RE: OT:Seal of approval scheme needed

[Guest guest]

Might have known this scepticism would have come from Ernst. He's a PITA!!!

He seems to be behind every study that disproves the efficacy of homoeopathy

over the past few years. I wish he'd retire!

What about all the crap allopathic information about cancer - and other

things - that's on the internet? The bottom line is that if people want to

believe and/or act on information they get about cancer off the Net, they're

free to do so. These *experts* seem to forget that we are all capable of

making up our own minds about our bodies and their treatment. They seem to

take us for a load of gullible fools...;o)

Love, light and peace,

Sue

" It is not unfair to conclude that medicine is the only branch of science

that has based its structure on opinions and suppositions rather than on

laws and principles. " ~ Vithoulkas, " The Science of Homoeopathy " .

§ OT:Seal of approval scheme needed

§

§

§ http://www.vidyya.com/vol6/v6i106_4.htm

§

§

§

§ Seal of approval scheme needed for complementary and

§ alternative Web sites

§ Complementary medicine researchers are urging major cancer

§ organizations and other impartial interest groups to

§ investigate Web sites offering complementary and alternative

§ medical advice on cancer, and to create and administer a 'seal

§ of approval' for their safety and reliability.

§

[Guest guest]

That's because the FDA, CDC, etc. won't allow these therapies to become

" approved " because big pHARMa and they stand to lose too much! YES they advise

using conventional therapies because these therapies (chemo and radiation

particularly) contribute to many many deaths of patients who may very well have

survived if they had not gone the conventional route!

They'd rather silence these types of therapies and protect their wallets, no

matter what the stakes.

Kay

*********************

" Generally speaking, the 'cancer cures' discussed on these Web sites are not

supported by good scientific evidence. Other sites are outright dangerous as

they advise patients against using conventional therapies. "

[Guest guest]

Slightly off topic - do hospitals get $$ for patients who die in facility?

I think they get $$ for persons born in facility (turning in Birth

certificate).

Just wondering because I just found out that my grandfather has been

hospitalized with pancreatitis and just turned serious due to an infection

in his IV??

Thanks and Blessings,

Nicki

Re: OT:Seal of approval scheme needed

That's because the FDA, CDC, etc. won't allow these therapies to become

" approved " because big pHARMa and they stand to lose too much! YES they

advise using conventional therapies because these therapies (chemo and

radiation particularly) contribute to many many deaths of patients who may

very well have survived if they had not gone the conventional route!

They'd rather silence these types of therapies and protect their wallets, no

matter what the stakes.

Kay

*********************

" Generally speaking, the 'cancer cures' discussed on these Web sites are

not supported by good scientific evidence. Other sites are outright

dangerous as they advise patients against using conventional therapies. "

[Guest guest]

Well, hospitals are the filthiest of places on the planet, if you're gonna get

something serious it will probably be from there. I worked in a hospital for 15

years, FILTHY!!!

Suzanne

Ohio

Re: OT:Seal of approval scheme needed

That's because the FDA, CDC, etc. won't allow these therapies to become

" approved " because big pHARMa and they stand to lose too much! YES they

advise using conventional therapies because these therapies (chemo and

radiation particularly) contribute to many many deaths of patients who may

very well have survived if they had not gone the conventional route!

They'd rather silence these types of therapies and protect their wallets, no

matter what the stakes.

Kay

*********************

" Generally speaking, the 'cancer cures' discussed on these Web sites are

not supported by good scientific evidence. Other sites are outright

dangerous as they advise patients against using conventional therapies. "