AOL article on trans fat labelling

[Guest guest]

From AOL. God, what a note to end on :-/

(July 10) -- Consumers will soon get a much clearer idea of just how bad that

glazed doughnut -- and even that little wheat cracker -- is for their health.

In the biggest regulatory change for the food industry in a decade, the

federal government issued a long-awaited rule requiring food makers to list the

amount of harmful, artery-clogging fats known as " trans fats " on their product

labels.

Though trans fats are found naturally in meats and some dairy products,

Americans ingest far greater amounts of them from munching cookies, chips and

other

snack foods -- including some that are labeled as " low fat. "

Nearly all fried and baked goods have some trans fats, and nutritionists

believe they are so noxious that no level is entirely safe. Not only do trans

fats

raise so-called bad cholesterol, but they also lower good cholesterol, the

stuff that reduces risk of clogged arteries.

The new requirement, issued by the Food and Drug Administration, will force

food companies to add a line to nutrition labels showing how many grams of

trans fats are included in each serving. The revised labels won't be mandatory

until Jan. 1, 2006 -- the government usually gives companies long lead times to

respond to new regulations to avoid disrupting business -- but consumers are

likely to see them sooner, especially on products with little or no trans fats.

The regulation could have big implications for the food industry as well as

individual eating habits -- just as requiring warning labels on cigarettes

nearly four decades ago led many people to give up smoking and sent the tobacco

industry searching for lower-nicotine products. Already a number of companies,

including Kraft Foods Inc. and Mc's Corp. are scrambling for ways to

reduce trans fats while keeping the familiar taste and texture in their popular

products.

PepsiCo's Frito-Lay has succeeded in lessening or abolishing trans fats in

its Doritos, Tostitos and Cheetos snacks -- and has already put the newly

required trans-fat line on their nutrition labels to tout the change. Legal

Seafoods, a closely held group of 28 restaurants on the East Coast, started

using a

reduced trans-fat oil to fry its famous fish and switched its supplier of oyster

crackers to one that doesn't use trans fats.

Just Wednesday, Unilever Best Foods North America, a unit of Unilever PLC,

announced it plans to eliminate trans fats from its entire line of I Can't

Believe It's Not Butter spreads by the middle of next year.

But reformulating won't be easy for most companies. All fats, including trans

fats, provide flavor and texture to foods. Last September, Mc's grabbed

headlines when it vowed to introduce a new oil that would cut trans fat in

its fried foods, including halving the amount in its French fries. But so far,

the company only has been able to cut trans fat in some fried-chicken products.

It has put a hold on changing the oil for its fries, citing concerns about

altering the taste. The chain says it continues testing.

Kraft, the nation's largest food company and maker of Oreo cookies and

Mayer Lunchables, says it has been making strides in eliminating or reducing

trans fats, but isn't sure when it will be able to complete the task. The

toughest challenge is with " sandwich cookies, " like Oreos (which contain 2.5

grams

of trans fat per three-cookie serving) because it's difficult to get the cream

filling to maintain its texture and shelf life without trans fats.

Food makers have turned for guidance to companies like Cargill, which has

sold a line of both liquid and solid oils with reduced levels of trans fats for

nearly a decade. It is easy to take trans fats out of chips, but baked goods

are harder, said Willie Loh of Cargill's specialty-canola-oils unit. " Some

companies may need to make changes to manufacturing, " said Mr. Loh.

The new labels won't mean much for consumers who don't have additional

knowledge and guidance. They won't put trans fats in context of a day's diet so

people will have no way to glean from the label how much trans fat is a lot. As

they can with other nutrients on the label, companies will be allowed to round

down the amount of trans fat as zero grams per serving if the amount is

anything under 0.5 gram. Similarly, if one serving of cookies has 1.4 grams of

trans

fat, the label can round down to list it as 1 gram.

Growing Awareness

The level of saturated fats -- which also raise bad cholesterol and are more

common than trans fats -- has been listed on food labels since they were first

required in the early 1990s. But it was only in the past several years that

scientists became aware of how harmful trans fats are, and a movement developed

to add them to food labels.

Now consumers will get the full " bad-fat " content from labels. (Other fats

are generally beneficial because they help lower cholesterol.)

People should try to keep their intake of saturated and trans fats combined

to 10% or less of the total calories they consume each day, says Grundy,

a well-known lipid specialist in Texas. That guideline applies not just to

adults but to children over age two. The benchmarks are even lower for those

already at risk of heart disease or with high cholesterol. They should get no

more

than 7% of calories from bad fats, for a total of 15.5 grams a day.

All this means a generally healthy person who eats 2,000 calories a day,

should consume no more than 20 grams of saturated and trans fats.

Have a glazed donut for breakfast and you have eaten 6 grams of so-called bad

fats. Grab a lunch of a Big Mac, fries and a soft drink and you've used up

all 20 grams of your daily bad-fat allowance. The average American, however,

eats a 2,250-calorie diet with about 15%, or 35 grams, coming from bad fat a

day.

" People have a ways to go " to reach the advisable ranges, said Margo Wootan

of the nutrition advocacy group the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

The trans-fat content in doughnuts and Big Macs may not come as much

surprise. But the new labels are likely to contain some startling information

for

other products. According to research by Consumer Reports magazine, a serving of

Nabisco Wheat Thins baked crackers (about 16 crackers) has 3.5 grams of bad

fats. That is worse than Sunshine's Cheese-It crackers which have 3 grams of bad

fat a serving. Kellogg's Cracklin' Oat Bran cereal has 3.5 grams of bad fat a

serving, more than a container of chocolate Jello Pudding Snacks, which has

2.5 grams.

Consumer intake of trans fats really took off when food makers figured out

how to add hydrogen to vegetable oil. The process, called hydrogenation, makes

the oil more solid at room temperature. Hydrogenated oils make pastries

flakier, breads moister and cookies fresher-tasting. It also delivers flavor in

frozen foods and quick-preparation meals.

Nutrition researchers have known the perils of trans fats for years. But

getting even the bare-bones quantity listing on food labels took nearly four

years

of wrangling between the FDA and the food industry. The industry beat back a

proposal that would have prevented companies from touting their products as

" lean " or " heart healthy " if they contained high levels of trans fats. The

industry also scored a major win by getting the FDA to jettison a proposed

footnote

to labels that would have advised consumers to keep their intake of trans

fats as low as possible.

The cautionary footnote was proposed by a panel of doctors convened to advise

the government on the trans-fat issue. After reviewing the science, the panel

concluded that even the smallest amount of trans fat increases the risk of

coronary heart disease so it couldn't tell consumers how much trans fats they

could eat without worrying. " There is no level at which there is no adverse

effect, " says Suzanne Hendrich, a professor at Iowa State University and a panel

member.

Still, some nutritionists now worry that the focus on trans fats will lead

people to lose sight of saturated fats. On average, Americans get 12% to 13% of

their daily calories from saturated fats, but only 2% to 3% from trans fats,

said Penny Kris-Etherton, a nutrition professor at Penn State University.

" Don't get so waylaid by thinking about trans fats and forget about the bigger

issue of saturated fat. "

[Guest guest]

> From AOL. <snip>

> The cautionary footnote was proposed by a panel of doctors convened

to advise

> the government on the trans-fat issue. After reviewing the science,

the panel

> concluded that even the smallest amount of trans fat increases the

risk of

> coronary heart disease so it couldn't tell consumers how much trans

fats they

> could eat without worrying. " There is no level at which there is no

adverse

> effect, " says Suzanne Hendrich, a professor at Iowa State

University and a panel

> member.

>

I don't know about the rest of you, but it's VERY worrying that the

FDA hasn't issued an outright ban on trans fats if even the tiniest

amount is bad! I wait to see what happens here in the UK....

Jo