Guest guest Posted July 14, 2003 Report Share Posted July 14, 2003 , Does your stock gel over? Somewhere on WAPF site it says beef broth requires about 12 hours to leach significant gelatin. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 Well.. I thought I knew how to do it, but reviewing Sally's recipe for beef broth in NT, my version is quite different. I haven't roasted the bones, although I'm sure that improves the flavor, but considering that nutritional value and simplicity are highest priorities, can someone recommend their own version of a bone marrow broth? Sally says to cook for about 3 times longer than I do, and she says to strain it so the broth is thinner. The way I cook it for only about 4 hours, it doesn't become so congealed and gloppy, so there's nothing to strain but the bones. Am I getting less nutritional value? Doesn't straining out more of the solid material lose some good stuff? Any ideas to make it simple without sacrificing nutrition, would be appreciated! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 > Sally says to cook for about 3 times longer than I do, and she says to > strain it so the broth is thinner. The way I cook it for only about 4 > hours, it doesn't become so congealed and gloppy, so there's nothing to > strain but the bones. Am I getting less nutritional value? Doesn't > straining out more of the solid material lose some good stuff? It's supposed to be congealed and gloppy, that's the point, I think. When it's hot it's thin. The straining is to get out the bits of beef and bone, which have given up their best to the broth already. They're tasteless and cloud the stock. I leave mine on the hob overnight, pull out the bones and veg, let it sit in the fridge another day, lift off the fat when it's cold (and save it for cooking) and then strain it. It's still gloopy when cold. Bone broth is not like making the usual standard stock or broth (though it should be); the point in the traditional method is getting the gelatin out of the bones. I have found, after years of making stock the standard way and the traditional way that the traditional also tastes better! There's a point at about the four hour mark when it stinks to high heaven; this is when I usually add the veggies and things start to smell better. Lynn S. ----- Lynn Siprelle * Writer, Mother, Programmer, Fiber Artisan The New Homemaker: http://www.newhomemaker.com/ Siprelle & Associates: http://www.siprelle.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 >> ? Somewhere on WAPF site it says beef broth requires about 12 hours to leach significant gelatin. << I rarely let mine cook beyond 4-5 hours and it always gels. Christie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 Hi Yup, my stock gels even after 4 hours <shrug>.. which is why I didn't question it until I reread Sally's recipe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 Thanks Lynn.. so how long do you think it needs to cook altogether? I don't have a hob in my apartment :-) Is that time part of the cooking time, or in addition to the 12 hrs cooking time? Also, do you do chicken this way too, or just the larger marrow bones? Thanks for the tip on reducing the smelliness. The walls of my building are thin, and when I cook all the other apartments are experiencing my experiments too. - >Message: 17 > Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:51:59 -0700 > From: " Lynn Siprelle, Editor " <editor@...> >Subject: Re: bone broth > > > Sally says to cook for about 3 times longer than I do, and she says to > > strain it so the broth is thinner. The way I cook it for only about 4 > > hours, it doesn't become so congealed and gloppy, so there's nothing to > > strain but the bones. Am I getting less nutritional value? Doesn't > > straining out more of the solid material lose some good stuff? > >It's supposed to be congealed and gloppy, that's the point, I think. >When it's hot it's thin. The straining is to get out the bits of beef >and bone, which have given up their best to the broth already. They're >tasteless and cloud the stock. I leave mine on the hob overnight, pull >out the bones and veg, let it sit in the fridge another day, lift off >the fat when it's cold (and save it for cooking) and then strain it. >It's still gloopy when cold. > >Bone broth is not like making the usual standard stock or broth (though >it should be); the point in the traditional method is getting the >gelatin out of the bones. I have found, after years of making stock the >standard way and the traditional way that the traditional also tastes >better! There's a point at about the four hour mark when it stinks to >high heaven; this is when I usually add the veggies and things start to >smell better. > >Lynn S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 - I actually find that my stocks don't gel once I cook them as long as Sally suggests, so lately I've simmered fowl and fish stocks for 12 hours and beef stock for 24 hours. At least that way the gelatin doesn't get broken down. So who knows what's best. >Yup, my stock gels even after 4 hours <shrug>.. which is why I didn't >question it until I reread Sally's recipe. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 > Thanks Lynn.. so how long do you think it needs to cook altogether? I > don't > have a hob in my apartment :-) Oh, that's just my way of saying " I leave it on the back burner. " I don't have an actual hob either, though if I had my way I would! > Is that time part of the cooking time, or > in addition to the 12 hrs cooking time? That's part of the cooking time. > Also, do you do chicken this way too, or just the larger marrow bones? Chicken I usually just put on in the morning and fish everything out in the evening before putting it in the fridge to cool. Lynn S. ----- Lynn Siprelle * Writer, Mother, Programmer, Fiber Artisan The New Homemaker: http://www.newhomemaker.com/ Siprelle & Associates: http://www.siprelle.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 At 06:00 PM 4/1/05 -0000, you wrote: >No, I've never tried boiling a roast chicken carcass, I've always >found it just easier (and less dishes! to just toss it back in the >oven) Infact, I have some chicken roasting right now for supper and >will be making some bone broth for her tonight. As for cocnut oil, I >am trying the Omega Nutrition brand (the best I can find around >here) but have not noticed anything. I would certainly be open to >trying your brand! My address is > > Siemens FWIW , my chicken stock rarely gels either - probably because I most always do it with the remains of a chicken I've boiled for cat food. My other stocks including roasted bones gel fine, though. MFJ I don't wanna work, I wanna play in the dirt all day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 No, I've never tried boiling a roast chicken carcass, I've always found it just easier (and less dishes! to just toss it back in the oven) Infact, I have some chicken roasting right now for supper and will be making some bone broth for her tonight. As for cocnut oil, I am trying the Omega Nutrition brand (the best I can find around here) but have not noticed anything. I would certainly be open to trying your brand! My address is Siemens 7 Marcy St. E PO Box 541 Teeswater, ON N0G 2S0 Thank you very much, I will let you know how it turns out!! >> > I don't see why this wouldn't be OK. In your boiling experiments, > have you used a roasted chicken carcass or a raw whole chicken? I > never use raw chicken to make broth; I save up all bones from eating > roasted meat in my freezer and then make broth when I get a bagful. > > Can you afford good coconut oil? I feel for your situation and would > be happy to send you some really high quality vco to try on your > daughter (externally and internally.) That way, you'd know if it > would be worth it to invest in some. > > Best, > > > New York Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 How about cold soups? I've really been chowing down on cold soups made with a variety of veggies with a base of bone broth. I like the veggies to start with onion and celery then it could be tomato or anything else. Slow cook the veggies in the broth, let cool and puree. Serve with cream! Yum! I need to make more as I discovered yesterday I had no more in the freezer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Ghislaine, That doesn't sound too bad... I adore creamed soups! I think part of my problem is I have been eating so badly for so long that I am accustomed to it. I guess I will just have to accustom myself to eating healthy. Sincerely, Lana M. Gibbons On 9/1/05, Ghislaine deLessines <ghislainedel@...> wrote: > > How about cold soups? I've really been chowing down on cold soups made > with > a variety of veggies with a base of bone broth. I like the veggies to > start > with onion and celery then it could be tomato or anything else. Slow cook > the veggies in the broth, let cool and puree. Serve with cream! > Yum! I need to make more as I discovered yesterday I had no more in the > freezer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Phil, That is an excellent idea. I have a whole bag of amaranth I bought to make alegria, but I don't use it for much else. I will have to try this. Thanks! Sincerely, Lana M. Gibbons On 8/29/05, REMOC <REMOCLIHP@...> wrote: > > I sometimes use broth instead of water to cook the grains I eat;brown > rice,quinoa,millet. Makes it very tasty. > > Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.