Guest guest Posted April 30, 2009 Report Share Posted April 30, 2009 , I just want to say that there is nothing nutritional in soy milk and it would be better for you to not even culture it. It has so many anti-nutrients that it would take a heck of a long time to culture anything good into it. It surely is not good for children due to the high levels of estrogen in it. This goes for all soy not just the milk. Sorry, just had to give my two cents on that. I've researched it until I'm blue in the face due to a soy allergy and found out all sorts of horrible things about it. There are many sites out there that preach about the dangers of soy. The Westin Price Foundation is one of them along with Dr. Mercola's website. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 > > , > I just want to say that there is nothing nutritional in soy milk and it would be better for you to not even culture it. It has so many anti-nutrients that it would take a heck of a long time to culture anything good into it. It surely is not good for children due to the high levels of estrogen in it. This goes for all soy not just the milk. > > Sorry, just had to give my two cents on that. I've researched it until I'm blue in the face due to a soy allergy and found out all sorts of horrible things about it. There are many sites out there that preach about the dangers of soy. The Westin Price Foundation is one of them along with Dr. Mercola's website. > > - > , I think much of our allergies might be because of some early exposure, or adaptation along the way of our food habits, or environmental changes. Maybe because you are allergic to Soy food so you do watch out and avoid it. I can drink soy milk until I'm blue in the face and still don't have any problem with it, both literally and figuratively. I would love to read up on any good tips, or experience on soy milk kefir from folks who have tried it. I may even try to make some fermented soybean paste and soy sauce for the first time this year. It really is beans overgrown with fungus, preserved in salt water (1 part salt, 4-5 parts water by weight). That may sound gross, but it is not much different than how blue cheese, or other cheese is made. Here in the U.S., with Chloramine (bleach and amonia cocktail, anyone???) in tap water, that can't be boiled away, I'm not sure boiled tap water is any good in the body short term, or long term. Not sure what kind of reaction it causes to our body with various food we eat. Jimmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 Thanks, Jimmy! I get tired of people reminding me of the dangers of soy, when I am of your opinion, that it is bad for those who are allergic to it (just like milk would be for those allergic to it, or wheat or anything else). I went off soy for 2 weeks to test the reaction on my son, now I'm going off milk for the same reason. And the estrogen in soy is phytoestrogen, which the body can use or discard as needed, not like the synthetic stuff prescribed by doctors. I am using organic, non-GMO soybeans, and when I mentioned to my naturopathic doctor (who also warned me against too much soy), that I make my own soy milk and tofu out of organic soy beans, she seemed very pleased. I rarely use any processed soy products (think veggie meats), because I now can make my own out of the soy fiber or tofu, and it's a whole lot cheaper. So.... anyone else have an answer to my original question? Or am I the only one who has ever tried culturing soy kefir? BTW, I'm not positive yet (I don't have a plastic tablespoon to measure with) but it seems my soy kefir grains really are growing. Give me a week and I'll know more for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 I just want to clarify, I only found out how bad unfermented soy is when I researched it due to an allergy. It is not only people who are allergic to it but everybody that it effects. It is extremely high in estrogens and anti-nutrients and can keep your body from absorbing calcium...amoung many other issues. As long as it is fermented there are added benefits; but, some believe that it is so full of anti-nutrients that it would take an act of Congress to get anything good put into it. I was not making a statement based upon my previous allergy (although it is one of the top 10 food allergens) I was making a statement based upon the reasearch I had done into it and finding such negative properties regarding it in its natural state. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 Thank you for warning the folks here on the danger of soy. My two cents is that is has never made the GRAS list. GRAS = Generally Recognized As Safe. It is not on that list and never will be. That's because it is not safe. It may take decades for some people, but it WILL eventually trash your thyroid gland. IMHO you are much better off with Almond " milk " . Milk being in quotes because almonds don't have an udder. Marilyn On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Estrello <majalove888@...