Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I have no doubt cancers are caused vaccines, either directly from some poisonous component, or from the immune system malfunction that vaccines cause. Cancers are NOT normal in children--maybe more common, but it did not used to be this way. The Virus and the Vaccine by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher is a book that discusses this very topic, and I am sure would have good documentation of the connection between vaccines and cancers. So, sorry to hear about the little boy. I hope they stay far away from chemo, and take the route to build up his immune system to fight this instead. Winnie Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia Vaccinations > Does anyone have any documentation on ALL being connected to > childhood > vaccinations? A 3 year old boy in my son-in-law's family has > been > diagnosed with this killer disease and I have a strong suspicion > that > this did not come from bad genes but from a needle. > I have seen a couple of references to ALL being the result of > diptheria immunization but there is very little information > supporting > this theory. > Also is there some information about now many cases of ALL have > been > diagnosed in the last 25 years, and have any children survived? > Thanks very much, > ... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 20+ years ago when I was working in a children's hospital as part of my nursing training, I was pulled to the cancer unit. There were children there that were only 2 months old all the way up to age 18. I remember wondering how in the world did all those kids get cancer?? They came there from all over the world. I'll bet the size of that cancer unit has grown tremendously in the years since then. Little developing brains and bodies cannot stand up to all the toxic ingredients in vaccines without succumbing in some way. Unfortunately parents of children aren't given the option to stay away from chemo, radiation, etc. if that's what the doctors order, and we know that's the only thing doctors know how TO do when it comes to cancer. Kay -----Original Message----- I have no doubt cancers are caused vaccines, either directly from some poisonous component, or from the immune system malfunction that vaccines cause. Cancers are NOT normal in children--maybe more common, but it did not used to be this way. The Virus and the Vaccine by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher is a book that discusses this very topic, and I am sure would have good documentation of the connection between vaccines and cancers. So, sorry to hear about the little boy. I hope they stay far away from chemo, and take the route to build up his immune system to fight this instead. Winnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 , I am so sorry to hear about this little boy suffering. I do hope that the family will resort to alternative healing (I have talked to a handful of people that cured themselves that way and my Dad was one of them). It is the conventional treatment these days that kills the majority of patients faster than the cancer itself. " In 2006, the National Institute of Health reported that America has recently experienced an " abrupt rise " in childhood cancers, which began in the early 1980's. From the early 1980's to the early 1990's, the incidence of cancer in American children under the age of ten years rose 37 percent. In more recent years the increase in childhood cancers has continued to climb at approximately this same rate. The incidence of malignancies in children is rising most quickly among the types of cancers that are generally associated with exposure to toxins. These cancers include leukemia and brain cancer. Currently, one in every 330 American children gets cancer. Approximately 25 percent of all children who get cancer die from it " . ** Source: Healing the New Childhood Epidemics: Autism, ADHD, Asthma, and Allergies by Bock, M.D. and Cameron Stauth ** Every vaccine on the market carries a disclaimer that the product has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic (cancer-causing) potential. You might want to share the vaccine package inserts with the family because if this little boy recovers, he will be faced with vaccines again in the future. While the medical association will not vaccinate a child suffering from cancer, they will once he/she has been in remission for one year or more. Pretty disturbing. http://vaers.hhs.gov/pdf/PackageInserts.pdf (to view all vaccines) http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_infanrix.pdf (page 7 to view ex. of warning) > > Does anyone have any documentation on ALL being connected to childhood > vaccinations? A 3 year old boy in my son-in-law's family has been > diagnosed with this killer disease and I have a strong suspicion that > this did not come from bad genes but from a needle. > I have seen a couple of references to ALL being the result of > diptheria immunization but there is very little information supporting > this theory. > Also is there some information about now many cases of ALL have been > diagnosed in the last 25 years, and have any children survived? > Thanks very much, > ... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Dawn, Do you know of any states where the choice to treat " alternatively " is permitted for pediatric patients? Not only are vaccines not tested for their carcinogenic effects, but the effects of any certain combination of vaccines given on the same day have never been studied either. There is no way the hodgepodge of ingredients in various vaccines, mixed together, could NOT have a negative effect on the recipient. Kay -----Original Message----- On Behalf Of Dawn I do hope that the family will resort to alternative healing (I have talked to a handful of people that cured themselves that way and my Dad was one of them). It is the conventional treatment these days that kills the majority of patients faster than the cancer itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Kay, I didn't know that we didn't have a choice? Maybe check with the list owner, Sheri Nakken on that one where she was a pediatric nurse? Kay <Casper3@...> wrote: Dawn, Do you know of any states where the choice to treat " alternatively " is permitted for pediatric patients? Not only are vaccines not tested for their carcinogenic effects, but the effects of any certain combination of vaccines given on the same day have never been studied either. There is no way the hodgepodge of ingredients in various vaccines, mixed together, could NOT have a negative effect on the recipient. Kay -----Original Message----- On Behalf Of Dawn I do hope that the family will resort to alternative healing (I have talked to a handful of people that cured themselves that way and my Dad was one of them). It is the conventional treatment these days that kills the majority of patients faster than the cancer itself. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Dawn, I, too, was a pediatric nurse (and obstetric). Unfortunately parents do NOT have a choice when it comes to treating their children with chemotherapy. There have been several stories in the media in recent years about parents being taken to court and having their children taken away (or attempted to) if they refuse allopathic treatment for their child for cancer. Abraham Cherrix is one such story. He was 17 and fought the system for the right to chose what treatment he received. His parents ultimately were granted the right to let him be treated with an alternative treatment, but I think his age played a big part. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,363941,00.html Daren and Barbara Jensen fled Utah with their son, , a few years ago, after the state ordered that the cancer-stricken boy be placed in state custody so that he can receive chemotherapy. http://www.patriotsaints.com/MyChildMyChoice/cases/Jensen/ Other cases of forced cancer treatment: http://www.whale.to/v/horwin1.html http://www.evehillary.org/sarah.memory.htm http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/drugs.htm#1 Kay -----Original Message----- On Behalf Of Dawn Crim Kay, I didn't know that we didn't have a choice? Maybe check with the list owner, Sheri Nakken on that one where she was a pediatric nurse? Kay <Casper3@...> wrote: Dawn, Do you know of any states where the choice to treat " alternatively " is permitted for pediatric patients? Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I am sorry to hear about your relative. I found this information about The Vitamin K shot being linked to leukemia. " The Vitamin K shot has been linked to leukaemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, which is characterized by an increased number of white corpuscles in the blood, and accounts for about 85 percent of childhood leukaemia. Research carried out by Dr. Louise , of the Sir Spence Institute of Child Health in Newcastle upon Tyne, produced the most startling results. Dr. Louise was quoted in the British Medical Journal in 1998 as stating, " It is not possible, on the basis of currently published evidence, to refute the suggestion that neonatal IM vitamin K administration increases the risk of early childhood leukemia. " . The British Journal of Cancer published " Factors associated with childhood cancer " by J. Golding, et al, in 1990. The report indicated that universally administered IM vitamin K injections significantly increase our children's chances of developing childhood cancer. A follow-up study published two years later in the British Medical Journal (Golding J, Paterson K, Greenwood R, Mott M. Intramuscular vitamin K and childhood cancer. BMJ 1992; 305:341-346.) reinforced the findings of the previous study. The authors' comments, in keeping with scientific style, are conservatively stated, but parents who are concerned about the health of their babies will read " danger " between the following lines: " The only two studies so far to have examined the relation between childhood cancer and intramuscular vitamin K have shown similar results and the relation is biologically plausible. The prophylactic benefits against haemorrhagic disease are unlikely to exceed the potential adverse effects from intramuscular vitamin K... " The chance of your child developing leukaemia from the Vitamin K shot is estimated to be about one in 500 (MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, Vol 2 #3, September 1992) · Animal studies have linked large doses of vitamin K to a variety of conditions that include anaemia, liver damage, kidney damage and death. · Interestingly the common problem that occurs these days of jaundice in newborns has only been reported since the introduction of Vitamin K administration. · According to the product insert, adverse reactions include haemolysis (or hemolysis - American spelling) (meaning breakdown of red blood cells), haemolytic anaemia (a disorder characterised by chronic premature destruction of red blood cells), hyperbilirubinemia (too much bilirubin in blood) and jaundice (yellow skin and eyes resulting from hyperbilirubinemia), and allergic reactions include face flushing, gastrointestinal upset, rash, redness, pain or swelling at injection site and itching skin. It also warns that large enough doses can cause brain damage in infants and/or impairment to liver function. Hypoxia has also been published as having occurred in infants after Vitamin K administration.----- > > I have no doubt cancers are caused vaccines, either directly from some poisonous component, or from the immune system malfunction that vaccines cause. Cancers are NOT normal in children--maybe more common, but it did not used to be this way. > > The Virus and the Vaccine by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher is a book that discusses this very topic, and I am sure would have good documentation of the connection between vaccines and cancers. > > So, sorry to hear about the little boy. I hope they stay far away from chemo, and take the route to build up his immune system to fight this instead. > > Winnie > > Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia > Vaccinations > > > Does anyone have any documentation on ALL being connected to > > childhood > > vaccinations? A 3 year old boy in my son-in-law's family has > > been > > diagnosed with this killer disease and I have a strong suspicion > > that > > this did not come from bad genes but from a needle. > > I have seen a couple of references to ALL being the result of > > diptheria immunization but there is very little information > > supporting > > this theory. > > Also is there some information about now many cases of ALL have > > been > > diagnosed in the last 25 years, and have any children survived? > > Thanks very much, > > ... > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I'm so sorry. Would a vaccine-injury attorney be able to fight the battle for alternative treatment? > Dawn, > > Do you know of any states where the choice to treat " alternatively " is > permitted for pediatric patients? > > > Kay > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I don't know. I think it would be a case by case situation and vary by state as well. The people mentioned in the articles below had long drawn out fights. Some of them won, others lost and their children died at the hands of the medical industry. Sickening when a parent doesn't have the right to chose how their own child is to be treated medically! It all comes back to the almighty $$$. Kay -----Original Message----- On Behalf Of Dawn I'm so sorry. Would a vaccine-injury attorney be able to fight the battle for alternative treatment? > > Dawn, > > I, too, was a pediatric nurse (and obstetric). Unfortunately parents do NOT > have a choice when it comes to treating their children with chemotherapy. > > There have been several stories in the media in recent years about parents > being taken to court and having their children taken away (or attempted to) > if they refuse allopathic treatment for their child for cancer. Abraham > Cherrix is one such story. He was 17 and fought the system for the right to > chose what treatment he received. His parents ultimately were granted the > right to let him be treated with an alternative treatment, but I think his > age played a big part. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,363941,00.html > > Daren and Barbara Jensen fled Utah with their son, , a few years ago, > after the state ordered that the cancer-stricken boy be placed in state > custody so that he can receive chemotherapy. > http://www.patriotsaints.com/MyChildMyChoice/cases/Jensen/ > > Other cases of forced cancer treatment: > http://www.whale.to/v/horwin1.html > http://www.evehillary.org/sarah.memory.htm > > http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/drugs.htm#1 > > Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.