Re: [NVIC] Flu Hype Could Double Vaccine Market

April 22, 2006

And an even more important motive behind the big " contagious

bird flu " scam is a political one, of the ruling persons' wanting

to terrorize people everywhere. Se for instance " UNITE! Infos "

#251en, #252en and #256en at my homepage. The CDC's

recent " dismissing " message (below) is just an enforced

(and phony) " retreat " after its own " pandemic " efforts have

gotten publicly exposed (above all by some people in Germany).

But those efforts are still " on " . There will be more " bird flu "

scare stories in the international mass media soon enough.

Rolf M.

www.rolf-martens.com

At 13:13 2006-04-22 +0100, you Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote:

>E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

>Vienna, Virginia <http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org

>

>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

> #8122

>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

>

> " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982. "

>

>============================================================================

>==============

>BL Fisher Note;

>

>On April 15,2006 the head of the federal Centers for Disease Control

>reportedly dismissed the threat of a bird flu pandemic:

>

><http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>http://w\

ww.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html

>Tacoma News Tribune

>April 15, 2006

> " There is no evidence it will be the next pandemic, " Dr.

>Gerberding,

>head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, said of

>avian flu. There is " no evidence it is evolving in a direction that is

>becoming more transmissible to people. "

>

>The following article published April 20 hypes the multi-billion dollar

>profits drug companies could make if enough people around the world get

>scared enough about a bogus impending bird flu epidemic. In what is shaping

>up to be a classic con fueled by fear, the take-all winners will be the

>holders of stock in drug companies making the experimental flu vaccines that

>some will justify forcing others to use for " the greater good. "

>

><http://news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://news.ya\

hoo.com/s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1

>Reuters via News

>April 20, 2006

>

>Pandemic threat could double flu vaccine market

>

>----------

April 22, 2006

Couldn't agree with you more, Rolf. They did it with SARS, West Nile, Anthrax

etc.

They'll be charging the mosquitos next year with being carriers of the next

" pandemic " with a new name and set of numbers and letters. The whole thing has

become so predictable. It will be interesting to see where it goes next.

Anita

Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@...> wrote:

And an even more important motive behind the big " contagious

bird flu " scam is a political one, of the ruling persons' wanting

to terrorize people everywhere. Se for instance " UNITE! Infos "

#251en, #252en and #256en at my homepage. The CDC's

recent " dismissing " message (below) is just an enforced

(and phony) " retreat " after its own " pandemic " efforts have

gotten publicly exposed (above all by some people in Germany).

But those efforts are still " on " . There will be more " bird flu "

scare stories in the international mass media soon enough.

Rolf M.

www.rolf-martens.com

At 13:13 2006-04-22 +0100, you Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote:

>E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

>Vienna, Virginia <http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org

>

>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

> #8122

>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

>

> " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982. "

>

>============================================================================

>==============

>BL Fisher Note;

>

>On April 15,2006 the head of the federal Centers for Disease Control

>reportedly dismissed the threat of a bird flu pandemic:

>

><http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>http://w\

ww.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html

>Tacoma News Tribune

>April 15, 2006

> " There is no evidence it will be the next pandemic, " Dr.

>Gerberding,

>head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, said of

>avian flu. There is " no evidence it is evolving in a direction that is

>becoming more transmissible to people. "

>

>The following article published April 20 hypes the multi-billion dollar

>profits drug companies could make if enough people around the world get

>scared enough about a bogus impending bird flu epidemic. In what is shaping

>up to be a classic con fueled by fear, the take-all winners will be the

>holders of stock in drug companies making the experimental flu vaccines that

>some will justify forcing others to use for " the greater good. "

>

><http://news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://news.ya\

hoo.com/s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1

>Reuters via News

>April 20, 2006

>

>Pandemic threat could double flu vaccine market

>

>----------

April 22, 2006

And when mosquitoes are identified as the " cause " of the disease, then

communities are mass sprayed with insecticides to control the mosquitoes.

In this state in some areas- spraying of whole neighborhoods/a sector of the

city occurs as often as once per week through the summer.

