Guest guest Posted October 9, 2007 Report Share Posted October 9, 2007 I respectfully disagree, I've seen first hand 100 IU provoke a rise of body temperature of 4 degrees for two hours in one individual that was deficient (by lab results), and that pattern repeated for several weeks and then lessened. In this case, it was actually Calcium and Vitamin D. I have also read similar results reported by other people. Mark, the human body rarely behaves along a straight linear line but through state changes or thresholds (Markovian process). If you are critically deficient, a small amount may provoke a state change that would never been seen with people that are not as deficient. The intake of vitamin D3 may not impact long term circulating levels, however it may cause a ***short term*** spike which can trigger the body's systems to kick off for a short term -- like the 4 degree rise in body temperature. Over long term, the circulating levels increased, and with it the typical sub-normal temperatures seen in CFIDS moved towards the normal (with an decrease of temperature intolerance). To me, the poster's need to have food with it means that there is a need to moderate this peak (despite being a low dosage) so that the amount of immune system 'kickoff' is tolerable seem very appropriate. IMHO > > Vitamin D by itself has basically no effect on any receptor. Oral > vitamin D must first be converted to 25(OH)D (mainly by the liver), > and then is converted to 1,25(OH)2D (at various sites), at which > point it can activate VDRs. One 400IU pill by itself is pretty much > unlikely to significantly raise circulating 25(OH)D levels. So any > effects from the supplement might more likely be due to to the some > other ingredient in the pill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.