US/WHO killers trick Uruguay into anti-H5N1 vacc. poisoning

[Guest guest]

At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added today, under

" News with brief comments " :

Tuesday, 21 March 2006 (NWBC 133) DANGER: US/WHO killers

trick Uruguay into " anti-H5N1 vaccinations " poisoning

2006-03-21, 22:30 GMT:

According to Prensa Latina today,

[http://www.plenglish.com.mx/article.asp?ID=

{7A48CBD6-9AC4-4690-ACB0-464CD0D2512F}) & language=EN]

" Uruguay will start *an anti-avian flu vaccine campaign* as

soon as the country receives the first 400,000 doses by late

March, the Public Health Ministry (MSP) reported Tuesday.

According to sector authorities, the first ones to be

vaccinated will be *children between eight months and two

years old*, then *people older than 65 years* and *those

suffering any chronic respiratory disease*, and finally those

working on poultry farms, states the World Health

Organization (WHO). " [Emphasis added here]

But such vaccination, mass vaccination even, is precisely

what must NOT be done.

There is NO " bird flu virus " , NO " H5N1 " . The massive propa-

ganda about this, by the US imperialists above all, by the

other imperialists too and by the WHO and the media under

their control is intended, in their desperate situation of

being opposed more and more by the people everywhere, to

create fear and, " hopefully " , mass vaccinations " against "

that non-existent " virus " , which can only cause poisonings

and, in the case of persons already ill, even deaths, which

they will then pretend " were caused by H5N1 " and take as

" showing " that " there is now a pandemic " and that " thus, even

more vaccinations " - that is, more killings - " are needed " .

Quite in particular, vaccinations of people SUFFERING ANY

CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE risks causing many deaths.

A big problem and danger here is the fact that scientific

knowledge about these matters is not very widespread among

people in general, and in some countries perhaps is practi-

cally non-existent. With this message, I'm trying to contri-

bute towards warning people in Uruguay and in other coun-

tries, including persons with political influence who do not

want to become accessories to mass murder.

Refutations of the imperialists' " bird flu " hoax and expla-

nations of the basic facts on this do exist. The best are in

an interview on 27.10.2005 with the German virologist Stefan

Lanka. An English translation of this is at my homepage, in

" UNITE! Info #251en " . In the below, I shall repeat some ex-

cerpts from it which I believe contain particularly important

information:

[http://www.faktuell.de/Hintergrund/Background367.shtml

http://rolf-martens.com/UNITE%21%20Infos/webstyle1/

unite_info_251en.html]

IS THERE, THEN, no bird flu at all?

Since the late 19th century, diseases of poultry in mass

animal farming have been observed: Bluecolouring of the

crest, decrease in egglaying performance, sagging of the

feathers, and sometimes these animals die too. These diseases

were called bird pest.

In present-day mass poultry farming, in particular when hens

are being raised in cages, many animals die each day as a

result of species-alien animal farming. Later, these conse-

quences of the mass animal farming were no longer called bird

pest, but bird flu. Since decades back, we are experiencing

that a transferable virus is being maintained as the cause of

this, in order to deflect from the actual causes.

THEN THOSE 100 MILLION hens which appear to have died from

bird flu in reality have died from stress or and/or from

nourishment deficiency and poisoning?

No! If one hen lies fewer eggs or gets a blue crest and that

hen is tested H5N1-positive too, then all the other hens are

gassed. That is how there got to be those 100 million appa-

rently H5N1-killed hens.

....

OF WHAT DID THOSE 61 PERSONS DIE who were demonstrated to

have H5N1?

There is only very little in the way of publicly available

reports, describing what were the symptoms and how these

persons were then treated. These cases clearly point in one

direction: Persons with symptoms of a cold, who then had the

bad luck to fall into the hands of H5N1 hunters, were killed

with enormous amounts of chemotherapy supposed to restrain

the phantom virus. Isolated in plastic tents, surrounded by

madmen in space suits, they died, in panicky fear, from

multiple organ failures.

....

DOES THEN THE SUBSTANCE TAMIFLU, which is now being purchased

with tax money and stocked, protect people from the bird flu?

That this substance protects against a flu nobody is main-

taining.

Tamiflu is supposed to function as a neuraminidase-re-

straining agent. It restrains in an organism the function of

the sugar neuraminidase acid, which is co-responsible for the

surface tension in the cells.

Those side effects which are noted on the instruction slips

accompanying packages of Tamiflu are almost identical to the

symptoms of a serious influenza. On a large scale, thus,

medicines are now being stored which cause precisely the same

symptoms as those which appear in an actual so-called influ-

enza - and which will discontinue, with a doctor, after seven

days, and without a doctor after a week.

If Tamiflu is administered to sick persons, then this is

likely to cause far more serious symptoms than those of a

serious influenza. If a pandemic is stated to exist, then

many people will take this medicine at the same time. In that

case we will actually have unequivocal symptoms of a Tamiflu

epidemic. Then also deaths caused by Tamiflu are to be expec-

ted, and this will then be presented as evidence of the

dangerous nature of the bird flu and evidence of how anxious

is the state that people should be in good health.

In this, the well-tested AIDS pattern is being repeated. In

Spain it's noted on the instruction slips accompanying

packages of AIDS medicine that it is not known whether the

symptoms are caused by the medicine or by the virus.

THEN YOU WILL ALSO NOT RECOMMEND any general vaccination or

the specially developed vaccination against the bird flu?

I am not recommending any madness.

Every vaccination substance contains poisonous substances

which have effects during a long time resulting in smaller or

larger permanent injury. The infection protection law re-

quires, as necessary precondition for a vaccination's being

justified, the " is " , the fact of there existing something

which causes a disease, for instance a virus.

Since none of the so-called diseasecausing viruses can be,

nor should be, maintained to exist, there can also be no

lawful vaccinations against influenza, and none against bird

flu either.

[END OF QUOTE]

There are some other articles too which demonstrate that the

" bird flu " propaganda is a hoax with very bad intentions

behind it, for instance two by Jon Rappport, the USA, on

17.01 respectively 19.01 of this year. Further statements (in

translation) on this question by Stefan Lanka and another

German expert, and an attempt by me to analyze its political

background and context, readers can find in my Info #252en.

[http://rolf-martens.com/otherspubs/

060302_v-list_c_analysis_of_bird-flu_hoax.html

http://rolf-martens.com/otherspubs/

060302_v-list_j_rappoport_j_west_on_bird_flu.html

http://rolf-martens.com/UNITE%21%20Infos/

webstyle1/unite_info_252en.html]

_____________________

Message posted by:

Rolf Martens

Malmö, Sweden

Phone and fax:

+46 - 40 - 124832;

rolf.martens@...

www.rolf-martens.com

______________________