Guest guest Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 I don't know about HBOT but my assuredly flawed understanding from Cheney is that the systems of some people with CFS, and I am definitely one, have mutated into a low-oxygen state as a protective measure, and if I put more oxygen in, it would oxidise my cells, and create free radicals and negatively affect this screwed up mitochondrial cooling system that he told me about. I probably got at least half of that wrong, I'm no Cheney. Helen > > Could someone please explain to me why Dr. Cheney and Dr. Goldstein > both believe HBOT is harmful? I'd really like to know more details > before embarking on this treatment. Also, are there any HBOT people > still on this list? (those who have had good experiences?). > > I'm doing nebulized glutathione and glutathione shots concurrently > with the HBOT (which, for the record, I haven't really started yet as > the home HBOT chamber is far more complicated than I thought it would > be), so I'm hoping to prevent potential oxygen toxicity. I'm afraid > of fire and other dangers (i.e. changes to eyesight that some > experience with HBOT), but I don't know what specific physical dangers > would apply to CFIDS patients. > > The general opinion of HBOT for cardiac conditions is mixed. There is > research on both sides. I personally have had so many experiences > where, post-exertion (and I'm talking minor exertion here) I've had an > extreme worsening of my cardiac symptoms and chest pains and neck > venous distention and ensuing cognitive problems that feel like > classic ischemia or cardiac decompensation. I want to experiment with > HBOT as a post-exertional tool for one thing, to see if it helps > offset my crashes somewhat. > > Peggy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 If it was me, I would first just try breathing some O2- the sort that people with lung problems use. It might be enough. Wasn't Cheny's objection to do with the PFO situation? That the pressure could be bad for some w. that condition? Adrienne Re: Cheney & Hyperbaric (HBOT) Could someone please explain to me why Dr. Cheney and Dr. Goldstein both believe HBOT is harmful? I'd really like to know more details before embarking on this treatment. Also, are there any HBOT people still on this list? (those who have had good experiences?). I'm doing nebulized glutathione and glutathione shots concurrently with the HBOT (which, for the record, I haven't really started yet as the home HBOT chamber is far more complicated than I thought it would be), so I'm hoping to prevent potential oxygen toxicity. I'm afraid of fire and other dangers (i.e. changes to eyesight that some experience with HBOT), but I don't know what specific physical dangers would apply to CFIDS patients. The general opinion of HBOT for cardiac conditions is mixed. There is research on both sides. I personally have had so many experiences where, post-exertion (and I'm talking minor exertion here) I've had an extreme worsening of my cardiac symptoms and chest pains and neck venous distention and ensuing cognitive problems that feel like classic ischemia or cardiac decompensation. I want to experiment with HBOT as a post-exertional tool for one thing, to see if it helps offset my crashes somewhat. Peggy This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 > > > > Could someone please explain to me why Dr. Cheney and Dr. Goldstein > > both believe HBOT is harmful? I'd really like to know more details > > before embarking on this treatment. Also, are there any HBOT people > > still on this list? (those who have had good experiences?). > > > > I'm doing nebulized glutathione and glutathione shots concurrently > > with the HBOT (which, for the record, I haven't really started yet > as > > the home HBOT chamber is far more complicated than I thought it > would > > be), so I'm hoping to prevent potential oxygen toxicity. I'm afraid > > of fire and other dangers (i.e. changes to eyesight that some > > experience with HBOT), but I don't know what specific physical > dangers > > would apply to CFIDS patients. > > > > The general opinion of HBOT for cardiac conditions is mixed. There > is > > research on both sides. I personally have had so many experiences > > where, post-exertion (and I'm talking minor exertion here) I've had > an > > extreme worsening of my cardiac symptoms and chest pains and neck > > venous distention and ensuing cognitive problems that feel like > > classic ischemia or cardiac decompensation. I want to experiment > with > > HBOT as a post-exertional tool for one thing, to see if it helps > > offset my crashes somewhat. > > > > Peggy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Argh! I think I answered my own question. It looks as if, in terms of the scientific literature, having patent foramen ovale (the heart defect Cheney talks about) would make a person a poor candidate for HBOT. If anyone can give me evidence to the contrary, or argue against this, please do! After doing further searches on patent foramen ovale, I found many articles linking it to increased risk of decompression illness in divers, which means that it is a likely risk factor for people attempting HBOT (since HBOT is basically " diving " ). After reading about this, I'm curious how Cheney would view patent foramen ovale in his theories on MCS. When I have a chemical exposure, I feel it right in my heart, and it makes all of my cardiac symptoms worse. I feel a sense of being poisoned throughout my whole body, and being absolutely unable to filter out gaseous pollutants of any kind. I wonder if this is at all similar to what happens in people with decompression illness and PFO? Peggy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Yes, that is what he found with the PFO hole. But if he's finding 80% of his patients have a PFO hole, that isn't very good odds for someone with CFS who is not his patient,is my point. Ideally one should make sure that oxygen is helpful and not harmful to one's particular health. Easier said than done, I know, since he apparently is the only one looking at this angle. > > If it was me, I would first just try breathing some O2- the sort that people with lung problems use. It might be enough. > Wasn't Cheny's objection to do with the PFO situation? That the pressure could be bad for some w. that condition? > Adrienne > Re: Cheney & Hyperbaric (HBOT) > > > Could someone please explain to me why Dr. Cheney and Dr. Goldstein > both believe HBOT is harmful? I'd really like to know more details > before embarking on this treatment. Also, are there any HBOT people > still on this list? (those who have had good experiences?). > > I'm doing nebulized glutathione and glutathione shots concurrently > with the HBOT (which, for the record, I haven't really started yet as > the home HBOT chamber is far more complicated than I thought it would > be), so I'm hoping to prevent potential oxygen toxicity. I'm afraid > of fire and other dangers (i.e. changes to eyesight that some > experience with HBOT), but I don't know what specific physical dangers > would apply to CFIDS patients. > > The general opinion of HBOT for cardiac conditions is mixed. There is > research on both sides. I personally have had so many experiences > where, post-exertion (and I'm talking minor exertion here) I've had an > extreme worsening of my cardiac symptoms and chest pains and neck > venous distention and ensuing cognitive problems that feel like > classic ischemia or cardiac decompensation. I want to experiment with > HBOT as a post-exertional tool for one thing, to see if it helps > offset my crashes somewhat. > > Peggy > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 my understanding is that a helpful level of oxygen would vary from person to person and it would be difficult and time-consuming to determine. A helpful level of oxygen was not determined for me. > > > > > > Could someone please explain to me why Dr. Cheney and Dr. > Goldstein > > > both believe HBOT is harmful? I'd really like to know more > details > > > before embarking on this treatment. Also, are there any HBOT > people > > > still on this list? (those who have had good experiences?). > > > > > > I'm doing nebulized glutathione and glutathione shots concurrently > > > with the HBOT (which, for the record, I haven't really started > yet > > as > > > the home HBOT chamber is far more complicated than I thought it > > would > > > be), so I'm hoping to prevent potential oxygen toxicity. I'm > afraid > > > of fire and other dangers (i.e. changes to eyesight that some > > > experience with HBOT), but I don't know what specific physical > > dangers > > > would apply to CFIDS patients. > > > > > > The general opinion of HBOT for cardiac conditions is mixed. > There > > is > > > research on both sides. I personally have had so many experiences > > > where, post-exertion (and I'm talking minor exertion here) I've > had > > an > > > extreme worsening of my cardiac symptoms and chest pains and neck > > > venous distention and ensuing cognitive problems that feel like > > > classic ischemia or cardiac decompensation. I want to experiment > > with > > > HBOT as a post-exertional tool for one thing, to see if it helps > > > offset my crashes somewhat. > > > > > > Peggy > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 my understanding is that the PFO hole makes you lose your last filter, it allows toxins to cross from side to side in your heart, and go straight to your brain via your circulation it's not a good thing to have or cause to grow larger > > Argh! I think I answered my own question. It looks as if, in terms > of the scientific literature, having patent foramen ovale (the heart > defect Cheney talks about) would make a person a poor candidate for > HBOT. If anyone can give me evidence to the contrary, or argue > against this, please do! > > After doing further searches on patent foramen ovale, I found many > articles linking it to increased risk of decompression illness in > divers, which means that it is a likely risk factor for people > attempting HBOT (since HBOT is basically " diving " ). > > After reading about this, I'm curious how Cheney would view patent > foramen ovale in his theories on MCS. When I have a chemical > exposure, I feel it right in my heart, and it makes all of my cardiac > symptoms worse. I feel a sense of being poisoned throughout my whole > body, and being absolutely unable to filter out gaseous pollutants of > any kind. I wonder if this is at all similar to what happens in > people with decompression illness and PFO? > > Peggy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 If a toxin's effect was to make muscle tone less, you could imagine it relaxing the heart in a way that would allow the size of the opening to increase. Adrienne Re: Cheney & Hyperbaric (HBOT) Argh! I think I answered my own question. It looks as if, in terms of the scientific literature, having patent foramen ovale (the heart defect Cheney talks about) would make a person a poor candidate for HBOT. If anyone can give me evidence to the contrary, or argue against this, please do! After doing further searches on patent foramen ovale, I found many articles linking it to increased risk of decompression illness in divers, which means that it is a likely risk factor for people attempting HBOT (since HBOT is basically " diving " ). After reading about this, I'm curious how Cheney would view patent foramen ovale in his theories on MCS. When I have a chemical exposure, I feel it right in my heart, and it makes all of my cardiac symptoms worse. I feel a sense of being poisoned throughout my whole body, and being absolutely unable to filter out gaseous pollutants of any kind. I wonder if this is at all similar to what happens in people with decompression illness and PFO? Peggy This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 I've had good experience with HBOT. However, mine is a home chamber which is a much lower ATA than the commercial or hospital ones. I recently read an interesting article about how much oxygen is in our air now. I live on the coast and it said that 30 years ago the percentage of oxygen was 30%. It's now 19%. That's a huge drop in not so long a time period. Maybe a little oxygen is something we might benefit from. It's all still on the examining table isn't it? lifelonglearner79 <lifelonglearner79@...> wrote: > > > > Could someone please explain to me why Dr. Cheney and Dr. Goldstein > > both believe HBOT is harmful? I'd really like to know more details > > before embarking on this treatment. Also, are there any HBOT people > > still on this list? (those who have had good experiences?). > > > > I'm doing nebulized glutathione and glutathione shots concurrently > > with the HBOT (which, for the record, I haven't really started yet > as > > the home HBOT chamber is far more complicated than I thought it > would > > be), so I'm hoping to prevent potential oxygen toxicity. I'm afraid > > of fire and other dangers (i.e. changes to eyesight that some > > experience with HBOT), but I don't know what specific physical > dangers > > would apply to CFIDS patients. > > > > The general opinion of HBOT for cardiac conditions is mixed. There > is > > research on both sides. I personally have had so many experiences > > where, post-exertion (and I'm talking minor exertion here) I've had > an > > extreme worsening of my cardiac symptoms and chest pains and neck > > venous distention and ensuing cognitive problems that feel like > > classic ischemia or cardiac decompensation. I want to experiment > with > > HBOT as a post-exertional tool for one thing, to see if it helps > > offset my crashes somewhat. > > > > Peggy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.