For more info

www..beyondpesticides.org

" Because freedom from pesticides is everybody's right "

Re: Re: [NVIC] Flu Hype Could Double Vaccine Market

> Couldn't agree with you more, Rolf. They did it with SARS, West Nile,

Anthrax etc.

> They'll be charging the mosquitos next year with being carriers of the

next " pandemic " with a new name and set of numbers and letters. The whole

thing has become so predictable. It will be interesting to see where it goes

next.

>

> Anita

>

> Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@...> wrote:

> And an even more important motive behind the big " contagious

> bird flu " scam is a political one, of the ruling persons' wanting

> to terrorize people everywhere. Se for instance " UNITE! Infos "

> #251en, #252en and #256en at my homepage. The CDC's

> recent " dismissing " message (below) is just an enforced

> (and phony) " retreat " after its own " pandemic " efforts have

> gotten publicly exposed (above all by some people in Germany).

> But those efforts are still " on " . There will be more " bird flu "

> scare stories in the international mass media soon enough.

>

> Rolf M.

> www.rolf-martens.com

>

> At 13:13 2006-04-22 +0100, you Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote:

>

> >E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

> >Vienna, Virginia

<http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org

> >

> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

> > #8122

> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> >

> > " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since

1982. "

> >

>

>===========================================================================

=

> >==============

> >BL Fisher Note;

> >

> >On April 15,2006 the head of the federal Centers for Disease Control

> >reportedly dismissed the threat of a bird flu pandemic:

> >

>

><http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>http

://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html

> >Tacoma News Tribune

> >April 15, 2006

> > " There is no evidence it will be the next pandemic, " Dr.

> >Gerberding,

> >head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, said

of

> >avian flu. There is " no evidence it is evolving in a direction that is

> >becoming more transmissible to people. "

> >

> >The following article published April 20 hypes the multi-billion dollar

> >profits drug companies could make if enough people around the world get

> >scared enough about a bogus impending bird flu epidemic. In what is

shaping

> >up to be a classic con fueled by fear, the take-all winners will be the

> >holders of stock in drug companies making the experimental flu vaccines

that

> >some will justify forcing others to use for " the greater good. "

> >

>

><http://news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://new

s./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1

> >Reuters via News

> >April 20, 2006

> >

> >Pandemic threat could double flu vaccine market

> >

> >----------

>

April 23, 2006

But as far as I understand, there actually IS a good reason to

combat mosquitoes with pesticides, namely in that they are

carrying some parasites - NOT bacteria or viruses - which are

causing malaria.

I haven't seen anything in that New Medicine theory either - which

I've concluded is correct, though I still am ignorant of many of its

details; homepage in English http://www.newmedicine.ca/ - that

would contradict this.

Now there since long is a campaign against, and a far-reaching

international ban against, that pesticide DDT, which formerly

was so successful (when applied sensibly, at least). It started

out with a book in 1962 by Carson: " Silent Spring " ; bans

were enacted from appr. 1972 on, with the US government taking

the initiative on this. The purported argument against DDT was/is

that it would harm the environment, making birds' eggs have

thinner shells etc.

But this apparently is a big scam too, most probably (I hold)

intended to have millions of people in Africa etc killed by malaria.

The cheap and effective DDT seems ti have no good replacement.

This is what's being argued by the website Africa Fighting Malaria

http://www.fightingmalaria.org/ for instance, and also by - the true

enough, capitalism-propagandistic but in several scientific respects

quite good website http://www.junkscience.com/ ( Milloy).

I too have written some things sharply opposing the ban against DDT.

A mistake? No, I don't think so. That pro-ban campaign very

clearly originates with those same people who are also orchestrating

the big " HIV/AIDS " and " contagious bird flu " scams.

Thus I strongly suspect that the website you're mentioning here,

Sandy, is making propaganda for something unfavourable to most

people.

This question/discussion about pesticides of course is somewhat off topic

here, but it's not bad, I believe, to have a couple of messages on/in

it posted here. I on my part won't go into any further discussion on

this on this list, but just want to say, with the above, that I believe

your'e wrong, Sandy, on one point concerning mosquitoes:

They (as far as I understand) ARE dangerous as carrying PARASITES,

though it would be wrong if some people " accused " them of carrying

" dangerous bacteria or viruses " (too).

