anti-vaccine = professional suicide

[Guest guest]

California ChronicleIt is committing professional suicide to be anti-vaccine!

England

June 07, 2009

There are three rules to being a good honest professional when it comes

to vaccines and they are,a) See no evil, Hear no evil, c) Speak no

evil.

Break any one of these rules and you are on a slippery slope to

professional suicide. Not only will big pharma try to destroy you, so

to, will every newspaper known to man, your governing body and even

your own friends and colleagues. Play to the rules and you will become

rich and successful. So why is it that there are some professionals,

who despite being discredited, professionally dissected and left on the

scrap heap by the medical profession and their peers,still continue to

speak out time and time again against vaccines and the pharmaceutical

companies who manufacture them?

In an article I read this morning wrote:-

" The continuing resistance by a certain kind of mummy to vaccination is selfish,

ignorant and downright dangerous "

She carried on writing a very biased, unbalanced piece of work, with no evidence

supporting her claims.She continued:-

" Not until many non-vaccinations later, in 2004, did the Lancet admit

that the Wakefield paper was " fatally flawed " . At the same time, 10 of

its doctor authors carefully retracted its " interpretation " of a

possible link between autism and MMR. This followed Sunday Times

journalist Deer's demolition of Wakefield's methodology and his

shocking discovery that the doctor had not disclosed two glaring

conflicts of interest. Before recommending single vaccines to parents

on the back of the Lancet paper, Wakefield had patented a single

measles vaccine. The GMC has yet to conclude its investigation into his

alleged misconduct. "

This is when you have to step back from this biased and ill informed piece and

say hold it right there.

Firstly, Deer from the Sunday Times, also, forgot to mention a

few conflicts of interest himself. No parent has ever complained about

Dr Wakefield, it was in fact Deer himself that made the

complaint to the GMC three days after he published his first article in

the Sunday Times.

Secondly, Deer's boss who commissioned his articles was none

other than Nuki who is the son of Professor Nuki who in

1987 sat on the Committee on Safety of Medicines when the CSM was

considering Glaxo Kline and French Laboratories MMR vaccine

Pluserix for approval. However, it caused very high levels of adverse

reactions and was withdrawn by the manufacturers on very little notice

in late 1992 leaving the Department of Health in an embarrassing

position.

On the Child Health Safety website it backs up this with evidence and carries on

to state:-

" Large numbers of British children were injured and legal aid claims

had already started from as early as 1990, six years before Wakefield

became involved and contrary to The Sunday Times´ false claims that

this was all a scam set up by Wakefield and solicitor Barr. "

So while and the rest of the world say what a

brilliant journalist Deer is and what an awful doctor Dr

Wakefield is and how his studies are flawed and how he is about to be

struck off for professional misconduct it is always worth reading the

other side to all this.. Maybe readers may like to see Dr Wakefield's

complaint about Mr Deer to the UK Press Complaints Committee

and see the truth of what Deer really did and how he conducts

himself. How he, according to this complaint, appeared to deliberately

twist the facts to try to damage Dr Wakefield. may be

interested to know that Dr Wakefield's case has been almost completely

proven, so he may in fact not be struck off at all.

was truly insulting of parents who have children who cannot be

vaccinated through ill health or allergies Children with an allergy to egg

are sometimes advised not to have the MMR vaccination because of the

vaccines contents which includes very small traces of chick egg

proteins, if they do have the vaccine, then doctors advise that they

need to be monitored Children who also have a allergy to gelatin

are advised not have the vaccine. However, many families may not know

that these children have these allergies before vaccination. Ms

was also insulting to all the Autistic children and their families who

suffer daily, many of these became Autistic, like little Ben Zeller, as

a direct result of the MMR vaccination.

However, 's worst insult was to the amazing doctor who not

only has had his career ruined by a peer of hers but has gone on to

suffer years of suffering and humiliation. He lost his research

funding, his professional credit and has been forced abroad to work.

Professionals like Dr Wakefield are dwindling fast, many now

discredited and financially ruined, having faced complaint after

complaint to their governing bodies, professionals who have had their

friends and peers turn their backs on them. These professionals have

ignored the three rules golden rules to success, they are professionals

who do see the truth, who do hear the cries and they are the

professionals who have the guts to speak out and risk everything to do

something about it. Long may professionals like Dr Wakefield,

Blakemore-Brown Psychologist, Dr Jayne Donegan, Dr Moulden,

Dr Mansfield, Dr Sherri Tenpenny, Dr Carly, Dr Mark

Geier, Professor Gordon and Dr Harold Buttram fight on and

continue to speak out about vaccines, adverse reactions and the

children who suffer. They are not like the three wise monkeys because

they speak the truth and are not afraid of the consequences.