Re:Anyone tried this? Testimonials are very interesting.

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

Have looked at the site.

I reckon anything that conceptualises the condition as a problem with

brain/central nervous system dysregulation, or neurological misprocessing of

stimulus (meaning a significantly impaired ability to cope with " stress " ) is on

the right track.

I also know it's possible, even after over a decade of illness, to have patches

where I am somewhere near normal. In my experience, this has been brought about

by medications (as per Jay Goldstein's theories) although sustainability was/is

always the problem. Still- this was/is very encouraging to me, because it

meant/means that the condition is, in all probability, a functional illness,

rather than there being some degenerative or irreversible problem. (Although,

even with full recovery, there might always be some pre-disposition or

sensitivity )

Of course, Goldstein's ideas involve suppressing an over-sensitive CNS

(primarily by inhibition of excitatory neurotransmitters)...which is in the same

ballpark as this stuff. So- yes...the theory makes sense to me. Whether it works

is another matter, but I'm pretty interested. (Particularly when there's a

money-back guarantee!)

Cheers,

[Guest guest]

In the fifteen years of dealing with this illness. I have concluded

that the things to try are those that people get the most result for

the least cost at the lowest risk. Given the testimonials ( several

people claiming to be far, far better, some almost normal), the cost

refundable, nothing to take. Hmmm. I have usually benefited from

things that many others seem to benefit from. I will take a closer

look at this...

I am trying Dr. Pall protocol right now with positive resutls. Want

to avoid mixing protocols so I can tell what did what...

>

> Hi ,

> Have looked at the site.

> I reckon anything that conceptualises the condition as a problem

with brain/central nervous system dysregulation, or neurological

misprocessing of stimulus (meaning a significantly impaired ability

to cope with " stress " ) is on the right track.

>

> I also know it's possible, even after over a decade of illness, to

have patches where I am somewhere near normal. In my experience, this

has been brought about by medications (as per Jay Goldstein's

theories) although sustainability was/is always the problem. Still-

this was/is very encouraging to me, because it meant/means that the

condition is, in all probability, a functional illness, rather than

there being some degenerative or irreversible problem. (Although,

even with full recovery, there might always be some pre-disposition

or sensitivity )

>

> Of course, Goldstein's ideas involve suppressing an over-sensitive

CNS (primarily by inhibition of excitatory neurotransmitters)...which

is in the same ballpark as this stuff. So- yes...the theory makes

sense to me. Whether it works is another matter, but I'm pretty

interested. (Particularly when there's a money-back guarantee!)

>

> Cheers,

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I bought it. Will let you know how it goes.

>

> Hi ,

> Have looked at the site.

> I reckon anything that conceptualises the condition as a problem

with brain/central nervous system dysregulation, or neurological

misprocessing of stimulus (meaning a significantly impaired ability

to cope with " stress " ) is on the right track.

>

> I also know it's possible, even after over a decade of illness, to

have patches where I am somewhere near normal. In my experience,

this has been brought about by medications (as per Jay Goldstein's

theories) although sustainability was/is always the problem. Still-

this was/is very encouraging to me, because it meant/means that the

condition is, in all probability, a functional illness, rather than

there being some degenerative or irreversible problem. (Although,

even with full recovery, there might always be some pre-disposition

or sensitivity )

>

> Of course, Goldstein's ideas involve suppressing an over-sensitive

CNS (primarily by inhibition of excitatory

neurotransmitters)...which is in the same ballpark as this stuff. So-

yes...the theory makes sense to me. Whether it works is another

matter, but I'm pretty interested. (Particularly when there's a

money-back guarantee!)

>

> Cheers,

>

>

>

>

>