All vaccines severely contaminated---Janine

[Guest guest]

Link to book in the US

<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0955917727/wellwithinA/>http://www.amazo\

n.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0955917727/wellwithinA/

Link to book in the UK

<http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0955917727/wellwithin-21/202-2017433-6\

2>http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0955917727/wellwithin-21/202-2017433-\

6312405

or http://tinyurl.com/6m8z3l

<http://www.whale.to/a/roberts_b.html>http://www.whale.to/a/roberts_b.html

http://jabs.org.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2855

Highly contaminated vaccines PDF Print E-mail

View Comments

Written by Janine

Monday, 18 August 2008 01:47

Extract from chapter of the book Fear of the Invisible..

This article follows on from the one i have

posted on MMR contamination but explains what is

happening more broadly - it is drawn from my new

book on vaccines and viruses Fear of the Invisible.

From the official US transcripts of recent

unreported meetings of US and UK vaccine safety scientists....

All ways of making vaccines have their dangers.

Dr Hayflick, a well-reputed scientist involved

for many years with vaccines, described at the

conference how the ‘Primary Culture' method of

taking cells from ‘sacrificed animals' or bird

embryos ran into problems when ‘it became

apparent that these cells contained many unwanted

viruses, some of which were lethal to humans.' He

noted: ‘Latent viruses were such a problem with

primary monkey kidney cells that a worldwide

moratorium on the licensing of all polio virus

vaccines was called in 1967 because of death and

illnesses that occurred in monkey kidney workers

and vaccine manufacturing facilities'. The

contaminating virus then blamed was the deadly

Ebola. This was most serious, but again I could

find no record of the public being informed about this suspension or the Ebola.

The top UK government expert present at this

conference, Dr Phil Minor of the National

Institute of Biological Standards and Control,

added that the polio vaccine had originally been

so polluted that it's doses contained as much

monkey virus as poliovirus! I had no idea that so

much monkey virus was in this vaccine given to

hundreds of millions of children.

Then there was another shock for me. I had been

assured two years earlier at the SV40 Workshop

held by the NIH in Washington that the polio

vaccine was no longer contaminated with SV40 -

and consequently I had so assured the UK public

in our resulting Channel 4 television

documentary. Now I learnt I had been misled and

consequently had seriously misinformed the

public. Scientists reported to this meeting that

‘SV40 sequences' remained in the poliovirus

seed used for the current polio vaccines.

............

AND MMR ...

Dr Heyrick told of how the eminent Dr Maurice

Hilleman, the scientist I earlier interviewed

about the MMR vaccine, had used what he thought

was an ‘intestine-based cell line' to make an

adenovirus vaccine, only to discover to his

horror that his cell line had been invaded and

taken over by the aggressive cervical cancer virus known as HeLa.

I also learnt that DNA fragments contaminate

vaccine lots and remained extremely active and

dangerous. Dr Golding feared they might combine

with other genetic codes in the vaccine lots -

and thus create a mutant viral strain that could

get in the individual doses of vaccine.

The removal of this contaminating DNA has proved

impossible. The US government in 1986 recommended

a weight limit for contaminating DNA of 100

picograms per vaccine dose. But the manufacturers

could not meet this safety recommendation, as was explained at this Workshop.

Their failure again led the government to relax

its standards, applying the 100 picograms limit

solely to vaccines produced from cancerous cells,

and allowing one hundred times as much

contaminating DNA (10 nanograms) in vaccines

produced on other types of cells. But the meeting

was told that vaccine manufacturers now admitted

they could not meet even this lower standard of

‘purity.' Thus high levels of hazardous DNA

pollution remain in many vaccines.

This failure was a great concern to the meeting.

