A Faulty Medical Model: The Germ Theory

[Guest guest]

Repeat of this post I posted earlier for a different view on virues & bacteria

EXCELLENT - my thoughts exactly

Sheri

http://www.unhinderedliving.com/germtheory.html

A Faulty Medical Model: The Germ Theory

In the medical schools of the United States and many other Western

countries today, doctors are taught a lie. This lie is a particular

viewpoint about disease called The Germ Theory. The scientist credited

with discovering it is Louis Pasteur, also credited with finding a cure for

Rabies. Pasteur has been heralded as making some of the most important

discoveries of all time. Yet, when we look at the historical evidence, we

see that Pasteur was an incompetent fraud! Not only did he NOT understand

the processes which he experimented with and wrote about, but most of what

he is credited with discovering was plagarized from scientists previous to

or contemporary with him. For a thorough rendition of this history, you

can read the full text of the 1940's book " Pasteur, Plagarist, Imposter " by

R.B. Pearson at The Dream and Lie of Louis Pasteur .

Basically, it boils down to this: Both Pasteur and a contemporary of his,

Antoine Beauchamp, were experimenting with the process of fermentation.

The prevailing theory was that fermentation was a simple chemical reaction,

but the experiments of Beauchamp showed that fermentation was a process

brought about by microorganisms in the air. Pasteur continued to insist

for some time after Beauchamp's discovery that fermentation was a process

that did not require oxygen because it was a lifeless chemical reaction

(called spontaneous generation). It took Pasteur many years to finally

grasp the concept that fermentation of sugars is caused by yeast fungus, a

living organism. When he did grasp and write about these concepts, he

presented them as his own discoveries, giving no credit at all to

Beauchamp. So at the very least, he was a thief and a plagarizer, and at

the most, a poor scientist (1).

Throughout their lives, Pasteur and Beauchamp continued to experiment with

microorganisms. Pasteur continued to adhere to the idea of Monomorphism,

the belief that all microbes and bacteria have only one form. Beauchamp

was able to prove, however, the existence of Pleomorphism, that microbes

can alter their form to appear as different germs. This discovery was

confirmed by many scientists that came after Beauchamp, including Gunther

Enderlein.

In his experiments, Enderlein found that every living cell contains two

distinct kinds of microorganisms called endobionts (which means " inside

life " ). These microorganisms live inside the cell and cannot be removed

from it. They play an important role in cellular health. The state of a

person's health is determined by the stage of development of these

organisms. Enderlein found that all microbes that live permanently in our

bodies go through three stages:

The Primitive Stage (microbe)

The Middle Stage (bacteria)

The End Stage (fungus)

Other scientists were later able to confirm that there was a fourth stage

which occurs only after extreme toxicity in which the fungus goes through a

transformation, mutating into the Virus.

Most of the diseases in modern society today are not caused by the

" pathogenic bacteria " that enter from outside us, as was taught by

Pasteur. Disease occurs as these endobionts are transformed from the

microbe stage to more virulent forms of life. The state of development of

these organisms depends upon the state of the medium in which the germ

lives. In other words, the microbes which live in our cells and assist the

cells in maintaining a healthy state will mutate into bacteria, fungus, and

viruses when the tissues of our bodies in which they live change to provide

a medium for their growth. They begin to become " pathogenic " when the pH

of the tissues becomes more acidic.

Primitive phases live in a strong alkaline pH

Bacterial phases live in mild alkaline pH

Fungal forms live in a medium acid pH

Viral forms live in a strong acid pH (2)

These primitive organisms can live in our bodies in the microbe stage

indefinitely, and do not cause disease, but rather perform a restorative

function. Bacteria and other germs consume dead matter. That is their

function. Experiments show that if you put a fresh, raw steak that still

has active live enzymes in it, and a cooked steak outside in the open air,

it is the cooked steak that will become infested with maggots.

Microorganisms cannot live in living tissue. It is only when the tissue

becomes dead that they move in to do their job.

That's what happens in your compost pile. You put your table scraps in

there, along with some bacteria, and the bacteria decompose the food scraps

into soil. Everything that exists on this earth eventually BIODEGRADES.

