Links in our posts - EVERYONE please read!

[Guest guest]

Hi all,

It was pointed out on another one of my lists that if you

put links inside parenthesis, like this: (http://www.nvic.org) that

the links stand a much better chance of staying intact after

processing through the listserv. I watched it for a week or so before

I posted here, to make sure this was actually the case, and it does

seem to work much better. So, from now on, we should try to remember

to put all our links in parentheses. Even really long links seem to

stay intact better that way.

[Guest guest]

Thanks, !

Winnie

Links in our posts - EVERYONE please read!

vaccinations

> Hi all,

>

> It was pointed out on another one of my lists that

> if you

> put links inside parenthesis, like this: (http://www.nvic.org) that

> the links stand a much better chance of staying intact after

> processing through the listserv. I watched it for a week or so before

> I posted here, to make sure this was actually the case, and it does

> seem to work much better. So, from now on, we should try to remember

> to put all our links in parentheses. Even really long links

> seem to

> stay intact better that way.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

Interesting. Can you have a look back at my post on 7.1.09 entitled

Measles could survive attempted eradication due to low vaccination rates " ?

I put three links in that one, all parenthesised, and my browser still split

them. Can you tell me if your browser split them too?

Sue x

-- Links in our posts - EVERYONE please read!

Hi all,

It was pointed out on another one of my lists that if you

put links inside parenthesis, like this: (http://www.nvic.org) that

the links stand a much better chance of staying intact after

processing through the listserv. I watched it for a week or so before

I posted here, to make sure this was actually the case, and it does

seem to work much better. So, from now on, we should try to remember

to put all our links in parentheses. Even really long links seem to

stay intact better that way.

[Guest guest]

Hi Sue,

There is only one link on that post that I can see, and it isn't in

parenthesis... are you thinking of a different post, maybe? The link

was scrambled in the " Vaccinations " post, but not in the

" VaccineDangers " google post. I've noticed Google doesn't scramble

links as badly as .

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Sue <mum2mishka@...> wrote:

> Hi ,

>

> Interesting. Can you have a look back at my post on 7.1.09 entitled

> Measles could survive attempted eradication due to low vaccination rates " ?

> I put three links in that one, all parenthesised, and my browser still split

> them. Can you tell me if your browser split them too?

[Guest guest]

Oops! Sorry, , I've posted too much about measles lately!

Try 6.1.09 " could measles fight off cancer? "

Sue x

-- Re: Links in our posts - EVERYONE please read!

Hi Sue,

There is only one link on that post that I can see, and it isn't in

parenthesis... are you thinking of a different post, maybe? The link

was scrambled in the " Vaccinations " post, but not in the

" VaccineDangers " google post. I've noticed Google doesn't scramble

links as badly as .

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Sue <mum2mishka@...> wrote:

> Hi ,

>

> Interesting. Can you have a look back at my post on 7.1.09 entitled

> Measles could survive attempted eradication due to low vaccination rates " ?

> I put three links in that one, all parenthesised, and my browser still

split

> them. Can you tell me if your browser split them too?

[Guest guest]

Ah! That's the one. Yes, all links in parentheses were good... no

broken links on my end. The links do take up more than one line, but

when I click on them, they are intact.

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Sue <mum2mishka@...> wrote:

> Oops! Sorry, , I've posted too much about measles lately!

>

> Try 6.1.09 " could measles fight off cancer? "

>

> Sue x