>wrote: > I just want to clarify, I only found out how bad unfermented soy is when I > researched it due to an allergy. It is not only people who are allergic to > it but everybody that it effects. It is extremely high in estrogens and > anti-nutrients and can keep your body from absorbing calcium...amoung many > other issues. As long as it is fermented there are added benefits; but, > some believe that it is so full of anti-nutrients that it would take an act > of Congress to get anything good put into it. I was not making a statement > based upon my previous allergy (although it is one of the top 10 food > allergens) I was making a statement based upon the reasearch I had done into > it and finding such negative properties regarding it in its natural state. > > - > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2009 Report Share Posted May 1, 2009 THANKS!!! I really appreciate this. I, too, have done research on soy and hate it that so many use it without knowing the true " cons " . Texas Thank you for warning the folks here on the danger of soy. My two cents is that is has never made the GRAS list. GRAS = Generally Recognized As Safe. It is not on that list and never will be. That's because it is not safe. It may take decades for some people, but it WILL eventually trash your thyroid gland. IMHO you are much better off with Almond " milk " . Milk being in quotes because almonds don't have an udder. Marilyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 > > > I just want to clarify, I only found out how bad unfermented soy is when I > > researched it due to an allergy. It is not only people who are allergic to > > it but everybody that it effects. It is extremely high in estrogens and > > anti-nutrients and can keep your body from absorbing calcium...amoung many > > other issues. As long as it is fermented there are added benefits; but, > > some believe that it is so full of anti-nutrients that it would take an act > > of Congress to get anything good put into it. I was not making a statement > > based upon my previous allergy (although it is one of the top 10 food > > allergens) I was making a statement based upon the reasearch I had done into > > it and finding such negative properties regarding it in its natural state. > > > > - > > > > > , Eastern veggetarians, including virtually all Asian buhdist monks, live entirely on veggetation, most won't even touch animal milk or eggs. After various combination of rice (main stapples), soy products (mostly self-made) would probably take a reasonably large daily portion (soy milk, fermented beans and curds, or cooked long enough until soften). Of course they eat lots of other fresh or fermented veggetables as well as other fresh and dried beans, too. I definitely say GMO soybeans are the pseudo science that should be declared SIFDCAS (Some Industry Funded Doctors Claim as Safe). I even read about some law suit about GMO crops cross-polination to (hence, contaminating) near-by fields and GMO license holder wanted the field owners to pay a licence for growing those or have to destroy their crop. I would hate to see various government making claims about food and drugs that they don't know much about just because they listen to the type of researchers that simply do " baloney research " on people who drink " 1/2 glass of wine a day is healthier vs. those who don't " which turns into " 1/2 glass of alcoholic beverage " (could mean entirely different thing), or some ridiculus thing like " people who eat 1 oz. of chocolate a day has healthier heart " . They don't even care to mention how many people participated and how long they observe those people or what dozen of other things they eat. Just because they have a PhD. doesn't mean I respect them all. That's exactly how some U.S. States passed laws favoring the various Milk industry lobby groups calling for the banning of raw milk. Now they have the Federal government buddy of theirs approved such things as X-ray radiated meat as well as cloned meat in the stores that we don't know anything about the long term affects. Of course all their paid researchers claim that it is safe. Probably as safe as when their paid PhD's claim with tobaco products. There are plenty of other problems in our food chain these days, to name a few: food coloring, high fructose corn syrup in sweet food, MSG in virtually every commercial meals and salty snacks (for those allergic to MSG). There's also peanut, gluten allergies... As for food, I think the U.S. overdose ourselves with milk, cow, pig, and (federally subsidized) corn products. I have read insinuation of growth hormone, antibiotics in milk and meat, that gross me out. Milk is also insinuated for early puberty problems. About food, the U.S. has over abbundant of food and that turn into the overweigh problem because of mindless eating, or brain washed from the early age by cartoon ads about coco puffs, chocolate milk, sugar loaded breakfast, to the sexual inuendo of " milk, it's good for you " ads. Not that other countries don't have similar problems, but I don't think I see a 600-pound (or even 200 pound) chronically starving person in Asia, or Africa. Sorry if this offend anyone but I do see picture a cow (chick fillet ads may strengthen that mental note) whenever I see a 300+ pound person on " the biggest looser " tv show, that's just my own reminder to not over eating, especially when it comes to 16oz. or 24oz. steak, or overloading on dairy, or cakes. I have to admit, in Asia, it is the sight of huge pigs (200-300 pounder) that people there associated with overweigh problems. My food moto has been take things in moderation. Jimmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 > > THANKS!!! I really appreciate this. I, too, have done research on soy > and hate it that so many use it without knowing the true " cons " . > > > Texas > > > Thank you for warning the folks here on the danger of soy. My two > cents is that is has never made the GRAS list. GRAS = Generally Recognized > As Safe. It is not on that list and never will be. That's because it is not > safe. It may take decades for some people, but it WILL eventually trash your > thyroid gland. IMHO you are much better off with Almond " milk " . Milk being > in quotes because almonds don't have an udder. > > Marilyn > I definitely don't care for the commercialized soy milk with vanila, chocolate, strawberry additives. I prefer the home made version, although I still have to worry about GMO soy beans. If you think you don't like soy milk, let's see how you see milk after reading the following. Just stumbled on this, government in some places have talked about banning whole milk? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/children_shealth/3339768/Now-Nanny-bans-the-ha\ rd-stuff.html http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2006/05/28/why_ban_whole_milk.php About milk, here are something you may want to read and see of the powerful industrial companies that will meddle with our food chain: http://www1.american.edu/TED/milk.htm http://www1.american.edu/projects/mandala/TED/SOYBEAN.HTM I do know one thing is the dairy industry powerful lobbying for laws that ban the use of the word " milk " in soy milk is way over the top In most languages, the term " soy milk " has been there for ages. I imagine they have other tricks under their sleeves, too. so I wouldn't be surprise of any negative research done on soy milk. Here are some titbits: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1227805491.html http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-4668251.html Everything below are about milk, found at: http://everything2.com/title/Milk ... word bought ™-end and ©-ed by the Dairy industry so that no one else may use the term. (This is true as far as I know in the US and Australia. As for other countries I don't know, but it does explain why no soy milk can use the term " milk " in its product name. E.g. " Soy Dream " , " Soy Drink " , " Soy Delight " ...) ... 2. bs says " cows which have been pumped up with human growth hormone, which is just really gross to me. " Well, nope. Cows are pumped up with BST, an acromy for Bovine SomatoTropine, which is a cow growth hormone, and legal in the United States, but not in the European Union, although the US wants to push it into our throats during every GATT discussions and threatens with sanctions. Besides, there's more BST remaining in the meat than in the milk. Maybe even more doubtful is the use of the vaccination/immunization treatments of the livestock which is correlated (a statistically significant positive relation) to the ever increasing occurence of milk protein allergy because of the transferred antibodies via the milk (uhm, researchers think it's the antibodies to blame, they're not 100% sure about that). ... " Don't Drink Your Milk! " is a small book written by the late Oski, M.D. as mentioned above. He maintained that bovine milk was not only unnecessary for humans but also actually harmful. Many other experts agree that cow's milk is a nasty secretion best reserved for calves (who by the way are removed from their mothers so we can have their milk). Dr. Mercola lists the following problems which he attributes to consumption of cow's milk: " iron deficiency anemia, allergies, diarrhea, heart disease, colic, cramps, gastrointestinal bleeding, sinusitis, skin rashes, acne, arthritis, diabetes, ear infections, osteoporosis, asthma, autoimmune diseases and possibly even lung cancer, multiple sclerosis and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. " The federal government subsidizes the dairy industry in the US. The US Department of Agriculture donated $200 million in 1999 to the dairy industry despite the fact that the cost of milk is at an all time high. The US WIC program includes milk and milk products as part of the food package they distribute regardless of the ability of the client to digest it. US schools (that receive federal monies) are required by law to put milk on every lunch tray unless the parents provide a doctor's excuse note to not do this. The natural age of weaning in humans is somewhere between 2.5 and 7 years as determined by research done by K. Dettwyler, an anthropologist and contributing author and editor of " Breastfeeding; Biocultural Perspectives " . Most people in the world become lactose intolerant as they grow past the natural age of weaning. Breastmilk is higher in lactose than any other milk so babies are not born lactose intolerant. Cow's milk does not deserve a special spot in the Food Pyramid. All the nutrients we get from milk can be had from other foods and sunshine without the medical problems caused by milk. At best, milk should be viewed as a treat, not an essential nutrient. Commercial interests dictate government policy and the attitude that we need milk filters on down to become a deeply held belief. Don't drink your milk. SOURCES: http://www.pcrm.org/news/issues040618_alert.html http://www.pcrm.org/health/VSK/VSK6.html http://www.mercola.com/article/milk/no_milk.htm http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0945383347/104-9279229-2060721?v=g\ lance http://articles.animalconcerns.org/ar-voices/archive/dont_drink.html http://www.notmilk.com/ http://www.mydr.com.au/default.asp?article=3775 (shows need for other sources of calcium) Jimmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.