It is really true that when we die, we will return to dust. Bacteria and

other pathogenic microorganisms are only doing their jobs. They are able

to sense chemically when dead matter is present, and they go about the

business of breaking it down. That is where disease comes from. The

microorganisms in your body are breaking down your dead tissues in

preparation for biodegradation (3).

Most of the germs which enter our bodies from the outside are quickly

killed by the immune system. But it is the microorganisms which live

permanently in our bodies that cause us to get sick. And they cause

sickness because we provide them with a rich growth medium so that they can

mutate and transform themselves into deadly bacteria, fungus, and viruses.

So you see, whether or not we get sick and die has very little to do with

what germ we catch, but has everything to do with whether we keep our

bodies free of the dead matter which these germs feed on. The dead matter

these germs feed on is produced when the pH in our bodies is altered from a

slightly alkaline state to a progressively more acidic state. In the next

lesson, we will learn how to properly equip our bodies so that these

microorganisms cannot mutate into virulent forms.

At the end of his life, Pasteur admitted that his theory was a fraud. He

said that it was not the germs that mattered, but the medium in which they

lived. And yet, his so-called " work " is the basis of the whole medical

model of disease and healing.

The Germ theory CANNOT account for the fact that if you expose 100 people

to what he called " pathogenic bacteria " that 10 of the people in that room

will NOT DEVELOP THE DISEASE. It's not that germs cause disease at all.

The pH of those people's bodies' was not acidic enough to support the

transformation of the germ into a bacteria, fungus or virus. Because the

germ never mutates, the person never gets sick.

Because of what I know about Louis Pasteur and The Germ Theory, there is no

way that I will allow myself to be treated by a medical doctor trained in

the United States or other Western countries. Their diagnoses and

treatments inevitably make the patient sicker by plunging the body into an

even more acidic state, and encouraging the more rapid transformation of

microbes into deadly pathogens.

In fact, if a person learns to alter their diet so that it encourages a

more alkaline pH in the body, there is no need to ever visit a medical

practitioner of any kind.

Everything I have said here is based upon sound scientific studies, and

actual historical documents. And yet, many people who choose to refuse

allopathic medical treatments are looked at as mentally unbalanced. And if

a person refuses to allow their child to be given medical treatments, they

are looked at as guilty of medical negligence and can have their children

taken away. And for what? Because they don't agree with one particular

interpretation of scientific data? The evidence I have given is sound and

proven. I hope anyone who reads this can see that a person who chooses to

reject The Germ Theory does so with much evidence to back them up, and they

are not being negligent with their own health or their children's.

I choose to reject the Medical Model. I choose to take charge of my own

health. And in doing so, I will avoid most all of the plagues of the 20th

and 21st centuries, including Cancer, Anthrax, and AIDS.

References:

(1) Pearson, R.B. (2001). The Dream and Lie of Louis Pasteur. Available

online: [http://www.sumeria.net/dream.html]. Taken from " Pasteur,

Plagarist, Imposter " by the same author, 1940's.

(2) Poehlman, Karl H. (1997). Synthesis of the Work of Enderlein,

Bechamps and other Pleomorphic

Researchers. Explore Vol. 8, No. 2.

(3) Logan, Cordell E. (2000). A Partially Unified Theory of Disease.

Priority One Health and Nutrition. Available online:

[http://www.priorityonevitamins.com/articles/theory_of_disease_Logan.htm].

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Classical Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL

OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

******

" Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down.

Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy

knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information

and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner

[Guest guest]

Sincere apologies for forgetting to snip that one - I got interrupted before

sending....(

Sue

> > RE: A Faulty Medical Model: The Germ Theory

> >

> >

> >Without wishing to play devil's advocate here, Sheri, I thought you and

> > subscribed to the belief that viruses don't actually

> >exist at all?

> >Or is it just that you don't accept the *images* of viruses in

> >the way that

> >doctors/scientists represent them?

> >

>

> >

[Guest guest]

i can't speak for sheri here, but as far as i'm

concerned, viruses do exist, of that i have no doubt.

even stefan lanka isolated a virus, just not a

" disease-causing " one :-).

it is the theory that viruses cause disease that i

don't accept. a german homeopath, joachim graetz,

pictures it in one of his books, and it makes total

sense to me. basically, you get ill because of some

imbalance (which could be anything, just not viruses),

you start feeling 'off'. that is when you ARE ill,

that stage that we usually refer to as 'oh i'm coming

down with something'. then, and only then, the thing

that the pHARMa calls 'virus' moves in to clear up

your system, to get you back into balance. to the

outside world, that is when you are ill, like having

measles, cp, etc.

lanka's reasoning is that with today's technology, it

should be real easy to isolate any disease causing

virus if it existed and i tend to believe that.

however, neither the measles virus nor HIV have EVER

been isolated and photographed. what the medical

textbooks etc show as viruses are NOT viruses.

i also believe that illness as such cannot really be

analysed with today's idea of " science " , because it

simply doesn't make sense. why is it that some people

pick up a cold every time they are near someone else

with a cold, whereas others never get it, to name just

one example. it's more than merely our strong or weak

'constitution', it's more than a well functioning

immune system.

anyway, that's my knut's worth.

:-)

claudia

--- Mum2mishka <mum2mishka@...> wrote:

> Without wishing to play devil's advocate here,

> Sheri, I thought you and

> subscribed to the belief that viruses don't

> actually exist at all?

> Or is it just that you don't accept the *images* of

> viruses in the way that

> doctors/scientists represent them?

>

> And how does the absence/presence of viruses fit

> with the philosophy of

> resonance and susceptibility? I'm a bit foggy on

> this at present - I'm not

> sure if homoeopaths accept the presence of

> pathogenic microbes in

> disease-causing processes, or whether they view

> dis-ease entirely as a

> disturbance in the vital force and its resonance.

> If the latter, how do we

> account for epidemics, or the fact that a family all

> sequentially come down

> with flu one after another?

>

> I used to think that viruses and bacteria caused

> dis-ease and illness - now

> my training suggests that dis-ease and illness is

> incidental of exterior

> pathogens, or at least, not as implicated as the

> orthodoxy would have us

> believe....

>

> What are your personal thoughts?

>

> Love, light and peace,

>

> Sue

'Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it.' - Bobby

Kennedy

http://www.livejournal.com/users/lady_karelia

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the explanation, . Now I get it...I am on the same page

as you after all.....)

Sue

> >

> >i can't speak for sheri here, but as far as i'm

> >concerned, viruses do exist, of that i have no doubt.

> >even stefan lanka isolated a virus, just not a

> > " disease-causing " one :-).

> >it is the theory that viruses cause disease that i

> >don't accept. a german homeopath, joachim graetz,

> >pictures it in one of his books, and it makes total

> >sense to me. basically, you get ill because of some

> >imbalance (which could be anything, just not viruses),

> >you start feeling 'off'. that is when you ARE ill,

> >that stage that we usually refer to as 'oh i'm coming

> >down with something'. then, and only then, the thing

> >that the pHARMa calls 'virus' moves in to clear up

> >your system, to get you back into balance. to the

> >outside world, that is when you are ill, like having

> >measles, cp, etc.

> >lanka's reasoning is that with today's technology, it

> >should be real easy to isolate any disease causing

> >virus if it existed and i tend to believe that.

> >however, neither the measles virus nor HIV have EVER

> >been isolated and photographed. what the medical

> >textbooks etc show as viruses are NOT viruses.

> >i also believe that illness as such cannot really be

> >analysed with today's idea of " science " , because it

> >simply doesn't make sense. why is it that some people

> >pick up a cold every time they are near someone else

> >with a cold, whereas others never get it, to name just

> >one example. it's more than merely our strong or weak

> >'constitution', it's more than a well functioning

> >immune system.

> >anyway, that's my knut's worth.

> >:-)

> >claudia

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

This is still somewhat confusing to me. I believe that germs feed on

dead cells, and are only doing their job, so I don't believe they are

causing diseases. Therefore, the key to good health is the internal

terrain, a good immune system, as so commonly said. But where I get a

little confused is the fact that we all have poor immune systems, or

are exposed to uncontrollable factors, such as the environment, that

weaken us. So we get some virus due to something dead inside even

though we are doing all the rights thing regarding health. At this

point, I tend to fall into the popular faulty medical logic by just

wanting to kill the virus. ??

Dan