Rolf M.

At 19:05 2006-04-22 -0400, you Sandy Rippetoe <srippetoe@...> wrote:

>And when mosquitoes are identified as the " cause " of the disease, then

>communities are mass sprayed with insecticides to control the mosquitoes.

>In this state in some areas- spraying of whole neighborhoods/a sector of the

>city occurs as often as once per week through the summer.

>

>For more info

>www..beyondpesticides.org

> " Because freedom from pesticides is everybody's right "

>

> Re: Re: [NVIC] Flu Hype Could Double Vaccine Market

>

> > Couldn't agree with you more, Rolf. They did it with SARS, West Nile,

>Anthrax etc.

> > They'll be charging the mosquitos next year with being carriers of the

>next " pandemic " with a new name and set of numbers and letters. The whole

>thing has become so predictable. It will be interesting to see where it goes

>next.

> >

> > Anita

> >

> > Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@...> wrote:

> > And an even more important motive behind the big " contagious

> > bird flu " scam is a political one, of the ruling persons' wanting

> > to terrorize people everywhere. Se for instance " UNITE! Infos "

> > #251en, #252en and #256en at my homepage. The CDC's

> > recent " dismissing " message (below) is just an enforced

> > (and phony) " retreat " after its own " pandemic " efforts have

> > gotten publicly exposed (above all by some people in Germany).

> > But those efforts are still " on " . There will be more " bird flu "

> > scare stories in the international mass media soon enough.

> >

> > Rolf M.

> > www.rolf-martens.com

> >

> > At 13:13 2006-04-22 +0100, you Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote:

> >

> > >E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

> > >Vienna, Virginia

><<http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org

> > >

> > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > > UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

> > > #8122

> > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > >

> > > " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since

>1982. "

> > >

> >

> >===========================================================================

>=

> > >==============

> > >BL Fisher Note;

> > >

> > >On April 15,2006 the head of the federal Centers for Disease Control

> > >reportedly dismissed the threat of a bird flu pandemic:

> > >

> >

> ><<http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>h

> ttp://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>http

>://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html

> > >Tacoma News Tribune

> > >April 15, 2006

> > > " There is no evidence it will be the next pandemic, " Dr.

> > >Gerberding,

> > >head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, said

>of

> > >avian flu. There is " no evidence it is evolving in a direction that is

> > >becoming more transmissible to people. "

> > >

> > >The following article published April 20 hypes the multi-billion dollar

> > >profits drug companies could make if enough people around the world get

> > >scared enough about a bogus impending bird flu epidemic. In what is

>shaping

> > >up to be a classic con fueled by fear, the take-all winners will be the

> > >holders of stock in drug companies making the experimental flu vaccines

>that

> > >some will justify forcing others to use for " the greater good. "

> > >

> >

> ><<http://news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://

> news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://new

>s./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1

> > >Reuters via News

> > >April 20, 2006

> > >

> > >Pandemic threat could double flu vaccine market

>

>----------

April 23, 2006

Those things which you're mentioning, Anita, are what

those rather big experts the " klein-klein-aktion " people in

Germany, and some others too, have also been pointing at

as earlier big scams, as you're saying. I on my part have

read about that only rather recently.

Rolf M.

At 12:47 2006-04-22 -0700, you Anita Durney <mydurney@...>

wrote:

>Couldn't agree with you more, Rolf. They did it with SARS, West Nile,

>Anthrax etc.

> They'll be charging the mosquitos next year with being carriers of the

> next " pandemic " with a new name and set of numbers and letters. The whole

> thing has become so predictable. It will be interesting to see where it

> goes next.

>

> Anita

>

> Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@...> wrote:

> And an even more important motive behind the big " contagious

>bird flu " scam is a political one, of the ruling persons' wanting

>to terrorize people everywhere. Se for instance " UNITE! Infos "

>#251en, #252en and #256en at my homepage. The CDC's

>recent " dismissing " message (below) is just an enforced

>(and phony) " retreat " after its own " pandemic " efforts have

>gotten publicly exposed (above all by some people in Germany).

