Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 I didnt think abortion was legal in the US in the 1960's.... wasn't Roe V. Wade in the early 70's? Sheri B. Cheryl <che2you@...> wrote: Thanks Re: Question At 05:11 PM 1/25/2006 -0800, you wrote: >I'm being told that vaccine makers haven't used aborted fetus cells since the 60's. In effect they are using cloned cells now... > >Any great comebacks to this? > >Cheryl > sorry ain't true See my webpage http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/abortedtissue.htm and read the links especially here - straight from the CDC's mouth - http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vacsafe/concerns/gen/humancell.htm " CDC is aware that some, but not all, vaccines are made from human cell-line cultures, and some of these cell lines originated from aborted fetal tissue, obtained from legal abortions in the 1960's. No new fetal tissue is needed to produce cell lines to make these vaccines, now or in the future. Fetal tissue is not used to produce vaccines; cell lines generated from a single fetal tissue source are used--vaccine manufacturers obtain human cell lines from FDA-certified cell banks. " -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. ****** " Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/abortedtissue.htm -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. ****** " Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 They were cells from the aborted fetuses of involuntarily hospitalized psychiatric patients. Given how people with mental illness are regarded, I seriously doubt that informed consent was even sought, and wouldn't be surprised if the terminations were involuntary in some instances. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ , 17mos See him at <http://www.tabulas.com/~wanderings/gallery/51140/> http://www.tabulas.com/~wanderings/gallery/51140/ Re: Aborted fetal cell lines I didnt think abortion was legal in the US in the 1960's.... wasn't Roe V. Wade in the early 70's? Sheri B. Cheryl <che2you@...> wrote: Thanks Re: Question At 05:11 PM 1/25/2006 -0800, you wrote: >I'm being told that vaccine makers haven't used aborted fetus cells since the 60's. In effect they are using cloned cells now... > >Any great comebacks to this? > >Cheryl > sorry ain't true See my webpage http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/abortedtissue.htm and read the links especially here - straight from the CDC's mouth - http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vacsafe/concerns/gen/humancell.htm " CDC is aware that some, but not all, vaccines are made from human cell-line cultures, and some of these cell lines originated from aborted fetal tissue, obtained from legal abortions in the 1960's. No new fetal tissue is needed to produce cell lines to make these vaccines, now or in the future. Fetal tissue is not used to produce vaccines; cell lines generated from a single fetal tissue source are used--vaccine manufacturers obtain human cell lines from FDA-certified cell banks. " -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. ****** " Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 --- " Sheri B. " <tallchick1966@...> wrote: > Oh, so they even used an illegal source? I mean if > it's not legal in your own country, just go outside > your country and get what you need. How > conveeeeeenient. > Sheri B. well.... if it's illegal to do or sell in your country it doesn't necessarily make it illegal for you to buy it... i found it goes both ways, although i'm pretty sure that's not how the powers that be intended for it *grin*. i have no doubt they invented such loopholes for their own benefit, but once in a while, we can make use of it too. to give an example, in england, the selling of stevia is illegal. but the buying isn't. so, while i live in england, i happily buy stevia from canada, stevia plants from germany, etc, and nobody can do a thing about it. just my thoughts, claudia No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. http://lady-karelia.livejournal.com/ __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 No, see my website - voluntary legal abortions in other countries from what I understand Where did you hear that ? >They were cells from the aborted fetuses of involuntarily hospitalized >psychiatric patients. Given how people with mental illness are >regarded, I seriously doubt that informed consent was even sought, and >wouldn't be surprised if the terminations were involuntary in some >instances. > >>> -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. ****** " Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Sheri - there is a fair amount of uncertainty as to whether the second fetal cell line MRC-5 was taken from a woman with mental health issues or whether or not it was voluntary or coerced. It seems " psychiatric reasons " for abortions were loosly used at the time in England. Anita >In the 1970’s a second aborted fetal cell line would be introduced in Great Britain by the Medical Research Council, named MRC-5. The cell line is derived from the lung tissue of a 14-week gestation male aborted for “psychiatric reasons”.