Why call Merck? Waste of time

[Guest guest]

I do NOT believe that this is a campaign we should be involved in. No

vaccine is safe and if the measles vaccine is dangerous (which it is),

the MMR vaccine is just more dangerous. We should not be wasting our

time and energy trying to get a dangerous vaccine re-introduced. We

should be spending our time spreading information about the dangers of

vaccination. That is just my .02 cents for what it's worth.

Take care,

Meryl

On 13/03/2009, at 6:39 AM, Sunshine Organics wrote:

> >

> > Please, everyone call Merck. In land a measles only booster is

> > required, not MMR booster. How many of our children got damaged

> > from the combined MMR, ALOT! forwarded from ACHAMP. Elaine

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Except not everyone feels the same way. Parents DO have a right to vaccinate

how they choose, and while I don't personally see how they could ever be fully

" safe, " those who choose to vaccinate do deserve to be able to do so how they

see fit and deserve to be able to have vaccines separate. For those who

selective or delay vax, this would be very important to them. Merck is IMO the

most unethical drug company out there so I don't know if anything said to them

would work, since once they realized that people were starting to think for

themselves and selectively and or delaying vaxing (or gasp! Not vaxing at all!)

they took away the single Measles vax. My view may not be popular, but I

believe in freedom of choice. People still choose to smoke and take drugs even

though it's widely known they are harmful. They have a right to make that

choice to partake of those items.

Lori

---- " meryl@... " <meryl@...> wrote:

> I do NOT believe that this is a campaign we should be involved in. No

> vaccine is safe and if the measles vaccine is dangerous (which it is),

> the MMR vaccine is just more dangerous. We should not be wasting our

> time and energy trying to get a dangerous vaccine re-introduced. We

> should be spending our time spreading information about the dangers of

> vaccination. That is just my .02 cents for what it's worth.

>

> Take care,

> Meryl

>

>

> On 13/03/2009, at 6:39 AM, Sunshine Organics wrote:

>

> > >

> > > Please, everyone call Merck. In land a measles only booster is

> > > required, not MMR booster. How many of our children got damaged

> > > from the combined MMR, ALOT! forwarded from ACHAMP. Elaine

> > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I also believe in freedom of choice. The problem as I see it is the choice peope

take to vaccinate

is not informed choice because they are lied to by the very people who are

supposed to guarantee

freedom of choice. So in effect they are brainwashed and don't really have a

choice without both sides being presented to them.

And of course the baby or child has no choice at all.

We know drugs are harmful because the people who make and sell them tell us they

are harmful. Physicians Desk reference among others.

We know ciggs are harmful because our government tells us so.  This is really a

choice because we know both sides.

But who tells us about the scam of blood poisoning? Vaccinations. Its we the

people who have suffered from the lies of those who are supposed to protect us

and our freedom of choice.

In my humble opinion any letter, phone call, or spoken word  to anybody  is

never wasted.

 

Jim

________________________________

From: " thefragile73931@... " <thefragile73931@...>

Vaccinations

Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 3:09:46 PM

Subject: Re: Why call Merck? Waste of time

Except not everyone feels the same way. Parents DO have a right to vaccinate how

they choose, and while I don't personally see how they could ever be fully

" safe, " those who choose to vaccinate do deserve to be able to do so how they

see fit and deserve to be able to have vaccines separate. For those who

selective or delay vax, this would be very important to them. Merck is IMO the

most unethical drug company out there so I don't know if anything said to them

would work, since once they realized that people were starting to think for

themselves and selectively and or delaying vaxing (or gasp! Not vaxing at all!)

they took away the single Measles vax. My view may not be popular, but I believe

in freedom of choice. People still choose to smoke and take drugs even though

it's widely known they are harmful. They have a right to make that choice to

partake of those items.

Lori

---- " meryl@.... au " <meryl@.... au> wrote:

> I do NOT believe that this is a campaign we should be involved in. No

> vaccine is safe and if the measles vaccine is dangerous (which it is),

> the MMR vaccine is just more dangerous. We should not be wasting our

> time and energy trying to get a dangerous vaccine re-introduced. We

> should be spending our time spreading information about the dangers of

> vaccination. That is just my .02 cents for what it's worth.

