Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 My contact sent me these From some of the mmr-can-do-no-wrong boys in the UK re: Hear The Silence & Their press release BEFORE the show Glen Aston [mailto:glen@...] Sent: 15 December 2003 12:42 (greetings all) Two points: 1. I know that you would do nothing lightly in terms of protecting children's health, and I say again that I do not wish to criticize either of the authors (whom I greatly respect) for an excellent letter. My point about " significant " , however, was not what *we* mean by it, but what others understand by it. I tried the phrase out on a journalist (yes, an anecdotal report coming up!), whose unprompted response was that it meant that MMR vaccination was indeed linked with autism, albeit uncommonly. That is why I went on to suggest alternatives for the future such as " there is no evidence for, and a great deal of evidence against... " . 2. I'm not clear if your statement " the implication that some of us were 'persuaded' not to take part is inaccurate " refers to my own previous plea to members to consider carefully before agreeing to take part in the debate and my own appreciation of the fact that some, like , had refused to do so. If so, then I did not intended to " persuade " people; I do not see it as my role to persuade colleagues, least of all you , who will make up their own minds independently (as you say). But it has always seemed to me that one of the real values of our professional e-groups is the chance to make points openly and for debate and consideration. If professional comment on our own website is interpreted by its own members as persuasion then we shall, as I think you imply, be bordering on conspiracy theory. Regards . ******* -----Original Message----- From: English [mailto:peter_english@...] Sent: 15 December 2003 20:18 I think is right about the word " significant " . In the letter it really does (in ordinary, as opposed to scientific English) make it seem as if we might be saying that there is a link, but that it's not, in our opinion (and in some quarters doctors are not perceived as humble!), very important. This allows others to disagree about the importance... 's way of putting it is much clearer. English Surrey, UK ********** We agonise over whether the omission or inclusion of a single word is correct on scientific, semantic, cultural and who knows what other grounds; they dont appear to give a shit what they say, nor to have a care of any implications or consequences, nor of their utterances relationship to any evidence or (is this a polemic too far?) to any objective truth. Is this why so many so-called opinion formers* prefer their slapdash claims to our hard-won evidence? * often humanities graduates educated beyond their ability to think. Dr Reynolds CCDC Herefordshire Health Protection Belmont Abbey, Hereford HR2 9RP 01432 344344 mailto:gary.reynolds@... gary.reynolds@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.