Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 I would not call circumcision a Christian tradition, it is solely a Jewish custom. Europe has a mostly Christian heritage and circumcision is almost unheard of. At least in Austria and Germany as well as Scandinavia one not even wastes a thought of whether to mutilate a baby boy or not! What a difficult confession it therefore was for my American husband to tell me that he was not whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 , Are you implying that traditional societies didn't circumcise? I don't know about other areas of the world, but it isn't the case in Africa. In Kenya, IIRC, only 2 out of over 30 tribes don't circumcise. Circumcision is done as a rite of passage into manhood (or womanhood, since they also cicumsise girls). If you're not circumcised, you're not considered a man. This is an aside, but it's an interesting story: While I was in Kenya, they had their first democratic elections. One of the candidates was a man in his 60s or 70s who was from one of the tribes that didn't circumcise. From my perspective, he seemed like a possible contender. One day I was talking to a Kenyan brother and sister who were among the more privileged and well-educated Kenyans. They told me that this man would never, absolutely never, be elected as president because noone would vote for a man who was uncircumcised. They said Kenya would be the laughing stock of Africa if it had a " boy " for president! It didn't matter that he was an older man; he was still considered a boy in the eyes of most Kenyans. (I pondered how this is never an issue during US elections!) How prevalent is male cicumcision around the world? Does anyone know how it came to be outside of the Judeo/Christian tradition? > There is ample writing that says the practice was > instituted *because* it reduced pleasure for the male, not just for > safety reasons. And we wonder why America, with a still high but > declining percentage of circumcised boys, is the way it is. This is > just not a pleasant way to start your life - in fact it is rather > barbaric. I think we can take a cue from traditional societies > here... if you don't have to cut something off, don't. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 In a message dated 5/21/03 11:10:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, SbrHaub@... writes: > I would not call circumcision a Christian tradition, it is solely a Jewish > custom. Europe has a mostly Christian heritage and circumcision is almost > unheard of. At least in Austria and Germany as well as Scandinavia one not > even > wastes a thought of whether to mutilate a baby boy or not! What a difficult > > confession it therefore was for my American husband to tell me that he was > not > whole. And I'd bet during the Middle Ages circumcision wouldn't earn you too much respect in a Christian community! Might land you on the stake at some points. Chris " To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. " --Theodore Roosevelt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 wrote on Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:48 AM << How prevalent is male circumcision around the world? Does anyone know how it came to be outside of the Judeo/Christian tradition?>> well... the whole of the Moslem world circumcise their males thought hardly ever as babies... traditionally it's been done when the boys reach 13 yrs of age though nowadays a lot of them are 'done' earlier at about the age of 7... similarly, in Africa where it is very wide spread, it's done as part of the initiation into manhood/womanhood, in early to mid 'teenagehood'... in Africa it's part of their tradition regardless of their religion... here in the UK, the late princess was criticised for not allowing her tow boys to be circumcised as is the norm with the royal family, the aristocracy and upper classes... going by numbers alone, it would seem that at least half of the male population of this planet is circumcised! Dedy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 I am not in favor of circumcision, but it is not solely a Jewish custom. I am pretty sure there are Moslem groups, and other societies in Africa that do it, too. Actually, there are many traditional societies that unfortunately ritually mutilate their members (not a pun) in some way. If you think male circumcision is bad, look up female circumcision, which is very common in the middle east/Africa. (And no, it is not a Jewish custom) It's pretty nasty, so I won't describe it here. Robin From: SbrHaub@... Reply- Subject: Re: Re: circumcision in traditional societies Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 23:08:44 EDT I would not call circumcision a Christian tradition, it is solely a Jewish custom. Europe has a mostly Christian heritage and circumcision is almost unheard of. At least in Austria and Germany as well as Scandinavia one not even wastes a thought of whether to mutilate a baby boy or not! What a difficult confession it therefore was for my American husband to tell me that he was not whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 However, people in western societies do pierce their ears, wear high heels, etc. They have worn corsets --which damage your internal organs--, burned witches, and operated on people for " masturbatory insanity " . In the United State, they still operate on girl babies whose genitals