Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 At 01:52 PM 8/26/2005 EDT, you wrote: >I would suggest going to the PAVE web site the have a lot of info there on >how the Bible speaks against vaccines. > >S. Heath > Thanks - but again it is important you use the exact wording that is in the law to write your exemption> -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Classical Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. ****** " Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Sheri Nakken <vaccineinfo@...> wrote: >> Use of scripture can get you in DEEP Trouble. >> ONLY use the wording of the law to write your exemption Sheri, This was only for my discussions with friends/family. Not for actually procuring an exemption for myself. On that, I totally agree with you. Give 'em what they need and not a word more! Sheri B. --------------------------------- Start your day with - make it your home page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 I agree that the official exemption letter should be simple and without scripture. I would reject signing anything that says " the child is at risk " blah blah blah, or restrict the signature as mentioned, or just have a new document prepared with the correct wording. Within the exemption letter I recommend listing all the ingredients of every vaccine instead of just saying " vaccines " or " shots " . Listing the ingredients is truthful and powerful, and the reader will definitely see the exemption differently, and may just understand why vaccines are being refused. I would also advise that if a basic religious or philosophical exemption is given, then everyone should in some way offer an explanation that is off the record. Maybe just an unsigned letter, or a stack of documents proving that all vaccines are deadly, or possibly even a conversation on the spot or at some other location. Yes, we want conversion!! Some will say why bother or take the risk when it's not necessary. Well, remaining silent is definitely an easier and more peaceful way, but I do think those receiving the letter need to be informed about what it is they support. By just giving the exemption, I think most would remain puffed up in their pride by assuming that we are very stupid and negligent. By not offering an explanation, I don't think they'll ever understand how serious this matter is and continue promoting this wickedness, unless the ingredients offer some conviction and they search out the truth. In whatever situation where a discussion would arise with a hard- hearted pro-vaccinator, personally I'd come at him or her from the Christian perspective and focus on witchcraft, sorcery, murder, genocide, crimes against humanity etc. and the consequences of their actions. The matter of church and state can also be brought out because vaccination is a sacrament of the government's Humanistic/Satanic religion that they are trying to force on the people. Proclaiming that vaccination is religion is something that needs to be emphasized more frequently because it's a great way to silence these fools and the ACLU should really be on our side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2005 Report Share Posted August 27, 2005 Listing the ingredients may come off as a medical protest This will negate your religious standpoint. I agree that making people who don't fully understand what they are administering read the ingredient list is powerful and truthful. Saying that the reader will definitely see the exemption differently, and may just understand why vaccines are'nt being used is an assumption and in the eyes of many an attempt to convert their thinking. It's just not that easy. Our children will be grown with children of their own before mainstream Americans will ever change the crux of their thinking. I appreciate where your coming from, but we cannot use exemptions and our childrens safety as forum to spread the word. It's too risky and will raise red flags that will only make it harder for everyone else. I also understand your concern for how they view us as stupid and negligent if we quietly offer the exemption and don't speak up and defend ourselves intellectually. I don't think there is a school district our healthcare facility in America that is unaware of why people are not vaxing their children. The media is putting it out there for everyone to see and think about. Albeit, most reports dispell the so called myth about the dangers of vaccines (particularly the autism/mercury link) but some do not and reveal powerful information to the public. If you didn't have children, it would be so much easier to be verbal and proactive about your feelings. For their sake, you should proceed with caution and go by the letter of the law. It is a matter of priority. Anita abolishvaccines <vaccinegenocide@...> wrote: I agree that the official exemption letter should be simple and without scripture. I would reject signing anything that says " the child is at risk " blah blah blah, or restrict the signature as mentioned, or just have a new document prepared with the correct wording. Within the exemption letter I recommend listing all the ingredients of every vaccine instead of just saying " vaccines " or " shots " . Listing the ingredients is truthful and powerful, and the reader will definitely see the exemption differently, and may just understand why vaccines are being refused. I would also advise that if a basic religious or philosophical exemption is given, then everyone should in some way offer an explanation that is off the record. Maybe just an unsigned letter, or a stack of documents proving that all vaccines are deadly, or possibly even a conversation on the spot or at some other location. Yes, we want conversion!! Some will say why bother or take the risk when it's not necessary. Well, remaining silent is definitely an easier and more peaceful way, but I do think those receiving the letter need to be informed about what it is they support. By just giving the exemption, I think most would remain puffed up in their pride by assuming that we are very stupid and negligent. By not offering an explanation, I don't think they'll ever understand how serious this matter is and continue promoting this wickedness, unless the ingredients offer some conviction and they search out the truth. In whatever situation where a discussion would arise with a hard- hearted pro-vaccinator, personally I'd come at him or her from the Christian perspective and focus on witchcraft, sorcery, murder, genocide, crimes against humanity etc. and the consequences of their actions. The matter of church and state can also be brought out because vaccination is a sacrament of the government's Humanistic/Satanic religion that they are trying to force on the people. Proclaiming that vaccination is religion is something that needs to be emphasized more frequently because it's a great way to silence these fools and the ACLU should really be on our side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2005 Report Share Posted August 27, 2005 I think you have a valid concern. If they were to lift the Phil.Exemp., that should not affect you if all your children have used it successfully and are registered and attending school. Kind of like a grandfather clause if you will. I never saw a state exemption form. If it's not too much trouble, when you have the time, would you post it for me to see. Come to think of it, Sheri N. probably has it on her web pages. Do you Sheri? Anita SaraShaughnessy@... wrote: While we are on the subject, I have a question. I live in Michigan, luckily, we have the option of a religious or philosophical exemption. When I called our local " vaccine " group, the woman I spoke with said that they encourage parents to file a philosophical exemption, kind of like a " use it or lose it " thing. She sent me a form to use, it is one that they made up, it has the law on the back and is better than the one from the health department because it doesn't have any of the the " I know that I am risking my child's health " crap. Anyway, I did the philosophical for my son who is just starting kindergarten (sniff, sniff) and want to know if others have chosen this route and why. I am worried about it, because I am afraid that if too many people use it, then they may take it away. I am also worried that if they decide to do away with one of our exemptions, that it will be the first to go. What are other thoughts and feelings? -- Sara Proud Mama to Colin 12/07/99 Jack 8/07/02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2005 Report Share Posted August 27, 2005 You are probably right, it would more than likely be grandfathered, I just don't have that much faith in our government to do what is right, fair or even constitutional. For the forms, go to www.momvaccines.org click on the waiver button, the MOM waiver is the one that I signed and turned in, the State one is the one that I don't want to sign, because it basically says that I am purposely putting my children and other children at risk of disease, when we know that the opposite is true. -- Sara Proud Mama to Colin 12/07/99 Jack 8/07/02 -------------- Original message -------------- I think you have a valid concern. If they were to lift the Phil.Exemp., that should not affect you if all your children have used it successfully and are registered and attending school. Kind of like a grandfather clause if you will. I never saw a state exemption form. If it's not too much trouble, when you have the time, would you post it for me to see. Come to think of it, Sheri N. probably has it on her web pages. Do you Sheri? Anita SaraShaughnessy@... wrote: While we are on the subject, I have a question. I live in Michigan, luckily, we have the option of a religious or philosophical exemption. When I called our local " vaccine " group, the woman I spoke with said that they encourage parents to file a philosophical exemption, kind of like a " use it or lose it " thing. She sent me a form to use, it is one that they made up, it has the law on the back and is better than the one from the health department because it doesn't have any of the the " I know that I am risking my child's health " crap. Anyway, I did the philosophical for my son who is just starting kindergarten (sniff, sniff) and want to know if others have chosen this route and why. I am worried about it, because I am afraid that if too many people use it, then they may take it away. I am also worried that if they decide to do away with one of our exemptions, that it will be the first to go. What are other thoughts and feelings? -- Sara Proud Mama to Colin 12/07/99 Jack 8/07/02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2005 Report Share Posted August 27, 2005 Thank you. SaraShaughnessy@... wrote:You are probably right, it would more than likely be grandfathered, I just don't have that much faith in our government to do what is right, fair or even constitutional. For the forms, go to www.momvaccines.org click on the waiver button, the MOM waiver is the one that I signed and turned in, the State one is the one that I don't want to sign, because it basically says that I am purposely putting my children and other children at risk of disease, when we know that the opposite is true. -- Sara Proud Mama to Colin 12/07/99 Jack 8/07/02 -------------- Original message -------------- I think you have a valid concern. If they were to lift the Phil.Exemp., that should not affect you if all your children have used it successfully and are registered and attending school. Kind of like a grandfather clause if you will. I never saw a state exemption form. If it's not too much trouble, when you have the time, would you post it for me to see. Come to think of it, Sheri N. probably has it on her web pages. Do you Sheri? Anita SaraShaughnessy@... wrote: While we are on the subject, I have a question. I live in Michigan, luckily, we have the option of a religious or philosophical exemption. When I called our local " vaccine " group, the woman I spoke with said that they encourage parents to file a philosophical exemption, kind of like a " use it or lose it " thing. She sent me a form to use, it is one that they made up, it has the law on the back and is better than the one from the health department because it doesn't have any of the the " I know that I am risking my child's health " crap. Anyway, I did the philosophical for my son who is just starting kindergarten (sniff, sniff) and want to know if others have chosen this route and why. I am worried about it, because I am afraid that if too many people use it, then they may take it away. I am also worried that if they decide to do away with one of our exemptions, that it will be the first to go. What are other thoughts and feelings? -- Sara Proud Mama to Colin 12/07/99 Jack 8/07/02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2005 Report Share Posted August 27, 2005 I use the religious AND philosophical.... I check both boxes. Vaccines are against my religion as I do not believe in them and and religion can be construed as a belief AND philosophically, well, I know they can't deliver what they imply they can. Laurie>Oh .. Anyway, I did the philosophical for my son who is just starting kindergarten (sniff, sniff) and want to know if others have chosen this route and why. I am worried about it, because I am afraid that if too many people use it, then they may take it away. I am also worried that if they decide to do away with one of our exemptions, that it will be the first to go. What are other thoughts and feelings? -- Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.