[PROVE] US Congress Confirms VACCINES NOT SAFE

[Guest guest]

[PROVE Note: For any parent out there that has had to endure harassment by

a pediatrician because you stuck by your decision to not vaccinate your

child because you knew vaccines are not safe for everyone, the US Congress

is about to give the American public the strongest confirmation ever that

vaccines truly are NOT SAFE and don't ever expect them to be safe.

Because vaccine manufacturers know that their products can hurt many people,

they have spent huge sums of money lobbying Congress for the past several

years looking for special liability protections, and it looks like they are

about to be awarded the blanket the protections they've tried so hard to

secure.

Think about it: since the definition of safe is " free from harm: harmless, "

and the US Congress is about to absolve vaccine manufactures from liability,

why on earth would they need to do that for a product that is truly free

from harm or harmless " ? The answer is, they wouldn't - vaccines really are

NOT SAFE and the US Congress knows this. What should be surprising to the

American people who have been brainwashed by vaccine toting public health

bureaucrats is how unsafe vaccines must be for Congress to take such drastic

measures.

US Congress through S975, commonly known as the " Biodefense and Pandemic

Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005 " , is stepping in and giving vaccine

makers liability protections to prevent multinational multibillion dollar

drug conglomerates from being financially ruined from liability for the

injuries and deaths they know happen from vaccines. Gee, there must be some

pretty nasty stuff in those vials.

Referring back to the definition of safe - the only ones who will be safe if

this bill passes are the vaccine makers. Remember that the next time your

doctor tells you to roll up your sleeve or goes to pull down your child's

pants. Could you afford to have yourself or anyone in your family hurt by a

shot?]

Vaccine bill to protect drug companies

Date: Sunday, October 23 @ 00:00:30

This story appeared in The Daily Herald on page A1.

http://www.harktheherald.com/modules.php?op=modload & name=News & file=article & s

id=67181

Facer of Orem summed up how most Americans, governmental entities and

health professionals feel about a public health emergency.

" I hope it doesn't happen, " he said.

But if at some point in the future it does, and Congress has passed the

Bioshield II bill, and people are injured because of a government-mandated

vaccine that is supposed to protect the American public

from the outbreak, those people will not be able to sue the vaccine

manufacturer.

The purpose of the Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act

of 2005, said bill author Sen. Burr, R-N.C., is to encourage

pharmaceutical companies to be developing such vaccines. According to Burr's

news release, the bill is a step toward creating a partnership between the

government and private corporations to " rapidly develop effective medical

drugs and vaccines to protect the United States from deliberate, accidental

and natural incidents involving biological pathogens. "

The bill in a large part focuses on bioterrorism and biological, chemical

and nuclear warfare, but Burr said in the release it also provides the

resources necessary to deal with a naturally occurring epidemic. It absolves

pharmaceutical companies from any liability from injured parties if the

federal government declares a public health emergency and mandates the

vaccine.

The bill's language and its precepts make Barbara Loe Fisher, president of

the National Vaccine Information Center, uncomfortable. She said it takes

away pharmaceutical companies' responsibility to consumers and gives too

much power to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, who declares

public health emergencies.

" Now this legislation is going to remove liability from the companies who

produce these drugs and vaccines at government request and nobody is held

accountable when a state of emergency is declared, " she said.

Pharmaceutical companies already are protected from most lawsuits. In 1986

Congress created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which is

a no-fault alternative to litigation, according to information from the U.S.

Department of Health and Human Services. It was created after the number of

lawsuits filed against vaccine producers spiked, and many companies opted to

get out of vaccine production because of skyrocketing legal costs.

The measure could be a good thing, said Lance Madigan, spokesman for the

Utah County Health Department. Protecting pharmaceutical companies from

prohibitively expensive litigation is positive because it allows the

companies to produce vaccines that in the large majority of cases protect

the public. In many instances, diseases that could have caused a national

crisis are controlled because of vaccines.

" There is always the possibility of adverse reactions " because of allergies

or other factors, he said, adding those instances are rare and almost

everyone benefits from getting immunized.

Under the bill, injured parties could still sue the vaccine company if they

can prove criminal fraud or negligence, unless the vaccine is mandated by

the government during a public health crisis, Fisher said. She is afraid

that in the event of a national crisis, pharmaceutical companies will push

an experimental drug through the Food and Drug Administration, and it will

be approved and distributed without going through the same rigorous process

drugs should.

" We just feel that enough is enough, " she said. " There has got to be some

accountability somewhere for these vaccines and drugs. "

Facer agreed someone should be accountable. But he questioned if it should

be the pharmaceutical companies.

" If the government mandates it, they should also bear the burden of

liability, " he said.

Madigan said the FDA's process for approving a drug is thorough and a drug

will not hit the market until it is considered safe for general consumption.

Should there be a national health crisis, the approval process may be

reduced, but it would be determined on a case-by-case basis, he said, with

many factors taken into account.

" Obviously, if the disease is that infectious or that deadly, then they're

probably going to be willing to have more risk, " he said.

The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions passed the

bill Tuesday and now will go to the full Senate for a vote.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Dawn

PROVE(Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education)

prove@... (email)

http://vaccineinfo.net/ (web site)

-------------------------------------------------------------------

PROVE provides information on vaccines, and immunization policies and

practices that affect the children and adults of Texas. Our mission is to

prevent vaccine injury and death and to promote and protect the right of

every person to make informed independent vaccination decisions for

themselves and their family.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This information is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Subscribe to PROVE Email Updates:

Click here http://vaccineinfo.net//subscribe.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Classical Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL

OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

******

" Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down.

Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy

knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information

and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner