Goldman, PhD - Exposing Problems with Chickenpox Vaccine; book; journal; more

[Guest guest]

Goldman, PhD - Exposing Problems with Chickenpox Vaccine

http://www.injectionbook.com/pages/1/index.htm

1. Info on 's job as Research/Analyst " insider " who was assigned to

study a specific disease in a local community

http://www.injectionbook.com/pages/2/index.htm

2. Website describes events once he started to see Shingles increased in

vaccinated

http://www.injectionbook.com/pages/2/index.htm

3. Fiction book based on his research - see below

http://www.injectionbook.com/pages/1/index.htm

4. LA County Notice to Cease & Desist & /lawyer response

5. Supporting Abstracts including 3 Abstracts written by Goldman

exposing the problem (WHICH were REFUSED by US Medical Journals and finally

published in Europe's Vaccine Journal

6. NEW MEDICAL JOURNAL

http://www.vaccineveritas.com/pages/1/index.htm

Medical Veritas ( " latin for truth " )

The International Journal of Medical Truth

(I will send an extra email on this)

If you know researchers who would like to actually get their research

published on the truth

If you write and would like to write for this journal - contact

Goldman, PhD

http://www.injectionbook.com/pages/2/index.htm

Rashes of Controversy

Foreword

In and of themselves, numbers have a certain intrinsic value. Ultimately,

however, when numbers represent “people,” their meaning can take on far

greater significance.

The book you’re about to read had its origins several years ago, when as an

epidemiological researcher I began to ask, “Why?” about some surprising

(and controversial) numbers I’d started to gather during an important

population-tracking project that monitored the course of a certain disease

after widespread vaccination against it began.

I might have just shrugged those figures off, passed them on to my

superiors, taken my paychecks and kept quiet. But I couldn’t do that,

because I knew that each of those surprising, undesirable numbers

represented nothing less than a suffering person. And I hope my telling

you this will help you understand why I had to write this book, because

it’s not primarily about the numbers that started it, but about the hurting

people those numbers represent – about, actually, the potential millions

more people who may even come to include you who read it. Without the

information this book contains, you would have likely remained ignorant

about why potential millions may suffer in a disease epidemic that is being

predicted for the years ahead of us, based on those very “unwanted numbers”

I discovered.

You see, along with other experts who have reviewed the studies I made, I

am convinced that this book’s “numbers” have been soundly arrived at. Yet

though that’s important, my most crucial task will be to tell the story

behind the numbers, and to relate that story primarily in a narrative told

in clear, non-scientific, human terms that can be understood by as many

people, whether scientifically knowledgeable or not, as possible.

Not that the science behind the numbers is unimportant. For those

interested in and trained evaluating and analyzing the science of the

numbers, I’ve interspersed supporting documentation and technical

explanations, in the forms of charts, articles published in scientific

journals and other materials throughout the far-less-technical running

story-narrative I’ve written for the “general” reader. I’ve provided more

such matter in detailed appendices, to be found at the back of the book.

I’ve tried in the story-narrative to clearly and simply define any

technical terms that may be unfamiliar to general readers, in most cases as

soon as these terms occur. So, as you read the story-narrative, please

feel free to skip over whichever medical-scientific supports may prove

difficult for you to “make head or tail” of; they’re included for the

benefit of those science-minded readers who are fully able to read,

appreciate and interpret them.

Indeed, the most important human issue this book raises involves not the

numbers it reports, but the depth of human anguish that may be imposed on

people, without their knowledge or consent, by an elite few who may

intentionally or unwittingly abuse their positions of authority.

As a research/analyst “insider” who was assigned to study a specific

disease in a local community chosen as representative of a sample U.S.

population, I certainly recognize the positive influence of vaccines and

the beneficial role vaccination against numerous diseases has played in

public health. Yet I am deeply concerned that all vaccines be developed

and used as safely as possible; I also believe we can always find room for

improvement in that regard. Thus, I have written this book hoping that you

will be moved by what you learn within these covers to join me in striving

to encourage future reforms in vaccine-related medical research and practices.

Certain health authorities – including some of the very same people who

encouraged, welcomed and published, in prestigious medical journals like

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), virtually all my

positive findings about the vaccination we were studying, – wanted me to

tell only half the story you’re about to read. It seems now that they’d

like to “cover up” what I’m going to expose to you in this book.

But it is my firm conviction that people like you have a right to know,

when certain medical interventions are adopted, even mandated by law, how

these interventions may affect the population at large — especially when

such interventions may result in suffering for you and your loved ones. So

I have moved forward despite health authorities’ objections to write and

publish the side of the story they aren’t eager for you to learn. And when

you’ve read it, I’m confident that you’ll understand why I’m dedicating

this effort to people like you, those you love and care for most, here in

America and throughout the world.

Introduction

On March 17, 1995, with little public fanfare, the Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) approved another vaccine, and this was subsequently

added to the nation’s childhood immunization schedule. Gradually, one by

one, states passed laws mandating that each and every infant be inoculated

at age 12 months with the newly approved live virus, to help protect

against a common childhood disease.

From 1995 through late 2002, I served as a Research/Analyst in a program,

supported by a grant from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention (CDC), designed to study the effects of this newly licensed

vaccine in a geographical region of some 300,000 residents. Several years

after the program began, positive aspects of vaccination were allowed to be

published in scientific journals; however, I noticed that data I had

collected suggesting that adverse effects might well be associated with the

vaccination program were being handled quite differently. A preliminary

trend suggested that the vaccination itself might have the potential to

spawn a widespread epidemic among adults of a disease far more serious than

the one being inoculated against. When CDC-affiliated health authorities

learned this, they began to take action, including legal steps, to prevent

my making these findings known to the scientific community and the public.

But whenever research data and information concerning potential adverse

effects associated with a vaccine used in human populations are suppressed

and/or misrepresented by health authorities, not only is this most

disturbing, it goes against all accepted scientific norms and dangerously

compromises scientists’ professional ethics. And so, to expose and warn

against what I believe to be just such abuses of ethics and public trust, I

have written the book you are about to read.

n S. Goldman, Ph.D.

Computer Scientist/Research Analyst

In 1994, anticipating the approval of a new vaccine, the highest health

authorities in the U.S. authorized and set in motion, at taxpayers’

expense, what would be a 10-year (and possibly longer) population study

project. This project would monitor a specific childhood disease that

hadn’t previously been targeted by vaccination, and study the effects of

this vaccination on the community. But let me ask you: As a concerned

citizen and taxpayer…

.. Wouldn’t you think that before such a project began, careful

attention would be given to devising methods of collecting data that would

allow researchers to detect both positive and negative (or deleterious)

trends that might possibly arise during the study of the newly licensed

vaccine?

.. Wouldn’t you think that if deleterious effects of vaccination

did begin to surface – effects far worse than those caused by the common

childhood disease being vaccinated against – medical authorities like those

at our nation’s Centers for Disease Control would be eager, in the

interests of public health and safety, to devise additional studies, with

perhaps improved methods and controls, that might either confirm or

disprove the existence of such effects?

.. Wouldn’t you think that if evidence did support these

deleterious effects of vaccination, and if scientific literature also

alluded to such effects, and in addition described the biological mechanism

involved in the ill-effects, that the CDC might move quickly to re-assess

the recommendations for vaccination, which may have been made under faulty

assumptions that no such adverse effects would result?

.. Wouldn’t you think that both the CDC and the local public

health department that uncovered the ill-effects would encourage

publication of balanced research that objectively included both positive

and negative findings, based on careful analysis of project data and studies?

.. Wouldn’t you think that if findings showed that vaccination of

all healthy children against this common disease might cause a far worse

disease outbreak – of epidemic magnitude, mass suffering and enormous cost

among adults – the nation’s foremost health authorities would feel

compelled to modify their vaccination policy, or at least to alert the

public to the possibility that this epidemic might loom in our nation’s

future?

By now it’s likely that, just as I did when they crowded my

mind, you answered, “Yes” to all these questions.

Yet you may be surprised and even distressed, as I was, to

learn that certain prominent health authorities’ answers to these questions

seemed to be anything but “yeses”:

.. That when I began my research on this project, for which my

considerable past analytical experience had amply qualified me, I was given

only negligible information about the nature or medical background/history

of the disease whose effects among the population I was to study.

.. That my superiors gave me no information about any prior

critical studies suggesting that the vaccination program might have

deleterious effects – even though, as I later learned, medical journals had

already published such literature.

.. That my superiors provided me with little guidance about what

kinds of study methodology they might prefer, so I had to exercise

considerable personal initiative and discretion to learn about the disease

and devise methods to correlate and analyze numerous project data.

.. That when I did come to realize that the program to vaccinate

every child to prevent this common childhood disease also might adversely

impact adults, who would experience increased incidence of a disease that

was potentially far more serious and life-threatening than the one being

vaccinated against, my superiors (1) severely criticized my preliminary

findings and hypothesis; (2) virtually ordered me to forsake this line of

investigation altogether; (3) urged me to wait another year before

presenting updated findings, when I persisted with my probing and analysis

of these matters; and (4) even withdrew the support of an expert who had

assisted me in a prior investigation I had initiated of these concerns.

.. That by the end of 2001, after I had initially been encouraged

to develop manuscripts and contribute toward publications highlighting

benefits resulting from vaccination, three manuscripts based on my research

that supported adverse effects of vaccination had been neglected by my

superiors for one to two years, despite my repeated requests to have them

reviewed and passed on to higher authorities at the CDC. (Interestingly,

and perhaps more revealing, my superiors saw fit to release for publication

the same day they were submitted, or at most after several weeks, all

positive data and other reports I or they contributed that showed benefits

of the vaccination program.)

.. That my colleagues and superiors not only declined my offer to

include them as co-authors of these manuscripts about the adverse effects

of vaccination, after I resigned for conscience’s sake from the project in

October 2002, the public health department pressured the county legal

department to threaten legal action against me, in an attempt to prevent my

subsequent independent efforts to publish these findings in scientific

journals.

Despite these threats, I’ve decided to make public the very

circumstances surrounding this cover up, in the very book you’re reading –

a book that you’ll find is part true medical mystery, part expose, and in

part an urgent call to public awareness and action.

As this book, based on my eight years’ experience on the

project, unfolds, you’ll read how…

.. My project superiors’ actions (and inactions) made it seem as

if they wanted to hear no distressing news whatsoever concerning the

vaccine, only “good news” that mimicked existing results in other studies.

.. When I brought my project superiors what I and (later) other

renowned (and independent) epidemiological researchers considered

preliminary evidence suggesting that the very vaccination program they had

seemed so intent (though with inadequate forethought) on pursuing might

well trigger a massive epidemic of a far worse disease, my superiors and

the CDC tried to employ (improperly, I believe) various statistical methods

and other means, to (1) discredit my evidence, then (2) cause me to abandon

my further investigation of this disastrous possible outcome, and then (3)

suppress both scholarly and general public knowledge of it.

.. But perhaps insufficient forethought about the possible effects

of vaccination wasn’t what was at fault at all. When I considered another

factor – that the federally funded vaccination campaign actually paid for

all vaccinations administered to qualified children, which meant that the

pharmaceutical companies, using both the CDC and public health departments

as distribution channels for vaccine, would be enriched monetarily for each

inoculation – I found it not unrealistic to conjecture this possibility:

that these combined interests may have been quite willing to allow the

epidemic I warned of to spread. Why? Because perhaps they even had hoped

soon to profit from the epidemic’s spread and subsequent cure, via another

vaccine, currently under trial by the same pharmaceutical company that

provided the initial childhood vaccine.

In fact, readers of this book may come to hold public health

agencies accountable for promoting universal vaccination that could

potentially cause a painful disease epidemic of many years’ duration among

adults – one far worse than the childhood disease they’re currently

vaccinating against. And readers may come to consider these agencies

guilty of profiting from the suffering of countless thousands (even

millions) of American people.

By now you may be wondering how and why a non-medical doctor, a

scientist like me with a Ph.D. in Computer Science, a Bachelor of Science

degree in Engineering and many creative achievements as a " bits-and-bytes "

person, has come to write a book like this, about a field remote from my

experience prior to this project?

To clearly analyze and discern disease trends that might have passed by

other eyes unnoticed, maybe it took someone from outside the field of

epidemiology (the science that deals with the incidence, distribution and

control of disease in populations, or, as another simple definition puts

it, the science of the occurrence of human disease) – someone who could

think outside the field’s “traditional boxes.”.

Maybe it took someone who’d suffered, as I had, from the excruciating pain

caused by the disease that I feared would be sparked by the vaccination of

every child – someone who felt physically ill, as I did, even imagining the

suffering others might endure while a vaccination-spurred epidemic of this

disease raged.

Maybe it took someone to write this book whose conscience was sufficiently

bothered that individuals and groups with special interests might enjoy

enormous profits at the expense of huge numbers of other people’s suffering.

Maybe it took someone whose sojourn in the world of medicine had led him to

fear that what he saw of this project might be but the tip of a sinister

iceberg, one made up of corporate greed and influence-peddling, of medical

arrogance and worst of all, of precipitous, and in this case nearly

heedless, medical experimentation on a largely unwary public.

Thus, though this book will deal mainly with my specific research

experiences and findings concerning one particular vaccination’s

potentially frightening outcomes, I believe the issues raised can by

extension be applied to future research that may also have profound effects

on this nation’s health and wealth. For I’ve come to suspect that even the

eyes of some of today’s leaders in “objective science” can become clouded

by the age-old “cataracts” of money, power and reputation.

I’ve come to suspect that even some of today’s most eminent men and women

of science and medicine might turn crassly confident and come to think that

if the vaccines or medications they recommend for diseases should cause

adverse reactions and create other diseases – well, they’ll be able to find

other vaccines or medications for those, too, in an endless cycle involving

more and more diseases, to be cured and prevented by more and more

pharmaceuticals.

