Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 OKay this may happen for some women,but I was diagnosed with Fibro and breastfed my baby. YES it hurt alot,but it hurt alot even if I would have given her a bottle so I choose to nurse because its so much better and healthier for the baby. Maybe my baby wont end up with this crippling disease. I do not have much quality of life at all. I would love to hear from other fibro sufferers.love Janet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 Hi Janet, Have you investigated stealth virus research done by ??and I am blocking on his name. Seems like some persons with your symptoms have been identified as having stealth viruses. I am sure someone else on this list can share more about this. On another note, did you or are you having any pesticide exposures? Re: Fibromyalgia prohibits sufferers from breastfeeding > OKay this may happen for some women,but I was diagnosed with Fibro and > breastfed my baby. YES it hurt alot,but it hurt alot even if I would have given > her a bottle so I choose to nurse because its so much better and healthier for > the baby. Maybe my baby wont end up with this crippling disease. I do not have > much quality of life at all. I would love to hear from other fibro > sufferers.love Janet > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Hi again, please send me the name of that doctor okay? I got this condition from 2 vaccinations. they call it fibro,because they do not know what to call it! I would appreciate any more info you can give me. I have tried the holistic approach,the alternative you name it I have detoxed my brains out and still have unbearable chronic pain.love Janet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 His name is W. . The link for articles he has written is http://www.s3support.com/mnews.cfm The original website is www.ccid.org let me add that this stealth virus stuff is over my head so I cannot make comments on it one way or another--maybe someone else on this list can -- but if I had neurodegenerative disorders or fibromyalgia, I would at least want to check into this further. Re: Fibromyalgia prohibits sufferers from breastfeeding > Hi again, please send me the name of that doctor okay? I got this condition > from 2 vaccinations. they call it fibro,because they do not know what to call > it! I would appreciate any more info you can give me. I have tried the > holistic approach,the alternative you name it I have detoxed my brains out and > still have unbearable chronic pain.love Janet > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Just wanted to let you know that there has been some controversy with Dr. . I'm in no way making a judgment in what is true or false. It could be the vaccine police on his case for all I know, but, everyone needs both sides of a story to make an accurate judgment. Info below. Disease Or Deception POSTED: 3:16 p.m. PST February 13, 2003 UPDATED: 11:39 a.m. PST March 11, 2003 Last August, after an inspection of 's practices, the government shut down his lab because of " immediate jeopardy " and ordered him to " cease and desist. " Team Four Reports has learned 's federal lab certificate was suspended and his state license was revoked. The reports cite dozens of violations, including failure to maintain records and throwing out blood samples. The CDC says 's actions border on fraudulent activity full article at http://www.nbc4.tv/team4reports/1977042/detail.html The National CFIDS Foundation W. Stripped of License -- Is All His Work Bogus? By Bob Huntington and Cheryl Tai with Gail Kansky W. , M.D., Ph.D. has been stripped of his license to do any clinical laboratory testing and his clinical laboratory license has been suspended. But does he even have a laboratory to shut down anymore, and did he ever find a virus that he has continued to call the " stealth virus " ? The most amazing fact we found out was that his license suspension was due to the work of one lone individual who is merely a patient! But let's give you some background first. Dr. received his medical training in Australia and was the chief of the Immunology/Molecular Pathology Unit at the LAC/USC (University of California) Medical Center as well as a professor of pathology at the USC School of Medicine. He was the former director of the Viral Oncology Branch of the FDA's (Federal Drug Administration) Bureau of Biologics which is the principal agency in charge of testing human vaccines. Before that, he worked at the National Cancer Institute. He emerged as a key player in ME/CFIDS research inthe late 1980's with a virus that he named a " stealth " virus. By the early 90's, The CFIDS Association had funded him for $231,000. Dr. had said he had discovered " Epione " which was a " potential therapy of stealth viral infection. " He named it after the wife of a Greek God of medicine known for skills in " soothing pain " . He assured the CFIDS Association that Epione was already in stage 2 testing with an IND number through the federal government. They cut off his funding but never told the patient community why. The reason they cut off funding? They checked with the FDA and found out all had told them about the status of Epione was a lie. If the CFIDS Association (CAA) had, at that time, been more forthcoming about this to the patient community, which they claim to represent, it may well have ended the destructive path that was taking. But they kept those facts to themselves and have, subsequently, caused a lot of harm to hundreds and, perhaps, thousands, of patients in the decade since this happened. When one of the authors of this piece asked Dr. why the CFIDS Association stopped funding him, he said it was a " mere misunderstanding. " Stealth viruses, according to Dr. , " Do, indeed, exist and can be at the root of many multi-system neuro degenerative illnesses such as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, fibromyalgia, attention deficit disorder, autism and other diseases causing behavioral changes. " He also lists Lyme's Disease, Gulf War Illness, a bevy of psychiatric illnesses and oncogenic (cancerous) diseases. But nobody has ever been able to replicate his findings in over a decade. So why has his license been pulled? preyed upon patients who were desperately ill, telling them that he knew what they had (a " stealth " virus) and only he could save them from their " fatal " disease. His therapeutic regimen included antibiotics, antivirals, diet and vitamins, neurontin, and other medications, including anti-depressants, that have all been tried before and are not new. What was different, was that he wanted you to be " monitored " closely which includes lot of tests that he does and not " to conclude a lack of long term benefit " for at least 4-6 months. He thoroughly frightened many by telling them that without funding for him, they had no chance. One person who had been diagnosed with " CFS " scoured every area to find donors, raising hundreds of thousands of dollars. As a single mother of a young child, she was frightened that her child would be left alone in this world. But then she found out facts that angered her and made her regret all the efforts she had made to raise funds for . She, single-handedly, found out the truth about W. and is working to expose the truth. The university where he had his laboratory had him physically removed by security guards in December of 1995! Despite the closure of his laboratory, 's curriculum vitai (CV) listed his professorship and laboratory at University of California's Department of Pathology and the NCF is in possession of a copy of his 1997-8 CV. Despite being removed from the University, is a tenured professor and the University will only say he is on " indefinite leave. " told patients that their blood was being monitored by the State of California. When this was checked out, the state denied ever receiving any serum,let alone " monitoring " any for him. continued at..... http://www.ncf-net.org/forum/martin.html > His name is W. . The link for articles he has written is > http://www.s3support.com/mnews.cfm > > The original website is www.ccid.org > > let me add that this stealth virus stuff is over my head so I cannot make > comments on it one way or another--maybe someone else on this list can -- > but if I had neurodegenerative disorders or fibromyalgia, I would at least > want to check into this further. > > > Re: Fibromyalgia prohibits sufferers from > breastfeeding > > > > Hi again, please send me the name of that doctor okay? I got this > condition > > from 2 vaccinations. they call it fibro,because they do not know what to > call > > it! I would appreciate any more info you can give me. I have tried the > > holistic approach,the alternative you name it I have detoxed my brains > out and > > still have unbearable chronic pain.love Janet > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Thanks for sharing. His research is " way out there. " but is he implicating that people get these stealth viruses from vaccines?? If so, I can see why everyone would want to shut him up/discredit him no matter what. So do stealth viruses exist or not? And are they transmitted to people in vaccines? Re: Fibromyalgia prohibits sufferers from > > breastfeeding > > > > > > > Hi again, please send me the name of that doctor okay? I got this > > condition > > > from 2 vaccinations. they call it fibro,because they do not know > what to > > call > > > it! I would appreciate any more info you can give me. I have > tried the > > > holistic approach,the alternative you name it I have detoxed my > brains > > out and > > > still have unbearable chronic pain.love Janet > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Take a look here Sandy. http://www.ccid.org/newdev.htm http://www.ccid.org/safety.htm > Thanks for sharing. His research is " way out there. " but is he implicating > that people get these stealth viruses from vaccines?? If so, I can see why > everyone would want to shut him up/discredit him no matter what. So do > stealth viruses exist or not? And are they transmitted to people in > vaccines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2004 Report Share Posted September 24, 2004 These links did not show up when I clicked through and I could not find them by going to ccid.org Re: Fibromyalgia prohibits sufferers from breastfeeding > > Take a look here Sandy. > > http://www.ccid.org/newdev.htm > > http://www.ccid.org/safety.htm > > > > Thanks for sharing. His research is " way out there. " but is he > implicating > > that people get these stealth viruses from vaccines?? If so, I can > see why > > everyone would want to shut him up/discredit him no matter what. > So do > > stealth viruses exist or not? And are they transmitted to people in > > vaccines? > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2004 Report Share Posted September 24, 2004 hmmm? They are working for me. Here is the text. Extensive research into the field of stealth viruses has been done and while once this was a very controversial issue with many doubting even the existence of these types of viruses, they have now been scientifically proven to exist. Culturing methods for these viruses has improved and hard sequence data is now available on them which show how these viruses have assembled themselves, the way that they've recombined with other genes, the cellular, viral, bacterial origins. And it is now known that the stealth virus can take varying structural forms but it has the basic capacity to imbed itself in the brain, persist in the brain causing brain dysfunction. Unfortunately, a very real result of all this research has shown that that stealth viral infections can progress to very severe illness, including death. And now it has also been found that stealth viruses are even more menacing because it has been discovered that they have the ability to acquire sequences of bacterial and even fungal origin. This strongly suggests that stealth viruses become viteria by infecting bacteria. Viteria are animal viruses that have incorporated bacterial genetic sequences. A brief summary of the viteria concept has been sento the FDA NIH and CDC and can be read here. Viteria: A Menacing New Life Form More can be read about viteria in this article. A Statement on Viteria The stealth virus has now been shown to be involved with many chronic disabling illnesses such as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, autism, Attention Deficit Disorder and many other diseases involving neurodegenerative symptoms with encephalopathy. There is a broad spectrum of symptoms involved with stealth virus infection which leads to the term multi-system stealth virus infection with encephalopathy (MSVIE). This has been seen in many, many patients tested by Dr. and now, unfortunately, this wide array of baffling symptoms is now also being seen in physicians that treat CFS patients. The case studies of 4 physicans with a wide array of differing symptoms is described in the paper CFS Among Physicians. These physicians all reported different signs and symptoms of their illness. They were all diagnosed as having CFS and all of them tested positive for the stealth virus. When live SV-40 virus was found in formulin treated poliovrus vaccine, a switch was made to use kidney cells from African Green Monkeys using a live (attenuated) strain of poliovirus. Kidney cultures from all 12 monkeys tested grew out simian cytomegalovirus. Sequencing studies done by Dr. on the stealth virus indicate that it originated in SCMV but the CDC and FDA have exhibited an unwillingness to have their vaccine safety procedures reviewed. Dr. writes an in-depth account of the cover-up by government agencies of the contamination of vaccines even though SCMV is still being found in poliovaccine and the deadly risk of stealth virus infection that exists for children who are made to use these vaccines. Read the article Vaccine Safety Second Link Vaccine Safety Dr. One of society's highest obligations is the protection of its children. Vaccine programs provide a proven method for childhood disease prevention. The safety of such programs has been entrusted to vaccine manufacturers and to government. regulatory agencies. Although widely touted as the major medical triumph of the 20th century, the development of viral vaccines has elements of less than stellar performance. The discovery in 1960 of live SV-40 virus contamination in formalin-treated poliovirus vaccine, produced in kidney cells cultures from rhesus monkeys, did not lead to an immediate recall of the contaminated vaccines. Rather the production method was switched to the use of kidney cells from the much less well characterized African green monkeys. This switch in monkey species was soon followed by the decision to forgo formalin inactivation by using a weakened (attenuated) live strain of poliovirus. Persisting concerns regarding contaminating viruses in the live poliovaccine led in 1972 to a joint study between the vaccine manufacturer and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Kidney cultures from all 12 monkeys tested grew African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus (SCMV). Only 4 of the SCMV isolates were detectable using the regular methods for virus detection. No changes in testing methodology were imposed, nor was the scientific community alerted to the findings. An excuse that was subsequently offered was that all such information about the study was deemed to be proprietary. The results of this earlier study were, however, not conveyed to me in 1977 when, as an FDA scientist, I notified the Director of the FDA's Bureau of Biologics that certain poliovaccine lots contained unexplained non-cellular DNA; and were therefore potentially viral contaminated. The issue of SCMV contamination of poliovirus vaccines was again raised with the FDA in May 1995. I was then working as a virologist at the University of Southern California. I had developed tissue culture methods which indicated the presence of atypical viruses in patients with complex neurological diseases. The viruses were striking in that they failed to evoke an inflammatory reaction in the patients from whom they were isolated. They were termed stealth viruses on this basis and seemingly they lacked target antigens for recognition by the body's cellular immune system. Sequencing studies on a stealth virus indicated it had originated from SCMV. Several meetings with FDA and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials clearly pointed to their unwillingness to allow any outside review of vaccine safety procedures. For example, a simple request to review histological slides of neurological tissue of monkeys inoculated with poliovaccine was refused, again on the basis that it was proprietary information. Noteworthy was the admission that the vaccines were routinely tested in rhesus monkeys because African green monkeys commonly show evidence of neurological disease. Moreover, even in rhesus monkeys, the vaccine was said to induce considerable damage, although less than that induced by non- attenuated poliovirus. The actual sequence data were published in a respected virology journal in July 1995. The article aroused the interest of anti- vaccine consumer groups. Through the efforts of one of these groups, I was invited to attend a vaccine safety meeting of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. The open meeting held on November 6, 1995 was followed the next day by an " executive session. " I was informed that several individuals at this meeting were " furious " that I was allowed to speak. A very much watered down account of what I said subsequently appeared in the official report of the meeting. Some insight into the lack luster nature of the existing system was provided by several brief interchanges with Government and other officials during the last several years. For example, I was asked whether formalin treatment would inactivate stealth viruses. My response was that I did not know. The chairman of the National Immunization Advisory Committee suggested his advocacy of a split protocol in which both formalin inactivated and live attenuated poliovaccine would provide the necessary time window for the manufacturer of the inactivated vaccine to develop the stocks required for a complete switch. True to his suggestion, the official switch to inactivated vaccine is scheduled for January 2000. Of course, those " in the know " would have already switched to the inactivated vaccine. An FDA reform bill was being considered by Congress in 1997. I suggested that the bill include the provision that " If a safety issue is identified in the regulation of a biological product, then Industry will waive its proprietary protection so that the information could be made available to the scientific community. " The suggestion was well received by the counsel for the House Commerce Committee. It was soon dropped, however, when support was not forthcoming from Industry, FDA or the American Medical Association (AMA). In speaking with an AMA lobbyist, I understood they " would not want the public to know that their doctors were not in the knowledge loop. " I once asked industry personnel involved in poliovaccine production whether they were still encountering SCMV in poliovaccine production lots. After some hesitation that disappeared as we all identified ourselves as parents, the straightforward answer was " not infrequently. " Armed with this information I again requested of an FDA official to please use modern techniques such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to screen poliovaccine lots for SCMV. " We would not know what to do with a positive result " was his answer. Continued sequencing of the prototype SCMV-derived stealth virus have helped substantiate the original suggestion that stealth adapted viruses simply lack the critical target antigens for cellular immune recognition. More impressively, the virus has the capacity to assimilate genes from infected cells and from bacteria. The cellular genes identified within the stealth virus include a gene with potential oncogenic (cancer causing) activity. The bacterial genes serve a wide range of metabolic functions that could enhance bacterial growth. Human and animal viruses with bacterial sequences represent a novel life form that has been christened viteria. The recombination of viral, bacterial and cellular genes within broadly infectious viteria is clearly of major medical and Public Health significance. For instance, it could provide a viral explanation for positive findings in clinical assays designed to detect various bacteria including the Borrelia burgdorferi (the agent for Lyme disease), mycoplasma, and chlamydia. FDA and CDC were informed of the publication of the results. It was disheartening, yet challenging, that neither organization responded. NIH was also notified but merely acknowledged that research is supportable by grants. During the last decade, I have written several clinical articles describing stealth virus infected patients with complex illnesses. The patients have included children with autism, adults with psychotic disease and several individuals with chronic fatigue/fibromyalgia syndrome. An additional recent publication described a stealth virus infected child whose illness began in 1997 as a behavioral problem. It took over seven months before the illness was attributed to brain damage, as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Even then the neurologist was unable to detect impaired motor or sensory functions. A brain biopsy performed shortly after the essentially normal clinical examination showed marked vacuolating/spongiform change. The child's clinical condition progressively deteriorated. He was examined at several major medical centers where it was wrongly concluded that he had a genetic disease from which he would soon die. He was shown to be stealth virus infected by tissue culture and significantly improved with anti-viral therapy, although he still has major residual deficits. Where is the Public Health concern that a childhood viral infection was not recognized at major medical centers. Where is the interest in the many other children who have tested positive for stealth viruses. Why the lack of discussion about possible brain damage causing national tragedies such as school shootings, and the increasing prevalence of autism, attention deficit, asthma and sudden infant death syndrome. Are stealth virus infected patients populating our psychiatric institutions, allergy clinics and even our cancer wards. The world and, in particular, its children appear to be at risk for stealth adapted viruses. The contribution of vaccines to the formation and dissemination of these viruses should be an open topic for scientific discussion. This is not occurring with those presently in charge of overseeing the safety of the Nation's immunization program. W. , M.D., Ph.D. Center for Complex Infectious Diseases Rosemead CA 91770 www.ccid.org > These links did not show up when I clicked through and I could not find them > by going to ccid.org > > Re: Fibromyalgia prohibits sufferers from > breastfeeding > > > > > > Take a look here Sandy. > > > > http://www.ccid.org/newdev.htm > > > > http://www.ccid.org/safety.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.