Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Vaccine Rationalization (lying to yourself)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Just put together by at Whaleto - good job!

Sheri

" When the incidence of a disease is low, authorities claim high vaccination

rates are responsible. When outbreaks occur, we are told not enough people

received the shots. For example, prior to a recent measles outbreak in a

Hobbs, New Mexico, school district, authorities boasted a 98 percent

vaccination rate. Then, when 76 cases of the disease broke out, researchers

claimed that " vaccine failure was associated with immunizations that could

not be documented in the provider's records. "

<http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being

Manipulated? by Neil Z. "

<http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html>http://www.whale.to/vacc

ine/rationalization_h.html

" He has lied to himself, and perhaps also to others, and believed his lie. "

---Secret, Don't Tell: The Encyclopedia of Hypnotism by Carla

<http://www.whale.to/b/emery_h.html>Emery p.221

[Allopaths have been " conditioned " to believe in vaccination (and pharma

drugs). After a medical education they could hardly be expected to

disagree with the beliefs engraved on the foundation stone of Allopathy--1.

vaccination is safe and effective, 2. Vaccination has saved millions of

lives. 3. Vaccination eliminated smallpox. Now could they? And they get

plenty of horrible examples of what happens to those who do, eg

<http://www.whale.to/vaccines/wakefield.html>Dr. Andy Wakefield]

" Because routine immunizations that bring parents back for repeated office

calls are the bread and butter of their specialty, pediatricians continue

to defend them to the death. The question parents should be asking is:

‘Whose death?........For a pediatrician to attack what has become the

" bread and butter " of pediatric practice is equivalent to a priest denying

the infallibility of the pope.......What does a Catholic do when he decides

that his priests are no good? Sometimes he directly challenges them, but

very seldom. He just leaves the Church. And that’s my answer. Leave the

Church of Modern Medicine. I see a lot of people doing that today. I see a

lot of people going to chiropractors, for example, who wouldn’t have been

caught dead in a chiropractor’s office a few years ago.

<http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/documents/ME-CFS_docs/Confessions%2520of%

2520a%2520Medical%2520Heretic.doc>Confessions of a Medical Heretic

Rationalization (making up a fake reason) is a major defense mechanism.

When we do things for reasons of which we are not consciously aware, we

rationalize. The obedient enactment of posthypnotic suggestion likewise

gets excused by fake explanations provided by the unconscious to the

conscious. A subject who does not remember being given a posthypnotic

suggestion will always invent an imaginary reason for obeying. His

rationalization will be as plausible as possible. He will consciously

believe it even though it is a lie he has told himself. Posthypnotic

suggestions can be beneficial or harmful. If asked later why he did this

particular thing, he will ... " rationalize his conduct by some kind of

semi-reasonable explanation...To anyone acquainted with the real motive,

namely, the post–hypnotic suggestion, these pseudo-motives are very

interesting because they are so similar to the pseudo-motives often given

by people to justify actions, the real reasons for which are unconscious to

themselves or, if conscious, dishonorable. " (Estabrooks, Scientific

American, p. 216). If a hypnotic subject is not consciously aware of an

implanted posthypnotic suggestion because of suggested amnesia, then he

does not know the real reason he did the posthypnotic act. In that

situation, he will make up some excuse for what he did, as plausible as

possible. He will honestly believe the rationalization. He has lied to

himself, and perhaps also to others, and believed his lie. After obeying an

amnestic posthypnotic suggestion, people do not say, " I don't know why I

did that " (which is their conscious mind's truth). They do not say, " The

hypnotist made me do it " (which is their uncon–sciously known truth).

In–stead, if you ask, " Why did you do that? " they will make up an excuse

which is as believable as possible--and they will honestly believe whatever

they said! A prominent experimental hypnotist gave a young woman a

posthypnotic suggestion to take off one shoe after she awakened from his

hypnosis demonstration. She was to set it on the table before her. He then

suggested amnesia and awakened her: ...she fidgeted for a few moments, then

slipped off one of her shoes with the other foot, reached down, lifted it,

and placed it on the table in front of her. Then she reached over and took

the flowers from a vase on the table and placed them in her shoe. (LeCron,

The Complete Guide to Hypnosis, p. 18) When the hypnotist asked why she had

put flowers in her shoe, the subject rationalized: " I have a vase at home

that looks something like a shoe. I wondered what kind of flower

arrangement I could use with it. " ---Secret, Don't Tell: The Encyclopedia

of Hypnotism by Carla <http://www.whale.to/b/emery_h.html>Emery p.221

The rationalization and denial ploy can be blatant or veiled. Blatant

rationalization is easier to spot. For example, in a recently published

pediatric legal paper, a Canadian neurologist candidly writes, " In this

article [on vaccine-induced brain injury], I will...offer some suggestions

for pediatricians to rationalize this emotional controversy. " He also

plainly states, " A vigorous effort is required to dispel the myth of

DTP-induced brain damage. " He makes his recommendation in spite of the

horrendous amount of literature in the medical journals indicating a causal

relationship between this vaccine and severe mental impairment. The veiled

Rationalization and Denial ploy is harder to detect. At first it appears

logical and sound. But it merely represents a more intricate attempt at

suppressing and confounding the truth. For example, according to some

researchers, the DPT vaccine does not cause seizures; instead, " fever from

the DTP vaccine may trigger one of these seizures. " (132) Or, according to

an experienced vaccine policymaker, Ed Mortimer, M.D., " These kids already

had underlying problems and DTP was the first fever-producing insult that

occurred to the child. " (133) Again, it wasn't the vaccine that caused the

brain damage; it was the fever from the vaccine.

<http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being

Manipulated?by Neil Z.

When the incidence of a disease is low, authorities claim high vaccination

rates are responsible. When outbreaks occur, we are told not enough people

received the shots. For example, prior to a recent measles outbreak in a

Hobbs, New Mexico, school district, authorities boasted a 98 percent

vaccination rate. Then, when 76 cases of the disease broke out, researchers

claimed that " vaccine failure was associated with immunizations that could

not be documented in the provider's records. "

<http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being

Manipulated?by Neil Z.

Although the Food and Drug Administration was legally bound to establish

and oversee the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and even

though every year about 12,000 reports of adverse reactions to vaccines are

made to the FDA, authorities refuse to follow up on these cases because

" the agency could not possibly investigate each report, " and besides, " a

cause and effect relationship is not presumed. "

<http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being

Manipulated?by Neil Z.

By November 10, 1999, the Vaccine Injury Compensation System had already

paid out more than $1 billion to settle claims of vaccine-induced damage or

death. However, because vaccine manufacturers and the federal government

are not required to admit responsibility, even when a claim is paid, they

are able to assert that " the settlement of a claim does not necessarily

establish liability. " <http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization

Ploys-Are Parents Being Manipulated?by Neil Z.

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

earthmysteriestours@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Reality of the Diseases & Treatment -

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...