Guest guest Posted December 23, 2006 Report Share Posted December 23, 2006 Hi, all. I want to bounce something off of you. As you may be aware, there have been several studies that have found that IgE-type allergies are not more common in PWCs than in the general public. However, PWCs report having big problems with allergies, and they also report worsening of allergies they had before developing CFS. I think I now have something new to add to this topic. I am in the process of writing a poster paper for the IACFS meeting coming up next month. This one is about the Glutathione Depletion- -Methylation Cycle Block Hypothesis for the Pathogenesis of CFS. It's based on my past work on glutathione depletion in CFS, and also on what's going on in autism research, where Jill and coworkers have found that glutathione depletion there is linked to a block in the methylation cycle. As I've mentioned before, it looks to me as though the same thing is going on in at least a major subset of PWCs. So what I've been doing today is to try to figure out what the effects of a blocked methylation cycle are, and to see if these are things that show up in CFS. One of the several things I've come upon is the fact that the deactivation of histamine requires methylation reactions. Thus, if a person has a blocked methylation cycle and thus decreased capacity for methylation (because the ratio of S-adenosylmethionine to S-adenosylhomocysteine drops, and this blocks the methyltransferase enzymes), then I think we should expect that if they have an allergic reaction to something, the histamine will rise higher and stay up longer than it would in a person with normal methylation capacity. Therefore, the allergic reaction would be expected to be more severe. This would explain why, even though the prevalence of IgE allergies in PWCs is not significantly different from that in the general population, the PWCs would experience more severe reactions when they did get them. It would also explain why allergies they had prior to developing CFS were observed to get worse after their CFS onset. So what do you think about this? My experience with this overall hypothesis continues to be that the pieces keep falling into place. I've never had an experience like this before, in about 40 years of working in science. Another thing that is really a mind-blower is this: research in secretory protein synthesis is showing that glutathione is necessary in the process of putting disulfide bonds (into those secretory proteins that are supposed to have them) correctly to establish their tertiary structure (folding) before they are secreted from the cell. I've pondered what would happen if the cells that secrete them do not have enough glutathione. They end up not being able to secrete the proteins properly, and there will likely be misfolding. (Recall that Jim Baraniuk et al. reported widespread misfolding of proteins in the spinal fluid in CFS.) O.K., here's the mind-blower: this cuts right across the symptoms of CFS. It can explain the low perforin production and thus the low cytotoxic activity of natural killer (NK) cells, one of the cardinal immunological features of CFS. It can also explain low production of ACTH, leading to the well-known observed blunting of the HPA axis. It can also explain why both oxytocin and antidiuretic hormone are low, the latter producing the diabetes insipidus, with its excessive urination, constant thirst, and low blood volume. The story just goes on and on. This is really a sweeping hypothesis, and I don't know if the community will believe it or not. In my view, too many things keep coming out right for there not to be some truth in this thing. Take care, and I wish you all the best in this season, however you celebrate it. Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.