>But those efforts are still " on " . There will be more " bird flu "

>scare stories in the international mass media soon enough.

>

>Rolf M.

>www.rolf-martens.com

>

>At 13:13 2006-04-22 +0100, you Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote:

>

> >E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

> >Vienna,

> Virginia

> <<http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org

> >

> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

> > #8122

> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> >

> > " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982. "

> >

> >============================================================================

> >==============

> >BL Fisher Note;

> >

> >On April 15,2006 the head of the federal Centers for Disease Control

> >reportedly dismissed the threat of a bird flu pandemic:

> >

> ><<http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>h

>

ttp://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>http://www.\

thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html

> >Tacoma News Tribune

> >April 15, 2006

> > " There is no evidence it will be the next pandemic, " Dr.

> >Gerberding,

> >head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, said of

> >avian flu. There is " no evidence it is evolving in a direction that is

> >becoming more transmissible to people. "

> >

> >The following article published April 20 hypes the multi-billion dollar

> >profits drug companies could make if enough people around the world get

> >scared enough about a bogus impending bird flu epidemic. In what is shaping

> >up to be a classic con fueled by fear, the take-all winners will be the

> >holders of stock in drug companies making the experimental flu vaccines that

> >some will justify forcing others to use for " the greater good. "

> >

> ><<http://news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://

>

news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://news./s\

/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1

> >Reuters via News

> >April 20, 2006

> >

> >Pandemic threat could double flu vaccine market

> >

> >----------

>

April 23, 2006

No the info at Beyond Pesticides is not propoganda - you need to read more

about the ingredients in pesticides as well as the potential adverse health

effects. Go to pubmed and search if you have the time-while you are there

search organophosphate pesticides (and neurological, and asthma, and

parkinson's, and seizures, and dermatitis, and cancer, and autoimmune, and

birth defects). You will find tons. As for the folks at Beyond Pesticides,

they are a great bunch, totally legitimate, and have been a great help to me

on various projects the past 4 or 5 years.

And as far as controlling mosquitoes--The best approach is an integrated

mosquito management approach. Prevention is always the first choice i.e.

cleaning up standing water/breeding grounds (this involves educating

people). For water/breeding grounds that cannot be cleaned up--then

larvacide can be used to kill the mosquito larva (with a least toxic

larvacide such as Bti). Finally in a public health threat situation,

spraying may be warranted (but even in this regard all mosquito insecticides

are not created equal- some have a lower toxicity than others). And keep

in mind that in some areas, communities are routinely sprayed simply for

" nuisance " reasons in the absence of any declared public health threat.

If you are interested in this topic, I will once again recommend that you

read the great info at www.beyondpesticides.org. They have a whole section

on mosquito control.

I write the above with the knowledge that I have about mosquito management

in the state where I live here in the US. I have not studied mosquito

problems, diseases carried by mosquitoes, or methods of mosquito management

in Africa or any other country.

Re: Re: [NVIC] Flu Hype Could Double Vaccine

Market

> >

> > > Couldn't agree with you more, Rolf. They did it with SARS, West Nile,

> >Anthrax etc.

> > > They'll be charging the mosquitos next year with being carriers of

the

> >next " pandemic " with a new name and set of numbers and letters. The whole

> >thing has become so predictable. It will be interesting to see where it

goes

> >next.

> > >

> > > Anita

> > >

> > > Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@...> wrote:

> > > And an even more important motive behind the big " contagious

> > > bird flu " scam is a political one, of the ruling persons' wanting

> > > to terrorize people everywhere. Se for instance " UNITE! Infos "

> > > #251en, #252en and #256en at my homepage. The CDC's

> > > recent " dismissing " message (below) is just an enforced

> > > (and phony) " retreat " after its own " pandemic " efforts have

> > > gotten publicly exposed (above all by some people in Germany).

> > > But those efforts are still " on " . There will be more " bird flu "

> > > scare stories in the international mass media soon enough.

> > >

> > > Rolf M.

> > > www.rolf-martens.com

> > >

> > > At 13:13 2006-04-22 +0100, you Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote:

> > >

> > > >E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

> > > >Vienna, Virginia

> ><<http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org

> > > >

> > > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > > > UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

> > > > #8122

> > > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > > >

> > > > " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since

> >1982. "

> > > >

> > >

> >

>===========================================================================

> >=

> > > >==============

> > > >BL Fisher Note;

> > > >

> > > >On April 15,2006 the head of the federal Centers for Disease Control

> > > >reportedly dismissed the threat of a bird flu pandemic:

> > > >

> > >

> >

><<http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>h

> >

ttp://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>http

> >://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html

> > > >Tacoma News Tribune

> > > >April 15, 2006

> > > > " There is no evidence it will be the next pandemic, " Dr.

> > > >Gerberding,

> > > >head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta,

said

> >of

> > > >avian flu. There is " no evidence it is evolving in a direction that

is

> > > >becoming more transmissible to people. "

> > > >

> > > >The following article published April 20 hypes the multi-billion

dollar

> > > >profits drug companies could make if enough people around the world

get

> > > >scared enough about a bogus impending bird flu epidemic. In what is

> >shaping

> > > >up to be a classic con fueled by fear, the take-all winners will be

the

> > > >holders of stock in drug companies making the experimental flu

vaccines

> >that

> > > >some will justify forcing others to use for " the greater good. "

> > > >

> > >

> >

><<http://news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://

> > news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://new

> >s./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1

> > > >Reuters via News

> > > >April 20, 2006

> > > >

> > > >Pandemic threat could double flu vaccine market

> >

> >----------

>

April 24, 2006

Thanks for the info, Sandy. I'm noting it for later study - above

all, of what arguments, if any, that site has against ( " sensible " ) DDT use,

which I'm advocating. As I wrote before, I won't go into the pesticides

questions here any more than I did last time, and these lines.

Rolf M.

At 17:33 2006-04-23 -0400, you Sandy Rippetoe <srippetoe@...>

wrote:

>No the info at Beyond Pesticides is not propoganda - you need to read more

>about the ingredients in pesticides as well as the potential adverse health

>effects. Go to pubmed and search if you have the time-while you are there

>search organophosphate pesticides (and neurological, and asthma, and

>parkinson's, and seizures, and dermatitis, and cancer, and autoimmune, and

>birth defects). You will find tons. As for the folks at Beyond Pesticides,

>they are a great bunch, totally legitimate, and have been a great help to me

>on various projects the past 4 or 5 years.

>

>And as far as controlling mosquitoes--The best approach is an integrated

>mosquito management approach. Prevention is always the first choice i.e.

>cleaning up standing water/breeding grounds (this involves educating

>people). For water/breeding grounds that cannot be cleaned up--then

>larvacide can be used to kill the mosquito larva (with a least toxic

>larvacide such as Bti). Finally in a public health threat situation,

>spraying may be warranted (but even in this regard all mosquito insecticides

>are not created equal- some have a lower toxicity than others). And keep

>in mind that in some areas, communities are routinely sprayed simply for

> " nuisance " reasons in the absence of any declared public health threat.

>

>If you are interested in this topic, I will once again recommend that you

>read the great info at www.beyondpesticides.org. They have a whole section

>on mosquito control.

>

>I write the above with the knowledge that I have about mosquito management

>in the state where I live here in the US. I have not studied mosquito

>problems, diseases carried by mosquitoes, or methods of mosquito management

>in Africa or any other country.

>

> Re: Re: [NVIC] Flu Hype Could Double Vaccine

>Market

> > >

> > > > Couldn't agree with you more, Rolf. They did it with SARS, West Nile,

> > >Anthrax etc.

> > > > They'll be charging the mosquitos next year with being carriers of

>the

> > >next " pandemic " with a new name and set of numbers and letters. The whole

> > >thing has become so predictable. It will be interesting to see where it

>goes

> > >next.

