Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Lol, I think you are still seeing it backwards, not everyone has the luxury of foreign travel. But if they do, they can choose where to go & whether or not to vaccinate. I recently asked my husband what he would do if the airline industry or the gov suddenly required vax. His answer- he'd hire a lawyer! No one can force vaccination, there are always options. Can't afford a lawyer? Make a bold and loud statement by changing careers. A job assignment? Switch with someone who believes in vax. Out of curiousity, anyone know of any penalties for forged vax records? I would think with so many new requirents that forged vax records would be big business. Toni Moslemi Mom to Cyrus 1991, Darius 1998, Remington Rose 2004 & Willow 3/21/09 Sent from my iPhone Nmidaughterseyes@... On Sep 20, 2009, at 4:14 PM, " trying2bnatural " <c68libra@...> wrote: I am sorry, I stand corrected - there is only one required vaccination for travel, the rest are " recommended " : Required Vaccinations The only vaccine required by International Health Regulations is yellow fever vaccination for travel to certain countries in sub-Saharan Africa and tropical South America. Meningococcal vaccination is required by the government of Saudi Arabia for annual travel during the Hajj. > > The other issue is, not all of us have the luxury of avoiding vaccinations - for instance, if you travel to other countries, then you have to get those vaccinations. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Actually what you referenced (well not actually since you didn't provide a link) shows two vaccines which are required, not one. Plus, and this is very important because, just as schools leave out any mention of exemptions when making claims about requirements for school entry, information about exemptions should be included when making statements about vaccines required for travel: (http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2010/chapter-2/yellow-fever.aspx) " Exemption from Vaccination and Waiver Letters Some countries do not require an ICVP for infants younger than a certain age (e.g., <6 months, <9 months, or <1 year of age, depending on the country). Age requirements for vaccination for individual countries can be found in the Yellow Fever Vaccine Requirements and Recommendations section in this chapter. For medical contraindications, a physician who has decided to issue a waiver should fill out and sign the Medical Contraindications to Vaccination section of the ICVP (Figure 2-2). The physician should also— Give the traveler a signed and dated exemption letter on the physician’s letterhead stationery, clearly stating the contraindications to vaccination and bearing the stamp used by the yellow fever vaccination centers to validate the ICVP. Inform the traveler of any increased risk of yellow fever infection associated with nonvaccination and how to minimize this risk by using mosquito protection measures. Reasons other than medical contraindications are not acceptable for exemption from vaccination. The traveler should be advised that issuance of a waiver does not guarantee its acceptance by the destination country. On arrival at the destination, the traveler may be faced with quarantine, refusal of entry, or vaccination on site. To potentially improve the likelihood of acceptance of a waiver upon arrival at the destination country, the provider can suggest that the traveler take the following additional measures before initiating travel: Obtain specific and authoritative advice from the embassy or consulate of the country or countries he or she plans to visit. Request documentation of requirements for waivers from embassies or consulates and retain these along with the completed Medical Contraindication to Vaccination section of the ICVP. " And if you read more on this site, you will also see that additional information, including a list of countries which require the vaccine for entry if you have been to a country " with risk of yellow fever transmission”AND an interesting third option: " Travelers who arrive in a country with a yellow fever vaccination entry requirement without proof of yellow fever vaccination may be quarantined up to 6 days. " So, vaccinate, present a medical exemption or be quarantined. NOT a simple " vaccines are required " or not. Winnie Re: Nursing school forcing me to get the flu vaccine. Vaccinations > I am sorry, I stand corrected - there is only one required > vaccination for travel, the rest are " recommended " : > > Required Vaccinations > > The only vaccine required by International Health Regulations is > yellow fever vaccination for travel to certain countries in sub- > Saharan Africa and tropical South America. Meningococcal > vaccination is required by the government of Saudi Arabia for > annual travel during the Hajj. > > > > > > The other issue is, not all of us have the luxury of avoiding > vaccinations - for instance, if you travel to other countries, > then you have to get those vaccinations. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 I am educating myself and simply am presenting the devil's advocate position and am interested to see the reactions! I am also educating myself, I thought, by being a part of this group. But, I was warned it was " out there " by another holistic mother and I can see why. A lot of the " education " I see on here is not necessarily helpful to an educated person, such as myself. Rather, many use the same scare tactics that your opponents do. It is not typically a helpful strategy, rather a turn-off. All I can do is give feedback and my opinion. You can give yours. I will admit if I have misintrepreted or otherwise. I have not vaccinated my 15 mth dd. I do not plan to. But, many thousands and millions of people have vaccinated and a majority have done " okay " - those are the facts and you cannot argue with those. I am not saying that vaccinations are not harmful or do not contain harmful materials but I hear a lot