rhogam shot was: Re: and autism

[Guest guest]

,

I got one at 16 weeks gestation with a minimum of 80-120 mcg.

thimerosal in it. The brand name was HypRhoD by Bayer. That much

mercury could have killed my son, and I am lucky he is not more

severely affected.

How did you find out how much mercury was in the rhogam shot?

Can I ask you what year you had your shot?

My son is severe/profoundly disabled, I am also a rhogam mom that had the

older rhogam that

I was told contained higher amts of mercury. I just would like to know where

it says 80-120 mcg.

I had talked with Dr Myers about why some children are more disabled

then others from mercury..

His response was of course genetics. That's why not all the children born in

Japan developed Minamata Disease...

Maybe they all did, but some were just so mild that it was missed. But some

were so disabled that they did not

survive very long. I believe this is the case with Rhogam moms.

Donna

On Dec 25, 2007 11:37 PM, <naa-chicago@...> wrote:

> I got one at 16 weeks gestation with a minimum of 80-120 mcg.

> thimerosal in it. The brand name was HypRhoD by Bayer. That much

> mercury could have killed my son, and I am lucky he is not more

> severely affected. RhoD shots are all produced in single dose pre-

> filled syringes, so there should NEVER be preservatives used in

> them. The pharmaceutical companies claim they used thimerosal in the

> manufacturing process to prevent contamination.

>

> And I agree, the pharma rep is the last person I'd trust. If any of

> you have read " Evidence of Harm " you might remember when one of the

> original mercury dads called the vaccine manufacturer to inquire

> about thimerosal; he was told by a representative at (I think) Merck

> that thimerosal was very mild, " like lime juice " .

>

> If you are concerned I would stick with the post-partum shot. The

> prenatal shot was never given up until the late 1980's, when the ACOG

> decided to recommend it be given during pregnancy as well as after

> delivery.

>

>

> >

> > From the research I did and reading sheri's page, the rhogam shot

> is not

> > necessary at 28 weeks. I declined the shot. I don't think

> preservatives

> > in food are harmless so I wouldn't believe a pHarma rep that their

> > preservatives are " harmless " .

> >

> >

> >

> > If you are comfortable having done that, then that works for you

> and for

> > you, that is what is important.

> >

> >

> >

> > I can agree and have agreed to the PP shot but then the baby is out

> of

> > the womb and out of immediate danger from anything in the shot. I

> > haven't been able to escape the shot yet.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nita, Mom to: 14, Jon 13, 10, 8, 6,

> Christian

> > (7/16/03 to 8/22/04), 2 and Isaac due Feb. 08

> > Learn from the mistakes of others. Trust me... you can't live long

> > enough to make them all yourself.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > snip, but I got

> > the rhogam shot..actually the formal name is different but it's the

> > same deal. Anyway, did TONS of research on it. Called the

> healthcare

> > professional line at the pharmaceutical company, spoke to the

> > pharmacist who KNOWS the shot. There is no mercury in the one I

> got.

> > The preservatives were harmless (so they say),

> >

> >

> > No virus found in this incoming message.

> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.8 - Release Date:

> 12/24/2007

> > 12:00 AM

> >

> >

> >

> > No virus found in this outgoing message.

> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.8/1195 - Release Date:

> > 12/24/2007 11:19 AM

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

,

Thanks...It really makes me ill knowing these people injected that much

mercury into our bodies

with out us knowing.. And the " average " was 80-120mcg, meaning it could have

been even higher?

How much mercury does it take to harm the brain of a fetus? Do you know what

the limit would be for a

2 1/2 lb fetus(The weight of a fetus at 6 months gestation)

I agree with you about the mercury, enough of it will harm anyone,

especially a fetus!

Sure pharma took out the mercury from childhood vaccines, Yet right after

doing this

there was a HUGE push to vaccinate pregnant women with the flu vaccine that

contains mercury.

(Bastards!)

I hope your other child will be speared the pain of any disease. Its enough

to have one

child suffer.

The Nigerian government is suing and seeks to arrest 3 in the Pharma field

for poisoning children. Why cant our country

do the same for its citizens! I had spoken to an attorney and ask if there

was any way we could have some people

that were responsible for this arrested. The answer was no, Pharma is

protected. No one should have that kind of protection. Kudos to Nigeria for

arresting the scum!

Nigeria court seeks 3 arrests in Pfizer drug trial

Mon 24 Dec 2007, 15:13 GMT

http://africa.reuters.com/top/news/usnBAN454820.html

KANO, Nigeria (Reuters) - A Nigerian court on Monday ordered the

arrests of three of the defendants in a trial over a drug test

conducted by Pfizer in 1996 which Nigerian authorities say killed 11

children and left others disabled.