>

> Take care,

> Meryl

>

>

> On 13/03/2009, at 6:39 AM, Sunshine Organics wrote:

>

> > >

> > > Please, everyone call Merck. In land a measles only booster is

> > > required, not MMR booster. How many of our children got damaged

> > > from the combined MMR, ALOT! forwarded from ACHAMP. Elaine

> > >

> > >

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

At 08:09 PM 3/12/2009, you wrote:

>Except not everyone feels the same way. Parents DO have a right to

>vaccinate how they choose, and while I don't personally see how they

>could ever be fully " safe, " those who choose to vaccinate do deserve

>to be able to do so how they see fit and deserve to be able to have

>vaccines separate.

Well, not necessarily. I get your point................but there a

lot of things I'd like to do but can't.

Of course this is just a pressure thing to get all to conform.

I would rather people would look deeper and maybe not getting singles

so easy will cause that?

>For those who selective or delay vax, this would be very important

>to them. Merck is IMO the most unethical drug company out there so I

>don't know if anything said to them would work, since once they

>realized that people were starting to think for themselves and

>selectively and or delaying vaxing (or gasp! Not vaxing at all!)

>they took away the single Measles vax. My view may not be popular,

>but I believe in freedom of choice. People still choose to smoke and

>take drugs even though it's widely known they are harmful. They have

>a right to make that choice to partake of those items.

Yes, they do, to a certain extent, but there are lot things that we

can't do even though we want to.

Sheri

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes March 18 & 19

[Guest guest]

I think Merck will take it that people are begging for vaccines. Who knows?

They're sure to ignore whatever they want to ignore.

I personally cannot accommodate those parents who vaccinate. If they want single

vaccines and can't get them, then maybe that will wake them up to the truth.

Winnie

Re: Why call Merck? Waste of time

Vaccinations

> Except not everyone feels the same way. Parents DO have a right

> to vaccinate how they choose, and while I don't personally see

> how they could ever be fully " safe, " those who choose to

> vaccinate do deserve to be able to do so how they see fit and

> deserve to be able to have vaccines separate. For those who

> selective or delay vax, this would be very important to them.

> Merck is IMO the most unethical drug company out there so I

> don't know if anything said to them would work, since once they

> realized that people were starting to think for themselves and

> selectively and or delaying vaxing (or gasp! Not vaxing at

> all!) they took away the single Measles vax. My view may not

> be popular, but I believe in freedom of choice. People still

> choose to smoke and take drugs even though it's widely known

> they are harmful. They have a right to make that choice to

> partake of those items.

> Lori

> ---- " meryl@... " wrote:

> > I do NOT believe that this is a campaign we should be involved

> in. No

> > vaccine is safe and if the measles vaccine is dangerous (which

> it is),

> > the MMR vaccine is just more dangerous. We should not be

> wasting our

> > time and energy trying to get a dangerous vaccine re-

> introduced. We

> > should be spending our time spreading information about the

> dangers of

> > vaccination. That is just my .02 cents for what it's worth.

> >

> > Take care,

> > Meryl

> >

> >

> > On 13/03/2009, at 6:39 AM, Sunshine Organics wrote:

> >

> > > >

> > > > Please, everyone call Merck. In land a measles only

> booster is

> > > > required, not MMR booster. How many of our children got damaged

> > > > from the combined MMR, ALOT! forwarded from ACHAMP. Elaine

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

At 09:32 PM 3/12/2009, you wrote:

>I also believe in freedom of choice. The problem as I see it is the

>choice peope take to vaccinate

>is not informed choice because they are lied to by the very people

>who are supposed to guarantee

>freedom of choice. So in effect they are brainwashed and don't

>really have a choice without both sides being presented to them.

>And of course the baby or child has no choice at all.

>We know drugs are harmful because the people who make and sell them

>tell us they are harmful. Physicians Desk reference among others.

>We know ciggs are harmful because our government tells us so. This

>is really a choice because we know both sides.

>But who tells us about the scam of blood poisoning? Vaccinations.

>Its we the people who have suffered from the lies of those who are

>supposed to protect us and our freedom of choice.

>In my humble opinion any letter, phone call, or spoken word to

>anybody is never wasted.

>

>Jim

But the phone call is to get them to sell single vaccines instead of only MMR

Sheri

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes March 18 & 19

[Guest guest]

Must be mis-communication. I was addressing the issue of freedom of choice, and

the analogy to ciggs and drugs,

not calling the drug company to advocate any type of shot.

A letter, word or phone call was meant to speak against not for.

I maybe should have isolated my thought.

Folks who decide to separate or selectively vax are still taking a chance on

causing their child

to get disease, disability or death. No one can predict what dose of poison will

harm. Anyone wanting to go for any type of shot doesn't understand that vaccines

DO NOT PREVENT ANY DISEASE and needs to keep on the path of education. Asking

the doctor to sign a guarantee of safety and effectiveness will prove that they

know the vaccine is neither safe or effective in preventing disease, otherwise

they would sign. Those of you who feel the need to vaccinate with any type of

shot are letting your doctor make the decision for you. You are doing this

because of a lack of knowledge which leads to unfounded fears. So if you learn

the truth your fears will disappear and your child will not suffer a disease,

disability or die from any vaccine. This is guaranteed.

Jim

 

________________________________

From: Sheri Nakken <vaccineinfo@...>

Vaccinations

Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:21:49 AM

Subject: Re: Why call Merck? Waste of time

At 09:32 PM 3/12/2009, you wrote:

>I also believe in freedom of choice. The problem as I see it is the

>choice peope take to vaccinate

>is not informed choice because they are lied to by the very people

>who are supposed to guarantee

>freedom of choice. So in effect they are brainwashed and don't

>really have a choice without both sides being presented to them.

>And of course the baby or child has no choice at all.

>We know drugs are harmful because the people who make and sell them

>tell us they are harmful. Physicians Desk reference among others.

>We know ciggs are harmful because our government tells us so. This

>is really a choice because we know both sides.

>But who tells us about the scam of blood poisoning? Vaccinations.

>Its we the people who have suffered from the lies of those who are

>supposed to protect us and our freedom of choice.

>In my humble opinion any letter, phone call, or spoken word to

>anybody is never wasted.

>

>Jim

But the phone call is to get them to sell single vaccines instead of only MMR

Sheri

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.wellwith in1.com/vaccine. htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes March 18 & 19

[Guest guest]

At 04:04 PM 3/13/2009, you wrote:

>Must be mis-communication. I was addressing the issue of freedom of

>choice, and the analogy to ciggs and drugs,

>not calling the drug company to advocate any type of shot.

The subject line started with calling Merck to request singles. " Why

Call Merck? "

>A letter, word or phone call was meant to speak against not for.

>I maybe should have isolated my thought.

>Folks who decide to separate or selectively vax are still taking a

>chance on causing their child

>to get disease, disability or death. No one can predict what dose of

>poison will harm. Anyone wanting to go for any type of shot doesn't

>understand that vaccines DO NOT PREVENT ANY DISEASE and needs to

>keep on the path of education. Asking the doctor to sign a guarantee

>of safety and effectiveness will prove that they know the vaccine is

>neither safe or effective in preventing disease, otherwise they

>would sign. Those of you who feel the need to vaccinate with any

>type of shot are letting your doctor make the decision for you. You

>are doing this because of a lack of knowledge which leads to

>unfounded fears. So if you learn the truth your fears will disappear

>and your child will not suffer a disease, disability or die from any

>vaccine. This is guaranteed.

>>Jim

Exactly

Thanks

Sheri

>

>

>________________________________

>From: Sheri Nakken <<mailto:vaccineinfo%40tesco.net>vaccineinfo@...>

><mailto:Vaccinations%40>Vaccinations

>Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:21:49 AM

>Subject: Re: Why call Merck? Waste of time

>

>At 09:32 PM 3/12/2009, you wrote:

>

> >I also believe in freedom of choice. The problem as I see it is the

> >choice peope take to vaccinate

> >is not informed choice because they are lied to by the very people

> >who are supposed to guarantee

> >freedom of choice. So in effect they are brainwashed and don't

> >really have a choice without both sides being presented to them.

> >And of course the baby or child has no choice at all.

> >We know drugs are harmful because the people who make and sell them

> >tell us they are harmful. Physicians Desk reference among others.

> >We know ciggs are harmful because our government tells us so. This

> >is really a choice because we know both sides.

> >But who tells us about the scam of blood poisoning? Vaccinations.

> >Its we the people who have suffered from the lies of those who are

> >supposed to protect us and our freedom of choice.

> >In my humble opinion any letter, phone call, or spoken word to

> >anybody is never wasted.

> >

> >Jim

>

>But the phone call is to get them to sell single vaccines instead of only MMR

>Sheri

>

>------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------

>Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

>Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

>Vaccines - <http://www.wellwith>http://www.wellwith in1.com/vaccine. htm

>Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes March 18 & 19

>

>