I’ve come to consider it possible that, if some leaders become blinded by

private and public money, humans suffering in large numbers may diminish in

their eyes to mere collections of blots on statistical charts. And if so,

such leaders might well, if they’re not stopped, continue experimenting on

humans en masse, to our hurt.

Even as I share these fears with you let me make several key matters clear.

First, I am not writing this book to decry all vaccination of all children

against all diseases. Vaccination against many potentially serious

diseases has proved a great blessing to mankind. Yet I am convinced, by my

research concerning the specific common childhood disease that I studied,

that the scientific community as well as the general public must maintain

an attitude of constant alertness and vigilance that will ensure that all

new medicines, vaccines and procedures are thoroughly tested and determined

to be safe in light of all possible outcomes – positive and deleterious –

before huge numbers of people are subjected to them and state laws mandate

them.

We must demand of our public health authorities that each individual

vaccine be evaluated separately and considered based on its own merits

and/or demerits, and not merely and automatically be regarded as safe just

because a majority of previously licensed vaccines have proved

cost-effective and successful and caused few adverse reactions.

Sadly, if you and I don’t make ourselves aware of and “inoculate” ourselves

against the kinds of abuses of public money and trust this book exposes, we

may, sooner or later, find ourselves living in an age, not only of the

planned product obsolescence we now endure from profit-hungry

manufacturers, we may also experience an age of planned disease-and-cure

cycles bestowed on us by unethical medical authorities and pharmaceutical

firms.

What can we do to protect ourselves from such frightening possibilities?

I have taken the initiative to submit my three manuscripts, which my

superiors likely read but gave me no substantive feedback about, to

respected scientific journals that have agreed, after thorough review, by

their editorial staffs and scientific experts (“peers”) in epidemiology, to

publish them.

Through my own research I’ve located and begun to share ideas and findings

with other scientists whose own highly regarded work echoes my concerns.

And I’ve found that some of these scientists have been waiting for years to

see just the kind of epidemiological data I’ve helped collect and analyze.

Hopefully, they and I will sound a cautionary alarm throughout the

scientific community. I’ve also written this book to alert parents and

others (who may or may not have medical backgrounds) to dangers to our

health that we may face from overly optimistic propaganda promoted by

trusted institutions toward which we’ve often looked for preventatives and

cures.

Ultimately, whether medical and pharmaceutical leaders conduct research and

practice the healing arts ethically, may well depend upon the pressure

exerted on them as a result of expositions of unethical conduct regarding

the kinds of issues this book raises. And, as I will argue at greater

length in the pages that follow, truly objective vaccine research will only

become attainable when research data and results are allowed to be

corroborated among independent experts, immune from the influence of (a)

sponsoring agencies that selectively control which data and results are

reported, ( vaccine profiteering motives, and © other conflicts of

interest.

My motivation for writing this book isn’t to gain either prestige or

profit. Rather, this work represents an attempt on my part to fulfill a

moral obligation to warn my own family, my friends, my community and the

world at large that we all may need to take a more active role in

decision-making that affects our own and our children’s and grandchildren’s

health.

This book issues in part a call that “ordinary” citizens should not give

carte blanche support or put “automatic” trust in all state-mandated

healthcare decisions and mandates that may be suggested by officials and/or

politicians. It also is intended to alert healthcare and political

authorities about the potential consequences of a vaccination policy

they’ve set in motion, and to highlight the responsibility they may

ultimately bear for increased suffering and death, despite their perhaps

good intentions to improve public health on a mass scale.

I now urge you to read on with these thoughts in mind and weigh carefully

the evidence I bring to the pages that follow. I will make every effort to

state the evidence clearly enough even to cause you an “intra-ocular

trauma” – that is, to hit you “right between the eyes.” The responsibility

will then rest with you, to act on what you learn, as your own informed

conscience leads you.

****

http://www.injectionbook.com/pages/9/index.htm

Los Angeles County Notice

to Cease and Desist Publication

AND 's response via lawyer

**********

FICTION BOOK

http://www.injectionbook.com/pages/1/index.htm

INJECTION

A fiction medical thriller currently. Perhaps reality in year 2009.

Use Order Form Below

INJECTION is about behind-the-scene health issues and their effect on

people in a town called Sycamore Springs from 2001 to 2018. A healthcare

official with a hero complex convinces the community that a vaccine to

protect against a common childhood disease is safe, when in fact, it has

not been thoroughly tested. As events unfold, a deleterious effect caused

by vaccination surfaces. Health authorities attempt to cover up the

finding, but the results are tragic. This fiction account is based on

research by S. Goldman, Ph.D., who served nearly eight years as

Research/Analyst on a project in a cooperative agreement with the Centers

of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Goldman - pearblossominc@...

******

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Classical Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL

OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

******

" Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down.

Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy

knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information

and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner