Guest guest Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 From Hillary 's Op-Ed in today's NYTimes: " Now, Judy Mikovits, the retrovirus expert at the Whittemore Institute, in Reno, Nev., who led the recent study, has revisited the cold case. Not surprisingly, the institute is private, created by the parents of a woman who suffers from chronic fatigue syndrome. But Dr. Mikovits collaborated with scientists at the National Cancer Institute and the Cleveland Clinic. When she began her work on this disease in 2006, Dr. Mikovits, a 22-year veteran of the National Cancer Institute, knew little about chronic fatigue syndrome. But she was intrigued that an unusually high number of patients being followed by a Nevada doctor were suffering rare lymphomas and leukemias; at least one had died. And she was also impressed that the doctor, Dan , had built an extraordinary repository of more than 8,000 chronic fatigue syndrome tissue samples going back as far as 1984. " My hypothesis was, `This is a retrovirus,' and I was going to use that repository to find it, " Dr. Mikovits told me. What she found was live, or replicating, XMRV in both frozen and fresh blood and plasma, as well as saliva. She has found the virus in samples going back to 1984 and in nearly all the patients who developed cancer. She expects the positivity rate will be close to 100 percent in the disease. " A live or replicating retrovirus even in FROZEN samples... We learn more about this every day, and with each day comes more questions! d. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/opinion/21johnson.html?_r=2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 What of making saliva or blood auto nosodes? Would those be beneficial against a retrovirus? I also have a homeopathic retroviral nosodes.. homeopathy beneficial?? Thanks, Robin > > From Hillary 's Op-Ed in today's NYTimes: > > " Now, Judy Mikovits, the retrovirus expert at the Whittemore Institute, in Reno, Nev., who led the recent study, has revisited the cold case. Not surprisingly, the institute is private, created by the parents of a woman who suffers from chronic fatigue syndrome. But Dr. Mikovits collaborated with scientists at the National Cancer Institute and the Cleveland Clinic. > > When she began her work on this disease in 2006, Dr. Mikovits, a 22-year veteran of the National Cancer Institute, knew little about chronic fatigue syndrome. But she was intrigued that an unusually high number of patients being followed by a Nevada doctor were suffering rare lymphomas and leukemias; at least one had died. And she was also impressed that the doctor, Dan , had built an extraordinary repository of more than 8,000 chronic fatigue syndrome tissue samples going back as far as 1984. > > " My hypothesis was, `This is a retrovirus,' and I was going to use that repository to find it, " Dr. Mikovits told me. > > What she found was live, or replicating, XMRV in both frozen and fresh blood and plasma, as well as saliva. She has found the virus in samples going back to 1984 and in nearly all the patients who developed cancer. She expects the positivity rate will be close to 100 percent in the disease. " > > A live or replicating retrovirus even in FROZEN samples... > > We learn more about this every day, and with each day comes more questions! > > d. > > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/opinion/21johnson.html?_r=2 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 Hi -- I apologize for not replying/ responding specifically to this POST with an answer/ comment, but the header caught my eye. You DO know that the HIV virus was found in a sample by a woman doctor from frozen samples she'd kept from a young man. Said young man passed away in a GA (think this was where it was) hospital of a mysterious wasting syndrome. No matter what treatment or test she administered she was never able to find a cause or treatment. When HIV emefrged later and people began dropping from (full blown) Aids, she ran tests via the CDC on some of the tissue and blood samples she had kept frozen. They did prove to be that same virus. All I am saying here is that if theere were even OLDER samples from people with (like) samples they might well get the same result. Just .. a sort of comment. I lost many friends to that other virus; most prior to the T cell treatments. This was why I happened to know of this case; used to read all I could about it. Thanks-- Jane, the one with the hound,NY, NY > From Hillary 's Op-Ed in today's NYTimes: > " Now, Judy Mikovits, the retrovirus expert at the Whittemore > Institute, in Reno, Nev., who led the recent study, has >revisited the cold case. Not surprisingly, the institute is private, >created by the parents of a woman who suffers from chronic fatigue >syndrome. But Dr. Mikovits collaborated with scientists at the >National Cancer Institute and the Cleveland Clinic. > When she began her work on this disease in 2006, Dr. Mikovits, a 22->year veteran of the National Cancer Institute, knew little about >chronic fatigue syndrome. But she was intrigued that an unusually >high number of patients being followed by a Nevada doctor were >suffering rare lymphomas and leukemias; at least one had died. And >she was also impressed that the doctor, Dan , had built an >extraordinary repository of more than 8,000 chronic fatigue syndrome >tissue samples going back as far as 1984. > " My hypothesis was, `This is a retrovirus,' and I was going to use >that repository to find it, " Dr. Mikovits told me. > What she found was live, or replicating, XMRV in both frozen and >fresh blood and plasma, as well as saliva. She has found the virus >in samples going back to 1984 and in nearly all the patients who >developed cancer. She expects the positivity rate will be close to >100 percent in the disease. " > A live or replicating retrovirus even in FROZEN samples... > We learn more about this every day, and with each day comes more questions! > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/opinion/21johnson.html?_r=2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.