Many of the doctors present worried that such a

great amount of DNA fragments might cause viral

mutations in the vaccines. ‘Naked' DNA (with no

protein coat) is known to be highly reactive said

Dr. Phil Krause. He then calculated; ‘If there

are 10 nanograms of residual DNA per dose, which

is the current WHO recommendation, and if two

doses were recommended per child, as is the case

with MMR vaccine, and the infectivity of viral

DNA in the vaccine were comparable to that of

purified polyoma virus DNA, we can calculate the

theoretical infectivity risk. ... For a vaccine

that is universally administered to the 4 million

children born in the US every year, this would

represent about 500 infections per year, clearly an unacceptable rate.'

This shocked me. If he was right, and it seemed

he was (none of the experts present questioned

his calculations), this surely meant the current

MMR vaccine is potentially very dangerous. Krause

also had only added up the risk from the one

vaccine. What when to it is added the

contaminating DNA in all the other vaccines?

------- and later on at the vaccine safety

meeting..... (I am putting together parts of my chapter here)

Dr Krause also stated: ‘Of course, in the

context of DNA vaccines, we are talking about

injecting even larger quantities of DNA into

people.' He was speaking here about the new DNA

vaccines being developed as ‘safer' than our current vaccines.

Another important safety issue was raised.

‘What would this contaminating DNA do when it

was injected into humans in vaccines? Could it

change our own DNA? Could it cause cancers - or

autoimmune diseases?' ‘When you consider that

almost everyone of these vaccines is injected

right into the tissue that is the preferred site

for DNA gene therapy ... I think you couldn't do

much more to get the DNA expressed [to get

contaminating DNA taken up by human cells] than

to inject it into a muscle in the way it's being done.'

Another speaker lamely admitted: ‘I chaired the

committee that licensed the chickenpox vaccine,

and it [residual DNA] was actually an issue that

we considered at that time. We looked among

recipients of the vaccine for evidence of an

autoimmune response associated with the DNA

included in that vaccine.' He then added:

‘Actually, we didn't look, we asked the company

to look and they did not find one.'

Walid Heneine of the CDC asked: ‘No one has

mentioned how much DNA we now have in the

licensed vaccines. I mean, how much are we being

exposed to? Do we have any idea how much is in

the viral vaccines, like yellow fever, measles,

mumps vaccines? Do the regulators have an idea

from the manufacturers, how much DNA there is?'

DR. Loewer replied: ‘I have no idea. Nobody that I know has mentioned it.'

Dr Becky Sheets from CBER then confirmed the

suspicions of many when she responded. ‘I think

that the vast majority of licensed vaccines, U.S.

licensed vaccines, have not been tested for

residual DNA. The few that have been tested are

the ones that have been licensed in the last few

years, including varicella and Hepatitis A.'

She then added: ‘I wanted to respond to an

earlier question regarding how purified are live

viral vaccines [like MMR] - [the answer is] minimally purified.'

These presentations made some of the experts very

uneasy. Dr. Desrosiers stated: ‘I don't worry

so much about the agents that one can test for. I

worry about the agents that you can't test for, that you don't know about.

Dr Greenberg agreed, He said he was: ‘worried

also about the agents that aren't known'. He

continued: ‘There are still countless thousands

of undiscovered viruses, proteins, and similar

particles. We have only identified a very small

part of the microbial world - and we can only

test for those we have identified. Thus the

vaccine cultures could contain many unknown particles.'

Another doctor said: ‘As time goes on, of

course, new viruses are discovered and new

problems arise. The foamy virus has been

[recently] identified as one that we should be

really sure is absent from these vaccines.'

The Chairman of the Workshop then asked Dr Maxine

Linial: ‘Maxine, does anybody know if vaccines

have been checked for foamy virus contamination?'

She replied: ‘As far as I know, no.'

‘You mean nobody has looked or as far as you know?

She responded; ‘I don't know. There are very

few reagents. I mean, there are reagents for the

so-called human or chimp foamy virus, but as far

as 1 know, there are no good antibody reagents.'

In other words, they could not tell if the

vaccines contained foamy viruses. (‘Reagents'

are antibodies to known virus particles.)

