporter covering the story that the schmuck's* ex-wife has information which contradicts the shcmuck's story. When asked for a quote, say something like my recollection of the events differ's from that of the schmuck's . Although he'll still view it as betrayal, it will not be an outright betrayal. At the same time it will tell the reporter that they need to follow up on this lead and they will explore alternative sources which can illuminate their path to enlightenment about the aforementioned schmuck. ;-) *please substitute the schmuck's real name for the word schmuck wherever necessary. Take Care, Kent Kent Moreno Rt 1 Box 128-X Burlington, WV 26710 knm@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2003 Report Share Posted February 12, 2003 Very sneaky...I love it Kent Moreno wrote: > on 2/12/03 11:42 PM, Sue Brown at karriemom@... wrote: > > Very good point. That is what worries me the most. He is the kind to > do just > that. > Sue > Sue, > > in my sometimes flawed human opinion, > > I wouldn't offer anything unless asked. Should the need arise (for your > vindication or that of your children...) that you do need to be asked then > have someone anonymously leak to the reporter covering the story that the > schmuck's* ex-wife has information which contradicts the shcmuck's story. > When asked for a quote, say something like my recollection of the events > differ's from that of the schmuck's . Although he'll still view it as > betrayal, it will not be an outright betrayal. At the same time it will > tell the reporter that they need to follow up on this lead and they will > explore alternative sources which can illuminate their path to > enlightenment > about the aforementioned schmuck. ;-) > > > *please substitute the schmuck's real name for the word schmuck wherever > necessary. > > Take Care, > > Kent > Kent Moreno > Rt 1 Box 128-X > Burlington, WV 26710 > knm@... > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.