Guest guest Posted April 24, 2011 Report Share Posted April 24, 2011 I read Teitelbaum's study of his protocol. A couple observations. 1. It is not a Chronic Fatigue Syndrome study, despite what he says. It's a Fibromyalgia study. What he says in the study is that the Fibromyalgia patients also had some CFS symptoms. That means nothing. It is the nature of Fibromyalgia to overlap symptoms with CFS. But that doesn't mean these patients would have qualified in the strictest sense. 2. A major part of the protocol is improving sleep. He has quite a list of pharmaceutical sleep aids and suggestions for how to use them. The protocol even goes so far as requiring that the sleep be fixed. So why do I mention the sleep thing. I believe that anyone who goes from shattered sleep to fairly decent sleep will say they feel much better. So for all we know, this study could have been done using only sleep-fixing part of the protocol and the outcome would have been the same. Because the basis by which they determine success is whether the person says he/she feels much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.