The experts voiced other concerns. ‘And I'll be

honest and say that I'm surprised that primary

African green monkey kidney cells continue to be

used, and I'm a little bit disappointed that FDA

and whoever is involved had not had a more

serious effort to move away from primary African

green monkey kidneys. We all know that there are

a number of neurodegenerative conditions and

other conditions where viral causes have been

suspected for years and no viral agent

identified. Maybe they're caused by viruses, but maybe they're not.'

Another doctor said: ‘We need to consider again

some of the issues of residual DNA. Is it

oncogenic? We had a lot of experience with

chicken leucosis viruses in chick embryo cells

beginning back in 1960. And the thing about them

is they are not easy to detect because they don't

produce any pathogenic effect.'

An unnamed participant added; ‘I have to

express some bewilderment [at this talk of

dangerous contamination], simply because, as I

mentioned last night, the vero cell, which under

many conditions is neoplastic [cancerous], has

been licensed for the production of IPV and OPV

[the common polio vaccines] in the United States,

Thailand, Belgium and France.' The current polio

vaccines thus run the risk of having oncogenes in

them. Again this was news to me. I had no idea

that the polio vaccine might be grown on cancer cells.

Dr. Rosenberg added, unreassuringly: ‘When one

uses neoplastic cells as substrates for vaccine

development, one can inadvertently get virus to

virus, or virus to cellular particle,

interactions that could have unknown biological consequences.'

Dr. Tom Broker said we had to be concerned about

‘papilloma virus infections' in the vaccine ...

‘One of the more remarkable facts of this

family of diseases is that since 1980 more people

have died of HPV disease than have died of AIDS.'

Dr. Phil Minor, from the UK National Institute of

Biological Standards and Control, told of another

disaster. ‘Hepatitis B was transmitted by

yellow fever vaccine back in the 1940s. The

hepatitis B actually came from the stabilizers of

the albumin that was actually put in there to keep it stable'

He continued: ‘For many years, rabies vaccines

were produced in mouse brain or sheep brain. They

have quite serious consequences, but not

necessarily associated with adventitial agents.

You can get encephalitis as a result of immune

responses to the non-invasic protein.'

‘Influenza is an actuated vaccine. Again, it's

not made on SPF eggs, that is, specified

pathogen-free eggs. They are avian leukosis virus

free, but they are not free of all the other

pathogens that you would choose to exclude from

the measles vaccine production system.'

Dr Minor, the UK's top vaccine safety officer,

then added: ‘So even today then you have to

bear in mind that a large amount of vaccine

that's made is made on really quite crude

materials, from an adventitious agent point of

view. It's not a trivial usage. In fact, when

consider what vaccines are actually made on these

days, they are quite primitive in some respects.'

These warnings were coming from a doctor working

for the UK government who asked me at a later

meeting not to pass on vaccine information that would alarm parents.

He went on to discuss SV40 and the polio vaccine.

‘It's a very common polyoma virus of old world

monkeys, and particularly rhesus macaques. The

difficulty with this was that, when the rhesus

macaque monkeys are sacrificed and a primary

monkey kidney culture made from him or her, as

the case may be, a silent infection is set up. So

there is evidence of infection [found] just by

looking at the cultures. In fact, these cultures

can throw out as much SV40 as they do polio

[virus].' ‘The problem was that the cell

cultures didn't show any sign of having defects,

when they were actually infected with SV40.'

It seemed that SV40, and its accompanying

proteins and genetic codes, would never have got

into so many humans if they had not contaminated

the vaccine - and that they were only dangerous

when moved into a species for which their

presence was not natural - such as into humans

and into cynomolgus (African Green) monkeys.

Dr Minor continued: ‘Wild caught monkeys were

being used extensively in vaccine production. Up

to a half of the cultures would have been thrown

away because of adventitious agent contamination,

mainly foamy virus, but certainly other things as well.'

