Guest guest Posted April 10, 2007 Report Share Posted April 10, 2007 I agree with a lot of what you said, Ingrid. I think the more scientific info anti-vax folks can get on their side, and the more they are able to " convert " influential people in media and Hollywood, the less these kinds of restrictions will happen. From " their " perspective, the value of vaccines is a slam-dunk and people who doubt them are just disgruntled n'er-do-wells who are needlessly scaring people. They want to stamp it out as backward thinking the same way people want to stamp out racism. I'm not saying they're right, I'm just saying that's how they see it. And to some extent it's perspective. For example, some vegetarian advocacy groups would like to see meat labeled as a carcinogen, since cooking meat allegedly gives it carcinogenic properties. The USDA and such have rejected this based on the idea that it is " scaring people " about the wholesomeness of the meat. So which should it be? -Angie > > I have experienced > so much dissappointment in my work as a lay brf counsellor simply > because I am not allowed to even mention vaccines and their damage > even though they damage our healthy brf children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.