Guest guest Posted May 30, 2001 Report Share Posted May 30, 2001 Listmates Has anyone had to deal with the Office Of Workers Compensation Programs? This is the federal goverment version of SAIF. I had a pt., a BLM firefighter, file a claim. The claim was denied because my dx was a strain/ sprain and " Under the provisions of the Federal Employees' Compensation Act Chiropractors are defined as " physicians " only to the extent that their reimbursable services are limitted to treatment consisting of manual manipulation of the spine to correct a subluxation as demonstrated by x-ray to exist. " So the claim was denied because my primary dx was str/ spr. Any suggestions on appealing? Charlie Caughlin _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2001 Report Share Posted May 30, 2001 When dealing with the Federal Govt, treat all claims as you do Medicare. Better yet, dont deal with Fed Work Comp. I have told my staff to turn away all SAIF and Fed Work Comp, it is'nt worth the staff hassle. Ron Johansen, PDX On Wed, 30 May 2001 18:13:05 " Charlie Caughlin " <caughlindrc@...> writes: > Listmates > > Has anyone had to deal with the Office Of Workers Compensation > Programs? > This is the federal goverment version of SAIF. I had a pt., a BLM > firefighter, file a claim. The claim was denied because my dx was a > strain/ > sprain and " Under the provisions of the Federal Employees' > Compensation Act > Chiropractors are defined as " physicians " only to the extent that > their > reimbursable services are limitted to treatment consisting of manual > > manipulation of the spine to correct a subluxation as demonstrated > by x-ray > to exist. " So the claim was denied because my primary dx was str/ > spr. Any > suggestions on appealing? > > Charlie Caughlin > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2001 Report Share Posted May 30, 2001 Ron, I agree with you they make the system so difficult and time intensive that is not worth your time to treat the patient and therefore exclude the patient from chiropractic care. DeSiena --------- Forwarded message ---------- From: RONALD R JOHANSEN <drjohansen@...> caughlindrc@... Cc: Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:54:54 -0700 Subject: Re: US Dept. of Labor & OWCP... help! Message-ID: <20010530.141022.-417365.1.drjohansen@...> When dealing with the Federal Govt, treat all claims as you do Medicare. Better yet, dont deal with Fed Work Comp. I have told my staff to turn away all SAIF and Fed Work Comp, it is'nt worth the staff hassle. Ron Johansen, PDX On Wed, 30 May 2001 18:13:05 " Charlie Caughlin " <caughlindrc@...> writes: > Listmates > > Has anyone had to deal with the Office Of Workers Compensation > Programs? > This is the federal goverment version of SAIF. I had a pt., a BLM > firefighter, file a claim. The claim was denied because my dx was a > strain/ > sprain and " Under the provisions of the Federal Employees' > Compensation Act > Chiropractors are defined as " physicians " only to the extent that > their > reimbursable services are limitted to treatment consisting of manual > > manipulation of the spine to correct a subluxation as demonstrated > by x-ray > to exist. " So the claim was denied because my primary dx was str/ > spr. Any > suggestions on appealing? > > Charlie Caughlin > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.