But, they could not be certain what viruses were

present. They could be mistaking SV40 for other

viruses. Why? He explained because antibody tests

are used to test for its presence - and such

tests are not all that accurate. Antibodies don't

only react to a specific viral protein. They may

‘cross-react' against other things. ‘What you

could also argue is that you are not picking up

SV40 specific antibodies at all, and they could

be other human polyomas [viruses] like the BK or

the JC, and it's cross-reacting antibodies that

we're picking up. I think that is still a thing that needs to be resolved.'

‘The point about this long story which I have

just been telling you about SV40 is that SV40 was

a problem between 1955 and 1962, and it's now

1999, and we still don't really know what was

going on. So if you actually make a mistake, it's

really quite serious. It may keep you occupied

for the rest of your working life. ‘

Then Dr Minor made a still more alarming

admission: ‘Now the regulatory authorities in

the room will be well aware of a large number of

other examples of this type which don't actually

get published. I think that's not so good. I

think this stuff really should be out there in the public literature.

Another UK expert then took the stand. It was Dr.

on from NIBSC and, as he explained, ‘for

those of you who don't know, NIBSC is CBER's

cousin from across the pond in the U.K.' In other

words, it was the top UK vaccine safety

monitoring body. He started off on a reassuring

note: ‘There is no evidence for any increase in

the incidence of childhood cancers since the

onset of measles, mumps vaccination.' But he then

said: ‘But, I think, as a scientific community,

unless we do something at least for the future,

we might be in a very difficult situation to

defend certain issues. If I confronted some of

the violent ideologically pure Greens in our

country, [telling them what we have been

discussing here]: I'm sure they would say:

‘Shut it down because this is unsafe, totally unsafe.'

It was thus that I learnt that our vaccines are a

veritable soup, made up not just of viruses that

should or should not be there, but also thousands

of bits of viruses and of cells, DNA and RNA

genetic codes, proteins, enzymes, chemicals and

perhaps oncogenes and prions. The vaccine was

monitored for the presence of only a very few of

these particles and vaccine lots are thrown away only if these are found.

In other words, the vaccines we give our children

are liquids filled with a host of unknown

particles, most of which came from the cells of

non-humans: from chickens, monkeys, or even from cancer cells.

Truly we do not know what we are doing or what

are the long-term consequences. All that is known

for sure is that vaccines are a very cheap form

of public medicine often provided by governments

to ensure the public that they really do care for the safety of our children.

.... the chapter continues....

Janine

author of 'Fear of the Invisible'

How scared should you be of Viruses and Vaccines...

Link to book in the US

<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0955917727/wellwithinA/>http://www.amazo\

n.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0955917727/wellwithinA/

Link to book in the UK

<http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0955917727/wellwithin-21/202-2017433-6\

2>http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0955917727/wellwithin-21/202-2017433-\

6312405

or http://tinyurl.com/6m8z3l

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes Sept 08

[Guest guest]

I so wish I could send this to the kids and autism list but they don't want

to hear that vaccines really might have some cause. They say they dread

their kid getting the disease more than they dread the risk of the vaccine

so since everyone is entitled to their opinion.. I let it and them go.

I think it should be criminal to give any kid a vaccine and double so for a

neurologically damaged kid! that ought to lead to being hung upside down

over a fire ant hill! Anyway, how can anybody be told this and then just

dismiss it?! And we all, I'm sure, consider ourselves to be caring parents.

It seems to me that this should alarm parents to hear of this but I can bet

dollars to donuts I could forward this to my many lists and I'd still get

people defending vaccines and continuing to use them. It makes reason stare!

Nita (crew chief) and the crew: 15, Jon 13, 11, 9,

7, Christian (7/16/03 to 8/22/04), 2 and Isaac, 2/3/08

http://momof6.dotphoto.com <http://momof6.dotphoto.com/> for not

necessarily current pictures

http://nitasspot.blogspot.com

Learn from the mistakes of others. Trust me... you can't live long enough

to make them all yourself.