Guest guest Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 > > Hi all, > > I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right knee - where I have > Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first wanted to hold off > until I had about 7 weeks of PT. > My question is - is it better to have local or general anesthesia > (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about 1 hour). He is > recommending general. I am looking for a quick recovery but also > would rather not know what is going on during surgery (don't need to > see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? > > Thanks ! > Jane Wow you are one lucky girl... My doctor is having me wait a year for a scope and I have grade III/IV!! Waiting 7 weeks for me would be a miracle! I don't know much about anestesia though I've never had any surgery on my knee yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 Hi Jane Glad you asked this question because I'm in the same boat as you. My scope is scheduled for October (I postponed it due not wanting to be crippled for the summer) The pre-app nurse told me it would be general anaesthetic not local. I'm sure i've read on this forum people actively conversing with their surgeon while he/she is poking around with the camera. I thought a knee scope could be done witht a local? I think I want to be awake for this. Anesthesia for arthscopy Hi all, I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right knee - where I have Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first wanted to hold off until I had about 7 weeks of PT. My question is - is it better to have local or general anesthesia (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about 1 hour). He is recommending general. I am looking for a quick recovery but also would rather not know what is going on during surgery (don't need to see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? Thanks ! Jane Boston, MA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 My doc wouldn't even do a local. I was all too happy to wake up when it was over. Don On 6/28/06, jd12622003 <jd12622003@...> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right knee - where I have > Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first wanted to hold off > until I had about 7 weeks of PT. > My question is - is it better to have local or general anesthesia > (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about 1 hour). He is > recommending general. I am looking for a quick recovery but also > would rather not know what is going on during surgery (don't need to > see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? > > Thanks ! > Jane > Boston, MA > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 I don't know whether they do this for your operation, but for my partial meniscectomy last Friday I had " light anesthesia " . I was totally out, but they didn't have to stick a tube all the way down my throat & help me breathe, just down to the larynx -- no sore throat. Also I woke up quickly (they put caffeine in the drip?) and they added some kinda anti-nausea stuff to the drip. I felt a little queasy but didn't throw up. I never felt out of it or like I needed to go back to sleep like I've done with deep anesthesias in previous operations. Another interesting thing they did for the nausea was put an " acupuncture " band on my wrist that sent an electric charge into the right spot and by God it actually stopped the queasiness! A little caveat: I have syringomyelia (cavities inside the spinal cord that are filled with spinal fluid -- they may or may not be symptomatic -- mine aren't -- I found out about them because I got a spine MRI once -- I keep getting them checked because if they get too filled with fluid, they can compress your spinal nerves & you can get paralyzed -- irrelevant to this discussion but I always need to tell the whole story). If an anesthesiologist knows you have syringomyelia they won't give you a caudal/spinal and for very good reason. I don't know how they guide the needle to the subarachnoid space for anesthesia on a normal person, but on someone with syringomyelia, it must be a lot more difficult to be sure you're in the subarachnoid space and not IN THE SPINAL CORD ITSELF or in the spinal-fluid-filled cavity. I talked to an anesthesiologist about this once & asked if maybe the reason some people end up paralyzed from spinal anesthesia is they have an unknown syrinx (the space) & he said it could be. Therefore, unless you know for certain that you don't have syringomyelia, I highly recommend that you not get a spinal/caudal. They CAN do a nerve block, but when they operate on the knee, they use a really tight tourniquet & they say that makes your leg hurt even with the nerve block. Also, some people end up paralyzed from a nerve block. I think the light anesthesia is the best way to go. Least pain, least risk. Ann Anesthesia for arthscopy Hi all, I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right knee - where I have Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first wanted to hold off until I had about 7 weeks of PT. My question is - is it better to have local or general anesthesia (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about 1 hour). He is recommending general. I am looking for a