[14] Two interesting points will be made here. The first, in an interview with Father Cornforth, of the UK, February, 2003: He related the story of how laws in England in the 1960’s - 1970’s timeframe were supposedly designed to limit the number of abortions, allowing only for “health of the mother”, which included mental health. He stated that the law was more of a “wink and a nod” and that, “psychiatric reasons were commonly noted on the records whenever no medical evidence of health problems could be legally accounted for, and certainly when there were other more sinister motives.” The second point of interest comes from Leonard Hayflick himself, who boasted, “I have not only worked with WI-38 but I am the developer of that strain. MRC-5 is a copycat strain made by the Brits almost ten years after I showed them how.” [15] Since neither the WI-38 nor the MRC-5 abortions were done in the United States, where at least one could speculate that even minimal informed consent laws might have prevented mischief, there is good reason to question the validity of the recorded reasons for the abortions. There is certainly no way of knowing whether the mothers volunteered their babies as research projects or not, but one could muse that especially in the case of MRC-5, even if the mother really had psychiatric problems, she could have been easily coerced. It may be speculation, but it deserves consideration in light of the absolute truth the abortions had been pre-arranged to have researchers present whose intention was extracting the tissue for vaccine production. That fact is undeniable. Sheri Nakken <snakken@...> wrote: No, see my website - voluntary legal abortions in other countries from what I understand Where did you hear that ? >They were cells from the aborted fetuses of involuntarily hospitalized >psychiatric patients. Given how people with mental illness are >regarded, I seriously doubt that informed consent was even sought, and >wouldn't be surprised if the terminations were involuntary in some >instances. > >>> --------------------------------- What are the most popular cars? Find out at Autos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Sheri B., What really bugs me, aside from the obvious, is that Merck & Co. had their filthy hands in this too. Aborted fetal cell lines for their precious rubella vaccine, thimerisol and Vioxx to name of few of their most evil works. They are morally bankrupt and have been from the start. Anita " Sheri B. " <tallchick1966@...> wrote: Thanks, Anita. This satisfies me. I know I don't want it in me or my kids. Who would? Sheri B. Anita Durney <mydurney@...> wrote: Sheri - I have more if you want it. Anita To fully understand the magnitude of intention by not only the abortionist and the researcher, but the pharmaceutical industry as well, one needs to look at the history of how these cell lines were obtained, by whom they were obtained and who ultimately profited. --------------------------------- Bring words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Definatly - Right up until at least the mid 1980s in England the quickest and easiest way to get an abortion was to claim it was for " psychiatric reasons " . It was very easy to do so and I believe what most women did or were told to do if they wanted an abortion. ~ Jowanna. > No, see my website - voluntary legal abortions in other countries from what > I understand > > Where did you hear that ? > > >They were cells from the aborted fetuses of involuntarily hospitalized > >psychiatric patients. Given how people with mental illness are > >regarded, I seriously doubt that informed consent was even sought, and > >wouldn't be surprised if the terminations were involuntary in some > >instances. > > > >>> > > > > --------------------------------- > > What are the most popular cars? Find out at Autos > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2006 Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 Gad I wish I could remember-I will see if I can find it!!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ , 17mos See him at <http://www.tabulas.com/~wanderings/gallery/51140/> http://www.tabulas.com/~wanderings/gallery/51140/ RE: Aborted fetal cell lines No, see my website - voluntary legal abortions in other countries from what I understand Where did you hear that ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2006 Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 This is interesting, but I am hoping to find my source for the information that seems to be sticking in my head about the involuntarily hospitalized-it is clearly not right (!) Drat I was hoping to indict the psychiatric machine with something more <G> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ , 17mos See him at <http://www.tabulas.com/~wanderings/gallery/51140/> http://www.tabulas.com/~wanderings/gallery/51140/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.