UK: EXCLUSIVE: EXPERTS CAST DOUBT ON CLAIM FOR ‘WONDER’ CANCER JABS

[Guest guest]

add your comments

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/posts/view/104443/EXCLUSIVE-Experts-cast-doubt-o\

n-claim-for-wonder-cancer-jabs>http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/posts/view/104443/\

EXCLUSIVE-Experts-cast-doubt-on-claim-for-wonder-cancer-jabs

31 May 2009

UK: EXCLUSIVE: EXPERTS CAST DOUBT ON CLAIM FOR ‘WONDER’ CANCER JABS

Story Image

LEFT IN PAIN: Teenager Ramagge has suffered from a joint disorder

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/myexpress/>

[]

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/myexpress/>

Sunday May 31,2009

By Lucy ston and Martyn Halle

Comment Speech Bubble

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/add/104443>Have your say(4)

LEADING scientists and doctors have raised fresh

concerns about the safety of a cervical cancer vaccine.

They have accused the manufacturers of Cervarix

and another jab, Gardasil, of making misleading claims.

More than 1,300 British girls have reported

adverse reactions to Cervarix, ranging from

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/posts/view/104443/EXCLUSIVE-Experts-cast-doubt-o\

n-claim-for-wonder-cancer-jabs#>paralysis<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/posts/v\

iew/104443/EXCLUSIVE-Experts-cast-doubt-on-claim-for-wonder-cancer-jabs#>

[]

to convulsions and sight problems.

Hailed as a wonder drug, it is claimed the jab

will give 70 per cent protection from the disease

to every girl under 18 by 2011.

Earlier this month the Sunday Express revealed

the story of Ramagge, 13, of Reigate,

Surrey, who has been unable to walk for six

months because of a joint disorder.

’s paediatrician blames her condition on Cervarix.

In Germany, 13 distinguished professors have

complained that the jab makers, Glaxo Kline

and Sanofi, have been guilty of giving “incorrect” information.

Professor a Doren, of the Charitie Hospital

in Berlin, said: “What concerns us is that the

two manufacturers of the vaccine aren’t always

using facts. They claim that a lot of high-risk

strains of cancer-causing virus are protected

against but equally there are others that are not.

“If protection is not more than 20 per cent then

that is an awful lot of money to be spending,

particularly as the vaccines have quite serious side-effects.

“Assertions that a vaccine reduces the risk of

cervical cancer by 70 per cent or even 98 per

cent should not be made at this point.”

Professor Doren criticised the fact that the only

trials for the vaccines were carried out on women

aged between 15 and 26 while the vaccine was

being given to 12 and 13 year olds.

[]

SEARCH UK NEWS for:

She said: “It is wrong to vaccinate these girls

when it has not been tried on this age group. It is unethical.

“We are meant to be in an era where drugs and

vaccines to be used on children are given trials

on that age group first before awarding a

licence. Otherwise you are experimenting on children, which is wrong.”

Last night a spokesman for the German national

vaccines committee told the Sunday Express that a

review of the evidence was under way.

Meanwhile in

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/posts/view/104443/EXCLUSIVE-Experts-cast-doubt-o\

n-claim-for-wonder-cancer-jabs#>the

Netherlands<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/posts/view/104443/EXCLUSIVE-Experts-c\

ast-doubt-on-claim-for-wonder-cancer-jabs#>

[]

there has been mass resistance to the vaccine

with only 49 per cent of girls turning up to have

the first jab of the three- injection course.

Six Dutch girls were taken to hospital after

being inoculated and there have been reports of

more than 500 other adverse reactions.

Doctors there are calling on their national

vaccines committee to reconsider its decision to

back vaccination of schoolgirls. Many scientists

claim the figure of 70 per cent protection

against cervical cancer is not based on

scientific evidence and has been used to convince

parents that their girls ought to have the jab.

Experts in Scotland, where the Health Service has

spent more than £64million vaccinating

schoolgirls, are also expressing concerns.

ish Conservative health spokeswoman

Scanlon said: “Given this new research, it is

incumbent on the ish government and the

chief ­medical officer to review the vaccin­ation

programme to ensure that it lives up to the

expectations of preventing cervical cancer.”

Last February 80,000 jabs in Valencia and the

Balearic Islands were withdrawn after three girls

ended up in hospital with convulsions and loss of

consciousness within hours of being inoculated.

Spanish heath officials later concluded the

vaccine had not caused the problems.

A spokesman for GlaxoKline said: “These

vaccines provide young girls and women valuable

new protection against cervical cancer and have

been thoroughly tested by vaccine experts.

“The German health authorities have reiterated

their positive assessment of these vaccines and

continue to make them fully available.”

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/add/104443>

Click here to have your say

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/add/104443>

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/GraceFilby>

User Image

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/GraceFilby>

EXPERTS CAST DOUBT ON CLAIM FOR ‘WONDER’ CANCER JABS

31.05.09, 10:02am

he Government cannot just walk away pretending it

is nothing to do with them. In May 2008 the

Department of Health published a document called

" Beating Cervical Cancer - The Facts " yet the

facts and figures about safety adverse effects

were plainly INCORRECT. I pointed this out

officially through a FOI question on October 1

2008 and they apologised for the error! Did they

remove the false information from the internet?

No, not until 15 May 2009 when yet again I

pointed it out to them. Did they ever recall the

faulty booklets or send out a corrigendum to

parents, childen, schools, PCTs, politicians,

nurses and doctors who had already agreed to the

Cervarix programme? I am still waiting for their reply to that question.

The fact is that the safety information

circulated by the Department of Health was

inaccurate and unclear, and they knew it. Everyone had been misled.

Here in Reigate we are fortunate to have an

excellent paediatrician who has stated that the

link between vaccines and arthralgia is well

established. He made the clear connection with

the Cervarix vaccine in Ramagge's

official diagnosis. Luckily there are also local

complementary therapists who have offered to help

restore her to good health, e.g. with homeopathy.

There are at least 2 other girls in Surrey who

have been off school for weeks because of the

Cervarix jab, and were trying to let the public know.

I, for one, would like to know how the Government

and other politicians are going to make amends

for letting these injuries happen.

May I add that there is an article in the BMJ,

2002, which states: " It would therefore be

prudent to warn patients awaiting vaccination

about the possible adverse effect on joint symptoms. " Jawad ASM.

• Posted by:

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/GraceFilby>GraceFilby

• <http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/view/292793>Report Comment

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/DanStone>

User Image

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/DanStone>

PAR FOR THE COURSE

31.05.09, 6:53am

This is unfortunately par for the course with

vaccination. In 2005 the Cochrane Review of MMR

was carefully spun to suggest the vaccine had

been given a clean bill of health. In fact the

document itself stated that the safety studies

both before and after MMR went on the market were

" largely inadequate " (it also warned that the

situation was similar for other vaccines).

Against this background the secondary media claim

that it did not prove a link with autism and

bowel disease was somewhat meaningless.

Meanwhile, the Government have purchased

undeveloped and untested 90 million doses of H1N1

swine flu vaccine on the back of World Health

Organization hype, for a disease which has so far

proved harmless in this country: will the vaccine

- which we will presumably all be supposed to have - be as harmless?

All this is not to say that all vaccines are

useless but that this is becoming an ever

expanding racket, and when it goes wrong the

government will just walk away pretending it is nothing to do with them.

• Posted by:

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/DanStone>DanStone

• <http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/view/292767>Report Comment

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/Freda>

User Image

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/Freda>

EXPERTS CAST DOUBT ON CLAIM FOR 'WONDER' CANCER JABS

31.05.09, 5:51am

I believe that if a eminent Professor like

a Doren of the Charitie Hospital in Berlin

uses the phrase " particularly as the vaccines

have quite serious side effects " then we hope

that the general public will realise that this is

fact and not fiction as our government and

GlaxoKline would have you believe. She also

picks up on the point that no trials, yes ladies

and gentlemen, no trials have been carried out on

the age groups which are being vaccinated.

Professor Doren considers this to not only be

unethical but also to be " experimental " . Dr Diane

Harper, another expert in this field, made

exactly the same point to the people of Scotland

last November and asked our government to wait

another four years before starting on this

programme of vaccination. The reason she did that

because she couldnt guarantee that the vaccine

was 100% safe. Who do you think knows more about

Cervarix and Gardasil, the scientists who carry

out the trials or the politicians and

pharmaceutical companies whose only interest is

in getting these vaccines marketed as quickly as

possible. I know who I would rather trust and it

most certainly is not the latter.

• Posted by:

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/Freda>Freda

• <http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/view/292763>Report Comment

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/Annelies>

User Image

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/Annelies>

EXPERTS CAST DOUBT ON CLAIM FOR ‘WONDER’ CANCER JABS

31.05.09, 2:10am

it's well known, worldwide, that both Gardasil

and Cervarix are non-proven vaccines. As far as

we know now, the damage is worse than the results

we'll knoe in approximately 15 or 20 years from

now. I'm from Holland and I'd like to correct the

numbers; the first round of vaccination was only

43%, the second even 18 % less. That's why our

gouverment is pissed off with us. However, we prove facts !!!

The Dutch gouverment stated that cervarix-cancer

was the second cancer, after breast-cancer, killing woman. .

That's a big, big lie, Cervarix-cancer is not

even in the top 10 of cancers worldwide. However,

the farma industry's , will promote this lie in

order to sell their dangerous , not proven vaccin.

Proven is: Cervical-cancer decreased after implenting pap-smears.

In Holland we know that our gouverment knows all

the facts. Yet they'll go on, next thing to

happen is all the young boys will have to be vaccinated against HPV-virus.

FORGET IT, we'll prevent this !!

There's a lot of money involved, appently our

health is not an issue what so ever.

• Posted by:

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/users/profile/Annelies>Annelies

• <http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/view/292760>Report Comment

<http://www.sundayexpress.co.uk/comments/viewall/104443>

View All Comments

To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button.

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines -

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes &

Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start May 20 & 21

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm