Re: I Hate This Guy (Melinda)

[Guest guest]

Someone else was posting and posing as me. You are right, waste of

time though.

>

> Dawn,

> I followed a lot of the posts on this blog - heavy stuff!

>

> I do wonder though, if engaging in argument like this is fruitful -

I

> think it tends to give the scientists more ammunition in their

> " anti-vaxers are just emotional crazies " when we engage in name

> calling and threatening rather than scientific presentation of the

> facts (which clearly none of these people have ever been exposed to,

> except the doctored CDC stuff or what big pharma chooses to

release.)

> I am part of another group who works on getting kids in special

> education the education and therapies they are entitled to by law,

and

> we have to work very hard to engage in respectful, fact-based

> conversations to destroy the perception that we are just

> over-emotional parents full of empty threats with no real basis for

> our arguments. That's not meant to offend - it's just to present an

> idea for thought.

>

> I don't understand how they deny sheer facts, like the aluminum

> levels that exceed the upper limits that the government themselves

> recommend?

>

> Melinda C.

>

[Guest guest]

Posing? That is creepy. Why would someone do that?

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Dawn <dawndanc@...> wrote:

> Someone else was posting and posing as me. You are right, waste of

> time though.

>

>

> >

> > Dawn,

> > I followed a lot of the posts on this blog - heavy stuff!

> >

> > I do wonder though, if engaging in argument like this is fruitful -

> I

> > think it tends to give the scientists more ammunition in their

> > " anti-vaxers are just emotional crazies " when we engage in name

> > calling and threatening rather than scientific presentation of the

> > facts (which clearly none of these people have ever been exposed to,

> > except the doctored CDC stuff or what big pharma chooses to

> release.)

> > I am part of another group who works on getting kids in special

> > education the education and therapies they are entitled to by law,

> and

> > we have to work very hard to engage in respectful, fact-based

> > conversations to destroy the perception that we are just

> > over-emotional parents full of empty threats with no real basis for

> > our arguments. That's not meant to offend - it's just to present an

> > idea for thought.

> >

> > I don't understand how they deny sheer facts, like the aluminum

> > levels that exceed the upper limits that the government themselves

> > recommend?

> >

> > Melinda C.

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

That's spooky! Do you know who it was???

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Dawn <dawndanc@...> wrote:

> Someone else was posting and posing as me. You are right, waste of

> time though.

[Guest guest]

No I don't know who it was....they want to paint anti-vaxers are crazy,

which is why they did that I am guessing.

> > Someone else was posting and posing as me. You are right, waste of

> > time though.

>

[Guest guest]

Dawn,

I didn't think a lot of those comments sounded like you and now it

makes sense. That is NUTS. These people will do anything to continue

to hide in their delusions.

Melinda C.