are " too big " . Noone's perfect. From: ChrisMasterjohn@... Reply- Subject: Re: Re: circumcision in traditional societies Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 06:02:54 EDT In a message dated 5/21/03 11:10:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, SbrHaub@... writes: > I would not call circumcision a Christian tradition, it is solely a Jewish > custom. Europe has a mostly Christian heritage and circumcision is almost > unheard of. At least in Austria and Germany as well as Scandinavia one not > even > wastes a thought of whether to mutilate a baby boy or not! What a difficult > > confession it therefore was for my American husband to tell me that he was > not > whole. And I'd bet during the Middle Ages circumcision wouldn't earn you too much respect in a Christian community! Might land you on the stake at some points. Chris " To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. " --Theodore Roosevelt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 Does anyone know why male infant circumcision became so prevalent in the US? > I would not call circumcision a Christian tradition, it is solely a Jewish > custom. Europe has a mostly Christian heritage and circumcision is almost > unheard of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 In a message dated 5/22/2003 1:49:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Dpdg@... writes: > well... the whole of the Moslem world circumcise their males thought hardly > ever as babies... traditionally it's been done when the boys reach 13 yrs of > age though nowadays a lot of them are 'done' earlier at about the age of > 7... > similarly, in Africa where it is very wide spread, it's done as part of the > initiation into manhood/womanhood, in early to mid 'teenagehood'... in Africa > it's part of their tradition regardless of their religion... > > here in the UK, the late princess was criticised for not allowing her > tow boys to be circumcised as is the norm with the royal family, the > aristocracy and upper classes... > > going by numbers alone, it would seem that at least half of the male > population of this planet is circumcised! > > Dedy > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 Hi, Well, I wasn't saying it was never done, because i was familiar with both male and female circumcision in Africa, but I believe that worldwide it is a minority practice. But I'm not an expert on the subject. I don't have a quote to prove this, but I am fairly certain the practice became widespread in America in the late 1800s because of n morality its proscriptions against pleasure. Also, I believe that 1971 was the peak of circumcision in America. This is probably due to a combination of demographics and questioning parents. I don't know if someone has already posted this link, but here's a lot of info: http://www.eskimo.com/~gburlin/mgm/facts.html " Current national rates: Australia 15%(1), Canada 20%(2), the United States 60%(3) " And: " Globally, 20% of male children will be subjected to some form of non-medically indicated genital mutilation. " Cheers, > , > Are you implying that traditional societies didn't circumcise? I > don't know about other areas of the world, but it isn't the case in > Africa. In Kenya, IIRC, only 2 out of over 30 tribes don't > circumcise. > > Circumcision is done as a rite of passage into manhood (or womanhood, > since they also cicumsise girls). If you're not circumcised, you're > not considered a man. > > This is an aside, but it's an interesting story: While I was in > Kenya, they had their first democratic elections. One of the > candidates was a man in his 60s or 70s who was from one of the tribes > that didn't circumcise. From my perspective, he seemed like a > possible contender. One day I was talking to a Kenyan brother and > sister who were among the more privileged and well-educated Kenyans. > > They told me that this man would never, absolutely never, be elected > as president because noone would vote for a man who was > uncircumcised. They said Kenya would be the laughing stock of Africa > if it had a " boy " for president! It didn't matter that he was an > older man; he was still considered a boy in the eyes of most > Kenyans. (I pondered how this is never an issue during US elections!) > > How prevalent is male cicumcision around the world? Does anyone know > how it came to be outside of the Judeo/Christian tradition? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2003 Report Share Posted May 22, 2003 >Does anyone know why male infant circumcision became so prevalent in >the US? > > I think part of it had to do with some studies relating non-circumcision to increases in certain types of cancer and STD's, plus a general desire to be " cleaner " in the '50s. (same era white bread was introduced!). -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2003 Report Share Posted May 23, 2003 In a message dated 5/22/03 10:41:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time, lm324@... writes: > Does anyone know why male infant circumcision became so prevalent in > the US? No, but it is an interesting fact that circumcision is a multi-billion dollar industry, and the SALE OF FORSKIN is a multi-million dollar industry, as it is used in certain kind of bandages! Chris " To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. " --Theodore Roosevelt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.