The northern state of Kano is suing Pfizer for $2 billion in damages

and pressing criminal charges over the testing of the antibiotic

Trovan on children in Kano during a meningitis epidemic that killed

12,000 children in six months.........

.......Lawyers for Pfizer were present but Judge Shehu Atiku complained

that individual defendants should have been there too and issued

arrest warrants against three of them.

Pfizer is arguing in a separate process in a Lagos court that the

defendants were not properly served criminal summons and therefore

were not technically charged or obliged to appear in court...... "

On Dec 26, 2007 8:32 AM, <naa-chicago@...> wrote:

> Donna,

>

> A friend of mine looked it up in a PDR (physician's desk reference)

> at a medical library. Others have told me that the 80-120 mcg was

> an 'average'; and that I'd have to FOIA the manufacturer to get the

> exact amount for my particular lot. One mom who is very involved in

> autism/vaccine issues did this and found out her shot actually had

> more than that. I think she had WinRho D.

>

> I got that shot in 1994. My other son who was born in 1996 and I got

> RhoGam during his pregnancy and he is not affected. I have not

> researched the brand that I got while pregnant with him, but I agree

> tht genetics play a role to a certain degree. However, if you give

> enough mercury to anyone they will be affected. My concern is that

> my 'typical' son will develop some other type of disease as he ages.

>

>

> > > >

> > > > From the research I did and reading sheri's page, the rhogam

> shot

> > > is not

> > > > necessary at 28 weeks. I declined the shot. I don't think

> > > preservatives

> > > > in food are harmless so I wouldn't believe a pHarma rep that

> their

> > > > preservatives are " harmless " .

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > If you are comfortable having done that, then that works for you

> > > and for

> > > > you, that is what is important.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I can agree and have agreed to the PP shot but then the baby is

> out

> > > of

> > > > the womb and out of immediate danger from anything in the shot.

> I

> > > > haven't been able to escape the shot yet.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nita, Mom to: 14, Jon 13, 10, 8, 6,

> > > Christian

> > > > (7/16/03 to 8/22/04), 2 and Isaac due Feb. 08

> > > > Learn from the mistakes of others. Trust me... you can't live

> long

> > > > enough to make them all yourself.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > snip, but I got

> > > > the rhogam shot..actually the formal name is different but it's

> the

> > > > same deal. Anyway, did TONS of research on it. Called the

> > > healthcare

> > > > professional line at the pharmaceutical company, spoke to the

> > > > pharmacist who KNOWS the shot. There is no mercury in the one I

> > > got.

> > > > The preservatives were harmless (so they say),

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.

> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> > > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.8 - Release Date:

> > > 12/24/2007

> > > > 12:00 AM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > No virus found in this outgoing message.

> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> > > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.8/1195 - Release Date:

> > > > 12/24/2007 11:19 AM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

WEll we know from the University of Calgary Studies that the fetus

absorbs the majority of maternal mercury burden, but we will never

know exactly how much the fetus got from RhoD.

Keep in mind that some brands of rhoD had quite a bit less than the

Bayer brands. The first civil case against a RhoD manufacturer (in

North Carolina) was dismissed....the mother's RhoD shot had 10 mcg, I

believe.

> > > > >

> > > > > From the research I did and reading sheri's page, the rhogam

> > shot

> > > > is not

> > > > > necessary at 28 weeks. I declined the shot. I don't think

> > > > preservatives

> > > > > in food are harmless so I wouldn't believe a pHarma rep that

> > their

> > > > > preservatives are " harmless " .

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > If you are comfortable having done that, then that works

for you

> > > > and for

> > > > > you, that is what is important.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > I can agree and have agreed to the PP shot but then the

baby is

> > out

> > > > of

> > > > > the womb and out of immediate danger from anything in the

shot.

> > I

> > > > > haven't been able to escape the shot yet.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nita, Mom to: 14, Jon 13, 10, 8,

6,

> > > > Christian

> > > > > (7/16/03 to 8/22/04), 2 and Isaac due Feb. 08

> > > > > Learn from the mistakes of others. Trust me... you can't

live

> > long

> > > > > enough to make them all yourself.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > snip, but I got

> > > > > the rhogam shot..actually the formal name is different but

it's

> > the

> > > > > same deal. Anyway, did TONS of research on it. Called the

> > > > healthcare

> > > > > professional line at the pharmaceutical company, spoke to

the

> > > > > pharmacist who KNOWS the shot. There is no mercury in the

one I

> > > > got.

> > > > > The preservatives were harmless (so they say),

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > No virus found in this incoming message.

> > > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> > > > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.8 - Release Date:

> > > > 12/24/2007

> > > > > 12:00 AM

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message.

> > > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.

> > > > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.8/1195 - Release

Date:

> > > > > 12/24/2007 11:19 AM

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >