Guest guest Posted July 10, 2006 Report Share Posted July 10, 2006 E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN #8122 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982. " ============================================================================ ============== BL Fisher Note: " We rely on the forceful application of law democratically debated and approved as the principal instrument of our public health policy, " proclaimed New York City Mayor Bloomberg (D) proclaimed to an enthusiastic audience of public health officials on June 14, 2006 at the CDC's " The Public Health and the Law in the 21st Century: Fifth Annual Partnership Conference " in Atlanta. Putting the emphasis on " control, " the New York Mayor voiced support for more laws more strictly enforced by the nation's health police to solve the problem of rampant diabetes and other chronic illnesses plaguing the American people these days. In what has become a familiar theme since the events of September 11, 2001, politicians are feeding the insatiable appetite of public health officials to force medical treatment on people. With so many Americans chronically ill and disabled after adhering to public health policies and mandates advocating increased use of prescription drugs and vaccines over the past half century, government officials are anxious to blame the poor health of America on the citizens themselves. " Blame the Victim " is a convenient out for government officials who are responsible for protecting the public health. During the past five years, there have been a number of state and federal laws which have seriously eroded civil liberties in America. Many have involved handing over unprecendented power to government health officials to force citizens to engage in medical interventions without their informed consent. Politicians like Mayor Bloomberg appear to have little appreciation for the inherent danger in giving doctors employed by the State the power to force citizens to follow doctors' orders. The book " The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code " by s and Grodin details many reasons why citizens of all states should require doctors to adhere to the ethical principle of informed consent when advocating citizens engage in any kind of medical treatment for the " greater good " of society. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/15/nyregion/15bloomberg.html The New York Times, B3 June 15, 2006 Laws Can Be Good for You, Mayor Tells Health Officials By Diane Cardwell Atlanta, June 14 - Putting New York's aggressive public health agenda on a national stage, Mayor R. Bloomberg told some of the nation's top health officials on Wednesday that government should use laws to influence behavior to fight chronic disease. Appearing before a public health law conference here run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mr. Bloomberg urged other cities and the federal government to follow New York's strategy to attack problems like tobacco use, obesity and related ills. " New threats result from, and are aggravated by, our forbearance, and even social and economic encouragement, of such behavior as tobacco addiction, unhealthy nutrition and excessively sedentary lifestyles, " Mr. Bloomberg said, calling chronic and noncommunicable diseases like diabetes the biggest health threats facing Americans. " An effective public health strategy must therefore alter that calculus by changing how we live, " he said. Mr. Bloomberg also took the opportunity to criticize the federal government for shortchanging New York and other cities in preparing for health emergencies brought on by epidemics or bioterrorism. Since taking office, Mr. Bloomberg has pushed through higher taxes on cigarettes, imposed strict prohibitions on smoking in restaurants and bars, mandated better nutrition and exercise programs for children in day care centers and created a registry for people with diabetes. And his reception in Atlanta was an indication that New York has become a model city for the aggressive use of information and legal tools - including licensing, regulation, tax policy, litigation and enforcement - to combat chronic diseases. Mr. Bloomberg's address, which drew applause about a half-dozen times, was the keynote speech of the conference, a spot reserved for an elected official who is a " recognized champion of public health, " said Lynn Austin, chief of staff to the center's director, Dr. L. Gerberding. Officials from the Public Health Law Association gave Mr. Bloomberg an award for his record in public health. " In 2001, the heartbeat of America was in New York City, " O'Brien, the president of the association, said in presenting the award. " And a decade from now, a century from now, the heart of New York City will beat stronger because of what you're doing today. " Mr. Bloomberg spent much of the speech outlining what he said were some of the achievements of his administration, including a reduction in the teenage smoking rate from 1 in 4 to 1 in 10, the strengthening of nutritional standards for school lunches and the fighting against the influx of illegal guns. But the administration did not plan to stop there, he said. In addition to working on the first comprehensive overhaul of the city's health code in 50 years, he said, the city would soon start a pilot program in the Bronx to intervene with diabetes patients and their doctors when tests showed dangerously high blood-sugar levels. In addition, Mr. Bloomberg said, the city was contemplating other legal steps to encourage greater physical activity by New Yorkers, but he declined to provide any details. Comparing his approach to the kind of full-out social effort that vanquished polio and pushed for laws that required seat belts or helped reduce drunken driving, Mr. Bloomberg said that although public education campaigns were an important part of any strategy, they could not succeed on their own. " We rely on the forceful application of law democratically debated and approved as the principal instrument of our public health policy, " he said. " Clearly there are many matters of personal behavior and personal taste that we have no business regulating. But just as clearly, there are also areas in which we have an obligation to act on what we know, on what incontrovertible facts tell us. " Even as he worked to promote his own approach, he used the speech to assail the federal government for its policy and financing decisions, calling its reactions to the threat of avian flu or a shortage of flu vaccine disjointed. Still stung over a 40 percent cut in New York's allocation of money for domestic security, Mr. Bloomberg said that the only rational way to distribute bioterror funds was based on population density and risk. Clearly, he said, these were not the yardsticks being used. " I really don't know how anyone can justify a distribution of bioterrorism funds that awards $8.20 per person to North Dakota, when New York City gets less than $3 per person, " he said, describing a preliminary plan for distribution money from the Centers for Disease Control, which is part of the federal Department of Health and Human Services, for the next fiscal year. ============================================= News@... is a free service of the National Vaccine Information Center and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect your informed consent rights http://www.nvic.org Become a member and support NVIC's work https://www.nvic.org/making%20cash%20donations.htm To sign up for a free e-mail subscription http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.