Yasko List

[Guest guest]

I've been backchanelled about this so will bring it up.

This list is my favorite on . I don't want to see its

fertility undermined and I don't want us to just stop discussing

Yasko/glutathione etc her cold turkey.

OTOH there are a # of us who probably want to discuss our test results

and our protocols and what's working, in detail that the others may

not want. If so, should we start a co-moderated Yasko group (with at

least 3 of us as moderators since we all have health issues and NONE

of us are going to want to play the role Ken sometimes has had to on

this list). We could have a files section where our test results are

permanently available to view (I don't think I can have a signature

because I use ).

General insights, news, Rich's thinking, and substantial improvements

like Sue's could be posted in both. Or perhaps, to help ease the

reading of those here, Rich could post a long post analyzing someone's

health history and test results, or whatever he likes to post, on

there, and a message here that he has just posted on there, for those

who like to read it. Or cross post if its encompassing enough.

What I'm trying to suggest is that we create a both/and situation,

that still allows big, important, stuff about the whole

Yasko/glutathione issue to remain a lively topic on here without

exclusively dominating the list for those who have trouble

concentrating or reading, and to allow those of us interested in

orembarking on this as one of our approaches to discuss it in as much

detail as we want on a Yasko list.

Again, I think that at least 3 of us should be comoderators. Maybe

Rich wouldn't mind being the first one (i.e the first and final

arbiter, because he gets along with everybody) who starts the list,

and a few others of us can volunteer because Rich isn't always

available to post. So asking him to do more is not the idea at all,

simply having him as a final arbiter should a few times a year, there

arise some thorny internet situation. I hope there's not but I've seen

even the best lists have such situations from time to time.

I would think that to register for this list, which would be

moderated, we should use the format where you have to mention a

bit about who you are and why you want to join (i.e. this list should

just be for people who genuinely want to pursue this approach; not for

those who are skeptical or want to cut it down).

This is my suggestion. Please chime in, I hope that is okay with Ken,

rather than backchanelling, if we take a few days to discuss this and

arrive at a solution that overall will benefit everybody.

The reason I'm bringing this up is because a few folks backchanneled

me on it.