[NVIC] FDA To Force Testing of Americans

[Guest guest]

E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

#8122

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

" Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982. "

============================================================================

==============

BL Fisher Note:

The noose is tightening around the neck of the American public. Since

Sept. 11, 2001, federal and state health officials have persuaded Congress

and the state legislatures to pass legislation that will take away our civil

liberties and use the militia to arrest, quarantine and force experimental

drugs and vaccines on us without our informed consent whenever the unelected

Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) declares an

" emergency. " Now, the FDA has issued a rule that will allow public health

officials to pull us out of our homes and, without our voluntary informed

consent, use experimental medical tests to test us for " diseases " whenever

that " emergency " is declared.

Will there be any guarantee these experimental tests are accurate? Will we

become guinea pigs in service to zealous public health officials and drug

companies profiting by our forced compliance?

What is certain is that if any of us are injured by the forced testing

and use of experimental drugs and vaccines, the public health officials and

drug companies responsible for harming us will not be held accountable in a

court of law. Congress made sure of that when it passed the Project

Bioshield and Pandemic Flu legislation during the past two years.

It is time for citizens to stand up and hold their elected officials at

the state and federal level responsible for what they have done. The

unchecked power that they have handed over to M.D./Ph.D. public health

officials in government health agencies is not only dangerous to the public

health, it is a threat to fundamental freedoms guaranteed under the U.S.

Constitution. Just as we don't have to be rocket scientists to understand

the flaws in the junk science DHHS passes off as proof that vaccines are

without significant risks, it doesn't take a constitutional lawyer to figure

out when our constitutional and human rights are being taken away.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Informed-Consent.html?ex=1150430400 & en

=adcaefcabf049db1 & ei=5070 & emc=eta1

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

June 7, 2006

Informed Consent Waived in Public Crisis

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 9:24 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a public health emergency, suspected victims would no

longer have to give permission before experimental tests could be run to

determine why they're sick, under a federal rule published Wednesday.

Privacy experts called the exception unnecessary, ripe for abuse and an

override of state informed-consent laws.

Health care workers will be free to run experimental tests on blood and

other samples taken from people who have fallen sick as a result of a

bioterrorist attack, bird flu outbreak, detonation of a dirty bomb or any

other life-threatening public health emergency, according to the rule issued

by the Food and Drug Administration.

In all other cases, the use of an experimental test still requires the

informed consent of a patient, as well as the review and approval of an

outside panel.

''To be candid, I hope it is a hypothetical problem. I hope we spent a lot

of time creating a rule we never have to invoke,'' said Dr. Steve Gutman,

director of the FDA's in-vitro diagnostics office.

Determining what constitutes a life-threatening public health emergency

would be left up to the laboratories doing the testing. That creates the

potential for conflicts of interest and other abuses, critics said.

''I don't like a rule like this because its most likely use is likely to be

a form of abuse. The emergency exception it creates will be stretched to

encompass non-emergency situations,'' said Jim Harper, director of

information policy studies at the Cato Institute.

The FDA said it published the rule to ensure the ability to identify quickly

whatever chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear agent is involved in

a terrorist attack or natural outbreak of disease. Doing so could save the

lives of those being tested as well as of others exposed, the FDA said.

''Baloney,'' said Dr. Deborah Peel, chairwoman of the Patient Privacy Rights

Foundation, a watchdog group. ''This sounds like they're taking for

themselves the right to test individuals every time they declare a public

health emergency. There is no way getting consent would delay testing.''

The FDA said that obtaining informed consent in those cases would be

impracticable or unfeasible.

The rule lays out a scenario where a laboratory discovers what appears to be

an unusual bug in a sample taken from a patient before a public health

emergency was even suspected. With the apparent bug in the lab but the

patient gone, going back for permission to use a confirmatory but

experimental test -- often the only type of test available -- would

introduce ''unacceptable delays,'' the FDA said.

''They're basically overriding state informed-consent laws,'' said Sue

Blevins, president of the Institute for Health Freedom. Blevins said her

group advocates for informed consent but that in emergencies it could be

sought after the fact.

''If they don't have the time to get it, at least inform them retroactively

what's been done, so people can keep track of what information has been

collected from them,'' Blevins said.

The rule took effect Wednesday but remains subject to public comment until

Aug. 7. The FDA said it published the rule without first seeking comments

because it would hinder the response to an outbreak of bird flu or other

public health emergency.

''Nobody said two airplanes would fly into the World Trade Center, did they?

We wouldn't have written the rule unless we thought it was a possibility,''

Gutman said.

The FDA said the lack of such an exemption impeded the public health

response to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, epidemic of

2003.

------

On the Net:

Food and Drug Administration rule:

http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/E6-8790.htm

=============================================

News@... is a free service of the National Vaccine Information

Center and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about

vaccines, diseases and how to protect your informed consent rights

http://www.nvic.org

Become a member and support NVIC's work

https://www.nvic.org/making%20cash%20donations.htm

To sign up for a free e-mail subscription http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htm