(No subject)

[Guest guest]

To understand any controversial subject, one needs to read both sides from the

main players, the people who were actually in the arena at the time the

controversy took place. This is especially true about vaccines. Only by knowing

the past and comparing it to the present " opinion " can one decide what is true

and what is not.

Most people believe that polio was eradicated by Salk's vaccine. And based on

that belief the whole vaccine argument rest.. In other words if Salk's vaccine

wiped out polio, then today's vaccines must also prevent disease. So if one

finds out that Salk's vaccine did not eradicate polio and that  Salk's plan was

based on his own theory of cause and effect, which also was diametrically

opposed  to the leading polio " experts " of the time, then one is liable to

understand that if the polio vaccine did not prevent polio then by the same

principle no vaccine will prevent any disease.

I have just finished a book. Breakthrough, the saga of Jonas Salk by

, written in 1966 after the polio fiasco was over. He interviewed Salk,

O'Connor and all the main players in person. You will read the truth about this

most unscientific experiment that cost 11 kids to die and over 200 more to

become paralyzed. If you are one who is trying to educate people not to

vaccinate, you need to read this book.

Punch in used books, there are lots of copies available for 8 or 9 dollars.

Jim