of people saying things about medical professionals that are not true and sound rather " Rush Limbaugh-ish " in their reviews and opinions. Many of you may have a valid reason for being pissed off at the medical community but the comments I have read are sophomoric and extreme. It isn't convincing me or education me. I don't need convincing, but if that is what you are trying to do - some of you - may want to consider your approach. Also, Dr. Mercola is a rather respected MD who has carried out tons of research and literature reviews on vaccinations, alternative and natural medicine and otherwise. It was his link that said if you have to get vaccinated there is a way to try to treat yourself after the vaccination. There are also other persons trying to give such advice. I plan to keep myself in the group a bit longer to see what I can learn and I appreciate the dialogue. > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate him/herself a bit. > It is great to participate in these discussions, but before giving > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate information behind it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 I often wonder about people who are working in the medical profession and are ant-vax. Are you not required to give vax, and if you do does that not make for a problem on conscience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Hi Lets take on the point about people who get vaccinated and do okay. I don't like to assume anything, but I will assume you mean they were not harmed in any way. That may be true. You never know if slight damage has been done or not. If a child was of a certain intelligence, how could one know if he/she wouldn't have been a little higher on the intelligence scale? However if the child is not damaged at all, that's good, but it doesn't mean the child was prevented from getting any disease. The whole vaccination scheme is based on conclusions not proof. It works like this. You take the polio vaccine. You don't get polio. Therefore you didn't get polio because of the vaccine. There is absolutely no proof of that conclusion. Then there were the 40 million kids like me back in 1954 who NEVER took a polio vaccine and never got polio. I don't argue with anybody about their conclusions. I just put my money where my mouth is. I will pay anyone 5,000.00 for proof that any vaccine ever prevented any disease. I am not sure what you say people are saying about Allopaths that are not true, but as far as I am concerned, outside of trauma and crises the Allopaths are not only useless but dangerous. They kill about three or four hundred thousand people every year. They call it iatrogenics. That's because they treat symptoms and not causes. And that's because they are ignorant of the cause of disease and health. What amazes me is how so many people build their disease after many years of a wrong lifestyle and than run to an Allopath to be given a drug which they foolishly believe will restore them to health. I am sorry to hear you state that people on this list are immature and extreme. Perhaps you have not had a child ruined for life or die, and the family torn apart because of the barbaric practice of blood poisoning. If you did I am sure you would be singing a different tune. In my personal experience it is usually the formally educated that lack clear thinking and intelligence. They are usually brainwashed. You have probably ran into a few yourself. You know the person who is trying to think of an answer and the Rolodex is revolving around to find the page or chapter of their school book to parrot an answer. As far as being pissed off at the medical profession, I can't speak for anyone else, but I have no problem admitting that. I think you would be pissed off if they killed your child, wouldn't you? I see nothing extreme about my view. one day this profession will go down as the most ignorant group of all professions. Hopefully a few will rot in jail. Any person, no matter who, that advocates a person to take a poison into their baby's body and says there is a way to treat or prevent damage is either not thinking or doesn't understand what makes a body healthy and what makes a body sick. Good luck in your search for truth. Jim O' Founder of S.I.N.B.A.D. Shots in body's are dangerous Healthologist . This word is not in the dictionary. That's because Allopaths study disease in order to explain health. If that makes no sense, it is typical of the Allopathic profession. Graduated from the School of Hard Knocks Certified in CS not BS ________________________________ From: trying2bnatural <c68libra@...> Vaccinations Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 10:39:35 PM Subject: Re: Nursing school forcing me to get the flu vaccine. I am educating myself and simply am presenting the devil's advocate position and am interested to see the reactions! I am also educating myself, I thought, by being a part of this group. But, I was warned it was " out there " by another holistic mother and I can see why. A lot of the " education " I see on here is not necessarily helpful to an educated person, such as myself. Rather, many use the same scare tactics that your opponents do. It is not typically a helpful strategy, rather a turn-off. All I can do is give feedback and my opinion. You can give yours. I will admit if I have misintrepreted or otherwise. I have not vaccinated my 15 mth dd. I do not plan to. But, many thousands and millions of people have vaccinated and a majority have done " okay " - those are the facts and you cannot argue with those. I am not saying that vaccinations are not harmful or do not contain harmful materials but I hear a lot of people saying things about medical professionals that are not true and sound rather " Rush Limbaugh-ish " in their reviews and opinions. Many of you may have a valid reason for being pissed off at the medical community but the comments I have read are sophomoric and extreme. It isn't convincing me or education me. I don't need convincing, but if that is what you are trying to do - some of you - may want to consider your approach. Also, Dr. Mercola is a rather respected MD who has carried out tons of research and literature reviews on vaccinations, alternative and natural medicine and otherwise. It was his link that said if you have to get vaccinated there is a way to try to treat yourself after the vaccination. There are also other persons trying to give such advice. I plan to keep myself in the group a bit longer to see what I can learn and I appreciate the dialogue. > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate him/herself a bit. > It is great to participate in these discussions, but before giving > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate information behind it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 At 12:41 AM 9/21/2009, you wrote: >I often wonder about people who are working in the medical profession and >are ant-vax. Are you not required to give vax, and if you do does that not >make for a problem on conscience. exactly Once I realized the danger, I worked in areas where I didn't have to give a vaccine and worked in areas I could justify. A pediatric ICU was my the last in-hospital place I worked. Children who drown or are in car accidents, for example don't have much other choice for help for such trauma (except homeopathy in addition could help greatly) Sheri Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm or http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start September 30 & October 1 http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm or http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 First of all, I'm glad that you've decided not to vaccinate your child; that tells me you aren't all " devil's advocate " . However, It floors me that you would take such a nonchalant attitude toward vaccination if you know ANYTHING about vaccination - which you must, since you have made the choice you've made. Giving the advice basically to just shut up and take the vaccine if you want to stay in the medical field (not your words, but that's what came thorough as the attitude in your post) is irresponsible, at best. You're correct, Dr. Mercola is a very respected doctor, and he does NOT approach the subject of vaccination with that same nonchalant attitude. In fact, Dr. Mercola shouts " Don't do it! Don't do it! " over and over. However, there is a huge fear that the government is going to be forcing this year's flu vaccine on either certain subsets of the population, or on the population as a whole. It's already happening with " healthcare " workers in the State of New York - they are having to fight tooth-and-nail to exercise their right to choose. That is why Dr. Mercola wrote his article in the first place. He hasn't suddenly developed the attitude " Oh, well, vaccinate now and worry about the consequences later. It's no big deal. " , I promise you. His article does give some things you can try if you are forced to take the vaccination, but he will still be one of the first in line to tell you it's better if you do NOT take the vaccine, because YOU JUST DON'T KNOW how that vaccine is going to affect any given individual. Telling someone to roll up their sleeve and take the vaccine because " You're not gonna die " , well... you don't know that for a fact, and wouldn't you feel like a complete heel if someone took your advice specifically and then wound up dead, or partially or fully paralyzed, or brain damaged, or blind? Those are just SOME of the side effects that can happen with ANY vaccine. You can say the majority of the population is unharmed by vaccines, but that's heresy... that is NOT fact. The FACT is, we don't know. We don't know if a person was harmed on a level that is undetectable, or if they will develop complications years from now stemming from that or any other vaccine they may have received. The studies have never been done. To think that you can know that without a doubt is naive and " sophomoric " , if you will. I don't think anyone here will deny that there isn't a place in our society for the allopathic model. I, for one, am entrenched in it right now with my son's severe allergies and asthma. I work my A$$ off every single hour of every single day to keep him as far from the allopaths as I can and yet we still end up in emergency situations that require the help of an allopath. Am I grateful to have the allopath system to bring my son out of his crises and save his life? You bet I am! And I don't hesitate for even a second to use it when it's needed. What we as a group are saying is that the allopathic model is based on disease and sickness - that's all they know. They don't know what creates (or causes) true health. To think that you can put a chemical, drug, heavy metal or " killed disease " into a body and expect it to be more healthy than when you started is barbaric and old world. That is medicine of the past, and should have been tabled long ago. But because someone somewhere stands to make a buck or two off our diseased states and dependent attitudes on drugs, vaccines and others to make us better, the ludicrous practice continues. For instance, why is the government telling pregnant women to take the UNTESTED H1N1 flu vaccine as soon as it comes out, rather than boost their immunity naturally with adequate sunlight, adequate sleep, and proper diet? Because nobody makes any money from telling a woman to go hang out in the sun for a few hours and soak up the rays, that why. They'd rather you expose your baby to Thimerosal (but DON'T eat that tuna!!!). You can argue that there are " thimerosal-free " versions of the vaccine that will be made available, but I was told pointblank by a CDC official when I attended the H1N1 Public Engagement Meeting here in Denver, CO, that they will not " offer " the thimerosal-free version to ANYBODY - pregnant woman or child - because they don't have that much available. A person will have to know to request the single-dose, thimerosal-free version on their own... and even then there is no guarantee that every venue doling out the vaccine will have it on hand to give. The bottom line is, the CDC, the FDA and government don't care about your health or mine, or the health of my unborn baby or yours, they only care about their bottom line and how much vaccine they can get out to the population is as little time as possible. I know this because I took the time to approach and talk with a CDC official face-to-face. I saw their attitude and watched as they danced around hard-hitting questions that they should have been prepared to answer but couldn't because they would be admitting how much they don't care about our health. If you choose to believe differently, so be it. I'm just calling a spade a spade. PS: I always find it funny that is the ones that don't use their real names that come on this list and try to play " devil's advocate " , and call the rest of us out. If you're so sure of your stance, why hide? On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:39 PM, trying2bnatural <c68libra@...> wrote: > > > > I am educating myself and simply am presenting the devil's advocate position and am interested to see the reactions! I am also educating myself, I thought, by being a part of this group. But, I was warned it was " out there " by another holistic mother and I can see why. A lot of the " education " I see on here is not necessarily helpful to an educated person, such as myself. Rather, many use the same scare tactics that your opponents do. It is not typically a helpful strategy, rather a turn-off. > > All I can do is give feedback and my opinion. You can give yours. I will admit if I have misintrepreted or otherwise. > > I have not vaccinated my 15 mth dd. I do not plan to. But, many thousands and millions of people have vaccinated and a majority have done " okay " - those are the facts and you cannot argue with those. I am not saying that vaccinations are not harmful or do not contain harmful materials but I hear a lot of people saying things about medical professionals that are not true and sound rather " Rush Limbaugh-ish " in their reviews and opinions. Many of you may have a valid reason for being pissed off at the medical community but the comments I have read are sophomoric and extreme. It isn't convincing me or education me. I don't need convincing, but if that is what you are trying to do - some of you - may want to consider your approach. > > Also, Dr. Mercola is a rather respected MD who has carried out tons of research and literature reviews on vaccinations, alternative and natural medicine and otherwise. It was his link that said if you have to get vaccinated there is a way to try to treat yourself after the vaccination. There are also other persons trying to give such advice. > > I plan to keep myself in the group a bit longer to see what I can learn and I appreciate the dialogue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 excellent and yes I notice the thing with using names and not using names.................... I came out there with my name and address for all to see without fear. Tell us about yourself trying2bnatural Sheri listowner At 06:35 PM 9/21/2009, you wrote: >First of all, I'm glad that you've decided not to vaccinate your >child; that tells me you aren't all " devil's advocate " . However, It >floors me that you would take such a nonchalant attitude toward >vaccination if you know ANYTHING about vaccination - which you must, >since you have made the choice you've made. Giving the advice >basically to just shut up and take the vaccine if you want to stay in >the medical field (not your words, but that's what came thorough as >the attitude in your post) is irresponsible, at best. You're correct, >Dr. Mercola is a very respected doctor, and he does NOT approach the >subject of vaccination with that same nonchalant attitude. In fact, >Dr. Mercola shouts " Don't do it! Don't do it! " over and over. >However, there is a huge fear that the government is going to be >forcing this year's flu vaccine on either certain subsets of the >population, or on the population as a whole. It's already happening >with " healthcare " workers in the State of New York - they are having >to fight tooth-and-nail to exercise their right to choose. That is >why Dr. Mercola wrote his article in the first place. He hasn't >suddenly developed the attitude " Oh, well, vaccinate now and worry >about the consequences later. It's no big deal. " , I promise you. His >article does give some things you can try if you are forced to take >the vaccination, but he will still be one of the first in line to tell >you it's better if you do NOT take the vaccine, because YOU JUST DON'T >KNOW how that vaccine is going to affect any given individual. >Telling someone to roll up their sleeve and take the vaccine because > " You're not gonna die " , well... you don't know that for a fact, and >wouldn't you feel like a complete heel if someone took your advice >specifically and then wound up dead, or partially or fully paralyzed, >or brain damaged, or blind? Those are just SOME of the side effects >that can happen with ANY vaccine. > >You can say the majority of the population is unharmed by vaccines, >but that's heresy... that is NOT fact. The FACT is, we don't know. >We don't know if a person was harmed on a level that is undetectable, >or if they will develop complications years from now stemming from >that or any other vaccine they may have received. The studies have >never been done. To think that you can know that without a doubt is >naive and " sophomoric " , if you will. > >I don't think anyone here will deny that there isn't a place in our >society for the allopathic model. I, for one, am entrenched in it >right now with my son's severe allergies and asthma. I work my A$$ >off every single hour of every single day to keep him as far from the >allopaths as I can and yet we still end up in emergency situations >that require the help of an allopath. Am I grateful to have the >allopath system to bring my son out of his crises and save his life? >You bet I am! And I don't hesitate for even a second to use it when >it's needed. What we as a group are saying is that the allopathic >model is based on disease and sickness - that's all they know. They >don't know what creates (or causes) true health. To think that you >can put a chemical, drug, heavy metal or " killed disease " into a body >and expect it to be more healthy than when you started is barbaric and >old world. That is medicine of the past, and should have been tabled >long ago. But because someone somewhere stands to make a buck or two >off our diseased states and dependent attitudes on drugs, vaccines and >others to make us better, the ludicrous practice continues. > >For instance, why is the government telling pregnant women to take the >UNTESTED H1N1 flu vaccine as soon as it comes out, rather than boost >their immunity naturally with adequate sunlight, adequate sleep, and >proper diet? Because nobody makes any money from telling a woman to >go hang out in the sun for a few hours and soak up the rays, that why. > They'd rather you expose your baby to Thimerosal (but DON'T eat that >tuna!!!). You can argue that there are " thimerosal-free " versions of >the vaccine that will be made available, but I was told pointblank by >a CDC official when I attended the H1N1 Public Engagement Meeting here >in Denver, CO, that they will not " offer " the thimerosal-free version >to ANYBODY - pregnant woman or child - because they don't have that >much available. A person will have to know to request the >single-dose, thimerosal-free version on their own... and even then >there is no guarantee that every venue doling out the vaccine will >have it on hand to give. > >The bottom line is, the CDC, the FDA and government don't care about >your health or mine, or the health of my unborn baby or yours, they >only care about their bottom line and how much vaccine they can get >out to the population is as little time as possible. I know this >because I took the time to approach and talk with a CDC official >face-to-face. I saw their attitude and watched as they danced around >hard-hitting questions that they should have been prepared to answer >but couldn't because they would be admitting how much they don't care >about our health. If you choose to believe differently, so be it. >I'm just calling a spade a spade. > > > >PS: I always find it funny that is the ones that don't use their real >names that come on this list and try to play " devil's advocate " , and >call the rest of us out. If you're so sure of your stance, why hide? > > > >On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:39 PM, trying2bnatural <c68libra@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > I am educating myself and simply am presenting the devil's > advocate position and am interested to see the reactions! I am also > educating myself, I thought, by being a part of this group. But, I > was warned it was " out there " by another holistic mother and I can > see why. A lot of the " education " I see on here is not necessarily > helpful to an educated person, such as myself. Rather, many use the > same scare tactics that your opponents do. It is not typically a > helpful strategy, rather a turn-off. > > > > All I can do is give feedback and my opinion. You can give yours. > I will admit if I have misintrepreted or otherwise. > > > > I have not vaccinated my 15 mth dd. I do not plan to. But, many > thousands and millions of people have vaccinated and a majority > have done " okay " - those are the facts and you cannot argue with > those. I am not saying that vaccinations are not harmful or do not > contain harmful materials but I hear a lot of people saying things > about medical professionals that are not true and sound rather > " Rush Limbaugh-ish " in their reviews and opinions. Many of you may > have a valid reason for being pissed off at the medical community > but the comments I have read are sophomoric and extreme. It isn't > convincing me or education me. I don't need convincing, but if that > is what you are trying to do - some of you - may want to consider > your approach. > > > > Also, Dr. Mercola is a rather respected MD who has carried out > tons of research and literature reviews on vaccinations, > alternative and natural medicine and otherwise. It was his link > that said if you have to get vaccinated there is a way to try to > treat yourself after the vaccination. There are also other persons > trying to give such advice. > > > > I plan to keep myself in the group a bit longer to see what I can > learn and I appreciate the dialogue. > > >------------------------------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 I have a couple of comments. First, how do you know the majority of those who are vaccinated are okay? Have you met them all? What is your definition of okay? Just being a devil's advocate myself here. I think the health of people in our country is abyssmal. Our children are not healthy. They have asthma, serious food allergies, ADHD, learning disabilities, cancers, diabetes, and more. When I was growing up, these were not these problems. Classrooms in my school were not labeled " dairy-free, egg-free, peanut-free, tree-nut free. " There were no special ed programs, classrooms or teachers in our schools. Kids went to the nurse for a bandaid or if they felt like they had to throw up. They did not go for their ADHD meds, or for their inhalers (which actually they carry around on them 24/7). I did not know of one kid who had a brain tumor or leukemia. It was even rare for adults to have cancer. Now they are dying in droves from cancer, and have many other debilitating diseases such as MS, ALS, arthritis, lupus, Parkinson's, etc. So, I disagree that most people are okay in the true sense of the word because THOSE are the facts, and you cannot argue with those. As an older person, I now read the obituaries. I see peers of mine, those in their 40's-60's, who are dying of cancers, many types of cancers. Most of them were likely vaccinated as children. And back then we're talking 5-6 vaccines, not 43. People in their 80's on up are dying from their bodies wearing out. Rarely do I see that they died of cancer. But do most people die directly from vaccines? No, so in that sense I suppose they are " okay " in that they're alive. And many seem and maybe are perfectly okay. Not everyone is vaccine-damaged. As for the Rush Limbaugh-ishness you see here, it might help if you understand that you have come here at a time when most of us who have been studying vaccine laws and policies, and have seen much damage over many years, are in a panic over the very real possibility that our nightmare of forced, mass vaccination is right around the corner. We are spending many hours working overtime, as it were, poring over article after editorial after medical opinion after other panicked parents' concerns, and are beginning to do a countdown until this all comes to a head likely next month. The " out there " you think you see is in fact a reflection of the " out there " that's out there in our government's wacky vaccine policies. We are trying to do what we can to stop the madness. And we're doing this to try to protect your child, among others, since you don't vaccinate, either. It is through efforts of we Rush Limbaugh's that you even have a religious exemption at your disposal, assuming you live in one of the 48 states that allow it. Just so you know. And I'm not sure what brought you to the decision not to vaccinate but I will tell you it was rare for people not to vaccinate when my children were little. It is more common now precisely because people like us, and I assume you, are making people aware. On Mercola: sure, he's got a lot of good info and I love his site, although occasionally his facts have been wrong. But I overlook it because he does offer a lot. But when you presented his advice on what to do if you have to vaccinate, perhaps you didn't realize it but it came across as if it was no big deal, if you vaccinate, just do what Mercola says and there won't be any side effects worth worrying about. That said, it certainly was worth reading, so thanks for that. Last thing: scare tactics. Pointing out facts that are scary is not the same thing as using scare tactics for financial gain. No one here benefits one iota if someone does not vaccinate. The same cannot be said for those who use scare tactics to sell vaccines. Maybe once several years go by and you see and hear more personal stories, you too may be perceived as out there. Just to warn you. Winnie Re: Nursing school forcing me to get the flu vaccine. Vaccinations > I am educating myself and simply am presenting the devil's > advocate position and am interested to see the reactions! I am > also educating myself, I thought, by being a part of this group. > But, I was warned it was " out there " by another holistic mother > and I can see why. A lot of the " education " I see on here is > not necessarily helpful to an educated person, such as myself. > Rather, many use the same scare tactics that your opponents do. > It is not typically a helpful strategy, rather a turn-off. > > All I can do is give feedback and my opinion. You can give > yours. I will admit if I have misintrepreted or otherwise. > > I have not vaccinated my 15 mth dd. I do not plan to. But, > many thousands and millions of people have vaccinated and a > majority have done " okay " - those are the facts and you cannot > argue with those. I am not saying that vaccinations are not > harmful or do not contain harmful materials but I hear a lot of > people saying things about medical professionals that are not > true and sound rather " Rush Limbaugh-ish " in their reviews and > opinions. Many of you may have a valid reason for being pissed > off at the medical community but the comments I have read are > sophomoric and extreme. It isn't convincing me or education me. > I don't need convincing, but if that is what you are trying to > do - some of you - may want to consider your approach. > > Also, Dr. Mercola is a rather respected MD who has carried out > tons of research and literature reviews on vaccinations, > alternative and natural medicine and otherwise. It was his link > that said if you have to get vaccinated there is a way to try to > treat yourself after the vaccination. There are also other > persons trying to give such advice. > > I plan to keep myself in the group a bit longer to see what I > can learn and I appreciate the dialogue. > > > > > > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate him/herself > a bit. > > It is great to participate in these discussions, but before > giving > > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate information > behind it. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2009 Report Share Posted September 21, 2009 Hi - I am . I also live in Denver, CO! I just rather not give all my personal information as I work in the medical system. Glad you made it to that presentation! We talked about it in our moms group. Thanks for the helpful links! > > > PS: I always find it funny that is the ones that don't use their real > names that come on this list and try to play " devil's advocate " , and > call the rest of us out. If you're so sure of your stance, why hide? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 , Ah! Hi neighbor! We don't need ALL your personal information, but it is nice to be able to address someone by their name when responding to posts. You and I are so lucky to live in the great State of Colorado. We can almost take vaccine exemptions for granted because they are so easy to obtain here. Other states don't have it nearly as good as we do. It is the " extremists " that have made that possible; my friends at We Are Change Colorado and Safe Minds in Boulder, to name a couple of groups that have fought hard for our rights and continue to fight for the truth to be brought to the people. I'm curious, as one who is in the medical field, do you discuss your vax decisions with people - i.e. other medical professionals? What is their response? For the most part, I haven't had a lot of negative response from the medical establishment in CO, although I had plenty in NM when I lived there. Most nurses I encounter in CO state that they don't blame me one bit for not vaxing, and as I've mentioned before, I've had four doctors tell me it was " lucky " for my son that I didn't vax him, as it likely would have killed him. Also, when I question medical personnel regarding the H1N1 flu. most roll their eyes and say it's such a non-event that they can't believe how the media has blown it so out of proportion. I wonder if I've just been lucky not to encounter " extremists " on the other side, or if that's the general feeling in the medical community in our state? I must say, when I attended the H1N1 Public Engagement, I was pleasantly surprised to find out just how much activism goes on in our state regarding vaccination awareness and rights. Approximately 30% of the room was on the vaccine awareness and freedom-of-choice side at that meeting. The CDC wasn't expecting us, and we hit them right between the eyes with a nice little wake up call. I think they were surprised that we weren't going to sit and listen to them spew their bull without firing facts and questions back at them! On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:03 PM, trying2bnatural <c68libra@...> wrote: > > > > Hi - I am . I also live in Denver, CO! I just rather not give all my personal information as I work in the medical system. > > Glad you made it to that presentation! We talked about it in our moms group. Thanks for the helpful links! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 The current estimates for autism prevalence is 1 in 100 kids. One in one hundred! 20 years ago it was 1 in 10,000. Different states have different tracking systems, but in my state, California, autism is tracked through the Regional Center system. Since they provide costly services to their clients, they do not make the criteria easy to qualify for assistance. So most kids with high functioning types of autism are not clients of ther Regional Centers here, and therefor not counted. So in California, I believe the numbers are grossly under counted. I am a volunteer parent for several autism organizations, as well organize a local support group for parents. A staggering amount of parents swear that their childs autims/developmental disorders were triggered by their vaccinations. This should be front page news everyday. But it isn't. We are made to feel like we don't exist. Our kids are real people that mainstream medicine has hurt and then turned their backs on. It is really horrifying, and really true. And for every kid that has been plunged into severe autism after vaccines, there are so many more that have speech delays, learning disabilities, behavior problems, ADHD, food allergies, asthma, OCD, aggression, bowel disorders, and the list goes on and on. I don't see a lot of healthy kids with sharp minds anymore. " Walking wounded " is more like it. But these conditions are accepted as the " new normal " . Now THAT is scary! Sylvia > > > > > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate him/herself > > a bit. > > > It is great to participate in these discussions, but before > > giving > > > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate information > > behind it. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 My youngest is completely unvaxed (another is almost, having had only one tetanus is a weak moment of mine) and at his first school conference with a new teacher, she began with saying that he had no learning problems and was doing just great. What?? But that is what they see so much of they must discuss it all the time in conferences. Winnie Re: Nursing school forcing me to get the flu vaccine. Vaccinations > The current estimates for autism prevalence is 1 in 100 kids. > One in one hundred! 20 years ago it was 1 in 10,000. Different > states have different tracking systems, but in my state, > California, autism is tracked through the Regional Center > system. Since they provide costly services to their clients, > they do not make the criteria easy to qualify for assistance. So > most kids with high functioning types of autism are not clients > of ther Regional Centers here, and therefor not counted. So in > California, I believe the numbers are grossly under counted. I > am a volunteer parent for several autism organizations, as well > organize a local support group for parents. A staggering amount > of parents swear that their childs autims/developmental > disorders were triggered by their vaccinations. This should be > front page news everyday. But it isn't. We are made to feel like > we don't exist. Our kids are real people that mainstream > medicine has hurt and then turned their backs on. It is really > horrifying, and really true. > > And for every kid that has been plunged into severe autism after > vaccines, there are so many more that have speech delays, > learning disabilities, behavior problems, ADHD, food allergies, > asthma, OCD, aggression, bowel disorders, and the list goes on > and on. I don't see a lot of healthy kids with sharp minds > anymore. " Walking wounded " is more like it. But these conditions > are accepted as the " new normal " . Now THAT is scary! > > Sylvia > > > > > > > > > > > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate > him/herself > > > a bit. > > > > It is great to participate in these discussions, but > before > > > giving > > > > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate > information > > > behind it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Yes, a typically developing child is almost a thing of the past lately! Good for him! Sylvia > > > > > > > > > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate > > him/herself > > > > a bit. > > > > > It is great to participate in these discussions, but > > before > > > > giving > > > > > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate > > information > > > > behind it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 I can't tell you how many times I'm asked over and over and over again of BOTH my children, " HOW old is he?? " " THAT is one smart/happy/coordinated kid! " My neighbors have nicknamed my youngest (now 17 months old) " Super Baby " because is really coordinated and STRONG, can push around the battery operated jeep they drive around the cul-de-sac, and climbs to the top of any jungle gym and goes down slides without a care in the world, by himself. Yes, my children are smart, and they receive a lot of attention from me, but that doesn't mean they are really THAT far above where any other kid their age should be, developmentally... it's just that they haven't been drugged down by the medical establishment in this country. People (good friends, neighbors, etc.) constantly tell me how lucky I am to have healthy, smart kids... Huh? LUCK has nothing to do with it... and in fact my younger child has plenty of health challenges despite never being vaxed, but if I try to tell them that, I'm full of it and don't know what I'm talking about. So the message I get almost daily from others is so conflicted.... " Good for you, Mama, you're doing something right to have such intelligent, healthy and happy, well-adjusted kids, but you're a COMPLETE IDIOT to think the fact that you don't vaccinate, give tylenol for every ache, pain or fever, or subject them to antibiotics at every sniffle has anything to do with it. " LOL Whatever! On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Sylvia <sylviapimentel@...> wrote: > > > > Yes, a typically developing child is almost a thing of the past lately! > > Good for him! > > Sylvia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Yesterday in my vaccine education class, a mother of an autistic son said in NW IN the rate is 1 in 48. I have not confirmed this. Jim ________________________________ From: Sylvia <sylviapimentel@...> Vaccinations Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 11:03:27 AM Subject: Re: Nursing school forcing me to get the flu vaccine. The current estimates for autism prevalence is 1 in 100 kids. One in one hundred! 20 years ago it was 1 in 10,000. Different states have different tracking systems, but in my state, California, autism is tracked through the Regional Center system. Since they provide costly services to their clients, they do not make the criteria easy to qualify for assistance. So most kids with high functioning types of autism are not clients of ther Regional Centers here, and therefor not counted. So in California, I believe the numbers are grossly under counted. I am a volunteer parent for several autism organizations, as well organize a local support group for parents. A staggering amount of parents swear that their childs autims/developmenta l disorders were triggered by their vaccinations. This should be front page news everyday. But it isn't. We are made to feel like we don't exist. Our kids are real people that mainstream medicine has hurt and then turned their backs on. It is really horrifying, and really true. And for every kid that has been plunged into severe autism after vaccines, there are so many more that have speech delays, learning disabilities, behavior problems, ADHD, food allergies, asthma, OCD, aggression, bowel disorders, and the list goes on and on. I don't see a lot of healthy kids with sharp minds anymore. " Walking wounded " is more like it. But these conditions are accepted as the " new normal " . Now THAT is scary! Sylvia > > > > > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate him/herself > > a bit. > > > It is great to participate in these discussions, but before > > giving > > > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate information > > behind it. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 I believe that a statistic around that number is true for boys. Winnie Re: Nursing school forcing me to get the > flu vaccine. > > > The current estimates for autism prevalence is 1 in 100 kids. > One in one hundred! 20 years ago it was 1 in 10,000. Different > states have different tracking systems, but in my state, > California, autism is tracked through the Regional Center > system. Since they provide costly services to their clients, > they do not make the criteria easy to qualify for assistance. So > most kids with high functioning types of autism are not clients > of ther Regional Centers here, and therefor not counted. So in > California, I believe the numbers are grossly under counted. I > am a volunteer parent for several autism organizations, as well > organize a local support group for parents. A staggering amount > of parents swear that their childs autims/developmenta l > disorders were triggered by their vaccinations. This should be > front page news everyday. But it isn't. We are made to feel like > we don't exist. Our kids are real people that mainstream > medicine has hurt and then turned their > backs on. It is really horrifying, and really true. > > And for every kid that has been plunged into severe autism after > vaccines, there are so many more that have speech delays, > learning disabilities, behavior problems, ADHD, food allergies, > asthma, OCD, aggression, bowel disorders, and the list goes on > and on. I don't see a lot of healthy kids with sharp minds > anymore. " Walking wounded " is more like it. But these conditions > are accepted as the " new normal " . Now THAT is scary! > > Sylvia > > > > > > > > > > Methinks that trying2bnatural may need to educate > him/herself > > > a bit. > > > > It is great to participate in these discussions, but > before > > > giving > > > > advice, one needs to know that there is accurate > information > > > behind it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.