Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN #8122 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982. " ============================================================================ ============== BL Fisher Note: Gardasil, the heavily promoted cervical cancer and genital wart vaccine that Merck, the CDC and AAP want to mandate for all 11 and 12 year old girls, will not only increase the risk of cervical cancer for some of adolescent girls but can also make them susceptible to infection from the multiple other strains of HPV. In addition, five women who got the vaccine around time of conception gave birth to babies with birth defects. With American babies now getting 48 doses of 14 vaccines by age six, profit-hungry drug companies and power-hungry federal health officials are targeting adolescents for new vaccine consumption. During a time when adolescents are undergoing hormonal changes and accelerated growth, they are being subjected to increased atypical manipulation of the immune system with viral and bacterial vaccines including DTaP, meningococcal, flu, hepatitis B and now a genital wart and cervical cancer vaccine. In this national experiment on our teenagers, will anybody be studying onset of chronic disease and disability in adolescents post vaccination? Or will predictable increases in brain and immune system dysfunction such as onset of new allergies, asthma, seizure disorders, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome, thyroid disease, chronic fatigue, depression, and yes, cancer, be written off as unassociated with vaccination? Injecting adolescent girls with any vaccine that could increase their chance of getting cancer without their voluntary, informed consent and the consent of their parents is immoral. All attempts to mandate Gardasil for school entry should be opposed as a violation of human rights, including the right to life. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051700 931.html?sub=AR The Washington Post FDA: Cervical cancer vaccine safe Gardasil prevents four types of HPV Wednesday, May 17, 2006 WASHINGTON (AP) -- A vaccine that blocks infection by the four virus types that cause most cervical cancers and genital warts appears safe and effective, but may actually increase the chance of disease in some patients, according to Food and Drug Administration documents released Wednesday. Merck & Co. seeks FDA approval for its Gardasil vaccine against four types of human papilloma virus, or HPV. Two of those four types are believed responsible for about 70 percent of cervical cancer cases. The cancer kills roughly 3,500 U.S. women a year; the other two types cause 90 percent of genital wart cases. An FDA panel of outside experts is to meet Thursday and discuss whether to recommend that the agency approve the vaccine. The FDA isn't required to follow the advice of its expert panels but usually does. According to briefing documents released ahead of the meeting, the panel should discuss various items of concern only if its members first agree that studies show the vaccine is safe and effective. That suggests the FDA favors its approval. Merck said the vaccine has the potential to reduce the annual number of new cervical cancers worldwide to roughly 150,000, from the current 500,000, and cut global deaths from the cancer by more than two-thirds, to an estimated 90,000. An FDA review of the results of studies on the vaccine found two important concerns, according to the documents released ahead of Thursday's meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products advisory committee. The first is that the vaccine may lead to an increased number of cases of a cancer precursor among patients already infected by any of the four virus types at the time they receive the vaccine, and whose immune systems have not cleared the virus from their bodies. The second concern is that any advantage the vaccine provides in protecting against the four virus types could be offset by infection by any of the multiple other types of HPV that the vaccine does not cover, according to the FDA documents. FDA staff also asked that the committee examine five cases where children with birth defects were born to women who had received the vaccine around the time of conception. Merck developed the vaccine and tested it in both women and men, but Thursday's discussion is expected to focus on its use in preventing HPV-related disease in women. An FDA decision is expected by June 8. Should it approve it, the national Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will decide later that month whether to endorse routine vaccination with the vaccine. The committee's HPV vaccine workgroup is recommending the vaccine be given to girls 11 and 12, and the committee will consider recommendations for females 13 to 26. ============================================= News@... is a free service of the National Vaccine Information Center and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect your informed consent rights http://www.nvic.org Become a member and support NVIC's work https://www.nvic.org/making%20cash%20donations.htm To sign up for a free e-mail subscription http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.