> > > >

> > > > Anita

> > > >

> > > > Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@...> wrote:

> > > > And an even more important motive behind the big " contagious

> > > > bird flu " scam is a political one, of the ruling persons' wanting

> > > > to terrorize people everywhere. Se for instance " UNITE! Infos "

> > > > #251en, #252en and #256en at my homepage. The CDC's

> > > > recent " dismissing " message (below) is just an enforced

> > > > (and phony) " retreat " after its own " pandemic " efforts have

> > > > gotten publicly exposed (above all by some people in Germany).

> > > > But those efforts are still " on " . There will be more " bird flu "

> > > > scare stories in the international mass media soon enough.

> > > >

> > > > Rolf M.

> > > > www.rolf-martens.com

> > > >

> > > > At 13:13 2006-04-22 +0100, you Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

> > > > >Vienna, Virginia

> > ><<<http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org>http://www.nvic.org>http://w

> ww.nvic.org

> > > > >

> > > > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > > > > UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

> > > > > #8122

> > > > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> > > > >

> > > > > " Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since

> > >1982. "

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >===========================================================================

> > >=

> > > > >==============

> > > > >BL Fisher Note;

> > > > >

> > > > >On April 15,2006 the head of the federal Centers for Disease Control

> > > > >reportedly dismissed the threat of a bird flu pandemic:

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> ><<<http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>

> http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>h

> > >

>ttp://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html>http

> > >://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/5663788p-5080102c.html

> > > > >Tacoma News Tribune

> > > > >April 15, 2006

> > > > > " There is no evidence it will be the next pandemic, " Dr.

> > > > >Gerberding,

> > > > >head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta,

>said

> > >of

> > > > >avian flu. There is " no evidence it is evolving in a direction that

>is

> > > > >becoming more transmissible to people. "

> > > > >

> > > > >The following article published April 20 hypes the multi-billion

>dollar

> > > > >profits drug companies could make if enough people around the world

>get

> > > > >scared enough about a bogus impending bird flu epidemic. In what is

> > >shaping

> > > > >up to be a classic con fueled by fear, the take-all winners will be

>the

> > > > >holders of stock in drug companies making the experimental flu

>vaccines

> > >that

> > > > >some will justify forcing others to use for " the greater good. "

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> ><<<http://news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http:/

> /news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1>http://

> > >

>

news./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1><http://new>http://new

> > >s./s/nm/20060420/bs_nm/birdflu_vaccines_dc_1

> > > > >Reuters via News

> > > > >April 20, 2006

> > > > >

> > > > >Pandemic threat could double flu vaccine market

April 24, 2006

>

> Re: [NVIC] Flu Hype Could Double Vaccine Market

>

>> But as far as I understand, there actually IS a good reason to

>> combat mosquitoes with pesticides, namely in that they are

>> carrying some parasites - NOT bacteria or viruses - which are

>> causing malaria.

This is absolutely not true. Looks like there's another area where you

could inform yourself.

DDT companies are heavily promoting this viewpoint.

>>

>> I haven't seen anything in that New Medicine theory either - which

>> I've concluded is correct, though I still am ignorant of many of its

>> details; homepage in English http://www.newmedicine.ca/ - that

>> would contradict this.

>>

>> Now there since long is a campaign against, and a far-reaching

>> international ban against, that pesticide DDT, which formerly

>> was so successful (when applied sensibly, at least). It started

>> out with a book in 1962 by Carson: " Silent Spring " ; bans

>> were enacted from appr. 1972 on, with the US government taking

>> the initiative on this. The purported argument against DDT was/is

>> that it would harm the environment, making birds' eggs have

>> thinner shells etc.

>>

>> But this apparently is a big scam too, most probably (I hold)

>> intended to have millions of people in Africa etc killed by malaria.

>> The cheap and effective DDT seems ti have no good replacement.

>>

NO this is totally propaganda you are buying into

>> This is what's being argued by the website Africa Fighting Malaria

>> http://www.fightingmalaria.org/ for instance, and also by - the true

>> enough, capitalism-propagandistic but in several scientific respects

>> quite good website http://www.junkscience.com/ ( Milloy).

DDT promoters

>>>

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

earthmysteriestours@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Reality of the Diseases & Treatment -

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

April 24, 2006

exactly

Sheri

At 05:33 PM 4/23/2006 -0400, you wrote: