Guest guest Posted May 11, 2006 Report Share Posted May 11, 2006 Just put together by at Whaleto - good job! Sheri " When the incidence of a disease is low, authorities claim high vaccination rates are responsible. When outbreaks occur, we are told not enough people received the shots. For example, prior to a recent measles outbreak in a Hobbs, New Mexico, school district, authorities boasted a 98 percent vaccination rate. Then, when 76 cases of the disease broke out, researchers claimed that " vaccine failure was associated with immunizations that could not be documented in the provider's records. " <http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being Manipulated? by Neil Z. " <http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html>http://www.whale.to/vacc ine/rationalization_h.html " He has lied to himself, and perhaps also to others, and believed his lie. " ---Secret, Don't Tell: The Encyclopedia of Hypnotism by Carla <http://www.whale.to/b/emery_h.html>Emery p.221 [Allopaths have been " conditioned " to believe in vaccination (and pharma drugs). After a medical education they could hardly be expected to disagree with the beliefs engraved on the foundation stone of Allopathy--1. vaccination is safe and effective, 2. Vaccination has saved millions of lives. 3. Vaccination eliminated smallpox. Now could they? And they get plenty of horrible examples of what happens to those who do, eg <http://www.whale.to/vaccines/wakefield.html>Dr. Andy Wakefield] " Because routine immunizations that bring parents back for repeated office calls are the bread and butter of their specialty, pediatricians continue to defend them to the death. The question parents should be asking is: ‘Whose death?........For a pediatrician to attack what has become the " bread and butter " of pediatric practice is equivalent to a priest denying the infallibility of the pope.......What does a Catholic do when he decides that his priests are no good? Sometimes he directly challenges them, but very seldom. He just leaves the Church. And that’s my answer. Leave the Church of Modern Medicine. I see a lot of people doing that today. I see a lot of people going to chiropractors, for example, who wouldn’t have been caught dead in a chiropractor’s office a few years ago. <http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/documents/ME-CFS_docs/Confessions%2520of% 2520a%2520Medical%2520Heretic.doc>Confessions of a Medical Heretic Rationalization (making up a fake reason) is a major defense mechanism. When we do things for reasons of which we are not consciously aware, we rationalize. The obedient enactment of posthypnotic suggestion likewise gets excused by fake explanations provided by the unconscious to the conscious. A subject who does not remember being given a posthypnotic suggestion will always invent an imaginary reason for obeying. His rationalization will be as plausible as possible. He will consciously believe it even though it is a lie he has told himself. Posthypnotic suggestions can be beneficial or harmful. If asked later why he did this particular thing, he will ... " rationalize his conduct by some kind of semi-reasonable explanation...To anyone acquainted with the real motive, namely, the post–hypnotic suggestion, these pseudo-motives are very interesting because they are so similar to the pseudo-motives often given by people to justify actions, the real reasons for which are unconscious to themselves or, if conscious, dishonorable. " (Estabrooks, Scientific American, p. 216). If a hypnotic subject is not consciously aware of an implanted posthypnotic suggestion because of suggested amnesia, then he does not know the real reason he did the posthypnotic act. In that situation, he will make up some excuse for what he did, as plausible as possible. He will honestly believe the rationalization. He has lied to himself, and perhaps also to others, and believed his lie. After obeying an amnestic posthypnotic suggestion, people do not say, " I don't know why I did that " (which is their conscious mind's truth). They do not say, " The hypnotist made me do it " (which is their uncon–sciously known truth). In–stead, if you ask, " Why did you do that? " they will make up an excuse which is as believable as possible--and they will honestly believe whatever they said! A prominent experimental hypnotist gave a young woman a posthypnotic suggestion to take off one shoe after she awakened from his hypnosis demonstration. She was to set it on the table before her. He then suggested amnesia and awakened her: ...she fidgeted for a few moments, then slipped off one of her shoes with the other foot, reached down, lifted it, and placed it on the table in front of her. Then she reached over and took the flowers from a vase on the table and placed them in her shoe. (LeCron, The Complete Guide to Hypnosis, p. 18) When the hypnotist asked why she had put flowers in her shoe, the subject rationalized: " I have a vase at home that looks something like a shoe. I wondered what kind of flower arrangement I could use with it. " ---Secret, Don't Tell: The Encyclopedia of Hypnotism by Carla <http://www.whale.to/b/emery_h.html>Emery p.221 The rationalization and denial ploy can be blatant or veiled. Blatant rationalization is easier to spot. For example, in a recently published pediatric legal paper, a Canadian neurologist candidly writes, " In this article [on vaccine-induced brain injury], I will...offer some suggestions for pediatricians to rationalize this emotional controversy. " He also plainly states, " A vigorous effort is required to dispel the myth of DTP-induced brain damage. " He makes his recommendation in spite of the horrendous amount of literature in the medical journals indicating a causal relationship between this vaccine and severe mental impairment. The veiled Rationalization and Denial ploy is harder to detect. At first it appears logical and sound. But it merely represents a more intricate attempt at suppressing and confounding the truth. For example, according to some researchers, the DPT vaccine does not cause seizures; instead, " fever from the DTP vaccine may trigger one of these seizures. " (132) Or, according to an experienced vaccine policymaker, Ed Mortimer, M.D., " These kids already had underlying problems and DTP was the first fever-producing insult that occurred to the child. " (133) Again, it wasn't the vaccine that caused the brain damage; it was the fever from the vaccine. <http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being Manipulated?by Neil Z. When the incidence of a disease is low, authorities claim high vaccination rates are responsible. When outbreaks occur, we are told not enough people received the shots. For example, prior to a recent measles outbreak in a Hobbs, New Mexico, school district, authorities boasted a 98 percent vaccination rate. Then, when 76 cases of the disease broke out, researchers claimed that " vaccine failure was associated with immunizations that could not be documented in the provider's records. " <http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being Manipulated?by Neil Z. Although the Food and Drug Administration was legally bound to establish and oversee the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and even though every year about 12,000 reports of adverse reactions to vaccines are made to the FDA, authorities refuse to follow up on these cases because " the agency could not possibly investigate each report, " and besides, " a cause and effect relationship is not presumed. " <http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being Manipulated?by Neil Z. By November 10, 1999, the Vaccine Injury Compensation System had already paid out more than $1 billion to settle claims of vaccine-induced damage or death. However, because vaccine manufacturers and the federal government are not required to admit responsibility, even when a claim is paid, they are able to assert that " the settlement of a claim does not necessarily establish liability. " <http://thinktwice.com/ploys.htm>Immunization Ploys-Are Parents Being Manipulated?by Neil Z. -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account earthmysteriestours@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Reality of the Diseases & Treatment - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.