Guest guest Posted June 25, 2003 Report Share Posted June 25, 2003 Suze- >coral calcium was one >the two products that failed their test because it contained 1.5 mcgs lead >per gram of calcium, which apparently exceeds california's " no significant >risk level " . Any idea whether this was true for most or all brands, or just one specific one? - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2003 Report Share Posted June 25, 2003 >coral calcium was one >the two products that failed their test because it contained 1.5 mcgs lead >per gram of calcium, which apparently exceeds california's " no significant >risk level " . >>>>Any idea whether this was true for most or all brands, or just one specific one? ------->paul, of the 15 brands tested, 2 failed due to the high lead levels. the other one was " Source NaturalsR Dietary Supplement Calcium & Magnesium, Amino Acid Chelate (250 mg from amino acid chelate per tablet, 1-3 per day) " . Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg/ mailto:s.fisher22@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.