quick recovery but also would rather not know what is going on during surgery (don't need to see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? Thanks ! Jane Boston, MA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 Hi , I'm sure you'll get all sorts of answers and all are worth thinking about. I've had two knee surgeries. One was with general anesthesia and one was with an epidural. By far, I liked the epidural much better. Coming out of the general was a bit disorienting, but not horrible. For me, I liked the epidural because I was awake the whole time, talked to the OS and the anesthesiologist the whole time, and by the time they wheeled me to the recovery room I was getting feeling back in my toes and I was walking out of there in less than 2 hours. I enjoyed seeing the procedure and felt a lot more " ownership " if you will, of my knee and it's problems. The surgeon was very gracious about explaining the different parts of the knee (the good, the bad and the ugly) and in short, I guess I was sort of fascinated by the whole thing. I had no nausea, no headache, no lack of appetite after (hmmm, maybe that wasn't a good thing <smile>) and was able to ask for the right amount of pain meds. By the time I got home I was as clear as could be, whereas with the general I was just about out of it for the next three days. Lots of caveats here.......if you are adverse to the process of the surgery (i.e. kinda freaked out) ask for more " sleepy " drugs. The anesthesiologist told me that I could be as awake or as asleep as I wanted. If the surgery is more extensive (mine was a cleanout/ " looksee " and a lateral release) the surgeon may want you under a general. My first operation involved the arthroscopic microfracture technique and since that involves more concentrated effort on the surgeon's part, I doubt he wanted me aware and asking stupid questions. Some people are better candidates for general, some are better candidates for an epidural. Talk to your doctor about it and see what he prefers. Good luck...when's the surgery date so we can cheer you on?? nne Re: Anesthesia for arthscopy > > Hi all, > > I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right knee - where I have > Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first wanted to hold off > until I had about 7 weeks of PT. > My question is - is it better to have local or general anesthesia > (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about 1 hour). He is > recommending general. I am looking for a quick recovery but also > would rather not know what is going on during surgery (don't need to > see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? > > Thanks ! > Jane Wow you are one lucky girl... My doctor is having me wait a year for a scope and I have grade III/IV!! Waiting 7 weeks for me would be a miracle! I don't know much about anestesia though I've never had any surgery on my knee yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 Thanks for your responses. I know that with " general " , it can take a long timefor the anestesia to get out of your system and can leave you feeling very tired for weeks after the surgery. I would prefer to be asleep but also want a quick recovery time. Jane --- Don Franck <panteradon@...> wrote: > My doc wouldn't even do a local. I was all too > happy to wake up when it was > over. > > Don > > > On 6/28/06, jd12622003 <jd12622003@...> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right > knee - where I have > > Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first > wanted to hold off > > until I had about 7 weeks of PT. > > My question is - is it better to have local or > general anesthesia > > (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about > 1 hour). He is > > recommending general. I am looking for a quick > recovery but also > > would rather not know what is going on during > surgery (don't need to > > see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? > > > > Thanks ! > > Jane > > Boston, MA > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 This " light " anesthesia I had last Friday -- my wake-up time was instantaneous. I was a little high on the pain drug, but fully awake. I wasn't tired the next day, either. I don't know exactly what " light " anesthesia means, but whatever it is, it's not heavy enough to require that they intubate you (i.e. very small risk of stopping breathing). I did have to ask for it, though. No one has ever volunteered it. Ann Re: Anesthesia for arthscopy Thanks for your responses. I know that with " general " , it can take a long timefor the anestesia to get out of your system and can leave you feeling very tired for weeks after the surgery. I would prefer to be asleep but also want a quick recovery time. Jane --- Don Franck <panteradon@...> wrote: > My doc wouldn't even do a local. I was all too > happy to wake up when it was > over. > > Don > > > On 6/28/06, jd12622003 <jd12622003@...> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right > knee - where I have > > Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first > wanted to hold off > > until I had about 7 weeks of PT. > > My question is - is it better to have local or > general anesthesia > > (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about > 1 hour). He is > > recommending general. I am looking for a quick > recovery but also > > would rather not know what is going on during > surgery (don't need to > > see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? > > > > Thanks ! > > Jane > > Boston, MA > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 I have had other surgeries (sinus for one) where they said I would need to be kept awake, but would remember little afterwards. It was a not unpleasant experience (even though I remember somewhat waking up and seeing the doctor pounding on a chisel up my nose . I agree it was nice to be almost totally awake coming out of the operating room. I have never asked for it in a knee operation, and no one has offered it. Mike MT Re: Anesthesia for arthscopy Thanks for your responses. I know that with " general " , it can take a long timefor the anestesia to get out of your system and can leave you feeling very tired for weeks after the surgery. I would prefer to be asleep but also want a quick recovery time. Jane --- Don Franck <panteradon@...> wrote: > My doc wouldn't even do a local. I was all too > happy to wake up when it was > over. > > Don > > > On 6/28/06, jd12622003 <jd12622003@...> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right > knee - where I have > > Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first > wanted to hold off > > until I had about 7 weeks of PT. > > My question is - is it better to have local or > general anesthesia > > (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about > 1 hour). He is > > recommending general. I am looking for a quick > recovery but also > > would rather not know what is going on during > surgery (don't need to > > see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? > > > > Thanks ! > > Jane > > Boston, MA > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 My sister in law just had a hip replacement done with an epidural rather than full anesthesia. Hard to imagine really and she was really concerned she would remember the sound of them cutting off her leg (gasp). But she came out and didn't remember a thing. Philip - http://www.xcskiwinn.org/community/blogs/panmanphil/default.aspx Re: Anesthesia for arthscopy Thanks for your responses. I know that with " general " , it can take a long timefor the anestesia to get out of your system and can leave you feeling very tired for weeks after the surgery. I would prefer to be asleep but also want a quick recovery time. Jane --- Don Franck <panteradon@...> wrote: > My doc wouldn't even do a local. I was all too > happy to wake up when it was > over. > > Don > > > On 6/28/06, jd12622003 <jd12622003@...> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have finally agreed to have a scope of my right > knee - where I have > > Grade 2-3. My doc is very, very good and at first > wanted to hold off > > until I had about 7 weeks of PT. > > My question is - is it better to have local or > general anesthesia > > (sp ?) for this procedure (supposed to take about > 1 hour). He is > > recommending general. I am looking for a quick > recovery but also > > would rather not know what is going on during > surgery (don't need to > > see it on a T.V. screen). Any recommendations ? > > > > Thanks ! > > Jane > > Boston, MA > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Re: Anesthesia for arthscopy I have had other surgeries (sinus for one) where they said I would need to be kept awake, but would remember little afterwards. That's when you start wondering whether you're out at all or they just give you an amnesia drug to make you forget the torture. It was a not unpleasant experience (even though I remember somewhat waking up and seeing the doctor pounding on a chisel up my nose . Hey -- that does sound like fun. I agree it was nice to be almost totally awake coming out of the operating room. I have never asked for it in a knee operation, and no one has offered it. They didn't offer it to me for this one, I just thought about it & brought it up & voila! They said " Sure! " Ann Mike MT You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Unsubscribe New Message Search Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved message search. Share feedback on the new changes to Groups Recent Activity a.. 2New Members b.. 2New Links Visit Your Group Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 I wonder how they do that selective amnesia thing. They told me when I woke up that I probably wouldn't remember most of the transition period. I do remember what happened after that though, except for the name of the wonderful pain drug. Or -- do I? Who's to say? I remember the names of 2 nurses, and I'm really bad with names. I remember telling a male nurse he was cute. I remember recommending the pain med to anyone that came within 10 ft. I really do think I remembered the whole recovery thing that they told me I'd forget. I took it as a challenge. Ann Re: Anesthesia for arthscopy My sister in law just had a hip replacement done with an epidural rather than full anesthesia. Hard to imagine really and she was really concerned she would remember the sound of them cutting off her leg (gasp). But she came out and didn't remember a thing. Philip - http://www.xcskiwinn.org/community/blogs/panmanphil/default.aspx __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.